Survival impact of sequential chemotherapy following pembrolizumab for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Pembrolizumab alone or combined with chemotherapy is the standard of care for first-line treatment of patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) with positive programmed death-ligand 1 combined positive scores. However, data on second-line chemotherapy following pembrolizumab are scarce. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective study was conducted to determine the efficacies of pembrolizumab and pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatments and the efficacy of second-line chemotherapy for patients with R/M HNSCC who were refractory or intolerant to first-line treatment. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were treated with pembrolizumab, and 29 received second-line therapy, with 27 opting for cetuximab-containing regimens. The median progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and PFS on next-line therapy for first-line treatment were 4.7 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1-8.7), 22.1 (95% CI, 12.6-not reached), and 15.6 months (95% CI, 9.7-not reached) in the pembrolizumab group and 5.4 (95% CI, 3.3-6.8), 15.8 (95% CI, 8.6-not reached), and 13.7 months (95% CI, 8.1-not reached) in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group, respectively. The overall response rate and median PFS for second-line treatment were 48.3% (95% CI, 30.4-67.0) and 6.1 months (95% CI, 2.30-8.84). The median OS for patients who received second-line treatment was 18.4 months, which was superior to the median OS of 6.0 months for patients who received the best supportive care (log-rank p = 0.10). CONCLUSION: This study indicates that cetuximab-containing second-line chemotherapy can improve outcomes in R/M HNSCC, even after first-line therapy failure or intolerance.

Mutational spectrum of TP53 gene correlates with nivolumab treatment efficacy in advanced gastric cancer (TP53MUT study).

BACKGROUND: Although nivolumab has a high efficacy, reliable biomarkers are needed to predict the efficacy. We evaluated the nivolumab efficacy according to the TP53 mutation in advanced gastric cancer patients enrolled in the GI-SCREEN project. METHODS: Sequence data of tumour specimens and clinicopathological information of 913 patients with advanced gastric cancer who were enrolled between April 2015 and March 2017 were obtained from the GI-SCREEN database. The follow-up information of 266 patients treated with nivolumab was also provided. RESULTS: Among 266 patients treated with nivolumab, the objective response rate (ORR) of TP53 wild type (wt) patients (24.6%) was higher than that of TP53 mutant patients (14.8%). Among TP53 mutant patients, the ORR of the frameshift type tended to be higher than the transition and transversion type (23.1%, 13.6%, and 13.0%, respectively). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was statistically longer in TP53 wt patients than in mutant patients (3.3 vs 2.1 months, HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.9). Among TP53 mutant patients, PFS was statistically longer in the frameshift type than in the transversion type. CONCLUSION: Nivolumab showed better efficacy in TP53 wt patients than in mutant patients. Among TP53 mutant patients, the frameshift type may have efficacy from nivolumab treatment.

Bevacizumab, Irinotecan, and Biweekly Trifluridine/Tipiracil for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: MODURATE, a Phase Ib Study.

BACKGROUND: In this phase Ib study MODURATE, we optimized the dosing schedule and tested the efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil, irinotecan, and bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin treatment failure. METHODS: We included a dose escalation (3 + 3 design) and an expansion cohort. Patients were administered trifluridine/tipiracil (25-35 mg/m2 twice daily, days 1-5), irinotecan (150-180 mg/m2, day 1), and bevacizumab (5 mg/kg, day 1) every 2 weeks. The recommended phase II dose (RP2D) in the dose escalation cohort was administered to at least 15 patients in both cohorts combined. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were enrolled. Five dose-limiting toxicities were observed. RP2D was defined as trifluridine/tipiracil 35 mg/m2, irinotecan 150 mg/m2, and bevacizumab 5 mg/kg. Of 16 patients who received RP2D, 86% (14/16) experienced grade ≥3 neutropenia without febrile neutropenia. Dose reduction, delay, and discontinuation occurred in 94%, 94%, and 6% of patients, respectively. Three patients (19%) showed partial response and 5 had stable disease for >4 months, with a median progression-free and overall survival of 7.1 and 21.7 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Biweekly trifluridine/tipiracil, irinotecan, and bevacizumab administration may have moderate antitumor activity with high risk of severe myelotoxicity in previously treated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer [UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000019828) and Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs041180028)].

