Impact of a Standardized Patient Hand-off Tool on Communication between Emergency Medical Services Personnel and Emergency Department Staff.

INTRODUCTION: Handoff communication between Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and Emergency Department (ED) staff is critical to ensure quality patient care. In January 2016, the Southwest Texas Regional Advisory Council (STRAC) implemented MIST (Mechanism, Injuries, vital Signs, Treatments), a standardized EMS to ED handoff tool. The En route Care Research Center conducted a Pre-MIST implementation survey of ED staff in December 2015 and a Post-MIST follow-up survey in July 2017 to determine the impact of the MIST handoff tool on the perceived quality of transmission of pertinent patient information and in the overall handoff experience. METHODS: We administered a nine-item Likert scale questionnaire to Brooke Army Military Medical Center (BAMC) ED providers and nurses before and after implementation of MIST. The questionnaire captured perceived competence and satisfaction with handoff communication (Cronbach's alpha 0.73). We analyzed responses for the total sample and by occupation (providers and nurses), and we calculated odds ratios to determine items that may be most predictive of a positive handoff experience from the perspective of the ED staff. We performed chi-square tests and reported data as percentages. RESULTS: Total respondents Pre- and Post-MIST were 128 (62%) nurses and 80 (38%) providers (MDs, DOs, and PAs). Following the implementation of MIST, more respondents reported that they were "informed of prehospital treatments" (p < 0.001), that "Red/Blue Trauma Alert Criteria were conveyed" (p < 0.001), and that the "time to give the report was sufficient to convey pertinent information" (p < 0.001). Nurses more frequently reported that "Red/Blue Trauma Alert Criteria were conveyed" post-MIST (p < 0.01). Providers more frequently reported that "Assessment findings were conveyed" (p < 0.05), that they 'interrupted the report for clarification" (p < 0.04), that "time to give the report was sufficient to convey pertinent information" (p < 0.001) and that they "felt positive about the overall handoff experience" (p < 0.03) Post-MIST. Overall satisfaction with the handoff was associated with frequently being informed of prehospital treatments (OR 5.5; 2.1-14.4) and frequently receiving a copy of the prehospital record (OR 2.9; 1.1-7.2). CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that providers and nurses reported an improvement in the handoff experience Post-MIST. This study supports the use of a standardized handoff tool at this critical step in patient care.

Impact of a Standardized EMS Handoff Tool on Inpatient Medical Record Documentation at a Level I Trauma Center.

BACKGROUND: The emergency department (ED) poses challenges to effective handoff from emergency medical services (EMS) personnel to ED staff. Despite the importance of a complete and accurate patient handoff report between EMS and trauma staff, communication is often interrupted, incomplete, or otherwise ineffective. The Mechanism of injury/Medical Complaint, Injuries or Inspections head to toe, vital Signs, and Treatments (MIST) report initiative was implemented to standardize the handoff process. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether documentation of prehospital care in the inpatient medical record improved after MIST implementation. METHODS: Research staff abstracted data from the EMS and inpatient medical records of trauma patients transported by EMS and treated at a Level I trauma center from January 2015 through June 2017. Data included patient demographics, mechanism and location of injury, vital signs, treatments, and period of data collection (pre-MIST and post-MIST). We summarized the MIST elements in EMS and inpatient medical records and assessed the presence or absence of data elements in the inpatient record from the EMS record and the agreement between the two sets of records over time to determine if implementation of MIST improved documentation. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 533 trauma patients transported by EMS and treated in a Level I trauma center (pre-MIST: n = 281; post-MIST: n = 252). For mechanism of injury, agreement between the two records was ≥96% before and after MIST implementation. Cardiac arrest and location of injury were under-reported in the inpatient record before MIST; post-MIST, there were no significant discrepancies, indicating an improvement in reporting. Reporting of prehospital hypotension improved from 76.5% pre-MIST to 83.3% post-MIST. After MIST implementation, agreement between the EMS and inpatient records increased for the reporting of fluid administration (45.6% to 62.7%) and decreased for reporting of pain medications (72.2% to 61.9%). CONCLUSIONS: The use of the standardized MIST tool for EMS to hospital patient handoff was associated with a mixed value on inpatient documentation of prehospital events. After MIST implementation, agreement was higher for mechanism and location of injury and lower for vital signs and treatments. Further research can advance the prehospital to treatment facility handoff process.

