High-bandwidth CMOS-voltage-level electro-optic modulation of 780 nm light in thin-film lithium niobate.

Integrated photonics operating at visible-near-infrared (VNIR) wavelengths offer scalable platforms for advancing optical systems for addressing atomic clocks, sensors, and quantum computers. The complexity of free-space control optics causes limited addressability of atoms and ions, and this remains an impediment on scalability and cost. Networks of Mach-Zehnder interferometers can overcome challenges in addressing atoms by providing high-bandwidth electro-optic control of multiple output beams. Here, we demonstrate a VNIR Mach-Zehnder interferometer on lithium niobate on sapphire with a CMOS voltage-level compatible full-swing voltage of 4.2 V and an electro-optic bandwidth of 2.7 GHz occupying only 0.35 mm2. Our waveguides exhibit 1.6 dB/cm propagation loss and our microring resonators have intrinsic quality factors of 4.4 × 105. This specialized platform for VNIR integrated photonics can open new avenues for addressing large arrays of qubits with high precision and negligible cross-talk.

A comparison of short-term treatment with inhaled fluticasone propionate and zafirlukast for patients with persistent asthma.

PURPOSE: To compare the short-term efficacy and safety of low-dose fluticasone propionate with that of oral zafirlukast therapy for patients previously treated with beta-2-agonists alone, and to evaluate the potential therapeutic benefit of switching from zafirlukast to a low-dose inhaled corticosteroid. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This study consisted of a 4-week randomized, double-blind treatment period followed by a 4-week open-label period. Two hundred ninety-four patients > or =12 years old with asthma previously uncontrolled with beta-2-agonists alone were randomly assigned to treatment with low-dose inhaled fluticasone (88 microg twice daily) or oral zafirlukast (20 mg twice daily). After 4 weeks, all patients discontinued their double-blind therapy and received open-label fluticasone (88 microg twice daily). Outcomes included pulmonary function, asthma symptoms, albuterol use, asthma exacerbations, and adverse events. RESULTS: During the double-blind treatment period, fluticasone patients had significantly greater improvements in morning peak flow (29.3 L/min vs. 18.3 L/min), percentage of symptom-free days (19.8% vs. 11.6%), and daily albuterol use (-1.8 puffs per day vs. -1.1 puffs per day) compared with zafirlukast patients (P < or =0.025, each comparison). During the open-label treatment period, patients switched from zafirlukast to fluticasone experienced additional improvements in morning peak flow (17.2 L/min), evening peak flow (13.6 L/min), and FEV(1) (0.11 liter) and daily albuterol use (-0.9 puffs daily) compared with values obtained at the end of the double-blind treatment period (P < or =0.001, each comparison). CONCLUSION: Low-dose fluticasone was more effective than zafirlukast in improving pulmonary function and symptoms in patients with persistent asthma. In addition, switching patients from zafirlukast to fluticasone further improved clinical outcomes.

Use of ipratropium bromide in asthma. Results of a multi-clinic study.

A multi-center, double-blind, 90-day study compared an ipratropium bromide metered-dose inhaler (40 microgram four times a day) with a metaproterenol metered-dose inhaler (1,500 micrograms four times a day) in 164 patients with asthma; of the 144 patients who completed the study, 71 received ipratropium and 73 received metaproterenol. Our results suggest that both drugs were equally effective bronchodilators. Although the shape of the pulmonary function response curves suggested that ipratropium has different bronchodilator kinetics than metaproterenol (in that it has a slower onset of action and a more prolonged duration), comparison of the areas under the curves for the two drugs showed that there was no statistical difference between ipratropium or metaproterenol. The only significant side effects noted with ipratropium were cough and exacerbation of symptoms; no anticholinergic side effects were noted.

Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray is safe and effective for children with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

INTRODUCTION: Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray, a new topical corticosteroid preparation, is effective when given as 200 micrograms once daily in patients (> 12 years of age) with seasonal allergic rhinitis. STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of fluticasone proprionate aqueous nasal spray in children aged 4 to 11 years with seasonal allergic rhinitis. STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group. PATIENTS: Two hundred fifty children aged 4 to 11 years with moderate-to-severe nasal symptoms, a positive skin test reaction to a late-summer or autumn allergen, a history of seasonal allergic rhinitis, and documentation of an unsatisfactory response to conventional treatment. INTERVENTIONS: Children were randomly assigned to receive fluticasone propionate, either 100 micrograms or 200 micrograms, or placebo, given by intranasal spray once daily in the morning for 14 days. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Severity of nasal symptoms (obstruction, rhinorrhea, itching, and sneezing) was recorded on visual analog scales by investigators at weekly visits and by patients (or adult guardian) daily in the evening. According to investigator and patient ratings, both fluticasone propionate 100 micrograms/d and 200 micrograms/d lowered total nasal symptom scores when compared with placebo. Both dosages of fluticasone propionate were more effective than placebo on the basis of investigator-rated overall clinical evaluation of efficacy at the end of treatment, with significant improvement (as opposed to moderate or mild improvement, no change or worsening) noted in 21% to 29% of the active-treatment groups vs 9% in the placebo group. There were no significant differences between the two fluticasone propionate dosages in any efficacy measurement. Morning plasma cortisol concentrations and frequency of drug-related adverse events were similar in the fluticasone propionate and placebo groups. CONCLUSION: In children as young as 4 years, 100 micrograms of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray given once daily is as effective as 200 micrograms given once daily, the usual adult dose for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Both fluticasone propionate dosages were well tolerated and neither dosage appears to interfere with the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in children.