Nivolumab versus irinotecan as third- or later-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: a multi-center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of nivolumab (NIVO) and irinotecan (IRI) and to identify clinical factors that facilitate treatment selection. METHODS: Patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) who underwent NIVO or IRI treatment between November 2016 and June 2018 at three institutions were retrospectively reviewed. The inclusion criteria were histologically confirmed gastric/gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma pretreated with fluoropyrimidines and taxanes, no previous NIVO or IRI treatment, and adequate organ function. Main outcome measures were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. Interaction between treatment groups and clinical factors regarding OS were tested using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for relevant variables. RESULTS: Both NIVO (n = 71) and IRI (n = 61) groups had similar baseline characteristics, except for sex distribution. NIVO and IRI groups had ORR of 20% and 6%, median PFS of 1.6 and 1.8 months, and median OS of 6.4 and 6.4 months, respectively. Interaction analysis did not reveal any significant interaction between NIVO and IRI related to OS for various factors. NIVO group tended to have fewer ≥ grade 3 adverse events than IRI group, especially neutropenia (3% vs. 28%) and febrile neutropenia (1% vs. 8%). In the NIVO group, one patient developed pneumonitis, and four patients developed skin reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Although no remarkable differences in efficacy were found between IRI and NIVO for AGC, NIVO had a better safety profile compared to IRI. We found no clinical markers that can assist treatment decisions.

Clinical outcomes of patients diagnosed with cancer of unknown primary or malignancy of undefined primary origin who were referred to a regional cancer center.

BACKGROUND: A regional cancer hospital has been identified to be crucial in the management of malignancies of undefined primary origin (MUO) and cancer of unknown primary (CUP). This hospital primarily consists of oncologists with expertise in CUP, pathologists, and interventional radiologists. Early consultation or referral of MUO and CUP to a cancer hospital is deemed important. METHODS: This study retrospectively collected and analyzed the clinical, pathological, and outcome data of all patients (n = 407) referred to the Aichi Cancer Center Hospital (ACCH) in Japan over an 8-year period. RESULTS: In total, 30% of patients were referred for a second opinion. Among 285 patients, 13% had non-neoplastic disease or confirmed primary site and 76% had confirmed CUP (cCUP), with 29% of cCUP being identified as favorable risk. In 155 patients with unfavorable-risk CUP, 73% had primary sites predicted by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and distribution of metastatic sites, whereas 66% of them received site-specific therapies based on the predicted primary sites. The median overall survival (OS) was found to be poor in patients with MUO (1 month) and provisional CUP (6 months). In addition, the median OS of 206 patients with cCUP treated at the ACCH was 16 months (favorable risk, 27 months; unfavorable risk, 12 months). No significant difference was noted in OS between patients with non-predictable and predictable primary-sites (13 vs 12 months, p = 0.411). CONCLUSION: The outcome of patients with unfavorable-risk CUP remains to be poor. Site-specific therapy based on IHC is not recommended for all patients with unfavorable-risk CUP.

[Discrepancy in Gastric Cancer Chemotherapy between the Asia and West].

There are still remarkable discrepancies in chemotherapy for gastric cancer between the Asia and West. Frequency, pathophysiology, treatment details, and outcomes of gastric cancer vary greatly depending on racial and regional differences. For example, in Japan, endoscopic mucosal resection/dissection is widely used for the diagnosis of early gastric cancer. Surgical outcomes are better in Japan than in the West, and the degree of lymph node dissection tends to be lower in the West. It is important to note that there are differences in the various backgrounds surrounding gastric cancer in the geographical regions. This paper describes the current status and future prospects of chemotherapy strategies in the field of gastric cancer chemotherapy, where new agents have been introduced successively in recent years, in Asia and the West, including background differences such as frequency and pathological conditions.

