Immunogenicity Risk Assessment of Process-Related Impurities in An Engineered T Cell Receptor Cellular Product.

Cell therapies such as genetically modified T cells have emerged as a promising and viable treatment for hematologic cancers and are being aggressively pursued for a wide range of diseases and conditions that were previously difficult to treat or had no cure. The process development requires genetic modifications to T cells to express a receptor (engineered T cell receptor (eTCR)) of specific binding qualities to the desired target. Protein reagents utilized during the cell therapy manufacturing process, to facilitate these genetic modifications, are often present as process-related impurities at residual levels in the final drug product and can represent a potential immunogenicity risk upon infusion. This manuscript presents a framework for the qualification of an assay for assessing the immunogenicity risk of AA6 and Cas9 residuals. The same framework applies for other residuals; however, AAV6 and Cas9 were selected as they were residuals from the manufacturing of an engineered T cell receptor cellular product in development. The manuscript: 1) elucidates theoretical risks, 2) summarizes analytical data collected during process development, 3) describes the qualification of an in vitro human PBMC cytokine release assay to assess immunogenicity risk from cellular product associated process residuals; 4) identifies a multiplexed inflammatory innate and adaptive cytokine panel with pre-defined criteria using relevant positive controls; and 5) discusses qualification challenges and potential solutions for establishing meaningful thresholds. The assessment is not only relevant to establishing safe exposure levels of these residuals but also in guiding risk assessment and CMC strategy during the conduct of clinical trials.

2023 White Paper on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis: ISR for ADA Assays, the Rise of dPCR vs qPCR, International Reference Standards for Vaccine Assays, Anti-AAV TAb Post-Dose Assessment, NanoString Validation, ELISpot as Gold Standard (Part 3 - Recommendations on Gene Therapy, Cell Therapy, Vaccines Immunogenicity & Technologies; Biotherapeutics Immunogenicity & Risk Assessment; ADA/NAb Assay/Reporting Harmonization).

The 17th Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (17th WRIB) took place in Orlando, FL, USA on June 19-23, 2023. Over 1000 professionals representing pharma/biotech companies, CROs, and multiple regulatory agencies convened to actively discuss the most current topics of interest in bioanalysis. The 17th WRIB included 3 Main Workshops and 7 Specialized Workshops that together spanned 1 week to allow an exhaustive and thorough coverage of all major issues in bioanalysis of biomarkers, immunogenicity, gene therapy, cell therapy and vaccines. Moreover, in-depth workshops on "EU IVDR 2017/746 Implementation and impact for the Global Biomarker Community: How to Comply with these NEW Regulations" and on "US FDA/OSIS Remote Regulatory Assessments (RRAs)" were the special features of the 17th edition. As in previous years, WRIB continued to gather a wide diversity of international, industry opinion leaders and regulatory authority experts working on both small and large molecules as well as gene, cell therapies and vaccines to facilitate sharing and discussions focused on improving quality, increasing regulatory compliance, and achieving scientific excellence on bioanalytical issues. This 2023 White Paper encompasses recommendations emerging from the extensive discussions held during the workshop and is aimed to provide the bioanalytical community with key information and practical solutions on topics and issues addressed, in an effort to enable advances in scientific excellence, improved quality and better regulatory compliance. Due to its length, the 2023 edition of this comprehensive White Paper has been divided into three parts for editorial reasons. This publication (Part 3) covers the recommendations on Gene Therapy, Cell therapy, Vaccines and Biotherapeutics Immunogenicity. Part 1A (Mass Spectrometry Assays and Regulated Bioanalysis/BMV), P1B (Regulatory Inputs) and Part 2 (Biomarkers, IVD/CDx, LBA and Cell-Based Assays) are published in volume 16 of Bioanalysis, issues 8 and 9 (2024), respectively.

Comparison of Pre-existing Anti-AAV8 Total Antibody Screening and Confirmatory Assays with a Cell-Based Neutralizing Assay in Normal Human Serum.

