Benign multicystic peritoneal mesothelioma in a sexagenerian man: an uncommon case presentation.

BACKGROUND: Multicystic mesothelial cyst is a rare, and usually benign, tumor which is rarely diagnosed preoperatively due to the poor specificity of its symptomatology. METHODS: We report the case of a 63-year-old man with multiple comorbidities (e.g. cryptogenic cirrhosis, chronic heart failure) and a history of surgical resection of a giant abdominal cyst, who complained of recurrent intermittent abdominal pain and vomiting that appeared several weeks before. Abdominal computed tomodensitometry (CT) revealed multiple diffusely localized cysts in the abdominal cavity, ranging from 30 mm to 210 mm. RESULTS: The patient underwent surgical resection of twelve intra-abdominal cysts, identified at final pathology as benign mesothelial cysts, which were probably a recurrence following the previous surgery for a single intra-abdominal cyst. Three months later, the patient recurred with development of two new intraperitoneal cysts, with an increasing volume on CT at last follow-up (18 months). Surveillance was recommended given the patient's comorbidities and the absence of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection is the treatment of choice for multicystic peritoneal mesothelioma, a rare disease that should be considered more as a borderline tumor than a benign tumor, given the high risk of recurrence and possible malignant transformation.

Preoperative treatment with mFOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine/Nab-paclitaxel +/- isotoxic high-dose stereotactic body Radiation Therapy (iHD-SBRT) for borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (the STEREOPAC trial): study protocol for a randomised comparative multicenter phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: For patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), surgical resection remains the only potentially curative treatment. Surgery is generally followed by postoperative chemotherapy associated with improved survival, yet neoadjuvant therapy is a rapidly emerging concept requiring to be explored and validated in terms of treatment options and oncological outcomes. In this context, stereotactic body radiation (SBRT) appears feasible and can be safely integrated into a neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen of modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX) with promising benefits in terms of R0 resection, local control and survival. However, the optimal therapeutic sequence is still not known, especially for borderline resectable PDAC, and the role of adding SBRT to chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting needs to be evaluated in randomised controlled trials. The aim of the STEREOPAC trial is to assess the impact and efficacy of adding isotoxic high-dose SBRT (iHD-SBRT) to neoadjuvant mFFX or Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel (Gem/Nab-P) in patients with borderline resectable PDAC. METHODS: This is a randomised comparative multicentre phase II trial, planning to enrol patients (n = 256) diagnosed with a borderline resectable biopsy-confirmed PDAC. Patients will receive 4 cycles of mFFX (or 6 doses of Gem/Nab-P). After full disease restaging, non-progressive patients will be randomised for receiving either 4 additional mFFX cycles (or 6 doses of Gem/Nab-P) (Arm A), or 2 mFFX cycles (or 3 doses of Gem/Nab-P) + iHD-SBRT (35 to 55 Gy in 5 fractions) + 2 mFFX cycles (or 3 doses of Gem/Nab-P) (Arm B). Then curative surgery will be performed followed by adjuvant chemotherapy according to patient's condition. The co-primary endpoints are R0 resection and disease-free survival after the complete sequence strategy. The secondary endpoints include resection rate, overall survival, locoregional failure / distant metastasis free interval, pathologic complete response, toxicity, postoperative complications and quality of life assessment. DISCUSSION: This trial will help define the best neoadjuvant treatment sequence for borderline resectable PDAC and aims to evaluate if a total neoadjuvant treatment integrating iHD-SBRT improves the patients' oncological outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at ClinicalTrails.gov (NCT05083247) on October 19th, 2021, and in the Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS) EU CT database (2022-501181-22-01) on July 2022.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy associated with isotoxic high-dose stereotactic body radiotherapy does not increase postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy for nonmetastatic pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The role of radiotherapy in the therapeutic sequence of nonmetastatic pancreatic cancer (PC) is controversial, including isotoxic high-dose stereotactic body radiotherapy (iHD-SBRT). This study aimed to compare postoperative outcome of patients with nonmetastatic PC undergoing neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) including iHD-SBRT versus upfront pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). METHODS: All patients undergoing PD for PC from 2017 to 2021 were retrospectively analyzed, identifying patients receiving NAT with iHD-SBRT. Toxicity of treatments and postoperative outcome were assessed and analyzed in a propensity score-matched population. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients underwent upfront surgery (surgery group) and 22 after NAT and iHD-SBRT (SBRT group). No major side effects SBRT-related were identified preoperatively. Postoperative morbidity was similar between groups. There was no postoperative death in SBRT group, and six in surgery group (p = 0.597). No difference was observed in the rates of complications related to pancreatic surgery. The postoperative hospital stay was shorter in SBRT versus surgery groups (p = 0.016). After propensity score matching, no significant difference in the postoperative morbidity was observed between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporation of iHD-SBRT in the NAT sequence before PD for PC did not increase postoperative morbidity compared with upfront surgery. These results confirm the feasibility and safety of iHD-SBRT for the upcoming STEREOPAC trial.

