Performing Quality Control on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Liver Fat/Iron Quantification Studies: A Critical Requirement.

OBJECTIVE: Nonalcoholic fatty liver and iron overload can lead to cirrhosis requiring early detection. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging utilizing chemical shift-encoded sequences and multi-Time of Echo single-voxel spectroscopy (SVS) are frequently used for assessment. The purpose of this study was to assess various quality factors of technical acceptability and any deficiencies in technologist performance in these fat/iron MR quantification studies. METHODS: Institutional review board waived retrospective quality improvement review of 87 fat/iron MR studies performed over a 6-month period was evaluated. Technical acceptability/unacceptability for chemical shift-encoded sequences (q-Dixon and IDEAL-IQ) included data handling errors (missing maps), liver field coverage, fat/water swap, motion, or other artifacts. Similarly, data handling (missing table/spectroscopy), curve-fit, fat- and water-peak separation, and water-peak sharpness were evaluated for SVS technical acceptability. RESULTS: Data handling errors were found in 11% (10/87) of studies with missing maps or entire sequence (SVS or q-Dixon). Twenty-seven percent (23/86) of the q-Dixon/IDEAL-IQ were technically unacceptable (incomplete liver-field [39%], other artifacts [35%], significant/severe motion [18%], global fat/water swap [4%], and multiple reasons [4%]). Twenty-eight percent (21/75) of SVS sequences were unacceptable (water-peak broadness [67%], poor curve-fit [19%] overlapping fat and water peaks [5%], and multiple reasons [9%]). CONCLUSIONS: A high rate of preventable errors in fat/iron MR quantification studies indicates the need for routine quality control and evaluation of technologist performance and technical deficiencies that may exist within a radiology practice. Potential solutions such as instituting a checklist for technologists during each acquisition procedure and routine auditing may be required.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Atypical Imaging Features: Review of the Morphologic Hepatocellular Carcinoma Subtypes With Radiology-Pathology Correlation.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fastest growing cause of cancer death in the United States with the incidence rate more than doubling in 20 years. HCC is unique since a noninvasive diagnosis can be achieved with imaging alone when specific clinical criteria and imaging characteristics are met, obviating the need for tissue sampling. However, HCC is a highly heterogeneous neoplasm. Atypical HCC subtypes vary significantly in their morphology, which can be attributed to specific histologic and molecular features, and can cause deviations from the classic imaging characteristics. The different morphologic subtypes of HCC frequently present a diagnostic challenge for radiologists and pathologists since their imaging and pathologic features can overlap with those of non-HCC malignancies. Identifying an atypical subtype can have important clinical implications. Liver transplant, albeit a scarce and limited resource, is the optimal treatment for conventional HCC, potentially curing both the tumor and the underlying pre-malignant condition. Some HCC subtypes as well as mimickers are associated with unacceptably high recurrence and poor outcome after transplant, and there remains limited data on the role and prognosis of liver transplantation for treatment of rare HCC subtypes. Other subtypes tend to recur later than classic HCC, potentially requiring a different follow-up scheme. This review will discuss the appearance of different HCC subtypes in relation to their histopathologic features. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

Web-based Conferencing: Tips, Tricks, and Scenario-based Best Practices for Clinicians During a Pandemic Crisis.

This article will familiarize the reader with useful tools and trouble-shooting tips for web-based conferencing. Radiology-based scenarios for web conferencing are also provided.

Gadobenate Dimeglumine Administration and Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis: Is There a Real Risk in Patients with Impaired Renal Function?

PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) in patients with renal disease who received gadobenate dimeglumine at a single medical center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was an institutional review board-approved HIPAA-compliant retrospective study with waiver of informed consent. Patients either underwent dialysis or not, had an abnormal estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and underwent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and/or MR angiography with gabobenate dimeglumine in 2010. Dialysis status, eGFR, time to transplantation, waiting list status, contrast material volume at index imaging, and additional imaging examinations between 2007 and 2014 were recorded. Clinical notes with and without integument examinations, pathologic records, and additional patient communication were evaluated for development of NSF through September 2014. Dates of latest documented integument examination and latest interaction were recorded. Mean, standard deviation, and median values were obtained, along with incidence percentage of NSF. RESULTS: Of 401 patients (172 women, 229 men; mean age, 50 years), 75.5% were dialysis dependent (n = 303) and 24.4% (n = 98) were not undergoing dialysis, with a mean eGFR ± standard deviation of 17 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) ± 5.6 (range, 6-41 mL/min per 1.73 m(2); median, 16.3 mL/min per 1.73 m(2)). Mean and median contrast material volume at index imaging were 24 mL ± 5.7 (range, 9-45 mL). Additional contrast material volume administered was 23 mL ± 12.9 (range, 6-64 mL; median, 20 mL; n = 66). One hundred twenty-six patients (31%) received a transplant; mean time to transplantation was 1.72 years ± 1.25 (range, 0-4.46 years; median, 1.4 years). No patients received diagnoses of NSF. Mean follow-up was 2.35 years ± 1.61 (range, 0.00-4.61 years; median, 2.75 years) with documented integument examination and 3.08 years ± 1.36 (range, 0.16-4.66 years; median, 3.66 years) with direct patient communication. CONCLUSION: No patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis, hemodialysis, or nondialysis who experienced renal failure developed NSF after administration of gadobenate dimeglumine after more than 2 years' mean follow-up. Gadobenate dimeglumine may be safe in this population.

Radiology Department Preparedness for the Management of Severe Acute Iodinated Contrast Reactions: Do We Need to Change Our Approach?

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify opportunities for reducing epinephrine administration errors after a sentinel event entailing an overdose of i.v. epinephrine occurred in a radiology department. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A root cause analysis was performed that included review and analysis of current system protocols, a medication audit, and access to treatment algorithms. A proctored three-question multiple-choice test was administered to radiology attending physicians, fellows, residents, and nurses to gauge baseline knowledge of epinephrine use. Chi-square analysis was performed. RESULTS: Twelve of 13 radiology department central pharmacy automation system locations lacked epinephrine ampules. As a result, personnel had to access i.v. epinephrine stocked on hospital code carts designed for use during cardiac arrest. This led to errors related to appropriate dosing. Test participants included 46 attending physicians, 23 fellows, 28 residents, and 25 nurses (n = 122). Almost all (99%) correctly identified epinephrine as the medication to administer in this situation. Approximately one half (52%) correctly identified the dose of intramuscular epinephrine, but only 29% knew the dose and rate of administration of i.v. epinephrine (p < 0.001). Attending physicians were more likely to administer i.v. epinephrine correctly than were the other groups (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Stocking and routine auditing of medication availability are essential. The use of epinephrine intended for cardiac arrest stocked on code carts should be avoided during contrast reactions. It would be optimal if first-line responders to contrast reactions included attending physicians, but this may not always be the case at academic institutions.

Understanding the role of radiologists in complex treatment decisions for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary malignant tumor of the liver and represents a significant global health burden. Management of HCC can be challenging due to multiple factors, including variable expectations for treatment outcomes. Several treatment options are available, each with specific eligibility and ineligibility criteria, and are provided by a multidisciplinary team of specialists. Radiologists should be aware of the types of treatment options available, as well as the criteria guiding the development of individualized treatment plans. This awareness enables radiologists to contribute effectively to patient-centered multidisciplinary tumor boards for HCC and play a central role in reassessing care plans when the treatment response is deemed inadequate. This comprehensive review aims to equip radiologists with an overview of HCC staging systems, treatment options, and eligibility criteria. The review also discusses the significance of imaging in HCC diagnosis, treatment planning, and monitoring treatment response. Furthermore, we highlight the crucial branch points in the treatment decision-making process that depend on radiological interpretation.

Learning From Experience: "Minimizing Patient Delays in Radiology: Optimizing On-Time Starts for CT Procedures".

