RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To review evidence on post-acute care (PAC) use and disparities related to race and ethnicity and rurality in the United States over the past 2 decades among individuals who underwent major joint replacement (MJR). DESIGN: Systematic review. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We included studies that examined US PAC trends and racial and ethnic and/or urban vs rural differences among individuals who are ≥18 years with hospitalization after MJR. METHODS: We searched large academic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus) for peer-reviewed, English language articles from January 1, 2000, and January 26, 2022. RESULTS: Seventeen studies were reviewed. Studies (n = 16) consistently demonstrated that discharges post-MJR to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) or nursing homes (NHs) decreased over time, whereas evidence on discharges to inpatient rehab facilities (IRFs), home health care (HHC), and home without HHC services were mixed. Most studies (n = 12) found that racial and ethnic minority individuals, especially Black individuals, were more frequently discharged to PAC institutions than White individuals. Demographic factors (ie, age, sex, comorbidities) and marital status were not only independently associated with discharges to institutional PAC, but also among racial and ethnic minority individuals. Only one study found urban-rural differences in PAC use, indicating that urban-dwelling individuals were more often discharged to both SNF/NH and HHC than their rural counterparts. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Despite declines in institutional PAC use post-MJR over time, racial and minority individuals continue to experience higher rates of institutional PAC discharges compared with White individuals. To address these disparities, policymakers should consider measures that target multimorbidity and the lack of social and structural support among socially vulnerable individuals. Policymakers should also consider initiatives that address the economic and structural barriers experienced in rural areas by expanding access to telehealth and through improved care coordination.
RESUMO
Scholars of global health have embraced universal education as a structural intervention to prevent HIV. Yet the costs of school, including fees and other ancillary costs, create an economic burden for students and their families, indicating both the challenge of realising the potential of education for preventing HIV and the ways in which the desire for education may produce vulnerabilities to HIV for those struggling to afford it. To explore this paradox, this article draws from collaborative, team-based ethnographic research conducted from June to August 2019 in the Rakai district of Uganda. Respondents reported that education is the most significant cost burden faced by Ugandan families, sometimes amounting to as much as 66% of yearly household budgets per student. Respondents further understood paying for children's schooling as both a legal requirement and a valued social goal, and they pointed to men's labour migrations to high HIV-prevalence communities and women's participation in sex work as strategies to achieve that. Building from regional evidence showing young East African women participate in transactional, intergenerational sex to secure school fees for themselves, our findings point to the negative health spillover effects of Uganda's universal schooling policies for the whole family.