Prehospital Life-Saving Interventions Performed on Pediatric Patients in a Combat Zone: A Multicenter Prospective Study.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to describe and evaluate prehospital life-saving interventions performed in a pediatric population in the Afghanistan theater of operations. DESIGN: Our study was a post hoc, subanalysis of a larger multicenter, prospective, observational study. SETTING: We evaluated casualties enrolled upon admission to one of the nine military medical facilities in Afghanistan between January 2009 and March 2014. PATIENTS: Adult and pediatric (<17 yr old) patients. MEASUREMENTS: We conducted initial descriptive analyses followed by comparative tests. For comparative analysis, we stratified the study population (adult vs pediatric), and subsequently, we compared injury descriptions and the interventions performed. Following tests for normality, we used the t test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test (nonparametric) for continuous variables and chi-square or Fisher exact for categorical variables. We reported percentages and 95% CIs. MAIN RESULTS: We enrolled 2,106 patients, of which 5.6% (n = 118) were pediatric. Eighty-two percent of the pediatric patients were male, and 435 had blast related injuries. A total of 295 prehospital life-saving interventions were performed on 118 pediatric patients, for an average of 2.5 life-saving interventions per patient. Vascular access (IV 96%, intraosseous 91%) and hypothermia prevention-related interventions (69%) were the most common. Incorrectly performed life-saving interventions in pediatric patients were rare (98% of life-saving interventions performed correctly) and n equals to 24 life-saving interventions over the 6-year period were missed. The most common incorrectly performed and missed life-saving interventions were related to vascular access. When compared with adult life-saving interventions received in the prehospital environment, pediatric patients were more likely to receive intraosseous access (p < 0.0001), whereas adult patients were more likely to have a tourniquet placed (p = 0.0019), receive wound packing with a hemostatic agent (p = 0.0091), and receive chest interventions (p = 0.0003). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, the most common intervention was vascular access followed by hypothermia prevention and hemorrhage control. The occurrence of missed or incorrectly performed life-saving interventions were rare.

Analysis of Injuries and Prehospital Interventions Sustained by Females in the Iraq and Afghanistan Combat Zones.

Background: Women served in both combat and non-combat units in the recent conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. Moreover, the recent conflicts lacked traditional separation of civilians from combatants carrying additional risk for injury to local civilians. There is a relative paucity of data specific to this topic. We compare injury patterns and interventions performed in the prehospital, combat setting among females versus males. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of previously published data from the Department of Defense Trauma Registry. We included all subjects that had at least one prehospital intervention documented. We compared variables between females and males. Results: From January 2007 to August 2016, our inclusion criteria captured 19,485 males and 533 females. Female casualties were older (median age 29 vs. 25), less likely to have sustained injuries from explosives (48.0% vs. 56.8%), and more severely injured as measured by median composite injury scores (10 vs. 9). Most subjects were in Afghanistan for both females and males (52.9% vs. 73.9%). Among United States (US) service members, findings were similar to the overall study population, except female service members had lower median composite injury scores than males (5 vs. 9). In unadjusted analyses, females were less likely to survive to hospital discharge (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48-0.97). There was no difference in survival (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.50-1.07), when controlling for confounders. In both unadjusted and adjusted analyses specific to US forces, we were unable to detect any differences in survival or for select analgesic administration. In both unadjusted and adjusted analyses specific to host nation civilians, we were unable to detect any differences in survival; however, even when controlling for confounders females were less likely to receive ketamine and IV morphine (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.15-0.63; 0.69, 95% CI 0.49-0.98, respectively). Conclusions: Females accounted for a small proportion of total casualties within our dataset. After controlling for confounders, survival was comparable between males and females, but host nation females were less likely to receive ketamine and intravenous morphine. Future studies should seek to elucidate the reasons for these subtle differences between males and females in prehospital combat casualty care.

Multicenter, Prospective Study of Prehospital Administration of Analgesia in the U.S. Combat Theater of Afghanistan.

BACKGROUND: Published data on prehospital medical care in combat is limited, likely due to the chaotic and unpredictable nature of care under fire and difficulty in documentation There is limited data on how often analgesic agents are administered, which drug are being used, and whether there is an association with injury patterns. METHODS: This study was a prospective, multicenter, observational study to determine which analgesic agents are being used prehospital and whether there is an association with injury patterns. Data was collected and recorded as casualties were brought into combat surgical hospitals in Afghanistan from October 2012 to April 2014. Onsite, trained investigators collected the data as part of a IRB approved protocol. Outcome data to 30 days was obtained from the DoD Trauma Registry (DODTR) within the Joint Trauma System. RESULTS: During the study period 532 patient encounters available for inclusion with 378 receiving an analgesic agent (total of 541 administrations). The average age was 27 (range 21-31), 99% male, 40% were US or coalition forces. Parenteral medications used were ketamine, fentanyl, morphine, hydromorphone and ketorolac. Penetrating injuries were more likely to receive analgesic agent (89% vs 79%, p=0.0057). Blunt trauma was less likely to receive ketamine (p=0.008). Fentanyl was used more for patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) >15 (p=0.016). CONCLUSION: Patients with penetrating trauma are more likely to receive analgesic agents in the combat prehospital setting. The most common analgesic used was ketamine. Patient ISS was not associated with administration of analgesia. Patients receiving analgesia were more likely to still be hospitalized at 30 days. The prospective nature of this study supports feasibility for future, larger, more comprehensive projects.