Pre-existing adeno-associated viruses (AAV) neutralizing antibodies (NAb) can prevent AAV vectors from transducing target tissues. The immune responses can include binding/total antibodies (TAb) and neutralizing antibodies (NAb). This study is aimed at comparing total antibody assay (TAb) and cell-based NAb assay against AAV8 to help inform the best assay format for patient exclusion criteria. We developed a chemiluminescence-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to analyze AAV8 TAb in human serum. The specificity of AAV8 TAb was determined using a confirmatory assay. A COS-7-based assay was used to analyze anti-AAV8 NAbs. The TAb screening cut point factor was determined to be 2.65, and the confirmatory cut point (CCP) was 57.1%. The prevalence of AAV8 TAb in 84 normal subjects was 40%, of which 24% were NAb positive and 16% were NAb negative. All NAb-positive subjects were confirmed to be TAb-positive and also passed the CCP-positive criteria. All 16 NAb-negative subjects did not pass the CCP criterion for the positive specificity test. There was a high concordance between AAV8 TAb confirmatory assay and NAb assay. The confirmatory assay improved the specificity of the TAb screening test and confirmed neutralizing activity. We proposed a tiered assay approach, in which an anti-AAV8 screening assay should be followed by a confirmatory assay during pre-enrollment for patient exclusions for AAV8 gene therapy. This approach can be used in lieu of developing a NAb assay and can be also implemented as a companion diagnostic assay for post-marketing seroreactivity assessments due to ease of development and use.

Bioanalytical Methods for Characterization of CAR-T Cellular Kinetics: Comparison of PCR Assays and Matrices.

Recently, multiple chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T)-based therapies have been approved for treating hematological malignancies, targeting CD19 and B-cell maturation antigen. Unlike protein or antibody therapies, CAR-T therapies are "living cell" therapies whose pharmacokinetics are characterized by expansion, distribution, contraction, and persistence. Therefore, this unique modality requires a different approach for quantitation compared with conventional ligand binding assays implemented for most biologics. Cellular (flow cytometry) or molecular assays (polymerase chain reaction (PCR)) can be deployed with each having unique advantages and disadvantages. In this article, we describe the molecular assays utilized: quantitative PCR (qPCR), which was the initial platform used to estimate transgene copy numbers and more recently droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) which quantitates the absolute copy numbers of CAR transgene. The comparability of the two methods in patient samples and of each method across different matrices (isolated CD3+ T-cells or whole blood) was also performed. The results show a good correlation between qPCR and ddPCR for the amplification of same gene in clinical samples from a CAR-T therapy trial. In addition, our studies show that the qPCR-based amplification of transgene levels was well-correlated, independent of DNA sources (either CD3+ T-cells or whole blood). Our results also highlight that ddPCR can be a better platform for monitoring samples at the early phase of CAR-T dosing prior to expansion and during long-term monitoring as they can detect samples with very low copy numbers with high sensitivity, in addition to easier implementation and sample logistics.

Neutralizing Antibody Validation Testing and Reporting Harmonization.

Evolving immunogenicity assay performance expectations and a lack of harmonized neutralizing antibody validation testing and reporting tools have resulted in significant time spent by health authorities and sponsors on resolving filing queries. A team of experts within the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists' Therapeutic Product Immunogenicity Community across industry and the Food and Drug Administration addressed challenges unique to cell-based and non-cell-based neutralizing antibody assays. Harmonization of validation expectations and data reporting will facilitate filings to health authorities and are described in this manuscript. This team provides validation testing and reporting strategies and tools for the following assessments: (1) format selection; (2) cut point; (3) assay acceptance criteria; (4) control precision; (5) sensitivity including positive control selection and performance tracking; (6) negative control selection; (7) selectivity/specificity including matrix interference, hemolysis, lipemia, bilirubin, concomitant medications, and structurally similar analytes; (8) drug tolerance; (9) target tolerance; (10) sample stability; and (11) assay robustness.

2022 White Paper on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis: FDA Draft Guidance on Immunogenicity Information in Prescription Drug Labeling, LNP & Viral Vectors Therapeutics/Vaccines Immunogenicity, Prolongation Effect, ADA Affinity, Risk-based Approaches, NGS, qPCR, ddPCR Assays (Part 3 - Recommendations on Gene Therapy, Cell Therapy, Vaccines Immunogenicity & Technologies; Immunogenicity & Risk Assessment of Biotherapeutics and Novel Modalities; NAb Assays Integrated Approach).