The impact of combined PD-L1 positive score on clinical response to nivolumab in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Nivolumab is recommended for patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (aESCC) refractory or intolerant to fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-based chemotherapy regardless of the tumor proportion score (TPS). However, the role of combined positive score (CPS) in predicting nivolumab efficacy remains unclear. We aimed to study whether TPS or CPS is a more suitable biomarker for predicting nivolumab efficacy in these patients. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from patients with aESCC treated with fluoropyrimidines and platinum and subsequently received nivolumab monotherapy between January 1, 2014 and September 15, 2020. Next, we evaluated the efficiencies of TPS and CPS in predicting the clinical response to nivolumab using PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx assay. RESULTS: This study included 50 patients (CPS groups: ≥ 10/1-10/ < 1, n = 24/18/8, respectively; TPS groups, ≥ 10%/1%-10%/ < 1%, n = 17/8/25, respectively). The median progression-free survival was 3.2, 2.5, and 1.5 months in the ≥ 10, 1-10 [hazard ratio (HR) vs. CPS of ≥ 10 group, 1.01; p = 0.98; adjusted HR, 1.33; p = 0.56], and < 1 CPS groups (HR vs. CPS of ≥ 10 group, 3.44; p = 0.006; adjusted HR, 1.67; p = 0.41), respectively. For the patients with CPS of ≥ 10/1-10/ < 1 and TPS of ≥ 10%/1%-10%/ < 1%, the objective response rate was 30%/25%/0% and 36%/0%/19% and the disease control rate was 60%/50%/12% (p = 0.06) and 65%/40%/38% (p = 0.30), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that a CPS of < 1 is not a strong predictor of efficacy but can predict the absence of response to nivolumab in patients with aESCC.

Epigenetic promoter alterations in GI tumour immune-editing and resistance to immune checkpoint inhibition.

OBJECTIVES: Epigenomic alterations in cancer interact with the immune microenvironment to dictate tumour evolution and therapeutic response. We aimed to study the regulation of the tumour immune microenvironment through epigenetic alternate promoter use in gastric cancer and to expand our findings to other gastrointestinal tumours. DESIGN: Alternate promoter burden (APB) was quantified using a novel bioinformatic algorithm (proActiv) to infer promoter activity from short-read RNA sequencing and samples categorised into APBhigh, APBint and APBlow. Single-cell RNA sequencing was performed to analyse the intratumour immune microenvironment. A humanised mouse cancer in vivo model was used to explore dynamic temporal interactions between tumour kinetics, alternate promoter usage and the human immune system. Multiple cohorts of gastrointestinal tumours treated with immunotherapy were assessed for correlation between APB and treatment outcomes. RESULTS: APBhigh gastric cancer tumours expressed decreased levels of T-cell cytolytic activity and exhibited signatures of immune depletion. Single-cell RNAsequencing analysis confirmed distinct immunological populations and lower T-cell proportions in APBhigh tumours. Functional in vivo studies using 'humanised mice' harbouring an active human immune system revealed distinct temporal relationships between APB and tumour growth, with APBhigh tumours having almost no human T-cell infiltration. Analysis of immunotherapy-treated patients with GI cancer confirmed resistance of APBhigh tumours to immune checkpoint inhibition. APBhigh gastric cancer exhibited significantly poorer progression-free survival compared with APBlow (median 55 days vs 121 days, HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.93, p=0.032). CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate an association between alternate promoter use and the tumour microenvironment, leading to immune evasion and immunotherapy resistance.