Signals from fat after injury: plasma adipokines and ghrelin concentrations in the severely burned.

INTRODUCTION: Hypermetabolism is universal in the severely burned and is characterized by catabolism of lean mass and body fat with associated insulin resistance. Adipokines are likely to play a role in these changes but have not been identified to date in burn patients. METHODS: From a single burn ICU, 17 burn patients with an expected stay>14 days were studied. Study period began within 14 days of admission. Over 7 days, plasma samples were collected for measurement of leptin, adiponectin, resistin, ghrelin, insulin, and cortisol by ELISA. For comparison, samples from 15 healthy controls of similar age, BMI, and blood glucose were obtained. RESULTS: Mean age was 33±17 years and BMI 26±3.4. Average burn size was 45±20% TBSA and ISS 32±10 with 72% having inhalation injury; in-hospital mortality was 29%. Estimated energy needs were 3626±710 kcal, of which 84±21% were met by enteral feeding with intensive insulin treatment (glucose 80-110 mg/ml). Using the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, burned subjects were more resistant than controls (17±11.3 and 8±10.0). Insulin levels were elevated (57±35.6 µU/ml in burned subject vs. 26±31.1 µU/ml in controls), and cortisol concentrations increased (50±41.2 µg/dl vs. 12±3.9 µg/dl). These traditional hormone changes were associated with increased resistin (16.6±5.5 ng/ml vs. 3.8±0.9 ng/ml) and decreased leptin (8.8±8.9 ng/ml vs. 19.4±23.5 ng/ml), adiponectin (9±3.5 ng/ml vs. 17±10.2 ng/ml), and ghrelin (0.37±0.14 ng/ml vs.0.56±0.26 ng/ml). CONCLUSION: Patients with burns, who are characteristically hypermetabolic with hypercortisolism and insulin resistant, have significant changes in adipokine levels that appear independent of the magnitude of initial injury or metabolic derangement. In addition, suppression of ghrelin in the presence of decreased leptin and adiponectin levels in combination with increased insulin and resistin levels represent unexpected changes in the metabolic milieu of the injured patient possibly due to dramatic activation of inflammatory pathways, indicating strategies for treatment.

Improved Adherence to Best Practice Ventilation Management After Implementation of Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) for United States Military Critical Care Air Transport Teams (CCATTs).

BACKGROUND: Critical Care Air Transport Teams (CCATTs) play a vital role in the transport and care of critically ill and injured patients in the combat theater to include mechanically ventilated patients. Previous research has demonstrated improved morbidity and mortality when lung protective ventilation strategies are used. Our previous study of CCATT trauma patients demonstrated frequent non-adherence to the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network (ARDSNet) protocol and a corresponding association with increased mortality. The goals of our study were to examine CCATT adherence with ARDSNet guidelines in non-trauma patients, compare the findings to our previous publication of CCATT trauma patients, and evaluate adherence before and after the publication of the CCATT Ventilator Management Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG). METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of ventilated non-trauma patients who were evacuated out of theater by Critical Care Air Transport Teams (CCATT) between January 2007 and April 2015. Data abstractors collected flight information, oxygenation status, ventilator settings, procedures, and in-flight assessments. We calculated descriptive statistics to determine the frequency of compliance with the ARDSNet protocol before and after the CCATT Ventilator CPG publication and the association between ARDSNet protocol adherence and in-flight events. RESULTS: We reviewed the charts of 124 mechanically ventilated patients transported out of theater via CCATT on volume control settings. Seventy percent (n = 87/124) of records were determined to be Non-Adherent to ARDSNet recommendations predominately due to excessive tidal volume settings and/or high FiO2 settings relative to the patient's positive end-expiratory pressure setting. The Non-Adherent group had a higher proportion of in-flight respiratory events. Compared to our previous study of ventilation guideline adherence in the trauma population, the Non-Trauma population had a higher rate of non-adherence to tidal volume and ARDSNet table recommendations (75.6% vs. 61.5%). After the CPG was rolled out, adherence improved from 24% to 41% (P = 0.0496). CONCLUSIONS: CCATTs had low adherence with the ARDSNet guidelines in non-trauma patients transported out of the combat theater, but implementation of a Ventilator Management CPG was associated with improved adherence.

