End-of-life and bereavement support to families in cancer care: a cross-sectional survey with bereaved family members.

BACKGROUND: Losing a close other to cancer is an incisive experience that occurs after a long course of illness and intense family caregiving. Despite an evident need for family engagement and support and guidance on this, patients and family members may not receive the attention and support they need when a family unit is experiencing a disruption by death. A clear understanding of the quality of care that is currently provided and its ability to address family needs is necessary to improve end-of-life and bereavement support to families affected by cancer. The purpose of this study is to investigate the quality of support of end-of-life and bereavement care to families, their (un)met needs, grief experiences, and self-perceived health outcomes. METHODS: A multi-center, cross-sectional observational survey study with family members (n = 35) whose close other died of cancer in a health institution or their own home in German-speaking Switzerland. RESULTS: Bereaved family members were mostly satisfied with end-of-life care. Information on the grief process and services, and acknowledgment of their grief was experienced as helpful. Most coped with their grief drawing on family resources and exhibited resilience, but they reported unmet needs in relation to family togetherness and caregiving. CONCLUSION: This study with a small number of family members indicates that support provided to families across settings and illness trajectories is perceived as helpful, with specific needs related to family support. The findings suggest that improvements should focus on ensuring care that addresses the family as a unit and enables togetherness, mutual reflection, meaningful relationships, preparedness for death, resilience, and benefit-finding. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: https://osf.io/j4kfh .

Exploring Implementation Processes of a Multicomponent Family Support Intervention in Intensive Care Units (FICUS) Study: A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation.

AIM: To investigate the experience with and progress of the implementation of a Family Support Intervention (FSI) into adult intensive care units (ICUs) as part of the cluster-randomised FICUS trial. DESIGN: A mixed-methods process evaluation using a multiple case study approach guided by the normalisation process theory. METHODS: This study took place between June 2022 and July 2023 in eight Swiss ICUs randomised to the intervention arm. A tailored implementation strategy was used to introduce the multicomponent FSI, consisting of a new family nursing role and a family care pathway, into interprofessional ICU teams. Participants were 40 ICU key clinical partners. Qualitative data were collected twice, early (3-6 months) and mid-implementation (9-12 months), using small group interviews. A questionnaire with psychometric measures (Acceptability of Intervention Measure, Feasibility of Intervention Measure, Intervention Appropriateness Measure, Normalisation Measure Development Questionnaire) was administered at mid-implementation. RITA pragmatic rapid thematic analysis and descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data. Qualitative and quantitative results were then compared across ICUs (cases). FINDINGS: Findings indicated the desired progress of the FSI integration overall and across cases, with high acceptability and appropriateness ratings but only moderate to high feasibility scores. Study-related barriers were noted in all ICUs (i.e., FSI delivery as part of a clinical trial). Implementation barriers included family nurses' limited capacity and clinician's attitudes towards the FSI. Leadership support and interprofessional collaboration were identified as facilitators. Case-based, integrated findings yielded two implementation pathways, namely early and protracted adopters. CONCLUSION: Implementation barriers were related to the feasibility of FSI delivery within the study context that required a high degree of standardisation and protocol adherence. Implementation progress was shaped by an interprofessional culture of family care, sufficient staff and time resources, and leadership support. The study's findings will inform future implementation of complex health interventions in ICUs. REPORTING METHOD: Good reporting of a Mixed-Methods Study (GRAMMS). PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Within the FICUS trial, a patient and family advisory board with a patient expert, three family members and a patient with own lived experience of critical care collaborate with the research team.

Adoption of evidence-based end-of-life and bereavement support to families in cancer care: A contextual analysis study with health professionals.