Cholangitis with Sphingobacterium multivorum and Acinetobacter junii bacteremia in a patient with gastric cancer: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Sphingobacterium is an aerobic, glucose non-fermenting, Gram-negative rod bacterium that has been isolated from soil, plants, food, and water sources, including in hospitals. Reports of systemic infections caused by Sphingobacterium multivorum (S. multivorum) are rare, and their clinical and microbiological characteristics remain unclear. Moreover, conventional microbiological methods have limited ability to identify S. multivorum. We report the first case of obstructive cholangitis with bacteremia caused by S. multivorum in a patient with gastric cancer. CASE REPORT: A 68-year-old woman with advanced gastric cancer, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia was admitted with obstructive jaundice, and subsequently developed obstructive cholangitis during the hospital stay. S. multivorum were identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry and 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing of the patient's blood samples. Based on the antibiotic susceptibility results of the isolates, cefepime was administered intravenously for 14 days, with good therapeutic outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: S. multivorum infection is rare, and its microbiology and pathogenicity in humans is mostly unknown. Therefore, multiple diagnostic approaches should be used to identify S. multivorum, and antimicrobial therapy should be selected based on the in vitro susceptibility. This report provides clinicians with novel information on the clinical manifestations and diagnostic methods for an accurate diagnosis of S. multivorum.

REVIVE study: a prospective observational study in chemotherapy after nivolumab therapy for advanced gastric cancer.

Nivolumab is an increasingly used standard care treatment for heavily pretreated patients with advanced gastric cancer, with increasing clinical use in Japan. Data from retrospective studies on various tumors have shown the objective response rate to cytotoxic chemotherapy potentially improves after an exposure to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Based on these data, we conducted the multicenter observational REVIVE study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cytotoxic chemotherapy in nivolumab-refractory or nivolumab-intolerant patients with advanced gastric cancer. Patients who are refractory or intolerant to nivolumab and scheduled to receive irinotecan monotherapy, oxaliplatin combination treatment or oral trifluridine/tipiracil hydrochloride therapy will be included. The primary end point is overall survival of nivolumab-pretreated patients with advanced gastric cancer after the cytotoxic chemotherapy. Clinical trial registration: UMIN000032182 (umin.ac.jp).

An observational study on nutrition status in gastric cancer patients receiving ramucirumab plus taxane: BALAST study.

Limited data are available regarding the efficacy of nutrition support in advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients receiving a standard second-line combination chemotherapy. The BALAST study is conducted as a prospective, multicenter observational study to evaluate the efficacy of nutrition support for patients with AGC treated with ramucirumab plus taxane as second-line treatment. As part of the routine care, patients who are malnourished or at risk of malnutrition will receive nutrition support from dietitians. We will enroll a total of 26 patients to estimate weight control rate at 12 weeks as primary end point. This study will generate valuable data reinforcing the role of nutrition support therapy for AGC patients receiving second-line chemotherapy.

Lay abstract Various guidelines recommend that nutrition support therapy should be considered if cancer patients are malnourished or at risk of malnutrition. Several studies have revealed that body weight loss, which is an important factor in determining the nutrition status, may predict survival during second-line standard chemotherapy with ramucirumab and a taxane for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients. However, limited data are available regarding the efficacy of nutrition support in AGC patients receiving ramucirumab and a taxane. This study is conducted as a prospective, multicenter observational study to evaluate the efficacy of nutrition support for Japanese patients with AGC treated with ramucirumab and a taxane. This study will generate valuable data reinforcing the role of nutrition support therapy for AGC patients in second-line treatment. Clinical trial registration: UMIN000037867.

A triplet combination of FOLFOXIRI plus cetuximab as first-line treatment in RAS wild-type, metastatic colorectal cancer: a dose-escalation phase Ib study.