The 2022 16th Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (WRIB) took place in Atlanta, GA, USA on September 26-30, 2022. Over 1000 professionals representing pharma/biotech companies, CROs, and multiple regulatory agencies convened to actively discuss the most current topics of interest in bioanalysis. The 16th WRIB included 3 Main Workshops and 7 Specialized Workshops that together spanned 1 week in order to allow exhaustive and thorough coverage of all major issues in bioanalysis, biomarkers, immunogenicity, gene therapy, cell therapy and vaccines. Moreover, in-depth workshops on ICH M10 BMV final guideline (focused on this guideline training, interpretation, adoption and transition); mass spectrometry innovation (focused on novel technologies, novel modalities, and novel challenges); and flow cytometry bioanalysis (rising of the 3rd most common/important technology in bioanalytical labs) were the special features of the 16th edition. As in previous years, WRIB continued to gather a wide diversity of international, industry opinion leaders and regulatory authority experts working on both small and large molecules as well as gene, cell therapies and vaccines to facilitate sharing and discussions focused on improving quality, increasing regulatory compliance, and achieving scientific excellence on bioanalytical issues. This 2022 White Paper encompasses recommendations emerging from the extensive discussions held during the workshop and is aimed to provide the bioanalytical community with key information and practical solutions on topics and issues addressed, in an effort to enable advances in scientific excellence, improved quality and better regulatory compliance. Due to its length, the 2022 edition of this comprehensive White Paper has been divided into three parts for editorial reasons. This publication (Part 3) covers the recommendations on Gene Therapy, Cell therapy, Vaccines and Biotherapeutics Immunogenicity. Part 1 (Mass Spectrometry and ICH M10) and Part 2 (LBA, Biomarkers/CDx and Cytometry) are published in volume 15 of Bioanalysis, issues 16 and 15 (2023), respectively.

Analysis of the Immunogenicity from Abatacept-Treated Pediatric Patients With Polyarticular-Course Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Findings From Two Phase III Clinical Trials.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this article is to present the analysis of anti-abatacept antibody data from children with polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pJIA), treated with abatacept. The data are from 395 participants with pJIA from two abatacept registrational trials. METHODS: We analyzed immunogenicity data according to age groups, administration route (intravenous [IV] or subcutaneous [SC]), drug treatment interruption, and co-medications (with or without methotrexate [MTX]) to assess impact on the incidence of anti-abatacept antibodies. RESULTS: The overall immunogenicity incidences observed in both JIA trials ranged between 4.7% and 23.3%. There was a slightly higher immunogenicity incidence in the 2-5-year-old participants (15.2%) compared with 6-17-year-old participants (4.7%). In the study with SC dosing, the overall incidence on treatment was 2.3% (3% if co-dosed with MTX), similar to the incidence for Period A of the IV study (similar duration of treatment as the SC study), which was 2.1% (1.4% if co-dosed with MTX). In the IV study, the period following a 6-month interruption in treatment had comparable immunogenicity incidences (22.9% with interruption vs. 18.2% without interruption, both co-dosed with MTX and 0% for both not co-dosed with MTX). In most cases, participants co-dosed with MTX had higher immunogenicity incidences than those on abatacept alone. CONCLUSION: Although some trends were noted in terms of incidence according to age and MTX co-dosing, none where conclusive owing to differences in population size. Drug holiday had no impact on immunogenicity incidence once treatment was resumed, and incidences across SC and IV dosing were comparable. There was no impact of immunogenicity on pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy.

Comparison of Titer and Signal to Noise (S/N) for Determination of Anti-drug Antibody Magnitude Using Clinical Data from an Industry Consortium.

During biotherapeutic drug development, immunogenicity is evaluated by measuring anti-drug antibodies (ADAs). The presence and magnitude of ADA responses is assessed using a multi-tier workflow where samples are screened, confirmed, and titered. Recent reports suggest that the assay signal to noise ratio (S/N) obtained during the screening tier correlates well with titer. To determine whether S/N could more broadly replace titer, anonymized ADA data from a consortium of sponsors was collected and analyzed. Datasets from clinical programs with therapeutics of varying immunogenicity risk levels (low to high), common ADA assay platforms (ELISA and MSD) and formats (bridging, direct, solid-phase extraction with acid dissociation), and titration approaches (endpoint and interpolated) were included in the analysis. A statistically significant correlation between S/N and titer was observed in all datasets, with a strong correlation (Spearman's r > 0.8) in 11 out of 15 assays (73%). For assays with available data, conclusions regarding ADA impact on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were similar using S/N or titer. Subject ADA kinetic profiles were also comparable using the two measurements. Determination of antibody boosting in patients with pre-existing responses could be accomplished using similar approaches for titer and S/N. Investigation of factors that impacted the accuracy of ADA magnitude measurements revealed advantages and disadvantages to both approaches. In general, S/N had superior precision and ability to detect potentially low affinity/avidity responses compared to titer. This analysis indicates that S/N could serve as an equivalent and in some cases preferable alternative to titer for assessing ADA magnitude and evaluation of impact on clinical responses.