AIMS: To investigate the level of adoption of evidence-based family engagement and support during end-of-life cancer care and subsequent bereavement and its contextual facilitators and barriers from health professionals' perspectives, and to explore differences between professional groups. DESIGN: Contextual analysis using an online cross-sectional survey. METHODS: This study was conducted in four Swiss hospitals and three home care oncology and palliative care services. Non-parametric testing was used to investigate the level of adoption and differences between nurses, physicians, occupational- and physiotherapists and psychosocial professionals (chaplains, onco-psychologists and social workers). The STROBE checklist for cross-sectional studies was followed. RESULTS: The majority of the 111 participating health professionals were nurses. Adoption was statistically significantly higher during end-of-life care than bereavement, with nurses and physicians reporting higher levels than the other professional groups. Guidance on end-of-life family care was available in about half of the cases, in contrast to a quarter for bereavement care. Self-perceived knowledge, skills and attitudes were moderate to high, with nurses and physicians reporting higher levels than others, except for general skills in working with families. Organisational structures were experienced as rather supportive, with the psychosocial group appraising the organisational context as significantly less conducive to fully implementing end-of-life and bereavement care than others, particularly during the end-of-life phase. CONCLUSION: Evidence-based family engagement and support were better adopted during end-of-life care than bereavement. Overall, nurses and physicians felt better enabled to care for families compared to other professional groups. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: https://osf.io/j4kfh. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: Implementation and quality improvement efforts should focus particularly on the bereavement phase and be tailored to professional groups. IMPACT: The findings show that evidence-based family engagement and support practices during end-of-life were rather well adopted in contrast to subsequent bereavement care, with nurses and physicians better enabled than other professionals to provide care. A better understanding of health professionals' contributions and roles in family care is important to build interprofessional capacity for evidence-based end-of-life and bereavement support. REPORTING METHOD: The STROBE checklist for reports of cross-sectional studies was followed (von Elm et al., 2007).

Translation and Psychometric Validation of the German Version of the Iceland-Family Perceived Support Questionnaire (ICE-FPSQ): A Cross-Sectional Study.

Supporting families experiencing critical illness through family interventions is essential to ease illness burden, enable family management, and reduce their risk for adverse health. Thus far, there is no validated German instrument to measure the perceived support families receive from nurses. We translated the 14-item Iceland-Family Perceived Support Questionnaire (ICE-FPSQ) and tested its psychometric properties with 77 family members of intensive care patients. Compared with the original instrument, the construct validity of the German ICE-FPSQ (FPSQ-G) showed unstable results with a partially divergent structure, most likely caused by the limited sample size. The first two principal components explained 61% of the overall variance and a good internal consistency with a Cronbach's alpha of .92. The FPSQ-G is a promising instrument to measure family members' perceptions of the support they received from nurses in the acute critical care setting but requires further validation.

Setting new priorities for nursing research: The updated Swiss Nursing Research Agenda-a systematic, participative approach.

AIM: To identify current key areas for nursing research in Switzerland, we revised the Swiss Research Agenda for Nursing (SRAN) initially published in 2008. BACKGROUND: By developing a research agenda, nursing researchers internationally prioritize and cluster relevant topics within the research community. The process should be collaborative and systematic to provide credible information for decisionmakers in health care research, policy, and practice. SOURCES OF EVIDENCE: After a participative, systematic, and critical evaluation within and outside of the Swiss Association for Nursing Science, the updated SRAN 2019-2029 defines four research priorities (new models of care, nursing care interventions, work and care environment, and quality of care and patient safety) and four transversal themes (organization of research, research methodologies, research in health care policy and public health perspectives). CONCLUSION: Adding to other national nursing research agendas, the categories are organized in a framework of key research priorities and transversal themes. They relate to the importance of global and local foci of research as well as challenges in health care services and policy systems. The agenda is an important prerequisite for enhancing the influence of nursing research in Switzerland and provides guidance for the next decade. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: The revised agenda ensures that research projects target key knowledge gaps and the discipline's core questions in respective countries. IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH POLICY: Nursing research should inform and influence health policy on all institutional and political levels. Therefore, the integration of public health perspectives in research is one of the most important new aspects of SRAN 2019-2029.

Tailored implementation of the FICUS multicomponent family support intervention in adult intensive care units: findings from a mixed methods contextual analysis.

