Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Mult Scler Relat Disord ; 81: 105365, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38101225

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Comorbidities are common in multiple sclerosis (MS); little is known in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) or outside high-income regions. OBJECTIVE: Compare comorbidities in MS/NMOSD patients, Zambia. METHODS: Comorbidities were compared for MS/NMOSD patients from Zambia's University Teaching Hospital using logistic regression. RESULTS: Thirty-three were included (MS/NMOSD:17/16); 22 (67 %) females, mean age=35.6-years. Fifteen (46 %) had any comorbidity [MS/NMOSD:11/4], 14 physical (MS/NMOSD:10/4) and 6 psychiatric comorbidity (MS/NMOSD:5/1). Odds of any/any physical comorbidity was higher in MS versus NMOSD (age-adjusted odds ratio[aOR]=6.9;95 %CI:1.4-34.7,p=0.020/aOR=5.6;95 %:1.1-28.0,p=0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Physical comorbidity affected >2-in-5 MS/NMOSD patients and psychiatric disorders ∼1-in-5. Odds of any/any physical comorbidity were >five-fold higher in MS versus NMOSD.


Assuntos
Esclerose Múltipla , Neuromielite Óptica , Feminino , Humanos , Adulto , Masculino , Esclerose Múltipla/epidemiologia , Neuromielite Óptica/epidemiologia , Zâmbia/epidemiologia , Países em Desenvolvimento , Comorbidade
2.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil ; 102(2S Suppl 1): S24-S32, 2023 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36634327

RESUMO

ABSTRACT: Stroke remains the second leading cause of global disability with 87% of stroke-related disability occurring in low- and middle-income countries. In low- and middle-income countries, access to acute stroke interventions is often limited, making effective poststroke rehabilitation potentially the best available intervention to promote poststroke recovery. Here, we build on our experience as an illustrative example of barriers individuals with stroke face in accessing rehabilitation services and review the literature to summarize challenges to providing effective rehabilitation in low- and middle-income countries. First, we focus on barriers individuals with stroke face in accessing rehabilitation in low- and middle-income countries, including health system barriers, such as lack of national guidelines, low prioritization of rehabilitation services, and inadequate numbers of skilled rehabilitation specialists, as well as patient factors, including limited health literacy, financial constraints, and transportation limitations. Next, we highlight consequences of this lack of rehabilitation access, including higher mortality, poorer functional outcomes, financial burden, caregiver stress, and loss of gross domestic product at a national level. Finally, we review possible strategies that could improve access and quality of rehabilitation services in low- and middle-income countries, including creation of inpatient stroke units, increased training opportunities for rehabilitation specialists, task shifting to available healthcare workers or caregivers, telerehabilitation, and community-based rehabilitation services.


Assuntos
Pessoas com Deficiência , Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Telerreabilitação , Humanos , Países em Desenvolvimento
3.
eNeurologicalSci ; 29: 100427, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36212617

RESUMO

Headache disorders are a common cause of disability globally and lead not only to physical disability but also to financial strain, higher rates of mental health disorders such as depression and anxiety, and reduced economic productivity which negatively impacts gross domestic product (GDP) on a national scale. While data about headache are relatively scarce in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), those available suggest that headache disorders occur on a similar scale in LMICs as they do in high-income countries. In this manuscript, we discuss common clinical, political, economic and social barriers to headache care for people living in LMICs. These barriers, affecting every aspect of headache care, begin with community perceptions and cultural beliefs about headache, include ineffective headache care delivery systems and poor headache care training for healthcare workers, and extend through fewer available diagnostic and management tools to limited therapeutic options for headache. Finally, we review potential solutions to these barriers, including educational interventions for healthcare workers, the introduction of a tiered system for headache care provision, creation of locally contextualized diagnostic and management algorithms, and implementation of a stepped approach to headache treatment.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA