RESUMO
Background: A high incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) has been reported in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients in critical care units and those undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). The introduction of dexamethasone (DXM) as treatment for severe COVID-19 has improved mortality, but its effects in other organs remain under study. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between DXM and AKI in COVID-19. Methods: In this prospective observational cohort study, we evaluated the incidence of AKI in critically ill COVID-19 patients undergoing mechanical ventilation, and the association of DXM treatment with the incidence, severity, and outcomes of AKI. The association between DXM treatment and AKI was evaluated by multivariable logistic regression. The association of the combination of DXM treatment and AKI on mortality was evaluated by Cox-regression analysis. Results: We included 552 patients. AKI was diagnosed in 311 (56%), of which 196 (63%) corresponded to severe (stage 2 or 3) AKI, and 46 (14.8%) received kidney replacement therapy. Two hundred and sixty-seven (48%) patients were treated with DXM. This treatment was associated to lower incidence of AKI (Odds Radio 0.34, 95% Confidence intervals [CI] 0.22-0.52, p < 0.001) after adjusting for age, body mass index, laboratory parameters, SOFA score, and vasopressor use. DXM treatment significantly reduced mortality in patients with severe AKI (HR 0.63, 95%CI 0.41-0.96, p = 0.032). Conclusions: The incidence of AKI is high in COVID-19 patients under IMV. DXM treatment is associated with a lower incidence of AKI and a lower mortality in the group with severe AKI.
Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda , COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/complicações , Respiração Artificial , Estudos Prospectivos , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Cuidados Críticos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Injúria Renal Aguda/epidemiologia , Injúria Renal Aguda/etiologia , Injúria Renal Aguda/prevenção & controle , Estado Terminal , Dexametasona , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Sleep disorders occur recurrently in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The relationship between poor sleep quality and IBD activity has been subject to scarce attention. Poor sleep quality could be considered a relevant extraintestinal manifestation and a potential marker of subclinical inflammation, which could increase the severity of inflammation and the risk of relapse, however, we do not have enough information to confirm this hypothesis. Objective: Describe the impact of IBD on the quality of sleep, in patients treated in a referral hospital. METHODS: Observational, analytical, and cross-sectional study. Patients with diagnosis of IBD treated at Centro Médico Nacional "20 de Noviembre" were evaluated. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) was used to measure sleep quality. IBD activity was measured using the Harvey-Bradshaw index for Crohn's disease (CD) and the Mayo scale for Ulcerative Colitis (UC). RESULTS: A total of 51 patients were included, the Pittsburgh Sleep Index Questionnaire (PSQI) was performed, after informed consent was signed. Patients had a mean age of 52. Fifty five percent were female, 65% had UC. Biological therapy was administered to 70.5%. In CD 89% were in remission and 11% in moderate activity. In UC 48.5% were in remission, 45.5% had mild activity and 6% had moderate activity. Eighty percent of the patients did not use hypnotic drugs. Patients with UC in remission had a bad perception of sleep quality in 68%, quite good sleep quality in 18% and very good sleep quality in 12% with a PSQI of 10.5 ± 3.2. In patients with mild activity, the perception of sleep quality was very good in 6%, quite good in 46%, quite bad in 40% and very bad in 6%, with a PSQI of 8 ± 3.7. In patients with moderate activity, 100% had a rather bad perception of sleep quality with a PSQI of 11 ± 1.4. For CD in remission the perception of sleep was quite bad in 43%, quite good in 43%, very bad in 6% and very good in 6% with a PSQI of 9 ± 4.3. In patients with moderate activity 50% had a very bad sleep quality perception and 50% a fairly good sleep quality perception with a PSQI of 14 ± 4.2. CONCLUSION: In this study a statistically significant association was obtained between PSQI and the perception of sleep reported by the patients, with a p < 0.005. Further research is still needed to better characterize sleep disturbances in this population. Due to the sample size, a prospective, randomized study is required to confirm these findings. The present analysis has no conflict of interest.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Colitis describes inflammation in the colon and is classified into defined diseases: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), Microscopic colitis, Ischemic colitis and Infectious colitis. The clinical significance of non-specific colitis is unclear as there are limited analysis which report the issue. Notteghem et al. (1993) showed that of 104 patients with non-specific colitis, 52.3% had another episode of symptoms within 3 years. Of these patients 54% were diagnosed with ulcerative colitis, 33% with Crohn's disease, and 13% remained unclassified, suggesting that non-specific colitis could be undiagnosed IBD. The objective of this analysis is to determine the clinical course of non-specific colitis through colonoscopy and histologic findings. METHODS: Retrospective observational study with patients underwent colonoscopies during the period from 2009 to 2019, whose biopsies were reported as non-specific colitis. RESULTS: 24 patients (18 women and 6 men) with non-specific colitis