BACKGROUND: The triplet-agent (5-fluorouracil/leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan; FOLFOXIRI) combined with an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody as a first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has shown promising results in Western trials. This phase Ib study assessed the safety of FOLFOXIRI plus cetuximab in Japanese patients with RAS wild-type mCRC. METHODS: Patients with previously untreated RAS wild-type mCRC received weekly cetuximab (400 mg/m2 at week 1 and subsequently 250 mg/m2) plus FOLFOXIRI that consisted of irinotecan (100, 120, and 150 mg/m2 defined as dose levels 0, 1, and 2), followed by oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 and l-leucovorin 200 mg/m2 and then 5-fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2. The dose level of irinotecan was escalated starting at dose level 1 in a 3 + 3 manner. The primary endpoint was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended phase-2 dose (RP2D). Secondary endpoints included safety, overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Nine patients were enrolled. The MTD was not reached at dose level 2 and the RP2D was 150 mg/m2 irinotecan. The most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (44%), fatigue (11%), paronychia (22%), and acneiform rash (11%). No dose-limiting toxicities occurred in any of the enrolled patients. No treatment-related death was observed. The ORR was 89% (95% confidence interval 52-100%). CONCLUSION: The safety profile of the combination of cetuximab and FOLFOXIRI was acceptable and promising anti-tumor activity was demonstrated, supporting further study in patients with RAS wild-type mCRC.

Phase I Study of Alternate-Day Administration of S-1, Oral Leucovorin, and Bevacizumab for Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

LESSONS LEARNED: The recommended S-1 dose was 40 mg/m2 , twice daily on Monday, Wednesday, Friday, and Sunday, with oral leucovorin and bevacizumab. Compared with daily administration, the alternate-day administration of S-1 with oral leucovorin may reduce mucositis with promising antitumor activity in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. BACKGROUND: Daily S-1 plus oral leucovorin administration in a 1-week-on/1-week-off schedule has promising efficacy in gastrointestinal cancer but is associated with high risk of mucositis and diarrhea. METHODS: This phase Ib, 3+3 dose-escalation trial included patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receiving S-1 (40 mg/m2 ) and leucovorin (25 mg) orally twice daily (level 1, even-numbered days; level 2, Monday, Wednesday, Friday, and Sunday) and intravenous bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) every 2 weeks. Enrollment continued at the recommended dose level in the expansion cohort. RESULTS: We enrolled 21 patients (3 and 18 patients in levels 1 and 2, respectively). Briefly, 12 and 9 patients had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 and 1, respectively, and 8 and 13 patients had 1-3 and ≥4 prior treatment lines, respectively. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was not observed, and level 2 was confirmed as the recommended dose. Common grade 3-4 adverse events at level 2 were anemia (22%), anorexia (6%), and diarrhea (6%). In the entire cohort, response rate, disease control rate, and median progression-free survival were 10%, 71%, and 4.2 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: The recommended S-1 dose was 40 mg/m2 , twice daily on Monday, Wednesday, Friday, and Sunday, with 25 mg oral leucovorin twice daily and 5 mg/kg bevacizumab every 2 weeks. Compared with the daily administration, alternate-day administration of S-1 plus leucovorin may reduce mucositis with promising antitumor activity in refractory mCRC.

A Prospective Trial Evaluating the Safety of a Shortened Infusion of Ramucirumab in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer.

LESSONS LEARNED: A shortened infusion of ramucirumab (from 60 to 20 minutes) was safe and feasible without infusion-related reactions.Twenty-minute infusions of ramucirumab can be an option for patients with no infusion-related reactions during the first 60-minute treatment. BACKGROUND: Ramucirumab is usually administered over 60 minutes, during which it is unlikely to cause infusion-related reactions (IRRs). This prospective study evaluated the safety of a shortened infusion of ramucirumab. METHODS: Patients who received their first dose of ramucirumab in a 60-minute infusion without developing IRRs were eligible and received their second ramucirumab dose for 20 minutes. The primary study endpoint was incidence of IRR during the first short-term infusion, and the secondary endpoints were incidence of IRR at any time and adverse events other than IRR. RESULTS: Of the 40 patients enrolled (median age, 68.5 years), 20 (55%) were male, 27 (67.5%) had stage IV gastric cancer, 25 (62.5%) received ramucirumab in combination with taxane-based chemotherapy, and 24 (60%) received only a single administration of ramucirumab prior to their enrollment. Notably, no IRR was observed during the first short-term infusion (IRR rate, 0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0%-0.72%). Among the 149 short-term infusions performed, there were no instances of IRRs or unexpected adverse events related to the treatment (Table 1). CONCLUSION: For patients without development of IRRs upon the first ramucirumab administration, shortening infusion time (from 60 to 20 minutes) is safe and feasible.