Inhaled ICI 204,219 blocks antigen-induced bronchoconstriction in subjects with bronchial asthma.

Three inhalation formulations of ICI 204,219 were compared for antagonism of antigen-induced bronchoconstriction in 16 subjects with asthma who demonstrated reproducible hypersensitivity to allergen during screening challenges. Each subject received a single 0.2-mg dose of each formulation and was challenged with ragweed 30 min after administration of ICI 204,219 until the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) decreased by 20 percent or the maximum allergen concentration (100 micrograms/ml) was reached. The majority of subjects tolerated 100 micrograms/ml of allergen without a 20 percent decrease in FEV1. Inhalation formulations of ICI 204,219 successfully inhibited bronchoconstriction in subjects with reproducible sensitivity to ragweed challenges.

A comparison of double-strength beclomethasone dipropionate (84 microg) MDI with beclomethasone dipropionate (42 microg) MDI in the treatment of asthma.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of a double-strength formulation of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP 84) metered-dose inhaler (MDI) with that of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP 42) MDI in the treatment of chronic asthma. DESIGN: A 28-day, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. SETTING: Outpatient. PATIENTS: A total of 423 patients aged 12 to 65 years (mean range, 34 to 36 years) with moderate asthma (FEV1, 50 to 80% of predicted) who required long-term inhaled corticosteroids were enrolled. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive BDP 84, two oral inhalations bid (336 microg/d), BDP 42, four oral inhalations bid (336 microg/d), or placebo. A fourth treatment arm administering BDP 84, eight oral inhalations bid (HD BDP 84; 1,344 microg/d) was also included to determine whether a dose-response relationship could be demonstrated. MEASUREMENTS: Spirometry, clinical observations. RESULTS: The three active treatments were significantly more effective (p < or = 0.01) than placebo at all time points in improving FEV1, the primary efficacy parameter; BDP 42 and BDP 84 were comparable to each other at every time point. Secondary pulmonary function tests (FVC, forced expiratory flow at 25 to 75% of FVC, and peak expiratory flow rate) showed similar results. All three active treatments were well tolerated. A dose response between 336 microg/d and 1,344 microg/d was demonstrated. CONCLUSION: In this well-controlled 28-day study, BDP 42 and BDP 84 were shown to be comparable in efficacy and safety on a microgram-for-microgram basis.

A dose-ranging study of fluticasone propionate administered once daily via multidose powder inhaler to patients with moderate asthma.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: This dose-ranging study evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of inhaled fluticasone propionate administered once daily via a multidose powder inhaler in patients with moderate asthma (FEV(1), 45 to 75% predicted). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this multicenter trial, 330 patients (> or = 12 years old) previously receiving inhaled corticosteroids or beta(2)-agonists alone were randomized in a double-blind manner to receive fluticasone propionate at 100, 200, or 500 microg once daily or matching placebo for 12 weeks. RESULTS: Once-daily treatment with fluticasone propionate resulted in an improvement in efficacy variables, such as FEV(1), morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF), asthma symptom scores, nighttime awakenings, albuterol use, and duration of study participation. A dose-related trend was observed for improvements in morning and evening PEF and albuterol use. Statistical significance for pairwise comparisons was achieved for 200 microg and 500 microg fluticasone propionate vs placebo for all efficacy variables, and for 100 microg fluticasone propionate vs placebo for morning and evening PEF at most or all time points. Drug-related adverse events were few (< or = 5%) and mostly related to the topical effects of inhaled corticosteroids. No dose-response effect or clinically relevant differences were observed in morning plasma cortisol concentrations or after cosyntropin stimulation. CONCLUSION: Once-daily treatment with fluticasone propionate was well tolerated and demonstrated some dose-related trends in improvements in lung function and asthma control in patients with moderate asthma.