BACKGROUND: The Family in Intensive Care UnitS (FICUS) trial investigates the clinical effectiveness of a multicomponent, nurse-led interprofessional family support intervention (FSI) and explores its implementation in intensive care units (ICUs). The local context of each ICU strongly influences intervention performance in practice. To promote FSI uptake and to reduce variation in intervention delivery, we aimed to develop tailored implementation strategies. METHODS: A mixed method contextual analysis guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was performed from March to June 2022 on eight ICUs assigned to the intervention group. ICU key clinical partners were asked to complete a questionnaire on CFIR inner setting measures (i.e., organizational culture, resources, learning climate and leadership engagement) and the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC) scale prior to group interviews, which were held to discuss barriers and facilitators to FSI implementation. Descriptive analysis and pragmatic rapid thematic analysis were used. Then, tailored implementation strategies were developed for each ICU. RESULTS: In total, 33 key clinical partners returned the questionnaire and 40 attended eight group interviews. Results showed a supportive environment, with CFIR inner setting and ORIC measures each rated above 3 (scale: 1 low-5 high value), with leadership engagement scoring highest (median 4.00, IQR 0.38). Interview data showed that the ICU teams were highly motivated and committed to implementing the FSI. They reported limited resources, new interprofessional information exchange, and role adoption of nurses as challenging. CONCLUSION: We found that important pre-conditions for FSI implementation, such as leadership support, a supportive team culture, and a good learning climate were present. Some aspects, such as available resources, interprofessional collaboration and family nurses' role adoption were of concern and needed attention. An initial set of implementation strategies were relevant to all ICUs, but some additions and adaptation to local needs were required. Multi-component interventions are challenging to implement within complex systems, such as ICUs. This pragmatic, theory-guided, mixed methods contextual analysis demonstrated high readiness and commitment to FSI implementation in the context of a clinical trial and enabled the specification of a tailored, multifaceted implementation strategy.

Nurse-patient interaction during the Covid-19 pandemic: Creating and maintaining an interactive space for care.

AIMS: To explore nurse-patient interactions during the Covid-19 pandemic from both nurses' and patients' perspectives. DESIGN: Qualitative study using constructive grounded theory. METHODS: A total of 34 patients and 49 nurses from acute and home care settings participated in individual or focus group interviews between December 2020 and May 2021. Data were analysed by a team of researchers using coding, memo-writing, theoretical sampling and constant comparison and integration. RESULTS: We identified the creation and maintenance of an interactive space as the main social process. This interactive space was shaped by the care context and the course of the pandemic. For nurses, four factors were key, namely protecting oneself and others, navigating communication barriers, adapting nursing actions to the evolving situation, and providing emotional care work. Patients experienced attentive caring relationships with nurses and felt that, for the most part, their individual needs had been met despite the pandemic challenges. CONCLUSION: Nurses and patients created an interactive space in which they were able to provide and receive the necessary care. Maintaining the interactive space was often challenging, and required an intentional effort by nurses, particularly in acute care settings. The findings illustrate that nurses ensured the provision of necessary care even during a public health crisis, thereby enabling patient access to good quality care. IMPACT: Nurse-patient relationships are important for effective, person-centred care delivery. Despite the pandemic challenges, nurses managed to uphold their caring imperative and ensure quality care. Findings provide further insights on the importance of nurse-patient interaction in maintaining quality care. They inform models of nursing care delivery and strategies to support quality care during public health crises.

Participatory development and implementation of a dementia care pathway with intervention bundles in acute care during the coronavirus pandemic: A process evaluation study.

AIMS: To explore the implementation of a dementia care pathway in an acute care setting. BACKGROUND: Dementia care in acute settings is often constrained by contextual factors. We developed an evidence-based care pathway with intervention bundles, and implemented it on two trauma units, with the aim to empower staff and improve quality care. DESIGN: Process evaluation using quantitative and qualitative methods. METHODS: Pre-implementation, unit staff completed a survey (n = 72) assessing family and dementia care skills and level of evidence-based dementia care. Post-implementation, champions (n = 7) completed the same survey, with additional questions on acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility, and participated in a focus group interview. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and content analysis guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). REPORTING GUIDELINE: Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research Checklist. RESULTS: Pre-implementation, staff's perceived skills in family and dementia care were moderate overall, with high skills in 'building relationships' and 'sustaining personhood'. Evidence-based interventions were delivered seldom to frequent, with 'individualized care' scoring lowest and 'assessing cognition' scoring highest. Implementation of the care pathway/intervention bundles was overshadowed by the pandemic, and failed due to major organisational- and process-related barriers. Acceptability scored highest and feasibility lowest, with concerns relating to complexity and compatibility of pathways/bundles when introduced into clinical routines. CONCLUSIONS: Our study implies that organisational and process factors are the most influential determinants to the implementation of dementia care in acute settings. Future implementation efforts should draw on the evolving evidence within implementation science and dementia care research to ensure effective integration and improvement process. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Our study provides important learning around improving care for persons with dementia and their families in hospitals. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: A family caregiver was involved in the development of the education and training programme.

