Impact of deceased organ donor marijuana use on donor culture positivity and solid organ transplant recipient outcomes.

With the increasing prevalence of marijuana use in the US, many deceased organ donors have a history of marijuana use, raising concerns about infectious risks to transplant recipients. We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study in which exposed donors were those with recent marijuana use (in the prior 12 months) and unexposed donors were those with no recent marijuana use. Primary outcomes included the following: (1) positive donor cultures for bacteria or fungi, (2) recipient infection due to bacteria or fungi within 3 months posttransplant, and (3) recipient graft failure or death within 12 months posttransplant. Multivariable regression was used to evaluate the relationship between donor marijuana use and each outcome. A total of 658 recipients who received organs from 394 donors were included. Recent marijuana use was not associated with donor culture positivity (aOR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.39-1.81, P = .65), recipient infection (aHR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.76-1.38, P = .90), or recipient graft failure or death (aHR: 1.65, 95% CI: 0.90-3.02, P = .11). Our data suggest that organs from donors with a history of recent marijuana use do not pose significant infectious risks in the early posttransplant period.

Impact of deceased organ donor injection drug use on donor culture positivity and recipient outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Due to the ongoing opioid epidemic in the United States, deceased organ donors increasingly have a history of injection drug use (IDU), raising concerns about infectious risks to solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. We sought to determine how recent IDU among deceased organ donors impacted donor culture results and recipient outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed at three transplant centers. Exposed donors were those with "recent IDU" (in the prior 12 months). Primary outcomes included (1) positive donor cultures for bacteria or Candida species, (2) recipient bacterial or Candida infection within 3 months posttransplant, and (3) recipient graft failure or death within 12 months posttransplant. Mixed effects multivariable regression models were used to evaluate the relationship between recent donor IDU and each outcome. RESULTS: A total of 658 SOT recipients who received organs from 394 donors were included. Sixty-six (17%) donors had a history of recent IDU. Recent IDU in donors was associated with a significantly increased odds of donor culture positivity (aOR 3.65, 95% CI 1.06-12.60, p = .04) but was not associated with SOT recipient infection (aHR 0.98, 95% CI 0.71-1.36, p = .92) or graft failure or death (aHR 0.67, 95% CI 0.29-1.51, p = .33). CONCLUSION: Donors with recent IDU are more likely to have positive cultures, but their recipients' outcomes are unaffected, suggesting organs from donors with recent IDU may be safely utilized.

Early detection of SARS-CoV-2 and other infections in solid organ transplant recipients and household members using wearable devices.

The increasing global prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 and the resulting COVID-19 disease pandemic pose significant concerns for clinical management of solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR). Wearable devices that can measure physiologic changes in biometrics including heart rate, heart rate variability, body temperature, respiratory, activity (such as steps taken per day) and sleep patterns, and blood oxygen saturation show utility for the early detection of infection before clinical presentation of symptoms. Recent algorithms developed using preliminary wearable datasets show that SARS-CoV-2 is detectable before clinical symptoms in >80% of adults. Early detection of SARS-CoV-2, influenza, and other pathogens in SOTR, and their household members, could facilitate early interventions such as self-isolation and early clinical management of relevant infection(s). Ongoing studies testing the utility of wearable devices such as smartwatches for early detection of SARS-CoV-2 and other infections in the general population are reviewed here, along with the practical challenges to implementing these processes at scale in pediatric and adult SOTR, and their household members. The resources and logistics, including transplant-specific analyses pipelines to account for confounders such as polypharmacy and comorbidities, required in studies of pediatric and adult SOTR for the robust early detection of SARS-CoV-2, and other infections are also reviewed.

Layperson Ability and Willingness to Use Hemostatic Dressings: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Background: The Hartford Consensus and Stop the Bleed Campaign empower the public to stop bleeding. While evidence for civilian tourniquet use is mounting, there is limited evidence regarding the public's ability to use hemostatic dressings. This study seeks to determine if laypeople can apply hemostatic dressings, and which hemostatic dressing they can use most successfully. Methods: 360 layperson participants in Maryland and Virginia completed 4 arms of this randomized, prospective controlled trial: plain gauze (control), z-folded gauze, s-rolled gauze, and injectable sponge (experimental) arms. Participants watched a standardized video, practiced hands-on dressing application, and were assessed applying the dressing via checklists and feedback mechanisms for pressure, timing, and packing. Participants completed pre and post questionnaires regarding willingness to use hemostatic dressings. Results: Overall, 202 participants (56%) applied the dressings correctly, and 83 (92%) applied the injectable sponges correctly. This is a significant difference from the other arms (p < 0.001), and OR 17.2 (95% CI 6.8 - 48.1) compared to control. 38 participants (40%) correctly applied plain gauze, while 37 (43%) and 44 (48%) participants correctly applied z-folded and s-rolled gauzes. The primary reasons for failure were not holding pressure long enough (n = 103, 65%) and not applying adequate pressure (n = 64, 41%). Participants in all arms had significant improvements in willingness to use hemostatic dressings: 154 (43.6%) participants pre vs. 344 (97.5%) post study participation (p < 0.001). Conclusions: More than half of laypeople can apply hemostatic dressings, and they are most successful applying injectable sponges. Brief education increases laypeople's reported willingness to use hemostatic dressings. Educators and planners should consider including injectable sponges in their Stop the Bleed programs and products. Level of Evidence: II (RCT with significant difference. One negative criterion for observer blinding).