Fluticasone alone or in combination with salmeterol vs triamcinolone in asthma.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacies of medium-dose fluticasone propionate (FP), medium-dose triamcinolone acetonide (TAA), and combined low-dose FP plus salmeterol (SL). DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, triple-dummy, multicenter, 12-week clinical trial. SETTING: Allergy/respiratory care clinics. PATIENTS: Six hundred eighty patients with asthma previously uncontrolled with low-dose inhaled corticosteroids. INTERVENTIONS: FP, 220 microg bid; TAA, 600 microg bid; or FP, 88 microg plus SL, 42 microg bid. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Outcome measures included FEV1, peak expiratory flow (PEF), supplemental albuterol use, nighttime awakenings, asthma symptoms, and physician global assessment. Compared with TAA, 600 microg bid, treatment with FP 220, microg bid, significantly increased FEV1, morning and evening PEF, and percent symptom-free days, and significantly reduced rescue albuterol use, number of nighttime awakenings, and overall asthma symptom scores (p < or = 0.035). Improvements with low-dose FP, 88 microg, plus SL, 42 microg bid, were significantly (p < or = 0.004) greater than TAA, 600 microg bid, in all the aforementioned efficacy measures as well as percent of rescue-free days. Combined low-dose FP, 88 microg, plus SL, 42 microg bid, also significantly increased FEV1 and percent of rescue-free days, and significantly reduced albuterol use compared with medium-dose FP, 220 microg bid (p < or = 0.018). At endpoint, both FP, 220 microg bid, and FP, 88 microg, plus SL, 42 microg bid, significantly increased FEV1 by 0.48 L and 0.58 L, respectively, compared with 0.34 L with TAA, 600 microg bid. CONCLUSION: In patients who are symptomatic while taking low-dose inhaled corticosteroids, medium-dose FP (440 microg/d) and combination treatment with low-dose FP (176 microg/d) plus SL (84 microg/d) are both more effective than medium-dose TAA (1200 microg/d) in improving pulmonary function and asthma symptom control.

Fluticasone propionate: an effective alternative treatment for seasonal allergic rhinitis in adults and adolescents.

BACKGROUND: Topical corticosteroids are widely regarded as the reference standard in allergic rhinitis therapy because they are well tolerated and effective against all rhinitis symptoms. We evaluated the efficacy, onset of action, and safety of two dosing regimens of the new corticosteroid fluticasone propionate compared with that of beclomethasone dipropionate in patients with moderate to severe seasonal allergic rhinitis. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized multicenter trial, 110 adolescents and 128 adults were treated for 4 weeks with one of the following regimens: fluticasone aqueous nasal spray 100 micrograms twice daily or 200 micrograms once daily, beclomethasone aqueous nasal spray 168 micrograms twice daily, or placebo. RESULTS: Patient-rated scores for nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, and combined nasal symptoms indicated that the two fluticasone regimens were equally effective and that both were superior to beclomethasone during most of the study (P < or = .05) and to placebo throughout the study (P < or = .01). Both fluticasone regimens also demonstrated significant clinical efficacy by 24 hours after the first dose. Clinician-rated mean total nasal symptoms scores for all three active treatments were superior to placebo at most time points but were not significantly different from each other. All treatments were well tolerated, with similar incidence and type of adverse events in all treatment groups and no apparent effects on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis function. CONCLUSIONS: Fluticasone aqueous nasal spray was effective in relieving nasal symptoms in adolescents and adults with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Fluticasone administered once or twice daily was superior to beclomethasone administered twice daily in relieving nasal obstruction and rhinorrhea and in reducing nasal symptoms more quickly.

Comparison of inhaled salmeterol and oral zafirlukast in asthmatic patients using concomitant inhaled corticosteroids.

CONTEXT: For asthmatic patients who remain symptomatic on inhaled corticosteroids, augmenting the therapy with additional long-term control medication is advocated. Long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonists and leukotriene modifiers are 2 therapeutic alternatives in the long-term controller class. OBJECTIVE: To compare the addition of a long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonist to the addition of an oral leukotriene modifier for asthma therapy in patients who remain symptomatic on inhaled corticosteroids. DESIGN: Double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, multicenter clinical studies. SETTING: 54 outpatient clinical centers. PATIENTS: 429 male and female patients with asthma 12 years of age and older who were symptomatic while taking inhaled corticosteroids. INTERVENTIONS: Salmeterol xinafoate 42 mcg via metered dose inhaler twice daily or oral zafirlukast 20 mg twice daily. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pulmonary function, asthma symptoms, supplemental albuterol use, asthma quality of life scores, and adverse events. RESULTS: Inhaled salmeterol provided significantly greater improvement in pulmonary function as well as significantly greater relief of both daytime and nighttime asthma symptoms compared with oral zafirlukast in patients concurrently treated with inhaled corticosteroids. The use of supplemental albuterol was reduced to a greater extent with salmeterol compared with zafirlukast. Patients treated with salmeterol showed significantly greater improvement in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) scores and were satisfied with how fast, how long, and how well the medication worked compared with patients in the zafirlukast group. Both treatments were well tolerated and demonstrated similar safety profiles. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with moderate to severe persistent asthma not sufficiently controlled with inhaled corticosteroids alone, the combination of inhaled salmeterol and inhaled corticosteroids is superior to the combination of oral zafirlukast and inhaled corticosteroids as stepwise therapy.