Factors influencing critical care nurses' family engagement practices: An international perspective.

BACKGROUND: Family engagement positively impacts patient and family members' experiences of care and health outcomes. While partnering with families denotes best practice in intensive care units (ICUs), its full adoption requires improvement. A better understanding of the factors that influence the implementation of family engagement practices is necessary. AIM: To investigate the factors that enable or hinder adult ICU nurse-family engagement and to explore potential international variations. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive, cross-sectional survey. Nurses from 10 countries completed the 'Questionnaire on Factors that Influence Family Engagement' (QFIFE), including five open-ended questions. We performed descriptive statistics on quantitative data and content analysis for open-ended questions, and then integrated the findings according to influencing factors and geographical patterns. This was part of a larger qualitative study where 65 nurses participated from adult intensive care units. RESULTS: Sixty-one nurses completed the questionnaire, making a response rate of 94%. Overall, patient acuity (Md = 5.0) and nurses' attitudes (Md = 4.6) seemed to be the most influential facilitator, followed by nurse workflow (Md = 4.0) and ICU environment (Md = 3.1) (score 1-6 most influential). The open-ended question data showed a more nuanced picture of the complexity of family engagement in care around these four determinants. Adding a fifth determinant, namely Families are complex structures that respond uniquely to the ICU and patient, revealed that difficult family dynamics, miscommunication and family having difficulty in understanding the situation or health literacy, hindered family engagement. Exploring geographical variations, Africa/Middle East consistently differed from others on three of the four QFIFE subscales, showing lower median levels. CONCLUSIONS: Some determinants are perceived to be more influential than others, becoming barriers or enablers to nurse-family engagement in adult ICU. Research that investigates contextual determinants and which compares implementation and improvement initiatives tailored to address family engagement practices barriers and enablers are needed. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Knowledge of this international study expands our understanding of enablers and barriers in family engagement that may inform family engagement practice improvement efforts around the world.

The Implementation of Evidence-Informed Family Nursing Practices: A Scoping Review of Strategies, Contextual Determinants, and Outcomes.

There is a lack of knowledge about the successful implementation of family nursing practices. This scoping review maps current knowledge about the implementation of evidence-informed family nursing practices across settings and populations. A systematic search (CINAHL, PubMed, Medline) identified 24 publications, published between 2010 and 2020. We found nurses' implementation experience to be one of disruption, learning, and moving to new ways of practicing. The implementation resulted in benefits to families and self but was marked by fluctuation and partial integration of evidence-informed family nursing practices into care delivery. Uptake was shaped by various contextual determinants, with barriers mainly at the team and organizational levels. We identified low-quality, tentative evidence that capacity-building strategies coupled with dissemination-educational strategies may enable family nursing practice skills and increase the quality of family care. More rigorous research is needed to build further knowledge about effective implementation. Future implementation endeavors should utilize the evolving knowledge base in family nursing and tailor implementation strategies to contextual barriers.

