The Role of Pancreatitis Risk Genes in Endocrine Insufficiency Development After Acute Pancreatitis in Children.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is increasingly recognized as a risk factor for diabetes mellitus (DM). We aimed to study the association of pancreatitis genes with pancreatic endocrine insufficiency (pre-DM and DM) development post-AP in children. METHODS: This was an observational cohort study that enrolled subjects ≤21 years with their first episode of AP and followed them for 12 months for the development of pancreatic endocrine insufficiency. Pancreatitis risk genes (CASR, CEL, CFTR, CLDN2, CPA1, CTRC, PRSS1, SBDS, SPINK1, and UBR1) were sequenced. A genetic risk score was derived from all genes with univariable P < .15. RESULTS: A total 120 subjects with AP were genotyped. Sixty-three subjects (52.5%) had at least 1 reportable variant identified. For modeling the development of pancreatic endocrine insufficiency at 1 year, 6 were excluded (2 with DM at baseline, 3 with total pancreatectomy, and 1 death). From this group of 114, 95 remained normoglycemic and 19 (17%) developed endocrine insufficiency (4 DM, 15 pre-DM). Severe AP (58% vs 20%; P = .001) and at least 1 gene affected (79% vs 47%; P = .01) were enriched among the endocrine-insufficient group. Those with versus without endocrine insufficiency were similar in age, sex, race, ethnicity, body mass index, and AP recurrence. A model for pre-DM/DM development included AP severity (odds ratio, 5.17 [1.66-16.15]; P = .005) and genetic risk score (odds ratio, 4.89 [1.83-13.08]; P = .002) and had an area under the curve of 0.74. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of children with AP, pancreatitis risk genes and AP disease severity were associated with pre-DM or DM development post-AP.

Prevalence of Gastrointestinal Symptoms and Impact on Quality of Life at 1-Year Follow-Up of Initial Attack of Acute Pancreatitis.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to describe the prevalence of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms following the first time occurrence of acute pancreatitis (AP) and to measure the impact of the episode on patient health-related quality of life (HRQOL) from the perspectives of patients and parents. METHODS: Questionnaires regarding GI symptoms 1 year following the initial occurrence of AP were obtained from 74 pediatric patients. Thirty of these patients completed both the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) 4.0 Generic Core Scales and the PedsQL Gastrointestinal Symptoms and Worry Scales. These data were compared to legacy-matched healthy controls. RESULTS: Children with a standalone occurrence of AP experienced a similar rate of GI symptoms compared to those who progressed to acute recurrent pancreatitis (ARP) within 1 year. PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales scores were significantly lower for children self-report and parent proxy-report for patients that experienced AP compared to healthy controls. AP patients also demonstrated significantly more symptoms than healthy controls in the Gastrointestinal Symptoms and Worry Scales across multiple domains. CONCLUSIONS: Gastrointestinal symptoms affect many children who experience a single AP event even without recurrent attacks. The burden of symptoms is not significantly different from those who develop ARP. This is a novel study that evaluates patient-reported outcomes in children following an AP attack and demonstrates there is a significant impact on HRQOL in children and family experiences post AP. More data are needed to study the progression of disease and the extended impact of AP following an initial AP attack in pediatric patients.

Ultrasound findings of acute pancreatitis in children.

BACKGROUND: Studies systematically documenting US findings in children with acute pancreatitis are limited. Pancreas duct dilation is described as the most reliable finding of acute pancreatitis but this has not been rigorously examined in children. OBJECTIVE: To systematically document US findings in children with acute pancreatitis and to define interobserver agreement on those findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study we retrospectively reviewed images for all pediatric patients <18 years of age who had been prospectively enrolled in a registry of patients with index admissions for acute pancreatitis between March 2013 and July 2020. Two blinded observers (R1, R2) reviewed the first transabdominal US examination performed within 2 weeks of the pancreatitis attack for each patient. RESULTS: In 141 children, US was performed at a median of 1 day (interquartile range [IQR]: 0, 1) following acute attack. Thirty-three (23%, R1) and 38 (27%, R2) children had no abnormal findings on US. Peripancreatic edema was the most frequent finding documented by both reviewers (63% R1, 54% R2). The pancreatic duct was visible in only 35% of the children and was dilated in only 12% (R1) and 14% (R2). There was substantial to almost-perfect agreement between reviewers on findings of acute pancreatitis (κ=0.62-1), including duct visibility. CONCLUSION: Peripancreatic edema was the most frequently identified finding in children with acute pancreatitis, present in up to 63%, with almost perfect interobserver agreement. Duct dilation, cited in the literature as a reliable finding of acute pancreatitis, was rarely identified in our sample.