Spleen-preserving pancreatectomy with removal of splenic vessels: impact on splenic parenchyma ?

BACKGROUND: While outcomes after spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SP-DP) have been widely reported, impacts on splenic parenchyma have not been well studied. This study aimed to compare postoperative outcomes, particularly spleen-related outcomes, by assessing splenic imaging after SP-DP with or without splenic vessels removal. METHODS: Data for all patients who underwent SP-DP with splenic vessels removal (Warshaw technique, WDP) or preservation (Kimura technique, KDP) between 2010 and 2022 in two tertiary centres were retrospectively analysed. Splenic ischemia and volume at early/late imaging and postoperative outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients were included, 51 in the WDP and 36 in the KDP groups. Median Charlson's Comorbidity Index was significantly higher in the WDP group compared with the KDP group. Postoperative morbidity was similar between groups. There was more splenic ischemia at early imaging in the WDP group compared to the KDP group (55% vs. 14%, p = 0.018), especially severe ischemia (23% vs. 0%). Partial splenic atrophy was observed in 29% and 0% in the WDP and KDP groups, respectively (p = 0.002); no complete splenic atrophy was observed. Platelet levels at POD 1, 2 and 6 were significantly higher in the WDP group compared to KDP group. At univariate analysis, age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, platelet levels at POD 6, and early splenic infarction were prognostic factors for development of splenic atrophy. No episodes of overwhelming post-splenectomy infection or secondary splenectomy were recorded after a median follow-up of 9 and 11 months in the WDP and KDP groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Splenic ischemia appeared in one-half of patients undergoing SP-DP with splenic vessels removal at early imaging, and partial splenic atrophy in almost 30% at late imaging, without clinical impact or complete splenic atrophy. Age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, platelet levels at POD 6, and early splenic infarction could help to predict the occurrence of splenic atrophy.

Perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy: retrospective analysis of bacteriological profile and susceptibility.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic tumours are frequently associated with obstructive jaundice requiring preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) before pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), exposing patients to infectious complications. This study aims to compare postoperative complications after PD with or without PBD and to analyse bile bacteriology and antibiotic susceptibility. METHODS: All patients undergoing PD between 2014 and 2019 were retrospectively evaluated, and postoperative outcomes were compared according to PBD use. Prophylactic narrow-spectrum antibiotic therapy was given for 24 h, then adapted according to bacteriologic profile. Intraoperative bile cultures and antibiograms were collected. RESULTS: Among 164 patients with intraoperative bile culture during PD (75 PBD+, 89 PBD-), an infected bile was observed in 95% and 70% of PBD + and PBD- groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Postoperative mortality and severe morbidity including infectious complications were similar between groups (5% and 15%). The median duration of antibiotherapy was longer in PBD + compared to PBD- groups (9 vs. 2 days, p = 0.009). Malignant indication and PBD were associated with bile contamination using univariate analysis, and PBD was significantly relevant at multivariate analysis. Most common pathogens identified in bile cultures were Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp. and Enterobacter spp. Overall antibiotic susceptibility to commonly used antibiotics was decreased, including those used in our local guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: PBD exposes nearly 100% of patients undergoing PD to bile infection and an increased duration of postoperative antimicrobial therapy, without increasing infectious complications in this study. Adaptation of antimicrobial prophylaxis should be further evaluated according to performance of PBD and local epidemiology, in order to avoid overuse of antibiotics.

Peritoneal patch in vascular reconstruction during pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer: a single Centre experience.

BACKGROUND: Concomitant venous resection during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic adenocarcinoma with mesenterico-portal vein involvement is increasingly performed to achieve oncological resection. This study aims to report a single centre experience in peritoneal patch (PP) as autologous graft for vascular reconstruction (VR) during PD. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent PD + VR with PP between December 2019 and September 2020 was performed, using a prospective collected database. Postoperative outcome and pathological margins were evaluated. Venous patency was assessed by computed tomography at day 7 and week 12 post surgery. RESULTS: Fifteen patients underwent PD + VR with PP reconstruction for pancreatic cancer, including one total pancreatectomy. VR consisted of lateral (n = 14) or tubular (n = 1) patch. The median PP length was 30 mm [26.3-33.8] and venous clamping time 30 min [27.5-39.0]. Computed tomography showed a patent VR in 93.3% and 53.3% after 7 days and 12 weeks, respectively; venous patency loss was always asymptomatic. The only postoperative VR-related complication was one mesenteric venous thrombosis. Five other patients experienced VR-unrelated complications: septic shock (n = 3), biliary fistula (n = 1) and post-traumatic subdural hematoma (n = 1). Mortality was nihil. At pathology, R0 resection (≥1 mm) was observed in 40.0% (6/15), venous margin was free in 46.7% (7/15), and venous wall was involved in 40.0% (6/15). CONCLUSIONS: Use of PP as venous substitute during PD + VR is safe and feasible with an acceptable postoperative morbidity, and a decreased but asymptomatic venous patency after 12 weeks which should question the role of anticoagulation therapy.

