Pressure distribution and flow characteristics during negative pressure wound therapy.

AIM OF THE STUDY: Negative pressure wound therapy is thought to improve wound healing by altering capillary perfusion. However, despite many theories, the underlying mechanism of action remains controversial. Recent evidence suggests an increased tissue pressure and a temporary decreased microvascular blood flow as the main reasons for the good clinical results [1]. In an attempt to further explain the mechanism of action, we investigated the pressure distribution on the foam interface, and the influence on perfusion in a pre-experimental design. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pressure distribution was measured using a sensor based on a capacitive dielectric elastomer with flexible electrodes. In vitro flow measurements were done with vessel imitations in a block of 300 bloom ballistic gel to simulate soft tissue. RESULTS: A peak pressure of up to 187 mmHg (255 g/cm2) within the foam interface, as well as decreased perfusion, were found using a standard negative pressure wound therapy setup. In conclusion, negative pressure wound therapy applies positive pressure to adjacent tissue and decreases local flow. The amount of suction applied is proportional to the pressure on the foam interface and reduction in flow. CONCLUSION: In line with previous studies investigating the underlying mechanism of action, these findings may contribute to possible alterations in the use of negative pressure wound therapy, e.g. lowering suction pressure in patients with diminished peripheral blood flow.

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy-A Vacuum-Mediated Positive Pressure Wound Therapy and a Closer Look at the Role of the Laser Doppler.

Background: Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is an intensely investigated topic, but its mechanism of action accounts for one of the least understood ones in the area of wound healing. Apart from a misleading nomenclature, by far the most used diagnostic tool to investigate NPWT, the laser Doppler, also has its weaknesses regarding the detection of changes in blood flow and velocity. The aim of the present study is to explain laser Doppler readings within the context of NPWT influence. Methods: The cutaneous microcirculation beneath an NPWT system of 10 healthy volunteers was assessed using two different laser Dopplers (O2C/Rad-97®). This was combined with an in vitro experiment simulating the compressing and displacing forces of NPWT on the arterial and venous system. Results: Using the O2C, a baseline value of 194 and 70 arbitrary units was measured for the flow and relative hemoglobin, respectively. There was an increase in flow to 230 arbitrary units (p = 0.09) when the NPWT device was switched on. No change was seen in the relative hemoglobin (p = 0.77). With the Rad-97®, a baseline of 92.91% and 0.17% was measured for the saturation and perfusion index, respectively. No significant change in saturation was noted during the NPWT treatment phase, but the perfusion index increased to 0.32% (p = 0.04). Applying NPWT compared to the arteriovenous-vessel model resulted in a 28 mm and 10 mm increase in the venous and arterial water column, respectively. Conclusions: We suspect the vacuum-mediated positive pressure of the NPWT results in a differential displacement of the venous and arterial blood column, with stronger displacement of the venous side. This ratio may explain the increased perfusion index of the laser Doppler. Our in vitro setup supports this finding as compressive forces on the bottom of two water columns within a manometer with different resistances results in unequal displacement.