Preoperative CT Scan is not Associated with Shorter Surgical Time or Improved Patient Outcomes for Trimalleolar Ankle Fractures.

Background: Posterior malleolar involvement can drastically affect patient outcomes. Literature has supported the use of preoperative Computed Tomography (CT) to assess posterior malleolar fracture morphology. The purpose of this study is to determine whether preoperative CT is associated with significant improvement in surgical time, postoperative complications, reoperation rates in trimalleolar ankle fractures. Surgeons were also asked to complete survey regarding use of CT scans to gauge utility preoperatively. Methods: Adult patients with trimalleolar ankle fractures who underwent operative fixation between 2018-2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Primary outcomes included surgical time, postoperative complications, and reoperations. Secondary outcome was presence of posterior malleolar fixation. 15 surgeons who performed ankle ORIF were surveyed to gain information regarding why or why not preoperative CT scan was obtained. Results: 288 patients with trimalleolar ankle fractures were included, 94 had preoperative CT scans (32.6%). No significant differences found in patient age, gender, BMI, smoking status between the groups that did and did not have preoperative CT scan. No significant differences were observed in AO/OTA classification between groups. Average surgical time was significantly higher in group that received a preoperative CT (114 without CT vs. 145 with CT, p<0.05). Complications (10.3% no CT vs 7.4% with CT, p=0.55) and reoperations (6.7% without CT vs. 7.4% with CT, p=0.16) not significantly different between groups. No significant difference was observed in rate of posterior malleolus fixation between groups (43.8% without CT vs 39.4% with CT; p=0.52). Of surveyed surgeons, 87% reported they don't routinely obtain preoperative CT scan for trimalleolar ankle fractures. Most common reasons for preoperative scans were deciding on approach/positioning, assessing for impaction, determining the size of the posterior malleolus. Conclusion: Although preoperative CT scans are obtained in one third of patients with operative trimalleolar ankle fractures, we did not find an improvement in surgical time, complications, and reoperation. Level of Evidence: III.

Does Transparency of Ankle Implant Costs Influence Surgeon Behavior?

Background: Ankle fractures are a common injury treated by orthopaedic surgeons. Unstable, displaced ankle fractures are often fixed with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) using different implant constructs at various cost. No study to date has looked at transparency in ankle implant costs to surgeon behavior. Our surgeons self-identified that the biggest barrier for lowering implant cost was the lack of cost transparency. This was a surgeon-led-study to evaluate whether increased transparency in implant costs affected surgeon behavior. Methods: Monthly operative logs from December 2021 to September 2022 were reviewed at our level 1 trauma center for operative fixation of ankle fractures. The cost data of each fixation construct was reported to trauma-trained surgeons at the end of each month from March 2022 to June 2022. Average costs of implants were compared before and after education. A linear mixed model was used to explore what factors were associated with changes in costs. Surgeons also participated in a poststudy survey. Results: The implant costs of 110 ankle fracture fixations were reviewed over the period before education (n = 60), during education (n = 30), and after education (n = 20). The mean implant cost difference for unimalleolar fractures was -$204.80 (P = .68), whereas the mean cost difference for bimalleolar fractures was -$9.82 (P = .98). Trimalleolar fractures had a mean cost difference of +$94.47 (P = .84). Linear mixed model demonstrated fracture pattern as the only factor significantly associated with implant costs (P < .01). Post-education surgeon survey revealed that 6 of 7 surgeons felt that monthly updates affected their implant selection. However, only 2 surgeons demonstrated a change in practice with decreased implant costs during the study. Conclusion: The majority of surgeons self-reported being influenced by the implant cost education, but the detected change in implant cost was only observed in less than one-third of surgeons. Our results suggest implant selection and related costs are not influenced by increased cost transparency education alone. Level of Evidence: Level III, case control study.