Beta 2 agonist therapy: oral versus inhaled delivery.

Although there is a place for administering oral medication, the inhaled route of administration for both bronchodilator and prophylactic purposes has been definitely shown to be the preferred route in numerous studies. The rapid onset of action, equivalent activity, and reduction in systemic effects all should lead the clinician to this form of therapy. Care must be taken to ensure proper utilization of the different types of inhalational medication to optimize their effectiveness.

Anti-leukotriene agents: a new direction in asthma therapy.

A role for the leukotrienes in asthma has been postulated for many years. These mediators induce potent bronchoconstriction, stimulate mucous secretion and decrease mucus transport, increase vascular permeability (thereby promoting edema formation), and induce migration of eosinophils into the lung. Recent studies with both leukotriene receptor antagonists and leukotriene synthesis inhibitors have demonstrated that these new agents can be effective in asthma induced by exercise, aspirin, and allergen challenges. Further, in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma, these drugs improve pulmonary function, decrease symptoms, and reduce the need for "rescue" bronchodilators. Anti-leukotrienes thus represent an important step forward in asthma management.

Efficacy of antileukotriene agents in asthma management.

OBJECTIVE: This article reviews information on the role of three antileukotrienes (anti-LTs), montelukast, zafirlukast, and zileuton, in the management of asthma. After reading this article, readers should have an understanding of the efficacy of anti-LTs in specific patient populations. DATA SOURCES: Relevant and appropriately controlled clinical studies on the efficacy of anti-LTs were used. Only literature in the English language was reviewed. STUDY SELECTION: Material was taken from peer-reviewed journals and published abstracts. RESULTS: The efficacy of anti-LTs has been established in numerous randomized, controlled, multicenter trials involving patients with mild-to-moderate disease. These agents reduce asthma symptoms, beta2-agonist use, and asthma exacerbations, in addition to improving pulmonary function. The anti-LTs are also effective when added to low-dose or high-dose corticosteroid regimens in symptomatic asthma patients. They have proven efficacy in patients with aspirin-sensitive asthma, and they appear able to reduce nasal congestion in asthma patients with concomitant upper airway symptoms. Some anti-LTs have been shown to be effective in pediatric asthma patients. CONCLUSIONS: In reviewing available clinical results as well as real-world experience in managing asthma patients, the Antileukotriene Working Group concludes that anti-LTs may be used in patients with mild persistent asthma as well as in combination with other asthma medications at all levels of disease severity for long-term maintenance of asthma control.

Management of influenza in patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

OBJECTIVE: To review the prevention and treatment of influenza in patients with asthma and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). DATA SOURCES: Computer-assisted MEDLINE searches for article and manual searches of conference proceedings on influenza, influenza vaccination, rimantadine, amantadine, oseltamivir, zanamivir, asthma, and/or COPD. STUDY SELECTION: Published articles and pertinent conference abstracts in the areas mentioned in Data sources were selected. Articles included for review were studies conducted on humans. RESULTS: Annual vaccination against influenza is the currently accepted practice for influenza management in patients with asthma and/or COPD. However, despite the availability and use of vaccination, influenza continues to cause serious morbidity and increased mortality. The management of influenza in at-risk patients with the older antivirals such as amantadine or rimantadine has not been widely accepted because of the rapid emergence of resistant variants, their lack of effect against influenza B, and poor adverse event profile. A new class of influenza antivirals, the neuraminidase inhibitors, has recently become available for the management of influenza. The currently marketed neuraminidase inhibitors are zanamivir and oseltamivir. Clinical studies have shown that these neuraminidase inhibitors are effective for the treatment and chemoprophylaxis of influenza A and B. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccination against influenza remains the gold standard for the prevention of influenza in patients with asthma and/or COPD. The neuraminidase inhibitors zanamivir and oseltamivir are useful adjuncts to influenza vaccines for the management of influenza in these patients who are at high-risk of developing influenza related complications.