Prenatal genetic counseling practices regarding recommendations for cancer genetic counseling: A retrospective chart review from two academic institutions.

Prenatal and preconception genetic counselors are trained to take patient pedigrees to evaluate for potential risks for genetic conditions, including hereditary cancer syndromes. However, little research has been published on how often prenatal/preconception genetic counselors provide recommendations for cancer genetic counseling solely based on a family history of cancer. Therefore, this study sought to (a) characterize the types of cancers recognized for a cancer genetic counseling recommendation, (b) analyze appointment indications associated with discussion documentation, and (c) investigate how often National Comprehensive Cancer Center (NCCN) genetic testing criteria for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer syndrome (HBOC) and Lynch syndrome were met and how often a recommendation for cancer genetic counseling was made. A retrospective chart review and pedigree analysis were performed for prenatal/preconception genetic counseling patients with a family history of cancer seen at two academic institutions between August 10, 2019, and December 1, 2019. In the 170 charts included, a recommendation for cancer genetic counseling was documented in 40% of all genetic counseling summaries and in 59.2% of summaries when NCCN genetic testing criteria for HBOC and/or Lynch syndrome was met. Using chi-squared and logistic regression analysis, these data support that individuals were significantly more likely to receive a recommendation when NCCN genetic testing criteria were met (OR = 5.01, p < .001) or when the family history contained two or more types of cancer (OR = 2.24, p = .02). Overall, this study identified the NCCN genetic testing criteria for HBOC and Lynch syndrome for which recommendations for cancer genetic counseling were commonly missed. This characterization suggests that continuing education for prenatal and preconception genetic counselors on updated NCCN guidelines may be helpful for improving rates of cancer genetic counseling referrals, uptake of genetic testing, and cancer screening recommendations.

Reproductive genetic counseling challenges associated with diagnostic exome sequencing in a large academic private reproductive genetic counseling practice.

OBJECTIVE: Diagnostic whole exome sequencing (WES) is rapidly entering clinical genetics, but experience with reproductive genetic counseling aspects is limited. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively review and report on our experience with preconception and prenatal genetic counseling for diagnostic WES. METHOD: We performed a retrospective chart review over 34 months in a large private prenatal genetic counseling practice and analyzed data for referral indications, findings, and results of genetic counseling related to diagnostic WES. RESULTS: Ten of 14 patients counseled about diagnostic WES for ongoing pregnancies pursued the test, resulting in identification of three pathogenic variants (30%). Five of 15 patients seeking counseling about familial WES results in an affected proband pursued prenatal diagnosis, resulting in identification of one affected fetus and five unaffected fetuses. We experienced challenges related to complexity and uncertainty of results, turnaround time, cost and insurance overage, and multidisciplinary fetal care coordination. CONCLUSION: Despite having experienced complexity and identified challenges of the reproductive genetic counseling, availability of diagnostic WES contributed important information that aided in prenatal care planning and decision-making. Future enhanced provider education and larger studies to systematically study the integration of WES in reproductive genetic counseling and prenatal care will be important.