PURPOSE: To identify and analyze factors resulting in consistently delayed start times of the first outpatient procedure scheduled at 8:30 AM and to establish a standardized process to increase on time starts from 11% to greater than 50% within 20 weeks. METHODS: Team of key stakeholders were assembled and goals for quality improvement project were established. Current state analysis performed via retrospective data warehouse collection and prospective monitoring of patient arrival and throughput. On time starts defined as patient arrival into computed tomography suite within 15 minutes of scheduled time. Root cause analysis and tests of change were generated during team meetings to address factors contributing to delays. Implementation phase of new processes and tests of change occurred over 20 weeks and continuous feedback was obtained. Number of on time starts and turnaround time (TAT) was monitored and collected throughout implementation phase and post implementation (control phase) for an additional 8 weeks. RESULTS: Current state process map demonstrated a baseline cycle time of 62-133 minutes from patient check in to start time. Root cause analysis identified multiple factors including environment, people, processes and materials issues. 14 tests of change were developed, including standardization of process map with specific time allotments and role assignments for the procedural team. Mean TAT decreased from 71.5 to 21 minutes during implementation phase. Mean TAT further decreased to 15.9 minutes during control phase. Exams starting within 15 minutes of appointment time improved from 11% to 60% with significant outliers being due to patient late arrival and difficult IV access. Excluding these causes, on time starts improved to 82%. CONCLUSION: Significant strides in improving workflow efficiency and patient waits and delays in the procedural space of radiology departments can be achieved by selecting a well-defined specific goal and utilizing a team approach to quality improvement.

Using qualitative descriptors of chronic liver disease on MRI: A practice prone to error.

PURPOSE: Assess accuracy of qualitative descriptors for chronic liver disease (CLD) in radiology reports compared to histopathological staging. METHODS: Database search for patients with hepatitis B/C (HBV/HCV) CLD, abdominal MRI during 2009-2016, and liver biopsy within 6 months of MRI or prior biopsy showing cirrhosis. Reports reviewed for mention of CLD and associated descriptors. Findings stratified into categories: normal/no mention of CLD; changes of CLD without qualitative descriptor; mild/early; moderate; severe/advanced and cirrhosis. Descriptive ranges categorized to the lesser degree. Percent concordance/discordance of descriptors and Scheuer stage (F0-F4), false positive (FP), false negative (FN) and sensitivity/specificity calculated. RESULTS: 309 patients, median age 54 (24-74). 91% had HCV (282/309), 7% HBV and 2% both HBV/HCV. Biopsy showed 19% without CLD/F0; 8% F1, 15% F2, 15% F3 and 43% F4. 188 MRI reports (61%) stated CLD was present; however, 16 had no fibrosis on histopathology (9% FP). 39% (121/309) did not mention or stated no CLD; however, 78 had CLD on histopathology (64% FN). 59% of FN were early fibrosis (F1 or F2), 27% F3 and 11% F4. Overall sensitivity and specificity was 69% and 73%, respectively. 77% (145/188) of MRI reports used a descriptive qualifier when describing CLD. 10% were concordant with exact histopathology staging. Of discordant reports, 90% identified CLD but under-called severity. CONCLUSION: Abdominal radiologists can detect CLD on MRI but degree of CLD is often under-called compared to histopathology suggesting radiologists should refrain from qualitative descriptors in assessing CLD on MRI and reaffirms the need for quantitative imaging.

Collaborative Learning in Radiology: From Peer Review to Peer Learning and Peer Coaching.

BACKGROUND: A Radiology Research Alliance Task Force was assembled in 2018 to review the literature on peer review and report on best practices for peer learning and peer coaching. FINDINGS: This report provides a historical perspective on peer review and the transition to peer collaborative learning and peer coaching. Most forms of current peer review have fulfilled regulatory requirements but have failed to significantly impact quality improvement or learning opportunities. Peer learning involves joint intellectual efforts by two or more individuals to study best practices and review error collaboratively. Peer coaching is a process in which individuals in a trusted environment work to expand, refine, and build new skills in order to facilitate self-directed learning and professional growth. We discuss the value in creating opportunities for peer learning and peer coaching. CONCLUSION: Peer collaborative learning combined with peer coaching provides opportunities for teams to learn and grow together, benefit from each other's expertise and experience, improve faculty morale, and provide more opportunities for collaborations between faculty.