Management of Combat Casualties during Aeromedical Evacuation from a Role 2 to a Role 3 Medical Facility.

INTRODUCTION: Emergent clinical care and patient movements through the military evacuation system improves survival. Patient management differs when transporting from the point-of-injury (POI) to the first medical treatment facility (MTF) versus transporting from the Role 2 to the Role 3 MTF secondary to care rendered within the MTF, including surgery and advanced resuscitation. The objective of this study was to describe care provided to patients during theater inter-facility transports and compare with pre-hospital transports (POI to first MTF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with the Role 2 to the Role 3 transports in Afghanistan and Iraq from 2007 to 2016. Data collected included procedures and events at the MTF and during transport. We compared the intra-theater transport data (Role 2 to Role 3) to data from a previous study evaluating pre-hospiital transports (POI to first MTF). RESULTS: We reviewed the records of 869 Role 2 to Role 3 transport patients. Role 2 to Role 3 transports were longer in duration compared to POI transports (39 minutes vs. 23 minutes) and were more likely to be staffed by advanced personnel (nurses, physician assistants, and physicians) (57% vs. 3%). The sample primarily consisted of military-aged males (mean age 27 years) who suffered from explosive or blunt force injuries. Procedures performed during each phase of care reflected the capabilities of the teams and locations. Pain and cardiac events were more common in POI evacuations compared to the Role 2 to Role 3 transports, but documentation of respiratory events, hemodynamic events, neurologic events, and equipment failure was more common during the Role 2 to Role 3 transports. Survival rates were slightly higher among the Role 2 to Role 3 cohort (98% vs. 95%, difference 3% [95% confidence interval of the difference 1-5%]). CONCLUSIONS: Inter-facility transports (Role 2 to Role 3) are longer in duration, transport more complex patients, and are staffed by more advanced level provider types compared to transports from POI.

Characterization of Long-range Aeromedical Transport and Its Relationship to the Development of Traumatic Extremity Compartment Syndrome: A 7-year, Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Military aeromedical transport evacuates critically injured patients are for definitive care, including patients with or at risk for developing traumatic compartment syndrome of the extremities (tCSoE). Compartment pressure changes of the extremities have not been determined to be associated with factors inherent to aeromedical transport in animal models, but the influence of aeromedical evacuation (AE) transport on the timing of tCSoE development has not been studied in humans. Using a registry-based methodology, this study sought to characterize the temporal features of lower extremity compartment syndrome relative to the timing of transcontinental AE. With this approach, this study aims to inform practice in guidelines relating to the timing and possible effects of long-distance AE and the development of lower extremity compartment syndrome. Using patient care records, we sought to characterize the temporal features of tCSoE diagnosis relative to long-range aeromedical transport. In doing so, we aim to inform practice in guidelines relating to the timing and risks of long-range AE and postulate whether there is an ideal time to transport patients who are at risk for or with tCSoE. METHODS: We performed a retrospective record review of patients with a diagnosis of tCSoE who were evacuated out of theater from January 2007 to May 2014 via aeromedical transport. Data abstractors collected flight information, laboratory values, vital signs, procedures, in-flight assessments, and outcomes. We used the duration of time from injury to arrival at Landstuhl Regional Medical Center (LRMC) to represent time to transport. We compared groups based on time of tCSoE (inclusive of upper and lower extremity) diagnosis relative to injury day and time of transport (preflight versus postflight). We used descriptive statistics and multivariable regression models to determine the associations between time to transport, time to tCSoE diagnosis, and outcomes. RESULTS: Within our study window, 238 patients had documentation of tCSoE. We found that 47% of patients with tCSoE were diagnosed preflight and 53% were diagnosed postflight. Over 90% in both groups developed tCSoE within 48 hours of injury; the time to diagnosis was similar for casualties diagnosed pre- and postflight (P = .65). There was no association between time to arrival at LRMC and day of tCSoE diagnosis (risk ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.96-1.16). CONCLUSION: The timing of tCSoE diagnosis is not associated with the timing of transport; therefore, AE likely does not influence the development of tCSoE.

Advancing Prehospital Combat Casualty Evacuation: Patients Amenable to Aeromedical Evacuation via Unmanned Aerial Vehicles.