Opioid-free versus opioid-based anesthesia in pancreatic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) is associated with significantly reduced cumulative postoperative morphine consumption in comparison with opioid-based anesthesia (OBA). Whether OFA is feasible and may improve outcomes in pancreatic surgery remains unclear. METHODS: Perioperative data from 77 consecutive patients who underwent pancreatic resection were included and retrospectively reviewed. Patients received either an OBA with intraoperative remifentanil (n = 42) or an OFA (n = 35). OFA included a combination of continuous infusions of dexmedetomidine, lidocaine, and esketamine. In OBA, patients also received a single bolus of intrathecal morphine. All patients received intraoperative propofol, sevoflurane, dexamethasone, diclofenac, neuromuscular blockade. Postoperative pain management was achieved by continuous wound infiltration and patient-controlled morphine. The primary outcome was postoperative pain (Numerical Rating Scale, NRS). Opioid consumption within 48 h after extubation, length of stay, adverse events within 90 days, and 30-day mortality were included as secondary outcomes. Episodes of bradycardia and hypotension requiring rescue medication were considered as safety outcomes. RESULTS: Compared to OBA, NRS (3 [2-4] vs 0 [0-2], P < 0.001) and opioid consumption (36 [24-52] vs 10 [2-24], P = 0.005) were both less in the OFA group. Length of stay was shorter by 4 days with OFA (14 [7-46] vs 10 [6-16], P < 0.001). OFA (P = 0.03), with postoperative pancreatic fistula (P = 0.0002) and delayed gastric emptying (P < 0.0001) were identified as only independent factors for length of stay. The comprehensive complication index (CCI) was the lowest with OFA (24.9 ± 25.5 vs 14.1 ± 23.4, P = 0.03). There were no differences in demographics, operative time, blood loss, bradycardia, vasopressors administration or time to extubation among groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this series, OFA during pancreatic resection is feasible and independently associated with a better outcome, in particular pain outcomes. The lower rate of postoperative complications may justify future randomized trials to test the hypothesis that OFA may improve outcomes and shorten length of stay.

Colorectal resection in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients: experience from a single tertiary center.

BACKGROUND: End-stage renal disease (ESRD) and renal replacement therapy (RRT) are important risk factors for post-operative morbidity and mortality but remains poorly reported in colorectal surgery. This study aims to evaluate postoperative outcomes of ESRD patients under RRT undergoing colorectal resection. METHODS: All ESRD patients under RRT who underwent colorectal resection between 2006 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Perioperative outcomes were analysed, such as risk factors of postoperative complications. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were analysed, including 27 emergency and 15 elective surgeries. The most frequent indication was acute colonic ischemia for emergency and malignancy for elective procedures. Laparoscopic approach was used in 12 patients (29%), without difference between elective and emergency groups. Postoperative severe complications rate (including deaths) was 50% (21/42), including 56% (15/27) and 40% (6/15) in emergency and elective groups, respectively (p = .334). Anastomotic leak was observed in 3 of the 23 patients (13%) undergoing digestive anastomosis, (1 in emergency and 2 in elective groups, p = .246). The postoperative mortality rate was 29%, not significantly different between groups. The median hospital stay was 14.5 days (8-42). At univariate analysis, history of cardiac event (p = .028) and open approach (p = .040) were associated with severe complications, and ASA score >3 (p = .043), history of cardiac event (p = .001) and diabetes (p = .030) associated with mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Colorectal surgery in ESRD patient exposes to high risk of morbidity and mortality, even in the elective setting, especially in patients with comorbidities like cardiac event and diabetes. Careful patient selection and closed management is required in such fragile patients.

What Should Guide the Performance of Venous Resection During Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma with Venous Contact?