Salvage chemotherapy with the combination of oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil in advanced gastric cancer refractory or intolerant to fluoropyrimidines, platinum, taxanes, and irinotecan.

BACKGROUND: Although nivolumab showed survival benefit in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) progressing after standard chemotherapy, there is a lack of data regarding oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in this clinical setting. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin with l-leucovorin and bolus/continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil as salvage treatment in patients with AGC refractory or intolerant to fluoropyrimidines, cisplatin, taxanes, and irinotecan. RESULTS: Overall, 50 patients treated between December 2009 and December 2013 were included in this analysis. The overall response rate (ORR) was 21.2% among 33 patients with measurable disease. The median time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) were 2.4 and 4.2 months. In multivariate analysis, factors associated with OS included poor performance status [hazard ratio (HR) 3.20; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.55-6.60], shorter time from the start of first-line therapy (HR 2.20; 95% CI 1.18-4.12), and higher neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio value (HR 4.87; 95% CI 2.32-10.25). In patients (n = 35) with at most one risk factor, the ORR, median TTF, and OS were 26.1%, 3.6, and 6.7 months, respectively. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (30%), anemia (22%), febrile neutropenia (8%), and peripheral neuropathy (8%). Initial and subsequent dose reduction was performed in 18 (36%) and 23 (46%) patients. There was one treatment-related death caused by septic infection. CONCLUSIONS: Salvage chemotherapy with the combination of oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil has a potential activity and is tolerable for heavily treated AGC with appropriate dose modification and patient selection.

Efficacy of Second-Line Bevacizumab-Containing Chemotherapy for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer following First-Line Treatment with an Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Antibody.

OBJECTIVE: Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies and bevacizumab are commonly used, sequentially, as palliative chemotherapies for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. However, little is known about the efficacy of second-line treatments containing bevacizumab after first-line treatment with an anti-EGFR antibody. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 128 patients who received second-line bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy and evaluated the effect of prior use of anti-EGFR antibody on the efficacy of the second-line treatment. RESULTS: As first-line treatments, 35 of these patients received only cytotoxic chemotherapy (cohort A), 58 received bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy (cohort B), and 35 received anti-EGFR-containing chemotherapy (cohort C). The median progression-free survival (PFS) with the second-line bevacizumab-containing therapy was 8.3 months in cohort C, 6.9 months in cohort A (hazard ratio [HR], 1.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-2.51), and 5.6 months in cohort B (HR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.18-3.22). Multivariate analysis showed that PFS in cohort C was the same as that in cohort A, but better than that in cohort B. The overall response rate in cohort C (25.7%) was also similar to that in cohort A (20.0%), but better than that in cohort B (10.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Prior use of anti-EGFR antibody did not adversely affect the efficacy of subsequent bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy.