From incidental learning to explicit memory: The role of sleep after exposure to a serial reaction time task.

This laboratory study explores whether sleep has different effects on explicit (recognition-based) and implicit (priming-based) memory. Eighty-nine healthy participants were randomly assigned to one of two experimental conditions: sleep or wake. All participants were previously exposed to an incidental learning session involving a 12-element deterministic second-order conditional sequence embedded in a serial reaction time task. The participants' explicit and implicit knowledge was assessed both immediately after the learning session (pretest) and after 12 h (posttest). For the sleep group, participants had a night of normal sleep between pretest and posttest, whereas the wake group spent 12 h awake during the day. The measures involved an explicit recognition test and an implicit priming reaction-time test with old fragments from a previously learned sequence and new fragments of a different control sequence. The sleep group showed statistically significant improvement between the pretest and the posttest in the explicit memory measure, whereas the wake group did not. In the implicit task, both groups improved similarly after a 12-h retention interval. These results suggest that throughout sleep, implicitly acquired information is processed offline to yield an explicit representation of knowledge incidentally acquired the night before.

The FALCON program: Two phase 2b randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies to assess the efficacy and safety of pegbelfermin in the treatment of patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and bridging fibrosis or compensated cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is the progressive form of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD); no approved therapies for NASH currently exist. Pegbelfermin (PGBF), a human fibroblast growth factor 21 analog, has metabolic effects that may provide benefit for patients with NASH. DESIGN: The FALCON 1 and 2 studies are phase 2b, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trials to assess safety and efficacy of PGBF treatment in patients who have histologically-confirmed NASH with stage 3 liver fibrosis (FALCON 1; NCT03486899) or compensated cirrhosis (FALCON 2; NCT03486912). In both studies, randomized patients receive once weekly subcutaneous injections of PGBF (10, 20, or 40 mg) or placebo during a 48-week treatment period and are then followed for an additional 4 weeks. ENDPOINTS: The primary efficacy endpoint for FALCON 1 is the proportion of patients who achieve ≥1 stage improvement in fibrosis (by NASH CRN fibrosis score) without NASH worsening or NASH improvement (≥2 point decrease in NAFLD Activity Score) without fibrosis worsening at Week 24. For FALCON 2, the primary efficacy endpoint is ≥1 stage improvement in fibrosis without NASH worsening at Week 48. Key safety endpoints for both studies include incidence and frequency of adverse events, bone mineral density and immunogenicity. SUMMARY: Previous clinical trial data show that PGBF can reduce hepatic fat and improve metabolic factors and biomarkers of hepatic injury and fibrosis. The FALCON studies aim to evaluate PGBF treatment specifically in patients with NASH and advanced fibrosis, who are at greatest risk of poor clinical outcomes over time.

Immunogenicity Risk Assessment for PEGylated Therapeutics.

The objective of this manuscript is to provide the reader with two examples on how to present an immunogenicity risk assessment for a PEGylated therapeutic as part of Investigational New Drug (IND) application or during other stages of the drug development process. In order to provide context to the bioanalytical strategies used to support the PEGylated therapeutics presented here, a brief summary of information available for marketed PEGylated biologics is provided. Two case studies are presented, a PEGylated enzyme and a PEGylated growth factor. For the former, the risk assessment covers how to deal with a narrow therapeutic window and suggestions to utilize a PD marker as surrogate for neutralizing antibody assessments in Phase I. The latter has recommendations on additional analytes that should be monitored to mitigate risk of immunogenicity to endogenous counterparts.

Strategies for method comparison when changes in the immunogenicity method are needed within a clinical program.

