RESUMO
AIM: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), a respiratory complication associated with neonatal prematurity, presents opportunities for pharmacological intervention due to its contributing risk factors. Despite diuretics' controversial usage in BPD treatment and varying institutional practices, this review aims to consolidate evidence from clinical trials regarding diuretic use in BPD. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines, searching EMBASE, Medline, Web of Science and CINAHL databases (PROSPERO 2022: CRD42022328292). Covidence facilitated screening and data extraction, followed by analysis and formatting in Microsoft Excel. RESULTS: Among 430 screened records, 13 were included for analysis. Three studies assessed spironolactone and chlorothiazide combinations, two studied spironolactone and hydrochlorothiazide, while eight examined furosemide. All studies evaluated drug effects on dynamic pulmonary compliance and pulmonary resistance, serving as comparative measures in our review. CONCLUSION: Diuretics' effectiveness in treating bronchopulmonary dysplasia remains uncertain. The limited number of identified randomised controlled trials (RCTs) hampers high-level evidence-based conclusions when applying the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO) approach. Conducting large prospective studies of good quality could provide more definitive insights, but the rarity of outcomes and eligible patients poses challenges. Further research, primarily focusing on RCTs assessing diuretics' safety and efficacy in this population, is warranted.
Assuntos
Displasia Broncopulmonar , Diuréticos , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Displasia Broncopulmonar/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Diuréticos/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hypernatraemia arises commonly in acute general medical admissions. Affected patients have a guarded prognosis with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Age-related physiology and physical/cognitive barriers to accessing water predispose older patients to developing hypernatraemia. This study sought to perform a descriptive retrospective review of hypernatraemic patients admitted under acute general medicine teams. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study of a sample of acute medical in-patients with serum[sodium]>145 mmol/L was conducted. Patients were exclusively older(>69 years) and admitted from Nursing homes (NH)(41%) and non-NH pathways(59%). A comparison of management of NH /non-NH patients including clinical presentation, comorbidities, laboratory values, [sodium] monitoring, intravenous fluid regimes and patient outcomes was performed. RESULTS: In total, 102 consecutive patients (males, n=69(67.6%)) were included. Dementia and reduced mobility were more common in NH residents and admission serum [Sodium] higher (148 vs 142 mmol/L/p=0.003). Monitoring was inadequate: no routine bloods within the first 12h in >80% of patients in both groups. No patient had calculated free water deficit documented. More NH patients received correct fluid management (60% vs 33%/p%0.015). Incorrect fluid regimes occurred in both groups (38% vs 58%/p=0.070). Length of stay in discharged patients was lower in NH, (8(4-20) vs 20.5(9.8-49.3 days)/p=0.003). Time to death for NH residents was shorter (9(5.5-11.5) vs 16 (10.25-23.5) days/p=0.011). CONCLUSION: This study highlights suboptimal management of hypernatraemia. Implementation of hypernatraemia guidelines for general medical older inpatients are clearly required with mechanisms to confirm adherence. Health care workers require further education on diagnostic challenges of dehydration in older people and the importance of maintaining adequate hydration.