May Measurement Month 2018: an analysis of blood pressure screening campaign results from Poland.

Hypertension remains the most important cardiovascular risk factor in Poland. May Measurement Month is a global initiative organized by the International Society of Hypertension aimed at raising awareness of hypertension and the need for blood pressure (BP) screening and demonstrating the potential of the opportunistic BP measurements. An opportunistic cross-sectional survey of volunteers aged ≥18 was carried out in 146 sites in May 2018. Blood pressure was measured in 6450 subjects (mean age: 41 ± 15 years; 59% females). After multiple imputation, the age and sex standardized systolic and diastolic BP was 126.7/78.4 mmHg in the whole analysed group, 132.8/81.3 mmHg in subjects taking antihypertensive drugs, and 125.7/78.0 mmHg in those not taking any antihypertensive drugs. After multiple imputation, the proportions of subjects with high BP (systolic ≥140 mmHg or diastolic ≥90 mmHg or on treatment for raised BP) were 22.2% in the whole analysed group, 39.2% in subjects taking antihypertensive drugs, and 18.6% those not taking any antihypertensive drugs. Overall, hypertension was present in 32.8% of participants, among them 38.7% were not aware of the disease, 53.1% were taking antihypertensive drugs, and 32.3% had BP controlled to target (<140/90 mmHg). Blood pressure was increasing with increasing body mass index and alcohol intake. Smokers and project participants with diabetes had increased average BP. In conclusion, this project provides additional evidence for a considerable potential for further reduction of cardiovascular risk through improvement in detection and treatment of hypertension in Poland.

Do we know more about hypertension in Poland after the May Measurement Month 2017?-Europe.

Elevated blood pressure (BP) is a worldwide burden, leading to over 10 million deaths yearly. May Measurement Month (MMM) is a global initiative organized by the International Society of Hypertension aimed at raising awareness of hypertension and the need for BP screening. An opportunistic cross-sectional survey of volunteers aged ≥18 was carried out in May 2017. BP measurement, the definition of hypertension and statistical analysis followed the globally approved MMM17 Study Protocol. In Poland 5834 (98.9%, Caucasian) individuals were screened. After multiple imputation, 2601 (35.3%) had hypertension. Of individuals not receiving anti-hypertensive medication, 976 (20.6%) were hypertensive. Of individuals receiving anti-hypertensive medication, 532 (49.1%) had uncontrolled BP. In the crude screened group, 81.4% declared to not receive any anti-hypertensive treatment, while the remaining 18.6% were on such medications. In overweight and obese patients both systolic and diastolic BP were significantly higher than in normal weight and underweight subjects. In addition, BP measured on Sundays was significantly lower than on Mondays. MMM17 was one of the largest recent BP screening campaigns in Poland. We found that over 1/3 of participants were hypertensive. Almost half of the treated subjects had uncontrolled BP. These results suggest that opportunistic screening can identify substantial numbers with raised BP.

Impacts of a Re-designed Care Path for Back Pain Directing Patients to Physiotherapists: A Pre-Post Intervention Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate impact of directing patients with back pain for first visit to a physiotherapist on sick leaves, healthcare utilization, and patient satisfaction. METHODS: Pre-post intervention study of 70,138 patients treated in Poland for back pain: 27,034 before the care pathway redesign and 43,104 after. RESULTS: After the redesign, all per-patient measures (mean ±â€ŠSD) significantly decreased over the 12-month follow-up: sick leaves number from 0.32 ±â€Š0.87 to 0.29 ±â€Š0.86, sick leaves days from 2.78 ±â€Š11.56 to 2.56 ±â€Š11.25, doctors' visits from 2.02 ±â€Š1.70 to 1.51 ±â€Š1.63, diagnostic imaging services from 0.63 ±â€Š0.79 to 0.43 ±â€Š0.71 and rehabilitation services from 7.55 ±â€Š14.90 to 4.70 ±â€Š12.61.The Net Promoter Score was higher for physiotherapist (83), than for orthopedists (59), primary care (74), or neurologists (67). CONCLUSIONS: Involving physiotherapists early in the back pain care may result in benefits for patients and healthcare organizations.

Clinical significance of antiphospholipid protein antibodies. Receiver operating characteristics plot analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the utility of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis in determining the strength of association between various antiphospholipid and anti-protein cofactor antibodies (aPA) and thrombosis, pregnancy morbidity, and thrombocytopenia. METHODS: Clinical and laboratory variables were retrospectively studied in 204 patients: 160 with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 22 with lupus-like syndrome (SLE-LS), and 22 with primary antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Laboratory evaluation included detection of lupus anticoagulant (LAC) and measurement of IgG and IgM anticardiolipin (aCL), antiphosphatidylserine (aPS), antiphosphatidylinositol (aPI), anti-beta 2 glycoprotein I (a beta 2GPI), and antiprothrombin (aPT) antibodies. ROC plot analysis was used to determine the clinical accuracy of aPA tests, and calculate cut-off values which best associate with clinical symptoms typical for APS. RESULTS: The LAC was associated with a history of thrombosis [odds ratio (OR): 3.04; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.5-6.2] and even more strongly with recurrent fetal loss (OR: 8.7; 95%CI: 2.8-26.7). ROC plot analysis revealed that the most accurate test for thrombosis was aCL IgG (ROC-derived cutoff value > 17.2 GPL; OR: 3.69; 95% CI: 1.8-7.4), for recurrent fetal loss, aPI IgG [> 22.1 theoretical units (TU); OR: 6.21; 95%CI: 2.1-18.5], closely followed by aCL IgG and a beta 2GPI IgG, and for thrombocytopenia aPS IgM (> 6.7 TU; OR: 1.9; 95%CI: 1.04-3.4). Among 182 autoimmune patients (SLE + SLE-LS), 6.6% presented clinical symptoms of APS without classic aPA (LAC and/or aCL), but with elevated levels of antibodies against other phospholipids, mainly aPI IgM. CONCLUSION: A laboratory that evaluates APS patients should establish its own threshold values for aPA tests. We suggest that ROC plot analysis is a valuable tool in establishing cutoff values. LAC and aCL determinations seem sufficient for the majority of laboratories. However, in specialized centers other tests should be available to detect those patients with clinical symptoms for APS but who are positive for antiphospholipid antibodies other than aCL and the LAC.