Comparing perspectives: patients' and health care professionals' views on spiritual concerns and needs in chronic pain care - a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: The spiritual aspect of care is an often neglected resource in pain therapies. The aim of this study is to identify commonalities and differences in chronic pain patients' (CPP) and health care professionals' (HCP) perceptions on the integration of spiritual care into multimodal pain therapy. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative exploratory study with 42 CPPs and 34 HCPs who were interviewed in 12 separate groups in five study centres specialising in chronic pain within German-speaking Switzerland. The interviews were transcribed and subjected to a qualitative content analysis. Findings were generated by juxtaposing and analysing the statements of (a) HCP about HCP, (b) HCP about CPP, (c) CPP about HCP, and (d) CPP about CPP. RESULTS: Views on spiritual concerns and needs in chronic pain care can be described in three distinct dimensions: function (evaluating the need / request to discuss spiritual issues), structure (evaluating when / how to discuss spiritual issues) and context (evaluating why / under which circumstances to discuss spiritual issues). CPPs stress the importance of HCPs recognizing their overall human integrity, including the spiritual dimension, and would like to grant spiritual concerns greater significance in their therapy. HCPs express difficulties in addressing and discussing spiritual concerns and needs with chronic pain patients. Both parties want clarification of the context in which the spiritual dimension could be integrated into treatment. They see a need for greater awareness and training of HCPs in how the spiritual dimension in therapeutic interactions might be addressed. CONCLUSIONS: Although there are similarities in the perspectives of HCPs and CPPs regarding spiritual concerns and needs in chronic pain care, there are relevant differences between the two groups. This might contribute to the neglect of the spiritual dimension in the treatment of chronic pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was part of a larger research project, registered in a primary (clinicaltrial.gov: NCT03679871 ) and local (kofam.ch: SNCTP000003086 ) clinical trial registry.

[Spirituality and health care. The perspective of patients with chronic pain]. / Spiritualität und Behandlung. Die Perspektive von Patienten mit chronischen Schmerzen.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain affects all aspects of human life, which raises spiritual questions that should be included within the framework of multimodal care. OBJECTIVES: We investigated the perspective of patients with chronic pain around spiritual concerns and their potential integration into care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted five focus group interviews and two small group interviews. In total, 42 patients with chronic pain in outpatient or inpatient pain care at the time of the study participated. The interviews were transcribed and thematically analyzed. RESULTS: Three themes emerged: (1) Chronic pain permeates the entity of a person's existence. (2) Spiritual resources are potentially supportive in living with chronic pain. (3) Patients appreciate the opportunity to engage with health care professionals in a dialog that encompasses spiritual concerns. For participants, these concerns have considerable relevance. In many cases participants associated them with religious convictions, but not exclusively. They often related feeling that their pain experience was dismissed. CONCLUSION: Finding strategies for effectively dealing with chronic pain represents a turning point in life. Open discussion with health care professionals that allow for spiritual issues facilitates this process.

Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the instrument: Families' Importance in Nursing Care - Nurses' Attitudes (FINC-NA).

BACKGROUND: The involvement of families in care has long been advocated for acute and critical care settings to improve quality and safety of care. Nurses' attitudes towards families influence the way they involve and partner with families in the planning and delivery of care. Therefore, instruments with proven psychometric properties are necessary to assess the attitudes of nurses towards involving families in nursing care. AIMS: To cross-culturally adapt and psychometrically test the German version of the Families' Importance in Nursing Care - Nurses' Attitudes (FINC-NA) scale with acute and critical care nurses. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out with 316 acute-critical care nurses, who filled in the FINC-NA between December 2016 and May 2018. Exploratory factor analysis was performed to assess structural validity. Internal consistency and homogeneity were determined using Cronbach's alpha. RESULTS: The four-factor structure of the FINC-NA - family as partner in care, family as resource in nursing care, family as their own resource and family as burden - was confirmed in the German version. Due to low primary and multiple loadings, seven items were removed. Moreover, five items loaded on different factors than the original version. Cronbach's alpha of factors ranged between 0.68 and 0.86. CONCLUSION: The cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of the German version of the FINC-NA resulted in a 19-item scale that measure nurses' attitudes towards the importance of families in nursing care. Further testing is needed to refine the structural validity and establish construct validity of the FINC-NA German version.

Translation and Psychometric Validation of the German Version of the Family Nursing Practice Scale (FNPS).

This article describes the cross-cultural adaption and psychometric testing of the Family Nursing Practice Scale (FNPS) German version. The FNPS aims to examine self-reported family nursing practice skills and reciprocity in the nurse-family relationship. Using a cross-sectional design, 583 acute and critical care nurses were invited to complete the FNPS German version. Exploratory factor analysis was used to assess the structural validity. Internal consistency was determined using Cronbach's alpha. A total of 317 nurses returned a completed online questionnaire. Principal axis factor analysis suggests a one-factor solution in which all 10 items are retained, accounting for 36% of the variance. Cronbach's alpha was .84. In contrast to the original version, our findings indicate the unidimensionality of the construct. The FNPS German version appears to be a valid and reliable scale to assess nurses' perception of their family nursing practice proficiency. Further testing is needed to confirm the unidimensionality and to establish test-retest reliability.

Impact of a nurse-led family support intervention on family members' satisfaction with intensive care and psychological wellbeing: A mixed-methods evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Families of critically ill persons face uncertainty and experience distress during and after their close other's stay in an intensive care unit (ICU). Proactive nurse engagement and support is recommended to meet families' needs in the ICU, but little is known about its impact on quality of family care. We introduced a family support intervention that consisted of an interprofessional family support pathway and a new role of an advanced practice family nurse. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to examine the effect of an advanced practice nurse-led family support intervention on family members' satisfaction, wellbeing, and psychological distress. METHODS: We conducted a quasi-experimental before-and-after study with embedded qualitative interviews in a Swiss University Hospital from March 2018 to July 2019 using a questionnaire (Family Satisfaction in the ICU-24 Survey, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Impact of Event Scale-Revised-6) and qualitative interviews (n = 19) after patient discharge. RESULTS: Families in the intervention group (n = 75) showed a trend for increased overall satisfaction (difference of 5.544, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.11 to 11.20), a statistically significant increase in satisfaction with decision-making (7.258, 95% CI: 0.89 to 13.63), and a nonsignificant increase in satisfaction with care (4.178, 95% CI: -1.53 to 9.89). Psychological distress was higher in the intervention group, with depression reaching statistical significance (difference of 1.706, 95% CI: 0.16 to 3.25), which may be explained by longer ICU stays and higher proportion of deaths in the intervention group. Families receiving the intervention reported to be feeling cared for, well informed, and better able to cope. Data integration suggests that early onset, fit to need, and quality of intervention were the most important intervention characteristics impacting family wellbeing. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that family members experience a nurse-led support intervention as beneficial for their wellbeing. It increased their satisfaction, but was unable to demonstrate a favourable impact on psychological distress.

Hospital-based bereavement care provision: A cross-sectional survey with health professionals.

BACKGROUND: An in-hospital death is a profound experience for those left behind and has been associated with family members' psychological morbidity. Supporting bereaved family members is an essential part of end-of-life care and includes attentive presence, information-giving, and emotional and practical support. The actual adoption of hospital-based bereavement care, however, remains little understood. AIM: To investigate hospital-based bereavement care provision and associated barriers. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey using an online questionnaire. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Health professionals (n = 196) from two University-affiliated acute and psychiatric hospitals in Switzerland. RESULTS: The most frequent bereavement services (⩾40%) were viewing the deceased, giving information on available support, and making referrals; the most often named barriers were lack of time and organizational support. Acute care health professionals faced statistically significant more structural barriers (55.1% vs 21.4% lack of time, 47.8% vs 25.9% lack of organizational support) and felt insufficiently trained (38.4% vs 20.7%) compared to mental health professionals (p ⩽ 0.05). Nurses provided more immediate services compared to physicians, such as viewing the deceased (71.3% vs 49.0%) and sending sympathy cards (37.4% vs 16.3%) (p ⩽ 0.01). In contrast, physicians screened more often for complex bereavement disorders (10.2% vs 2.6%) and appraised bereavement care as beyond their role (26.5% vs 7.8%) (p ⩽ 0.05). CONCLUSION: The study indicates that many barriers to bereavement care exist in hospitals. More research is required to better understand enabling and limiting factors to bereavement care provision. A guideline-driven approach to hospital-based bereavement care that defines best practice and required organizational support seems necessary to ensure needs-based bereavement care.

Acute care delivery to persons with cognitive impairment: a mixed method study of health professionals' care provision and associated challenges.

