RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the response to treatment given on a large scale for hepatitis B and C through a nationwide programme. METHODS: Records of patients who received treatment of hepatitis B and C during past 2 years through the Prime Minister's programme for the Prevention and Control of Hepatitis Viral Infection was retrieved randomly from 12 sites after taking consent from the management and the site managers. Data confidentiality was ensured. All data was photocopied and brought to the Pakistan Medical Research Centre at the Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi, where it was entered and analysed. The inclusion/exclusion criteria and the followup tests that were to be done before, during and after treatment were taken from the National programme manager so that actual data could be matched with the guidelines. Data was analysed through a specially developed programme. RESULTS: A total of 7752 patients received treatment at the 12 sites for hepatitis C. Adherence to inclusion/exclusion criteria or protocol was followed in 7572 (97.6%) patients. Out of 7572 patients, 3440 (45.4%) completed 6 months of interferon therapy, but the polymerase chain reaction test at the end of 6 months was available in 1686 (49%) cases. It was not detected at 6 months in 1133/1686 (67%) cases, while in 553 (33%) cases there was no response. Data for hepatitis B was collected from 8 sites. A total of 454 cases received treatment and 85 (18.72%) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Treatment was completed by 9 (10.58%) cases, with 3 (3.52%) cases showing Hepatitis B 'e' antigen clearance and anti-HBe (antibody to hepatitis B 'e' antigen) production. CONCLUSION: Poor followup and inadequate documentation of serological/biochemical tests were the major drawbacks in both hepatitis B and C patients, resulting in wastage of huge human and financial resources without proper planning and accountability.
Assuntos
Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Hepatite B/tratamento farmacológico , Hepatite C/tratamento farmacológico , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Seleção de Pacientes , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Auditoria Médica , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/normas , Paquistão , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To review the Lady Health Workers programme and critically explore various aspects of the process to extract tangible implications for other similar situations. METHODS: A descriptive study was carried out over a period of one year (2007-08). A detailed desk review of project documents, interaction with relevant stakeholders, performance validation and extensive feedback from the community were collected. The data so obtained was analyzed and evaluated against predetermined benchmarks. RESULTS: Each LHW serves a population of 1,000 people in the community and extends her services in the catchment population through monthly home visits. The scope of work includes over 20 tasks covering all aspects of maternal, newborn and child care. Total cost incurred on each worker is averaged at PKR 44,000 (US $ 570) per anum.Almost 60% of the total population of Pakistan, mostly rural, is covered by the programme with more than 90,000 LHWs allover the country. The health indicators are significantly better than the national average, in the areas served by the LHWs. CONCLUSIONS: The LHW programme has led to a development of a very well placed cader that links first level care facilities to the community thus improving the delivery of primary health care services. However, despite its success and the trust it has earned from the community, there are certain areas which need special attention which include poor support from sub-optimal functional health facilities, financial constraints and political interference leading to management issues. The future carries a number of challenges for management of the programme which have been highlighted.
Assuntos
Agentes Comunitários de Saúde , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Centros de Saúde Materno-Infantil , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Serviços de Saúde Rural/organização & administração , Logro , Atenção à Saúde/tendências , Feminino , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Paquistão , Desenvolvimento de Programas , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , População Rural , Recursos HumanosRESUMO
Somalia, Kenya and Ethiopia, situated in the Horn of Africa, are highly vulnerable to climate change, which manifests itself through increasing temperatures, erratic rains and prolonged droughts. Millions of people have to flee from droughts or floods either as cross-border refugees or as internally displaced persons (IDPs). The aim of this study was to identify knowledge status and gaps regarding public health consequences of large-scale displacement in these countries. After a scoping review, we conducted qualitative in-depth interviews during 2018 with 39 stakeholders from different disciplines and agencies in these three countries. A validation workshop was held with a selection of 13 interviewees and four project partners. Malnutrition and a lack of vaccination of displaced people are well-known challenges, while mental health problems and gender-based violence (GBV) are less visible to stakeholders. In particular, the needs of IDPs are not well understood. The treatment of mental health and GBV is insufficient, and IDPs have inadequate access to essential health services in refugee camps. Needs assessment and program evaluations with a patients' perspective are either lacking or inadequate in most situations. The Horn of Africa is facing chronic food insecurity, poor population health and mass displacement. IDPs are an underserved group, and mental health services are lacking. A development approach is necessary that moves beyond emergency responses to the building of long-term resilience, the provision of livelihood support and protection to reduce displacement by droughts.
Assuntos
Secas , Refugiados , Etiópia , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Quênia , Masculino , SomáliaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To assess the motivational level and use of skills amongst the graduates of training courses on maternal and newborn healthcare in emergency settings. METHODS: Postal survey involving Doctors and Nurses from public sector hospitals who attended training courses on Essential Surgical Skills with emphasis on Emergency Maternal and Child Health. RESULTS: Ninety percent of respondents reported the use of acquired skills and the structured Airway, Breathing, Circulation (ABC) approach in handling emergencies. Instances were described where this approach helped to improve practice, simplify treatment and save lives in all age groups, especially mothers and newborns. Lack of equipment and lack of support from higher levels were the common barriers yet many graduates managed to obtain equipment and 81% of respondents reported that these training courses had resulted in better availability or use of supplies at their facilities. Efforts were made by the graduates for institutionalizing the trainings and discussions (88%) were found to be the most common mode followed by formal teaching of the skills (66%). Hand washing was the most commonly used skill followed by the use of bag valve and mask resuscitation in the newborn at birth. Those catering for neonates expressed their confidence in obstetric procedures, while obstetricians described themselves as being self-assured now in neonatal resuscitation. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of a structured training programme in a resource-constrained healthcare system has improved the emergency management of patients. ESS-EMCH trainings should be incorporated into the district health systems to enhance emergency care handling capacities of healthcare staff, to help them contribute to achieve the MDGs and also for sustainable improvement in maternal, neonatal and child healthcare.