RESUMO
Background: Health care disparities have been well-documented in literature to affect care and recovery after surgery. Insurance type is regularly cited by orthopedic surgeons to play a role in the incongruences faced by patients in the perioperative period. Recent trends highlight an increased reluctance by some insurance companies to approve indicated surgery. Our primary objective was to assess insurance type and how it affects approval rates for rotator cuff débridement and rotator cuff repair. Methods: A retrospective review of 999 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff débridement or repair was conducted. Data abstraction included demographics, prior surgical or nonsurgical interventions, radiologic imaging, insurance type, and denial of insurance coverage. Patients were grouped by insurance type-Medicaid, Medicare, workers' compensation, and private insurance. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were developed to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for insurance type associated with the denial of insurance coverage. Results: Nine hundred ninety-seven patients were included in our final analysis. Those with private insurance were more likely to be non-Hispanic white (71%), whereas the proportion of Hispanics was highest among those with workers' compensation (27%) and Medicaid (20%). There were no significant differences by insurance type for prior nonsurgical interventions and radiologic imaging. For previous surgical interventions (13%), however, rates were higher for Medicaid (18%) and workers' compensation (17%) than those for Medicare (12%) and private insurance (9%) (P = .003). Compared with private insurance, the odds of insurance denial were significantly higher for those with Medicaid at 54% (OR: 7.91, 95% confidence interval: 5.27-11.88, P < .001) and workers' compensation at 19% (OR: 1.71, 95% confidence interval: 1.04-2.81, P = .04). Discussion: One in 2 patients with Medicaid coverage faces insurance denial compared with any other insurance type. Workers' compensation follows with the second highest rates. Almost half the Hispanic population are insured by either Medicaid or workers' compensation and may face barriers to care that can negatively impact outcomes and complication rates.
RESUMO
Purpose: To evaluate the return-to-play rate and performance level changes in National Football League (NFL) athletes after a surgically treated pectoralis major muscle (PMM) tear. Methods: A descriptive epidemiologic study was conducted. All NFL players from 1933 to 2013 were reviewed for surgically treated PMM tears. Age at injury, height, weight, body mass index, date of injury, position played, draft selection, and total seasons played were recorded. Return to play was assessed for the entire cohort, as well as by position. Performance analysis before and after injury was also conducted for the entire cohort, as well as by position and draft selection. Data analysis was performed with the paired-samples t test, with P < .05 considered statistically significant. Results: Our review of 80 NFL seasons from 1933 to 2013 provided a total of 55 instances of PMM tears. All instances occurred between the time frame of 2004 and 2012. After exclusions, 24 instances unique to 24 NFL athletes were confirmed by 2 separate investigators and these athletes were included as our final study cohort. Of the 24 players identified to have a surgically repaired PMM tear, 20 (83%) returned to play. The mean return-to-play period was 302 ± 128 days. The mean difference in performance scores before versus after PMM injury was 171.33 and was statistically significant, with P = .0330. Conclusions: In this study, there was an 83% return-to-play rate after surgical repair of PMM tears. Although we found a statistically significant decrease in player performance after surgery, this difference was no longer seen after players were stratified by position type and draft selection. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic case series.