INTRODUCTION: The U.S. military currently utilizes unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for reconnaissance and attack missions; however, as combat environment technology advances, there is the increasing likelihood of UAV utilization in prehospital aeromedical evacuation. Although some combat casualties require life-saving interventions (LSIs) during medical evacuation, many do not. Our objective was to describe patients transported from the point of injury to the first level of care and characterize differences between patients who received LSIs en route and those who did not. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of the records of traumatically injured patients evacuated between January 2011 and March 2014. We compared patient characteristics, complications, and outcomes based on whether they had an LSI performed en route (LSI vs. No LSI). We also constructed logistic regression models to determine which characteristics predict uneventful flights (no en route LSI or complications). RESULTS: We examined 1,267 patient records; 47% received an LSI en route. Most patients (72%) sustained a blast injury and injuries to the extremities and head. Over 78% experienced complications en route; the LSI group had higher rates of complications compared to the No LSI group. Logistic regression showed that having a blunt injury or the highest abbreviated injury scale (AIS) severity score in the head/neck region are significant predictors of having an uneventful flight. CONCLUSION: Approximately half of casualties evaluated in our study did not receive an LSI during transport and may have been transported safely by UAV. Having a blunt injury or the highest AIS severity score in the head/neck region significantly predicted an uneventful flight.

Prehospital Use of Ketamine in the Combat Setting: A Sub-Analysis of Patients With Head Injuries Evaluated in the Prospective Life Saving Intervention Study.

OBJECTIVES: Ketamine is used as an analgesic for combat injuries. Ketamine may worsen brain injury, but new studies suggest neuroprotection. Our objective was to report the outcomes of combat casualties with traumatic brain injury (TBI) who received prehospital ketamine. METHODS: This was a post hoc, sub-analysis of a larger prospective, multicenter study (the Life Saving Intervention study [LSI]) evaluating prehospital interventions performed in Afghanistan. A DoD Trauma Registry query provided disposition at discharge and outcomes to be linked with the LSI data. RESULTS: For this study, we enrolled casualties that were suspected to have TBI (n = 160). Most were 26-year-old males (98%) with explosion-related injuries (66%), a median injury severity score of 12, and 5% mortality. Fifty-seven percent (n = 91) received an analgesic, 29% (n = 46) ketamine, 28% (n = 45) other analgesic (OA), and 43% (n = 69) no analgesic (NA). The ketamine group had more pelvic injuries (P = 0.0302) and tourniquets (P = 0.0041) compared to OA. In comparison to NA, the ketamine group was more severely injured and more likely to require LSI procedures, yet, had similar vital signs at admission and disposition at discharge. CONCLUSIONS: We found that combat casualties with suspected TBI that received prehospital ketamine had similar outcomes to those that received OAs or NAs despite injury differences.

Level 1 Trauma Centers and OEF/OIF Emergency Departments: Comparison of Trauma Patient Populations.

INTRODUCTION: Brooke Army Medical Center (BAMC), the largest military hospital and the only level 1 trauma center in the DoD, cares for active duty, retired uniformed services personnel, and beneficiaries. In addition, BAMC works in collaboration with the Southwest Texas Regional Advisory Council (STRAC) and University Hospital (UH), San Antonio's other level 1 trauma center, to provide trauma care to residents of the city and 22 counties in southwest Texas from San Antonio to Mexico (26,000 square mile area). Civilian-military partnerships are shown to benefit the training of military medical personnel; however, to date, there are no published reports specific to military personnel experiences within emergency care. The purpose of the current study was to describe and compare the emergency department trauma patient populations of two level 1 trauma centers in one metropolitan city (BAMC and UH) as well as determine if DoD level 1 trauma cases were representative of patients treated in OEF/OIF emergency department settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We obtained a nonhuman subjects research determination for de-identified data from the US Air Force 59th Medical Wing and the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio Institutional Review Boards. Data on emergency department patients treated between the years 2015 and 2017 were obtained from the two level 1 trauma centers (BAMC and UH, located in San Antonio, Texas); data included injury descriptors, ICU and hospital days, and department procedures. RESULTS: Two-proportion Z-tests indicated that trauma patients were similar across trauma centers on injury type, injury severity, and discharge status; yet trauma patients differed significantly in terms of mechanism of injury and regions of injury. BAMC received significantly greater proportions of patients injured from falls, firearms and with facial and head injuries than UH, which received significantly greater proportion of patients with thorax and abdominal injuries. In addition, a significantly greater proportion of patients spent more than 2 days in the ICU and greater than two total hospital days at BAMC than in UH. In comparison to military emergency departments in combat zones, BAMC had significantly lower rates of blood product administration and endotracheal intubations. CONCLUSIONS: The trauma patients treated at a military level 1 trauma center were similar to those treated in the civilian level 1 trauma center in the same city, indicating the effectiveness of the only DoD Level 1 trauma center to provide experience comparable to that provided in civilian trauma centers. However, further research is needed to determine if the exposure rates to specific procedures are adequate to meet predeployment readiness requirements.

Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury Transported by Critical Care Air Transport Teams: The Influence of Altitude and Oxygenation during Transport.

INTRODUCTION: Traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) are life-threatening, and air transport of patients with TBI requires additional considerations. To mitigate the risks of complications associated with altitude, some patients fly with a cabin altitude restriction (CAR) to limit the altitude at which an aircraft's cabin is maintained. The goal of this study was to examine the effects of CARs on patients with TBI transported out of theater via Critical Care Air Transport Teams. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with moderate-to-severe TBI evacuated out of combat theater to Landstuhl Regional Medical Center via Critical Care Air Transport Teams. We collected demographics, flight and injury information, procedures, oxygenation, and outcomes (discharge disposition and hospital/ICU/ventilator days). We categorized patients as having a CAR if they had a documented CAR or maximum cabin altitude of 5,000 feet or lower in their Critical Care Air Transport Teams record. We calculated descriptive statistics and constructed regression models to evaluate the association between CAR and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: We reviewed the charts of 435 patients, 31% of which had a documented CAR. Nineteen percent of the sample had a PaO2 lower than 80 mm Hg, and 3% of patients experienced a SpO2 lower than 93% while in flight. When comparing preflight and in-flight events, we found that the percentage of patients who had a SpO2 of 93% or lower increased for the No CAR group, whereas the CAR group did not experience a significant change. However, flying without a CAR was not associated with discharge disposition, mortality, or hospital/ICU/ventilator days. Further, having a CAR was not associated with these outcomes after adjusting for additional flights, injury severity, injury type, or preflight head surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with TBI who flew with a CAR did not differ in clinical outcomes from those without a CAR.

Influence of Time to Transport to a Higher Level Facility on the Clinical Outcomes of US Combat Casualties with TBI: A Multicenter 7-Year Study.

INTRODUCTION: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide and is associated with mortality rates as high as 30%. Patients with TBI are at high risk for secondary injury and need to be transported to definitive care expeditiously. However, the physiologic effects of aeromedical evacuation are not well understood and may compound these risks. Combat TBI patients may benefit from delayed aeromedical evacuation. The goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of transport timing out of theater via Critical Care Air Transport Teams (CCATT) to a higher level facility on the clinical outcomes of combat casualties with TBI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients with TBI who were evacuated out of theater by CCATT from January 2007 to May 2014. Data abstractors collected flight information, vital signs, procedures, in-flight assessments, and outcomes. Time to transport was defined as the time from injury to CCATT evacuation out of combat theater. We calculated descriptive statistics and constructed regression models to determine the association between time to transport and clinical outcomes. This study was approved by the U.S. Air Force 59th Medical Wing Institutional Review Board. RESULTS: We analyzed the records of 438 patients evacuated out of theater via CCATT and categorized them into three groups: patients who were transported in one day or less (n = 165), two days (n = 163), and three or more days (n = 110). We used logistic regression models to compare outcomes among patients who were evacuated in two days or three or more days to those who were transported within one day while adjusting for demographics, injury severity, and injury type. Patients who were evacuated in two days or three or more days had 50% lower odds of being discharged on a ventilator and were twice as likely to return to duty or be discharged home than those who were evacuated within one day. Additionally, patients transported in three or more days were 70% less likely to be ventilated at discharge with a GCS of 8 or lower and had 30% lower odds of mortality than those transported within one day. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with moderate to severe TBI, a delay in aeromedical evacuation out of the combat theater was associated with improved mortality rates and a higher likelihood of discharge to home and return to duty dispositions. This study is correlational in nature and focused on CCATT transports from Role III to Role IV facilities; as such, care must be taken in interpreting our findings and future studies are needed to establish a causal link between delayed evacuation and improved discharge disposition. Our study suggests that delaying aeromedical evacuation of TBI patients when feasible may confer benefit.

Posttraumatic stress disorder in combat casualties with burns sustaining primary blast and concussive injuries.