Aim: To present the reader with different approaches used to compare immunogenicity methods when changes are needed during a clinical program. Results: Five case studies are presented, in the first two case studies, the approach utilized a small sample size for the comparison. In the third case, all samples from a study were analyzed by both methods. In the fourth case, the intended use of noncomparable assays in an integrated summary drove design of experiments to establish the expected limits of pooling data. In the fifth case, a selectivity approach was used as an alternate to use of incurred samples. Conclusion: When data pooling across methods is needed, it is important to define the limits of comparability.

Perspectives on exploring hybrid LBA/LC-MS approach for clinical immunogenicity testing.

Biological drug products may elicit an antidrug antibody (ADA) response. The current widely used bridging ligand binding assay (LBA) is the gold standard for ADA assessments in drug development, which is a qualitative assay followed by a quasi-quantitative titer analysis but can be prone to interferences from biological matrices, drug targets and circulating drugs. We present our perspectives and findings in exploring a hybrid LBA/LC-MS as an orthogonal bioanalytical tool for clinical immunogenicity assessments. The hybrid LBA/LC-MS is a semiquantitative assay with acceptable specificity, drug tolerance and the capability of multiplexed detection of ADA isotypes. The assay results suggest this technology to be a promising and complementary bioanalytical tool that can provide informative immunogenicity data in drug development.

Protein detection enhanced by 3DNA dendrimer signal amplification.

DNA dendrimers, conjugated with both anti-biotin antibodies and up to 350 labeling entities, were designed and adapted to protein microarray and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to improve the limits of protein detection with no additional steps or equipment. Application of conjugated dendrimers to standard ELISA cytokine detection resulted in up to threefold improvement of the limits of detection with no significant increase in the inter- and intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV) compared to streptavidin horseradish peroxidase (SA-HRP) detection. The adaptation of conjugated dendrimers to protein microarray cytokine detection resulted in up to 10-fold improvement of the limits of detection, but assay conditions would have to be optimized to decrease the intra- and inter-assay %CVs.

Generic Anti-PEG Antibody Assay on ProterixBio's (Formerly BioScale) ViBE Platform Shows Poor Reproducibility.

PEGylation is a modification commonly used to increase the half-life of therapeutic proteins. The strategy for immunogenicity testing of these compounds should include methods to detect both anti-protein and anti-PEG antibodies. We previously reported a method for the detection of anti-PEG antibodies using ProterixBio's (formerly BioScale) acoustic membrane microparticle (AMMP) technology. Our initial method development work showed the assay was capable of detecting antibodies in human serum with a sensitivity of 1 µg/mL with good reproducibility (CV < 7%). Since the publication of this initial paper, additional experimentation was performed in an effort to validate the assay for support of clinical sample analysis. This additional data indicate that the method has high variability (CV% > 20) and is unsuitable to support clinical sample analysis.

The Clinical Pharmacology of Elotuzumab.

Novel treatment options are needed to improve long-term outcomes for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). In this article, we comprehensively review the clinical pharmacology of elotuzumab, a first-in-class monoclonal anti-SLAMF7 antibody approved in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (ELd) for the treatment of patients with MM and one to three prior therapies. Elotuzumab has a dual mechanism of action to specifically kill myeloma cells: binding SLAMF7 on myeloma cells facilitates natural killer (NK) cell-mediated antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), and direct engagement of SLAMF7 on NK cells further enhances NK cell activity. Elotuzumab administration causes transient elevations of selected cytokines (tumor necrosis factor-α, interferon-γ-induced protein-10 and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1). The temporary nature of these elevations (greatest after the first dose, with a trend to return to baseline by day 7) suggests a low likelihood of facilitating clinically meaningful drug-drug interactions. Elotuzumab exposure increases more than proportionally to dose and >80% SLAMF7 receptor occupancy is achieved with the approved elotuzumab 10 mg/kg regimen. Population pharmacokinetic data from 375 patients demonstrated weight-based dosing is appropriate for elotuzumab, and that ethnicity and hepatic/renal function have minimal effects on exposure. Exposure-response analysis of patients treated with ELd demonstrated that increased elotuzumab exposure does not elevate the risk of grade 3+ adverse events (AEs) or AEs leading to discontinuation/death. Elotuzumab antidrug antibodies occurred in 18.5% of patients treated with ELd or elotuzumab plus bortezomib and dexamethasone, but were generally transient and did not affect elotuzumab efficacy or safety. A monotherapy study indicated elotuzumab does not have clinically relevant effects on QT intervals.