Drug induced pancreatitis is the leading known cause of first attack acute pancreatitis in children.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Drug induced acute pancreatitis (DIAP) as one of the acute pancreatitis (AP) risks factors is a poorly understood entity. The aim of the current study was to compare the characteristics and course of DIAP cases in children presenting with a first attack of AP. METHODS: Patients presenting with AP were included in a prospective database. We enrolled 165 AP patients that met criteria for inclusion. DIAP patients were included in that group if they were exposed to a drug known to be associated with AP and the rest were included in the non-drug induced-acute pancreatitis (non-DIAP) group. RESULTS: DIAP was observed in 40/165 (24%) of cases, 24 cases had drug-induced as the sole risk factor, and 16 had DIAP with another risk factor(s). The two groups were similar in intravenous fluid and feeding managements, but ERCP was more commonly performed in the non- DIAP group, 14 (11%), vs 0% in the DIAP group, p = 0.02. Moderately severe [9 (23%) vs 11 (9%)] and severe AP [7 (18%) vs 6 (5%)] were more commonly associated with DIAP than non- DIAP, p = 0.001. DIAP was more commonly associated with ICU stay, 10 (25%), vs 12 (10%), p = 0.01, hospital stay was longer in DIAP median (IQR) of 6 (3.9-11) days vs 3.3 (2-5.7) days in non- DIAP, p = 0.001. The DIAP group had a significantly higher proportion of comorbidities (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: DIAP is a leading risk factor for a first attack of AP in children and is associated with increased morbidity and severity of the pancreatitis course. DIAP warrants further investigation in future studies.

Nutritional parameters following first episode of pediatric acute pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Acute pancreatitis (AP) carries the risk of subsequent nutritional deficiencies. The prevalence of these deficiencies following a single episode of AP in children is unknown. We aimed to determine prevalence of anthropometric and laboratory-based measures of nutritional status in children following their first (index) admission for AP. METHODS: Prospective observational cohort study of patients ≤21 years of age with first episode of confirmed AP. Anthropometric and laboratory values were obtained at time of AP onset and at follow up time points of 3 and 12 months (m) post AP. AP attack was classified as either: mild, moderately severe or severe (which were combined in one group (SAP)). RESULTS: 181 patients met criteria and were followed prospectively with 52% male, a median age of 13.7 years (IQR 9.4-16.0) and median Body Mass Index (BMI) Z-score of 0.6 (IQR -0.5, 1.6). Most patients had mild AP (140, 77%), with 23% meeting criteria for moderate or severe (41/181). 6 (3%) had diabetes mellitus (DM) predating AP and were excluded from further analysis. BMI Z-score remained stable during the follow up period. 13% of patients developed pre-DM or DM at 3m or 12m. Nearly one third of patients had low ferritin at 3m (29%) or 12m (29%). At 12m, 8% of patients had Vitamin A deficiency. 6% of patients had low Vitamin E levels at 3m and 5% at 12m. Over half of patients at both 3m and 12m had 25 OH Vitamin D insufficiency or deficiency (56% and 56%). Prolonged International Normalized Ratio (INR) (>1.3) was seen in 9% of patients at 12m. Very low albumin (<3.5 g/dL) was found in 24% of patients at 3m and 18% at 12m (Table 1). Patients with very low albumin at 3m were younger (median 10.7 vs. 14.2 years, p = 0.04), however sex, BMI Z-score and AP severity were not associated with albumin level. Although BMI Z-score did not differ between the groups, those with SAP had a significant decrease in BMI Z-score from first attack compared to mild AP at 3m (-0.4 vs. 0.0, p = 0.0002, Figure 2). At 3m, Vitamin E deficiency in SAP versus mild AP was found in 20% vs 2% (p = 0.04) and SAP had a lower median hematocrit (35.8 vs. 37.6, p = 0.046). There were no other laboratory significant differences at 3m in mild versus SAP groups. At 12m, those with SAP were more likely to have pre-DM or DM compared to mild AP (31% vs. 7%, p = 0.002). No other significant laboratory differences occurred at 12m. CONCLUSIONS: After the first AP attack patients experience nutritional deficiencies, including ferritin, all fat-soluble vitamins, and low albumin. SAP is associated with a decrease in BMI Z-score, increased prevalence of vitamin E deficiency at 3m, and an increase in pre-diabetes and diabetes at 12m. Serial monitoring of vitamin and mineral values post AP is warranted and further prospective studies are needed.

Acute pancreatitis is associated with gut dysbiosis in children.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric acute pancreatitis (AP) is associated with significant morbidity. Therefore, improved understanding of children who will develop severe AP is critical. Adult studies have reported AP associated gut dysbiosis, but pediatric studies are lacking. AIMS: Assess stool microbial taxonomic and functional profiles of children with first attack of AP compared to those of healthy controls (HC), and between mild and severe AP METHODS: Children under 21 years hospitalized at a tertiary center (n = 30) with first AP attack were recruited including HC (n = 34) from same region. Shotgun metagenomic sequencing was performed on extracted DNA. RESULTS: Demographics were similar between AP and HC. Alpha diversity (-0.68 ± 0.13, p-value < 0.001), and beta-diversity (R2=0.13, p-value < 0.001) differed, in children with AP compared to HC. Species including R.gnavus, V.parvula, E.faecalis, C.innocuum were enriched in AP. MetaCyc pathways involved in amino acid metabolism and fatty acid beta-oxidation were enriched in AP. Beta-diversity (R2=0.06, p-value = 0.02) differed for severe AP compared to mild AP with enrichment in E.faecalis and C.citroniae. CONCLUSIONS: Gut dysbiosis occurs in pediatric AP and is associated with AP severity. A multicenter study confirming these findings could pave way for interventional trials manipulating the gut microbiome to mitigate AP severity.