BACKGROUND: There is a heightened focus on postexplosion functional outcomes in combat casualties. Previously, we reported a high prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (32%) and mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) (41%) in patients with explosion-related burns. We hypothesized that the prevalence of PTSD in patients with burn was associated with primary blast injuries (PBIs) and mTBI. METHODS: We reviewed the records of 333 patients admitted consecutively to the United States Army Institute of Surgical Research burn center for explosion-related injuries between March 2003 and March 2006. By using the Posttraumatic Checklist, Military Version (PCL-M), patients were evaluated for PTSD symptoms (PCL-M score >or=44). Loss of consciousness defined mTBI. Patient data were analyzed in groups based on PTSD (yes or no), mechanism of injury (improvised explosive device [IED] vs. other explosive), PBI (yes or no), and mTBI (yes or no). RESULTS: Of 333 patients, 119 had PTSD assessments. Overall, PTSD was 22% (26 of 119). The prevalence of PTSD differed between mechanism of injury groups (p = 0.03). In the IED group (n = 105), 25% had PTSD symptoms and 18% had mTBI; patients injured by other explosive devices (n = 14) had no PTSD symptoms and one had mTBI (p = 0.04; p = 0.69, respectively). Also in the IED group, in patients with PBI, PTSD was 45% (9 of 20) compared with 20% (17 of 85) without PBI (odds ratio=3.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-9.16). More patients with PBI and mTBI (4 of 6; 67%) had PTSD symptoms compared with other patients (22 of 99; 22%) (odds ratio, 7.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.20-40.78). No other associations were found between PBI and mTBI. CONCLUSION: IED-wounded burn patients with PBI and mTBI have a greater prevalence of PTSD. Patients who did not have IED-related injuries did not have PTSD and only one had mTBI.

Interventions Performed on Multipurpose Military Working Dogs in the Prehospital Combat Setting: A Comprehensive Case Series Report.

INTRODUCTION: The military working dog (MWD) has been essential in military operations such as Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) and Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF). MWDs sustain traumatic injuries that require point of injury and en route clinical interventions. The objective of this study was to describe the injuries and treatment military working dogs received on the battlefield and report their final disposition. METHODS: This was a convenience sample of 11 injury and treatment reports of US MWDs from February 2008 to December 2014. We obtained clinical data regarding battlefield treatment from the 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment (SOAR) database and supplemental operational sources. A single individual collected the data and maintained the dataset. The data collected included mechanism of injury, clinical interventions, and outcomes. We reported findings as frequencies. RESULTS: Of the 11 MWD casualties identified in this dataset, 10 reports had documented injuries secondary to trauma. Eighty percent of the cases sustained gunshot wounds. The hindlegs were the most common site of injury (50%); however, 80% sustained injuries at more than one anatomical location. Seventy percent of cases received at least one clinical intervention before arrival at their first treatment facility. The most common interventions included trauma dressing (30%), gauze (30%), chest seal (30%), and pain medication (30%). The survival rate was 50%. CONCLUSION: The majority of the MWD cases in this dataset sustained traumatic injuries, with gunshot being the most common mechanism of injury. Most MWDs received at least one clinical intervention. Fifty percent did not survive their traumatic injuries.

Cardiac massage for trauma patients in the battlefield: An assessment for survivors.

INTRODUCTION: Survival from traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest (TCA) has been reported at a rate as low as 0-2.6% in the civilian pre-hospital setting, and many consider resuscitation of this group to be futile. The aim of this investigation was to describe patients who received cardiac massage during TCA in a battlefield setting; we also aimed to identify predictors of survival. METHODS: We conducted a review of the Department of Defense Trauma Registry to identify patients who received cardiac massage in the battlefield between 2007 and 2014. Patients were also grouped according to location of cardiac arrest: pre-hospital (PH) and in-hospital (IH). The groups were compared and evaluated by injury, transport time, type of resuscitation, and pre-hospital procedures. Outcome variables included survival to discharge and 30-day survival. Categorical variables were analysed using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. Wilcoxon tests were performed for continuous variables. Regression modelling was used to assess for predictors of survival. RESULTS: 75 of all 582 patients (13%, 95% CI 10-16) survived to 30 days, and all survivors were transported out of the battlefield; 23 PH (7.8%, 95% CI 5.2-12) and 52 IH (17%, 95% CI 13-22) patients survived to 30 days (p < 0.001). Closed-chest cardiac massage with the administration of intravenous medications was associated with 30-day survival among IH patients. CONCLUSIONS: We report a 13% survival to 30 days among all patients receiving cardiac massage in a battlefield setting. Closed-chest cardiac massage predicted survival among IH TCA victims who also received intravenous medications in this review of combat-related TCA.