Emerging technologies for biotherapeutic bioanalysis from a high-throughput and multiplexing perspective: insights from an AAPS emerging technology action program committee.

This manuscript aims to provide insights and updates on emerging technologies from a throughput and multiplexing perspective and to update readers on changes in previously reported technologies. The technologies discussed range from nascent (ultrasensitive Cira, Intellicyt®, Dynaxi and Captsure™) to the more established (Ella and SQIDlite™). For the nascent technologies, there was an emphasis on user interviews and reviews, where available, to help provide an unbiased view to our readers. For the Ella, a review of published user data as well as author and other user experiences are summarized. Due to their emergent nature, all the technologies described are applicable in the early drug development stage, may require an upfront investment of capital and may not perform as expected.

An Integrated Assessment of the Effects of Immunogenicity on the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Efficacy of Elotuzumab.

Elotuzumab is a humanized, immunostimulatory anti-signaling lymphocytic activation molecule F7 (SLAMF7) IgG1 monoclonal antibody indicated in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who have received 1-3 prior therapies. We assessed the immunogenicity of elotuzumab as a monotherapy and in combination with bortezomib/dexamethasone and lenalidomide/dexamethasone in patients with MM in five clinical studies, including the pivotal ELOQUENT-2 trial (NCT01239797). Anti-drug antibody (ADA) prevalence was determined using a validated bridging assay. The prevalence of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) was assessed in ADA-positive samples from ELOQUENT-2. Data from four trials of elotuzumab combined with lenalidomide/dexamethasone or bortezomib/dexamethasone (n = 390 evaluable patients) demonstrated that nine (2.3%) patients were ADA positive in baseline assays, 72 (18.5%) were ADA positive on-treatment or during follow-up, and two (0.5%) developed persistent ADAs. Patients treated with elotuzumab monotherapy had a higher incidence of elotuzumab ADAs than those on the combination therapy. In general, ADAs developed early and resolved after 2-4 months. Of 45 on-treatment ADA-positive patients in ELOQUENT-2, 19 had NAbs. Population pharmacokinetic modeling demonstrated an apparent increase in target-mediated elimination (higher V max, lower K M) in ADA-positive versus ADA-negative patients. ADAs were associated with lower elotuzumab steady-state exposure; however, this result may have been confounded by differential myeloma protein levels. ADAs/NAbs were not associated with hypersensitivity, infusion reactions, or loss of elotuzumab efficacy. Using a novel visualization, we also demonstrate that there is no clear relationship between the occurrence and titer values of ADA/NAbs and progression-free survival and best overall response status in patients treated with elotuzumab.

Pharmacokinetic, Pharmacodynamic, and Safety Profile of a Novel Anti-CD28 Domain Antibody Antagonist in Healthy Subjects.

We report pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of a novel anti-CD28 domain antibody antagonist (lulizumab pegol) in healthy subjects following single- or multiple-dose administration. A minimal anticipated biological effect level approach was used to select a 0.01 mg starting dose for a single-ascending-dose (SAD), double-blind, first-in-human study. Part 1 included 9 intravenous (IV; 0.01-100 mg) and 3 subcutaneous (SC; 9-50 mg) doses or placebo. In part 2, a keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) immunization was performed in 16 subjects/panel, who received 1 of 3 IV doses (9-100 mg) or placebo. In a double-blind, multiple-ascending-dose (MAD) study, subjects received SC lulizumab 6.25 mg every 2 weeks, 12.5 mg weekly, 37.5 mg weekly, or placebo. Among 180 treated subjects, 169 completed the studies. Peak concentrations and areas under the curve from time 0 to infinity increased dose proportionally. Estimated SC bioavailability was 68.2%. Receptor occupancy of approximately ≥80% was maintained for ≥2 weeks at ≥9-mg doses (SAD) and throughout the dosing interval (MAD). IV doses ≥9 mg inhibited antibody production against KLH for 2 weeks. No significant cytokine or immune cell changes were observed. No immunogenicity responses persisted, and there was no correlation to adverse events. Headache occurred in 21 SAD and 4 MAD subjects receiving lulizumab; in the MAD study 5 lulizumab subjects experienced infections. Lulizumab IV or SC was safe at all doses studied, without evidence of cytokine release.