undergoing follow-up by the Gastroenterology outpatient clinic were included. The most frequent indications for colonoscopy were abdominal pain (43.7%), blood in stools (26.8%), diarrhea (21.6%) and anemia (7.9%). The mean age was 56.5 years. During follow-up, patients had at least 2 colonoscopies and 4 biopsies per colonic segment. In the male population ascending colon cancer was later diagnosed in 16.7%, another 16.7% were diagnosed with nonspecific chronic ulcerative colitis, 33.3% with eosinophilic colitis, and the rest of the patients were diagnosed with non-specific colitis. From the female group, 5.6% had lymphocytic colitis, 5.6% eosinophilic colitis, 5.6% collagenous colitis, 5.6% Crohn's disease, 5.6% mixed irritable bowel syndrome, and the rest of the patients (72%) had biopsy report of non-specific colitis. CONCLUSIONS: All patients with a histopathological diagnosis of non-specific colitis underwent a second colonoscopy with biopsy, which resulted in a definitive diagnosis of Crohn's disease in 5.6% of women and Ulcerative Colitis in 16.7% of men. This study comes to show that there is an important subgroup of patients who are underdiagnosed. We suggest that patients with non-specific colitis reported on a histopathology report must continue their follow-up by a specialized ward.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: Acute kidney injury (AKI) with the requirement of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) portends a poor prognosis for kidney function in lupus nephritis (LN). This study evaluated the kidney function recovery rates, the rates of reinitiation of KRT, and factors associated with these outcomes in LN. METHOD: All consecutive patients hospitalized for LN with KRT requirement between 2000 and 2020 were included. Their clinical and histopathologic characteristics were retrospectively registered. The outcomes and associated factors were evaluated by multivariable Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Among 140 patients, 75 (54%) recovered kidney function, with recovery rates of 50.9% and 54.2% by 6 and 12 months of therapy. The factors associated with a lower probability of recovery included a previous history of LN flares, worse eGFR and higher proteinuria at presentation, immunosuppression with azathioprine, and hospitalizations within 6 months of therapy initiation. There was no difference in the kidney function recovery rates between mycophenolate and cyclophosphamide treatment schemes. Out of 75 patients who recovered kidney function, 37 (49%) reinitiated KRT, with KRT reinitiation rates of 27.2% and 46.5% by 3 and 5 years. Seventy-three (52%) patients had at least one hospitalization within 6 months of initial therapy, 52 (72%) of them secondary to infectious events. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 50% of patients with LN and KRT requirement recover kidney function within 6 months. The risk-to-benefit ratio decisions may be aided by clinical and histological factors. These patients require close follow-up as ≈50% of those who recover kidney function will reinitiate dialysis in the long term. Key Points ⢠Approximately 50% of patients with severe acute lupus nephritis with the need for kidney replacement therapy requirement recover their kidney function. ⢠The factors associated with a lower probability of recovery of kidney function include a previous history of LN flares, worse eGFR and higher proteinuria at presentation, immunosuppression with azathioprine, and hospitalizations within 6 months of therapy initiation. ⢠Patients who recover kidney function will require close follow-up as around 50% of them will eventually reinitiate kidney replacement therapy.
Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda , Nefrite Lúpica , Humanos , Nefrite Lúpica/complicações , Nefrite Lúpica/tratamento farmacológico , Azatioprina/uso terapêutico , Diálise Renal , Rim/patologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Injúria Renal Aguda/terapia , Injúria Renal Aguda/complicações , Proteinúria/complicações , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Abstract Background: A high incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) has been reported in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients in critical care units and those undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). The introduction of dexamethasone (DXM) as treatment for severe COVID-19 has improved mortality, but its effects in other organs remain under study. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between DXM and AKI in COVID-19. Methods: In this prospective observational cohort study, we evaluated the incidence of AKI in critically ill COVID-19 patients undergoing mechanical ventilation, and the association of DXM treatment with the incidence, severity, and outcomes of AKI. The association between DXM treatment and AKI was evaluated by multivariable logistic regression. The association of the combination of DXM treatment and AKI on mortality was evaluated by Cox-regression analysis. Results: We included 552 patients. AKI was diagnosed in 311 (56%), of which 196 (63%) corresponded to severe (stage 2 or 3) AKI, and 46 (14.8%) received kidney replacement therapy. Two hundred and sixty-seven (48%) patients were treated with DXM. This treatment was associated to lower incidence of AKI (Odds Radio 0.34, 95% Confidence intervals [CI] 0.22-0.52, p < 0.001) after adjusting for age, body mass index, laboratory parameters, SOFA score, and vasopressor use. DXM treatment significantly reduced mortality in patients with severe AKI (HR 0.63, 95%CI 0.41-0.96, p = 0.032). Conclusions: The incidence of AKI is high in COVID-19 patients under IMV. DXM treatment is associated with a lower incidence of AKI and a lower mortality in the group with severe AKI.