Abdominal Imaging Surveillance in Adult Patients After Fontan Procedure: Risk of Chronic Liver Disease and Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To assess the prevalence of chronic liver disease (CLD) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in adult patients who had surveillance imaging after Fontan procedure. METHODS: Institutional review board-approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant retrospective study evaluated electronic medical records including radiology reports and clinical notes for adult patients after Fontan procedure between January 1993 and January 2016. Abdominal ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging reports were reviewed for changes of CLD and HCC. Existence of concomitant viral hepatitis was also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 145 patients (male: 78 and female: 67) had surveillance imaging after Fontan procedure. In all, 78% (113/145) had ongoing imaging surveillance (median follow-up 3.05 years, IQR: 0.75-5.3 years); 19% (21/113) had an initial normal study and remained normal throughout follow-up; 19% (21/113) had an initial normal study with subsequent imaging reporting changes of CLD; and 62% (71/113) had existing changes of CLD on initial study. HCC was identified in 5 patients (median 22 years post-Fontan, IQR: 10-29 years), 4 of which had a normal initial study. Only 1 patient with HCC had concomitant viral hepatitis C infection. CONCLUSION: Radiologists should be aware that CLD is exceedingly common in post-Fontan cardiac physiology, and surveillance imaging is warranted given the risk of HCC.

Comparative Effectiveness of Tumor Response Assessment Methods: Standard of Care Versus Computer-Assisted Response Evaluation.

PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness of metastatic tumor response evaluation with computed tomography using computer-assisted versus manual methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this institutional review board-approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant retrospective study, 11 readers from 10 different institutions independently categorized tumor response according to three different therapeutic response criteria by using paired baseline and initial post-therapy computed tomography studies from 20 randomly selected patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who were treated with sunitinib as part of a completed phase III multi-institutional study. Images were evaluated with a manual tumor response evaluation method (standard of care) and with computer-assisted response evaluation (CARE) that included stepwise guidance, interactive error identification and correction methods, automated tumor metric extraction, calculations, response categorization, and data and image archiving. A crossover design, patient randomization, and 2-week washout period were used to reduce recall bias. Comparative effectiveness metrics included error rate and mean patient evaluation time. RESULTS: The standard-of-care method, on average, was associated with one or more errors in 30.5% (6.1 of 20) of patients, whereas CARE had a 0.0% (0.0 of 20) error rate ( P < .001). The most common errors were related to data transfer and arithmetic calculation. In patients with errors, the median number of error types was 1 (range, 1 to 3). Mean patient evaluation time with CARE was twice as fast as the standard-of-care method (6.4 minutes v 13.1 minutes; P < .001). CONCLUSION: CARE reduced errors and time of evaluation, which indicated better overall effectiveness than manual tumor response evaluation methods that are the current standard of care.

Reassessing medicare trends in diagnostic CT colonography after achieving CPT code category I status.

PURPOSE: Compare national trends in utilization and coverage of diagnostic (non-screening) computed tomography colonography (CTC) in the Medicare population before and after achieving Current Procedural Terminology(®) (CPT) Category I code status in 2010. METHODS: Claims by provider type and location for diagnostic CTC were identified between 2005 and 2013 using Medicare Physician Supplier Procedure Summary Master Files. Frequencies of billed and denied services were used to calculate denial rates for CTC and abdominal computed tomography (CT). PubMed search for articles with "CT colonography" in abstract or title during 1997-2013 was performed. Publications were recorded yearly and matched to CTC denial rates. RESULTS: Annual Medicare claims for diagnostic CTC increased 212% during 2005-2009 in Category III status and increased 27.4% during 2009-2013 after implementation of Category I codes. Claims for abdominal CT rose 13.4% over the same overall period. Denial rates decreased from 70% to 32.8% between 2005 and 2009, and fluctuated between 24.7 and 30.6% thereafter. Denial rates for abdominal CT remained constant (4.1%-4.6%). From 2005 to 2013, services grew most in the private office (1678-7293) and hospital outpatient (1644-6449) settings with radiologists performing 93.3% of CTC. 1037 CTC publications were identified which increased 3567% between 1997 (3) and 2008 (107), plateaued until 2010 (114) and declined thereafter (75 in 2013). CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic CTC grew dramatically from 2005 to 2009, but slowed thereafter; even after achieving CPT Category I code status in 2010. Medicare denial rates declined during early years but later stabilized which paralleled a slowing in new peer-reviewed research. CTC continues to be performed predominately by radiologists in the outpatient setting.

