Why haploinsufficiency persists.

Haploinsufficiency describes the decrease in organismal fitness observed when a single copy of a gene is deleted in diploids. We investigated the origin of haploinsufficiency by creating a comprehensive dosage sensitivity data set for genes under their native promoters. We demonstrate that the expression of haploinsufficient genes is limited by the toxicity of their overexpression. We further show that the fitness penalty associated with excess gene copy number is not the only determinant of haploinsufficiency. Haploinsufficient genes represent a unique subset of genes sensitive to copy number increases, as they are also limiting for important cellular processes when present in one copy instead of two. The selective pressure to decrease gene expression due to the toxicity of overexpression, combined with the pressure to increase expression due to their fitness-limiting nature, has made haploinsufficient genes extremely sensitive to changes in gene expression. As a consequence, haploinsufficient genes are dosage stabilized, showing much more narrow ranges in cell-to-cell variability of expression compared with other genes in the genome. We propose a dosage-stabilizing hypothesis of haploinsufficiency to explain its persistence over evolutionary time.

DNA Instability Maintains the Repeat Length of the Yeast RNA Polymerase II C-terminal Domain.

The C-terminal domain (CTD) of RNA polymerase II in eukaryotes is comprised of tandemly repeating units of a conserved seven-amino acid sequence. The number of repeats is, however, quite variable across different organisms. Furthermore, previous studies have identified evidence of rearrangements within the CTD coding region, suggesting that DNA instability may play a role in regulating or maintaining CTD repeat number. The work described here establishes a clear connection between DNA instability and CTD repeat number in Saccharomyces cerevisiae First, analysis of 36 diverse S. cerevisiae isolates revealed evidence of numerous past rearrangements within the DNA sequence that encodes the CTD. Interestingly, the total number of CTD repeats was relatively static (24-26 repeats in all strains), suggesting a balancing act between repeat expansion and contraction. In an effort to explore the genetic plasticity within this region, we measured the rates of repeat expansion and contraction using novel reporters and a doxycycline-regulated expression system for RPB1 In efforts to determine the mechanisms leading to CTD repeat variability, we identified the presence of DNA secondary structures, specifically G-quadruplex-like DNA, within the CTD coding region. Furthermore, we demonstrated that mutating PIF1, a G-quadruplex-specific helicase, results in increased CTD repeat length polymorphisms. We also determined that RAD52 is necessary for CTD repeat expansion but not contraction, identifying a role for recombination in repeat expansion. Results from these DNA rearrangements may help explain the CTD copy number variation seen across eukaryotes, as well as support a model of CTD expansion and contraction to maintain CTD integrity and overall length.