The Role of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Children.

The use of biologic therapies has changed the treatment landscape for children with inflammatory bowel disease. While the novel biologics have improved clinical outcomes, there remains a significant gap in achieving endoscopic remission, prolonged steroid-free remission, and drug durability. Contributing to this gap is the paucity of real-world pharmacokinetic studies in children and a failure to dose optimize therapy during induction. Emerging data from a pediatric clinical trial and several observational studies have shown that the combination of proactive therapeutic drug monitoring and achievement of early therapeutic concentrations is effective in achieving improved outcomes. The next steps will be to leverage these past studies to develop more innovative clinical trials to properly assess the safety and effectiveness of proactive therapeutic drug monitoring in children.

Temporal Analysis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pancreatitis Co-Occurrence in Children and Adults in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: Pancreatitis in inflammatory bowel disease has been attributed to peripancreatic intestinal disease and/or drug-induced pancreatic toxicity. We used large cohort analyses to define inflammatory bowel disease and pancreatitis temporal co-occurrence with a detailed descriptive analysis to gain greater insight into the pathophysiological relationship between these 2 diseases. METHODS: Truven Health MarketScan private insurance claims from 141,017,841 patients (younger than 65 years) and 7,457,709 patients from 4 academic hospitals were analyzed. We calculated the prevalence of Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis (UC) with acute pancreatitis or chronic pancreatitis (CP) and performed temporal and descriptive analyses. RESULTS: Of 516,724 patients with inflammatory bowel disease, 12,109 individuals (2.3%) had pancreatitis. Acute pancreatitis (AP) was 2-6x more prevalent than CP. In adults, AP occurred equally among Crohn's disease and UC (1.8%-2.2% vs 1.6%-2.1%, respectively), whereas in children, AP was more frequent in UC (2.3%-3.4% vs 1.5%-1.8%, respectively). The highest proportion of pancreatitis (21.7%-44.7%) was at/near the time of inflammatory bowel disease diagnosis. Of them, 22.1%-39.3% were on steroids during pancreatitis. Individuals with CP or recurrent pancreatitis hospitalizations had increased risk of a future inflammatory bowel disease diagnosis (odds ratio = 1.52 or 1.72, respectively). DISCUSSION: Pancreatitis in inflammatory bowel disease may not simply be a drug adverse event but may also involve local and/or systemic processes that negatively affect the pancreas. Our analysis of pancreatitis before, during, and after inflammatory bowel disease diagnosis suggests a bidirectional pathophysiologic relationship between inflammatory bowel disease and pancreatitis, with potentially more complexity than previously appreciated.

Improving Shared Situation Awareness for High-risk Therapies in Hospitalized Children.

BACKGROUND: High-risk therapies (HRTs), including medications and medical devices, are an important driver of preventable harm in children's hospitals. To facilitate shared situation awareness (SA) and thus targeted harm prevention, we aimed to increase the percentage of electronic health record (EHR) alerts with the correct descriptor of an HRT from 11% to 100% on a high-acuity hospital unit over a 6-month period. METHODS: The interdisciplinary team defined an HRT as a medication or device with a significant risk for harm that required heightened awareness. Our aim for interventions was to (1) educate staff on a new HRT algorithm; (2) develop a comprehensive table of HRTs, risks, and mitigation plans; (3) develop bedside signs for patients receiving HRTs; and (4) restructure unit huddles. Qualitative interviews with families, nurses, and medical teams were used to assess shared SA and inform the development and adaptation of interventions. The primary outcome metric was the percentage of EHR alerts for an HRT that contained a correct descriptor of the therapy for use by the care team and institutional safety leaders. RESULTS: The percentage of EHR alerts with a correct HRT descriptor increased from an average of 11% to 96%, with special cause variation noted on a statistical process control chart. Using qualitative interview data, we identified critical awareness gaps, including establishing a shared mental model between nursing staff and the medical team as well as engagement of families at the bedside to monitor for complications. CONCLUSIONS: Explicit, structured processes and huddles can increase HRT SA among the care team, patient, and family.

Unapproved drugs in the United States and the Food and Drug Administration.

Despite more than a century of evolving federal legislation, there remain many unapproved drugs on the United States (US) market. This article reviews the history of drug approval in the US, beginning with the landmark Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906, through to the development of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906 was the first comprehensive federal legislation covering drug regulation. Intervening legislation, such as the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938 and Kefauver-Harris Amendments in 1962, was later instituted. In June 2006, a century after the development of the FDA as an enforcement body, an initiative was undertaken to remove unapproved drugs from the marketplace. The Marketed Unapproved Drugs-Compliance Policy Guide outlines enforcement policies aimed at efficiently and rationally bringing all unapproved and illegally marketed drugs into the approval process, or discontinuing their manufacture, distribution, and sale. The FDA has been actively pursuing control of unapproved drugs in recent years, with an approach concentrating on drug safety to ensure optimal public health and consumer protection.