Descriptive Analysis of Cardiac Patients Transported by Critical Care Air Transport Teams.

INTRODUCTION: Critical Care Air Transport Teams (CCATTs) transport critically ill patients within and out of theaters of combat operations. Studies of the CCATT population reveal as many as 35% of patients have a non-trauma diagnosis, of which more than half are cardiac.The purpose of this retrospective study was to describe the epidemiology of critically ill patients with cardiac diagnoses evacuated from theater via CCATT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 290 medical patients with a primary cardiac diagnosis transported from any theater of operation to Landstuhl Regional Medical Center, Germany from January 2007 to April 2015. RESULTS: The majority of patients were male with an average age of 46 ± 11 years, US contractors (47%, n = 137), followed by US Active Duty (32%, n = 93). Patients had an average BMI of 29 ± 5; 62% of cardiac patients were either overweight or obese. The most common cardiac diagnoses were ST elevation myocardial infarction, Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, and angina. Pre-flight vital signs indicate overall patients were stable prior to evacuation, with the majority receiving supplemental oxygen and only 5% requiring mechanical ventilation. Eighty-one percent of patients experienced at least one cardiac event during flight, however less than 5% required adjustment to oxygen or ventilator settings. CONCLUSIONS: Critically ill cardiac patients make up a significant portion of patients transported out of the combat theater. These patients are older, overweight and have identified risk factors for cardiac morbidity. More strenuous pre-deployment screening for risk factors and prevention strategies could minimize the use of military resources to evacuate these patients from the combat theater.

Disease and Non-Battle Traumatic Injuries Evaluated by Emergency Physicians in a US Tertiary Combat Hospital.

Introduction Analysis of injuries during military operations has focused on those related to combat. Non-combat complaints have received less attention, despite the need for many troops to be evacuated for non-battle illnesses in Iraq. This study aims to further characterize the disease and non-battle injuries (DNBIs) seen at a tertiary combat hospital and to describe the types of procedures and medications used in the management of these cases. METHODS: In this observational study, patients were enrolled from a convenience sample with non-combat-related diseases and injuries who were evaluated in the emergency department (ED) of a US military tertiary hospital in Iraq from 2007-2008. The treating emergency physician (EP) used a data collection form to enroll patients that arrived to the ED whose injury or illness was unrelated to combat. RESULTS: Data were gathered on 1,745 patients with a median age of 30 years; 84% of patients were male and 85% were US military personnel. The most common diagnoses evaluated in the ED were abdominal disorders, orthopedic injuries, and headache. Many cases involved intravenous access, laboratory testing, and radiographic testing. Procedures performed included electrocardiogram, lumbar puncture, and intubation. CONCLUSION: Disease and non-battle traumatic injuries are common in a tertiary combat hospital. Emergency providers working in austere settings should have the diagnostic and procedural skills to evaluate and treat DNBIs. Bebarta VS , Mora AG , Ng PC , Mason PE , Muck A , Maddry JK . Disease and non-battle traumatic injuries evaluated by emergency physicians in a US tertiary combat hospital. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018;33(1):53-57.

En Route Care Provided by US Navy Nurses in Iraq and Afghanistan.

BACKGROUND: US Navy nurses provide en route care for critically injured combat casualties without having a formal program for training, utilization, or evaluation. Little is known about missions supported by Navy nurses. OBJECTIVES: To characterize the number and types of patients transported and skill sets required by Navy nurses during 2 combat support deployments. METHODS: All interfacility casualty transfers between 2 separate facilities in Iraq and Afghanistan were assessed. Number of patients treated, number transported, en route care provider type, transport priority level and duration, injury severity, indication for critical care transport, en route care interventions, and vital signs were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 1550 casualties, 630 required medical evacuation to a higher level of care. Of those, 133 (21%) were transported by a Navy nurse, with 131 (98.5%) classified as "urgent," accounting for 46% of all urgent transports. The primary indication for en route care nursing was mechanical ventilation of intubated patients (97%). Mean (SD) patient transport time was 29.8 (7.9) minutes (range, 17-61 minutes). The most common en route care interventions were administration of intravenous sedation (80%), neuromuscular blockade (79%), and opioids (48%); transfusions (18%); and ventilation changes (11%). No intubations, cricothyroidotomies, chest tube placements, or needle decompressions were performed en route. No deaths occurred during transport. CONCLUSIONS: US Navy nurses successfully transported critically injured patients without observed adverse events. Establishing en route care as a program of record in the Navy will facilitate continuous process improvement to ensure that future casualties receive optimized en route care.