From the battlefield to main street: Tourniquet acceptance, use, and translation from the military to civilian settings.

Throughout history, battlefield medicine has led to advancements in civilian trauma care. In the most recent conflicts of Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan/Operation Iraqi Freedom, one of the most important advances is increasing use of point-of-injury hemorrhage control with tourniquets. Tourniquets are gradually gaining acceptance in the civilian medical world-in both the prehospital setting and trauma centers. An analysis of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) data shows an increase of prehospital tourniquet utilization from 0 to nearly 4,000 between 2008 and 2016. Additionally, bystander educational campaigns such as the Stop the Bleed program is expanding, now with over 125,000 trained on tourniquet placement. Because the medical community and the population at large has broader acceptance and training on the use of tourniquets, there is greater potential for saving lives from preventable hemorrhagic deaths.

Analysis of Layperson Tourniquet Application Using a Novel Color-Coded Device.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a color-coded tourniquet designed for public use increases successful tourniquet application by laypeople. METHODS: This was a randomized study conducted on April 25, 2015. The study occurred during the Maryland Day activity at the University of Maryland in College Park, Maryland. Investigators recruited participants with posters displayed at major crosswalks around a central testing area. A total of 157 volunteers aged 18 years or older and without prior military service or medical training were enrolled. A participant stood in front of a waist-down mannequin with an isolated leg injury while an investigator read aloud a mass causality scenario. The investigator then asked the participant to apply a tourniquet to the mannequin's leg. All participants received a 4-step illustrated just-in-time (JiT) instruction card designed to facilitate layperson tourniquet application. Test participants received a color-coded tourniquet designed for layperson use with instructions printed on the device. Control participants received a black Combat Application Tourniquet (C-A-T; Composite Resources, Rock Hill, SC). Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio in blocks of 50. The primary outcome was the proportion of successful tourniquet applications by those who received color-coded tourniquets compared to those who received black tourniquets. Secondary outcomes included validation of previous data analyzing layperson success with tourniquet application, time for successful placement, reasons for failed applications, and participant self-willingness and comfort using tourniquets. We also analyzed demographic data on the study population and inter-rater reliability regarding the assessment of successful tourniquet application. RESULTS: Participants supplied with color-coded tourniquets successfully placed the device 51.38% of the time, compared to 44.71% of the time for controls using a black tourniquet (risk ratio: 1.15; 95% confidence interval: 0.83-1.59; P=0.404). Participants' self-reported willingness to use a tourniquet rose from 40.8% before the study to 80.3% after the study (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The color-coded device did not significantly increase laypeople's proportion of successful tourniquet applications when compared with a standard black device. However, this study reproduced pilot study data showing that laypeople can successfully apply tourniquets about half the time if provided JiT instructions. Age, sex, race, income, and highest level of education were not found to impact one's ability to properly apply a tourniquet. Laypeople's willingness to apply tourniquets doubled to 80% after brief exposure to the device. These results affirm the feasibility of engaging laypeople as immediate lifesavers of trauma victims and justify further efforts to boost rates of proper application.

Challenging management of a complex distal aortic arch pseudoaneurysm following previous aortic dissection repair.

The primary goals of surgery for acute aortic dissection are to resect or control the intimal flap, prevent distal malperfusion, protect the brain and have a viable patient. However, several technical measures are important to prevent early and late sequalae, including adequate aortic resection, creating a stable anastamotic suture line, appropriate graft measurement and tailoring and completely resecting inciting aortic aneurysms. Utilizing simultaneous sternotomy and thoracotomy incisions, we report the re-operative management of a patient with an expanding distal aortic arch pseudoaneurysm, extending into the left pleural space, superimposed upon severely kinked proximal ascending aortic grafts and an aneurysmal aortic root only 6 months after initial repair.