Objectives: Cognitive impairment is common among older persons admitted to hospital and associated with adverse outcomes. Inadequate care has been widely reported, with health professionals tending to be ill-equipped to meet the specific needs of this patient group. This study aimed to investigate health professionals' care provision to persons with cognitive impairment and associated challenges.Design and Setting: A concurrent, cross-sectional mixed method study was conducted at two university-affiliated hospitals.Participants: A total of 339 health professionals participated in the study.Measurements: An online survey (n = 312) determined the extent to which health professionals perceived their care provision to be person-centered and evidence-based (POPAC-R), and experience distress in looking after this patient group (NPI-D). Four focus group interviews (n = 27) explored health professionals' experience of care provision.Results: More than half of the health professionals reported to act always or very frequently in person-centered and evidence-based ways, and two third experienced challenging behaviors as moderately to very distressing. Health professionals working in acute geriatric wards demonstrated statistically significant higher levels of person-centered and evidence-based care provision, and lower distress. Their caring practices pertained to building a relationship, addressing specific needs, involving family members, and working collaboratively.Conclusions: Findings suggest that geriatric models of care delivery support staff in meeting the needs of persons with cognitive impairment. Health professionals require an acute care culture that values relational, collaborative and coordinated care as essential to patient safety and quality of care, and supports the consistent implementation of evidence-based practices for this patient group.

Implementing Family Systems Care Through an Educational Intervention With Nurses and Midwives in Obstetrics and Gynecological Care: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation.

This mixed-methods study examined Family Systems Care (FSC) implementation through a 1-day educational session combined with 4 months of guided application of FSC knowledge and skills in obstetrics and gynecology settings. Nurses and midwives' (n = 47) attitudes toward families and their practice skills with families were assessed before the educational intervention began (Time 0), after the completion of the 1-day educational session (Time 1), and after 4 months of the FSC guided implementation phase that included coaching and mentoring (Time 2). Four focus groups with the nurses and midwives explored their FSC implementation experiences. Participants reported an initial drive to implement FSC, which faltered over time. A perceived fit to the needs of families in obstetrics and gynecology, a supportive context, and facilitated learning on the units promoted FSC uptake. Participants understood FSC as: (a) involving family members in care, a practice they felt confident about; (b) assessing families' situations, needs, concerns, which were practices that were new and stressful; and (c) offering family nursing interventions, which they felt insufficiently prepared for. Practice skills in FSC increased after the 1-day educational session but decreased to baseline after the FSC guided implementation phase. Attitudes of the nurses and midwives toward the families did not change. Following the education and guided implementation, participants' ability to work with families in a relational, systemic way could not be fully established or sustained.

Adaption, benefit and quality of care associated with primary nursing in an acute inpatient setting: A cross-sectional descriptive study.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate the adoption of primary nursing and to determine the quality of primary nurse-led care in an acute inpatient setting. DESIGN: Descriptive cross-sectional study. METHODS: Participants included inpatients (N = 369) and nurses (N = 381). To assess adoption of primary nursing, patient records were analysed and an online survey of nurses was conducted from May-June 2017. To measure quality of nursing care, a structured questionnaire was administered to inpatients. RESULTS: Patients reported high quality of individualized, responsive and proficient care, but lower levels of coordinated care. Most nurses agreed that primary nursing is beneficial for person-centred caring. However, only two-thirds found that it was practiced on their unit and only half of care planning activities were attributable to primary nurses. CONCLUSION: While perceived as beneficial, adoption of primary nursing in clinical practice remains partial. Hence, primary nursing may not be enough to ensure continuity and coordination of acute care.

Relocation experiences with unplanned admission to a nursing home: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: In many countries, people over 85 years of age are relocated involuntarily or unplanned to a nursing home. In Switzerland, 43% of elderly over 85 years are admitted to nursing homes after hospital discharge. This percentage is higher than in the USA with 32.5% or in Germany with only 19%. Despite those more frequent Swiss admissions, no research has been conducted exploring how unplanned admissions to nursing homes affect the adaptation. Therefore, the aim of this study was to gain an in-depth understanding into unplanned admissions to nursing homes and to explore its impact on adaptation. METHODS: The study used a qualitative interview design based on Meleis' transition model. Secondary data analysis was guided by Mayring's qualitative content analysis. Face-to-face interviews with elderly over 77 years (n = 31) were conducted from a convenience sample in Switzerland between January and March 2013. RESULTS: The following four patterns of adaptation emerged from the analysis: "being cut-off," "being restricted," "being cared for," and "moving on." The patterns evaluate the relocation into nursing homes and provide an opportunity to appraise the stages of adaption. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents a model of analysis to evaluate patterns of adaptation following an unplanned admission to a nursing home after hospital discharge.