Beyond complications: Comparison of procedural differences and diagnostic success between nurse practitioners and radiologists performing image-guided renal biopsies.

PURPOSE: Radiology-trained nurse practitioners (NPs) may perform image-guided medical renal biopsies with computed tomography (CT). This study evaluates the procedural differences and diagnostic success between biopsies performed by NPs compared to radiologists. DATA SOURCES: A retrospective study was performed on patients who underwent nontargeted, CT-guided renal biopsy between 2009 and 2014. Provider type (NP or radiologist), number of core specimens obtained, sedation medication dose, CT dose index (CTDI), and diagnostic success were recorded. Categorical and continuous variables were analyzed using χ2 and Student's two-tailed t-test, respectively, comparing NPs with radiologists. CONCLUSIONS: A total of 386 patients were included; radiologists performed 215 biopsies and NPs performed 171 biopsies. There was no significant difference in diagnostic success, amount of tissue harvested (number of cores), radiation dose, or sedation dosage between NPs and radiologists performing CT-guided renal biopsies. Only 4% were nondiagnostic (n = 7, radiologists; n = 9, NPs; p = .325). Overall mean number of cores obtained was 3.7, mean CTDI was 176.5 mGy, mean fentanyl dose was 86.3 µg, and mean midazolam was dose 1.54 mg without a statistically significant difference between provider types. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: NPs perform image-guided medical renal biopsies in a similar fashion to radiologists with respect to diagnostic success, amount of tissue harvested, total radiation dose exposure, and administration of sedation.

Assessment of Added Value of Noncontrast to Contrast-Enhanced Abdominal Computed Tomography Scan for Characterization of Hypervascular Liver Metastases.

Assess the added value of nonenhanced computed tomography (NECT) to contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) of the abdomen for characterization of hypervascular liver metastases and incidental findings. Institutional review board approved, Health Insurance Probability and Accountability Act compliant, retrospective study of patients with melanoma, neuroendocrine tumor, or thyroid cancer. First available triphasic abdomen CT after initial diagnosis was reviewed by 3 radiologists. The 3 most suspicious lesions were characterized on the CECT as benign or malignant and then recharacterized after reviewing the NECT with CECT. Incidental renal and adrenal lesions were characterized similarly. Diagnostic performance of CECT vs its combination with NECT was assessed. Statistical significance level was set at P < 0.05. A total of 81 patients were included (mean age = 55 years; 52% male; 64% with liver lesions; 27% and 11% with incidental renal and adrenal lesions, respectively). Percentage area under the curve and 95% CI of CECT vs combination with NECT for characterization of liver metastases was 98(94-100) vs 99(96-100) for reviewer 1 (P = 0.35), 93(86-100) vs 94(87-100) for reviewer 2 (P = 0.23), and 96(90-100) vs 99(97-100) for reviewer 3 (P = 0.32). Mean difference in area under the curve and 95% CI between 2 protocols for characterization of liver, renal, and adrenal lesions were -0.007(-0.05 to 0.04) (P = 0.63), -0.09(-0.25 to 0.07) (P = 0.22), and -0.01(-0.05 to 0.02) (P = 0.27), respectively. After addition of NECT, confidence level for lesion characterization increased 4%-15% for liver metastases, 18%-59% and 33%-67% for renal and adrenal lesions, respectively. In conclusion, while addition of NECT to CECT improved radiologist' confidence, there was no statistically significant change in characterization of hypervascular liver metastases or incidental renal and adrenal lesions.