Serum CA19-9 Response Is an Early Predictive Marker of Efficacy of Regorafenib in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

PURPOSE: Regorafenib improves survival in chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. However, regorafenib induces various adverse events (AEs) that often impair patients' quality of life. Identification of early predictive markers of the efficacy is warranted. METHODS: We retrospectively examined 146 consecutive mCRC patients who received regorafenib. Clinical parameters, including patient background, AEs, and changes in biochemical parameters until day 28, were evaluated to identify efficacy predictors. RESULTS: Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.1 months, and median overall survival was 6.6 months. Major AEs in all cycles were hand-foot skin reaction, hypertension, and increased aspartate transaminase. We extracted 121 patients for prognostic analysis. In univariate analysis, decreased carcinoembryonic antigen (HR: 0.570, p = 0.012) and decreased carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) (HR: 0.422, p = 0.0012) were identified as prognostic markers of PFS. Patients in whom serum CA19-9 decreased after regorafenib exhibited significantly better PFS (median 3.7 vs. 2.0 months, p = 0.004) than those in whom serum CA19-9 did not decrease. Multivariate analysis revealed early CA19-9 decrease as an independent predictive factor (HR: 0.415, 95% CI: 0.210-0.818, p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: Early response of CA19-9 may predict the efficacy of regorafenib. Additional studies are needed for external validation.

Immunotherapy for gastroenterological cancer.

After the paradigm shift happened in malignant melanoma, the immune checkpoint inhibi- tors have been developed all over the world in the many types of cancer not the exception of the gastroenterological cancer. The authors showed a comprehensive review of the literature and update on the use of anti-CTLA-4, anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-LI therapy in the area of gastro- enterological cancer. The clinical evidence of the immune checkpoint inhibitors in gastroen- terological cancer remains limited, although the light come in this cancer type and immuno- therapy could play an important role in the year to come.

A short interval between bevacizumab and anti-epithelial growth factor receptor therapy interferes with efficacy of subsequent anti-EGFR therapy for refractory colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Both bevacizumab and anti-epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) agents (e.g. cetuximab and panitumumab) are sequentially used for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Their co-administration as a first-line treatment does not improve outcome, indicating that there are negative interactions between these agents. A long-term pharmacokinetics study demonstrated serum persistence of bevacizumab following termination of bevacizumab 6 months after the last administration. This prompted us to investigate the impact of short intervals between bevacizumab and anti-EGFR antibody on the efficacy of subsequent anti-EGFR therapy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with KRAS exon 2 wild-type mCRC who underwent anti-EGFR therapy after the failure of fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin and irinotecan. We divided patients into two groups (Group A: the interval between bevacizumab and anti-EGFR agent< 6 months; Group B: the interval >6 months). RESULTS: Of the 114 included patients (median age, 63 years), 78 (68%) were male. Most patients (88%) were treated with cetuximab plus irinotecan. Groups A and B consisted of 74 and 40 patients, respectively. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics. Group B patients had significantly longer progression-free survival (4.2 vs. 6.6 months; HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.43-0.98; P = 0.038) and longer overall survival (11.6 vs. 14.3 months; HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.41-0.98, P = 0.039). The response rate was 24.3% in Group A and 47.5% in Group B (P = 0.012). CONCLUSION: A short interval between bevacizumab and anti-EGFR antibody treatment may interfere with the efficacy of subsequent anti-EGFR therapy.

Comparison between surgery and definitive chemoradiotherapy for patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score analysis.

PURPOSE: Our intent was to compare survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus chemoradiotherapy (CRT) among patients with potentially resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS: Information about 406 consecutive esophageal cancer patients with resectable disease who underwent surgery with neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisting of cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil or who underwent definitive CRT was reviewed. The survival outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and propensity score-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. Relevant variables were included in the propensity score model. RESULTS: Overall, 206 patients planned to undergo surgery (S group) and 200 patients planned to undergo CRT (CRT group). In the unadjusted situation, progression-free survival and overall survival did not differ statistically between the groups. After matching, both survival outcomes were better in the S group compared to the CRT group. Subanalysis showed both survival outcomes were better in the S group for patients with only stage III disease. However, survival outcomes for stages I, II, and IV were not significantly different between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with resectable disease, survival outcomes in the S group were favored over those of the CRT group. These results indicate that different therapeutic strategies should be used for stage III esophageal cancer than for other stages.