Complete surgical resection, most often associated with perioperative chemotherapy, is the only way to offer a chance of cure for patients with pancreatic cancer. One of the most important factors in determining survival outcome that can be influenced by the surgeon is the R0 resection. However, the proximity of mesenteric vessels in cephalic pancreatic tumors, especially the mesenterico-portal venous axis, results in an increased risk of vein involvement and/or the presence of malignant cells in the venous bed margin. A concomitant venous resection can be performed to decrease the risk of a positive margin. Given the additional technical difficulty that this implies, many surgeons seek a path between the tumor and the vein, hoping for the absence of tumor infiltration into the perivascular tissue on pathologic analysis, particularly in cases with administration of neoadjuvant therapy. The definition of optimal surgical margin remains a subject of debate, but at least 1 mm is an independent predictor of survival after pancreatic cancer surgical resection. Although preoperative radiologic assessment is essential for accurate planning of a pancreatic resection, intraoperative decision-making with regard to resection of the mesenterico-portal vein in tumors with a venous contact remains unclear and variable. Although venous histologic involvement and perivascular infiltration are not accurately predictable preoperatively, clinicians must examine the existing criteria and normograms to guide their surgical management according to the integration of new imaging techniques, preoperative chemotherapy use, tumor biology and molecular histopathology, and surgical techniques.

The real incidence of biliary tract complications after adult liver transplantation: the role of the prospective routine use of cholangiography during post-transplant follow-up.

Biliary tract complications (BTCs) still burden liver transplantation (LT). The wide reporting variability highlights the absence of systematic screening. From 2000 to 2009, simultaneous liver biopsy and direct biliary visualization were prospectively performed in 242 recipients at 3 and 6 months (n = 212, 87.6%) or earlier when indicated (n = 30, 12.4%). Median follow-up was 148 (107-182) months. Seven patients (2.9%) experienced postprocedural morbidity. BTCs were initially diagnosed in 76 (31.4%) patients; 32 (42.1%) had neither clinical nor biological abnormalities. Acute cellular rejection (ACR) was present in 27 (11.2%) patients and in 6 (22.2%) BTC patients. Nine (3.7%) patients with normal initial cholangiography developed BTCs after 60 (30-135) months post-LT. BTCs directly lead to 7 (2.9%) re-transplantations and 14 (5.8%) deaths resulting in 18 (7.4%) allograft losses. Bile duct proliferation at 12-month biopsy proved an independent risk factor for graft loss (P = 0.005). Systematic biliary tract and allograft evaluation allows the incidence and extent of biliary lesions to be documented more precisely and to avoid erroneous treatment of ACR. The combination 'abnormal biliary tract-canalicular proliferation' is an indicator of worse graft outcome. BTCs are responsible for important delayed allograft and patient losses. These results underline the importance of life-long follow-up and appropriate timing for re-transplantation.

Solitary prostate cancer liver metastasis: an exceptional indication for liver resection.

INTRODUCTION: Prostatic cancer metastases (PCM) are usually systemic. Isolated PCM liver metastases (PCLM) are very rare. The treatment of PCM consists of hormono- and chemotherapy eventually combined with stereotactic radiation. PATIENT AND DISCUSSION: A case of a 67-year old man presenting with a solitary, metachronous PCLM undergoing a left extended hepatectomy due to resistance to hormono- and chemotherapy is reported. He died of recurrent systemic disease 31 months later. CONCLUSIONS: The very rare indication and possible role of liver resection in the treatment of PCLM is discussed.

Non-occlusive Mesenteric Ischemia as a Fatal Complication in Acute Pancreatitis: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Vascular complications of severe acute pancreatitis are well known and largely described unlike non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia, which is a rare and potentially fatal complication. Non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia is an acute mesenteric ischemia without thrombotic occlusion of blood vessels, poorly described as a complication of acute pancreatitis. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively maintained registry of all pancreatic diseases referred to our center from 2013 to 2018, in order to determine the causes of early death. We identified three patients who died within 48 h after hospital admission from severe acute pancreatitis complicated by irreversible non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia. Their clinical presentation, management, and outcomes were herein reported. RESULTS: Three consecutive patients with severe acute pancreatitis developed non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia within the first 5 days after onset of symptoms and died 48 h after non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia diagnosis despite optimal intensive care management and surgery, giving a prevalence of 3/609 (0.5%). Symptoms were unspecific with consequently potential delayed diagnosis and management. High doses of norepinephrine required for hemodynamic support (n = 3) potentially leading to splanchnic vessels vasoconstriction, transient hypotension (n = 3), and previous severe ischemic cardiomyopathy (n = 1) could be involved as precipitating factors of non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia. CONCLUSION: Non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia can be a fatal complication of acute pancreatitis but is also challenging to diagnose. Priority is to reestablish a splanchno-mesenteric perfusion flow. Surgery should be offered in case of treatment failure or deterioration but is still under debate in early stage, to interrupt the vicious circle of intestinal hypoperfusion and ischemia.

Long-term results of secondary biliary repair for cholecystectomy-related bile duct injury: results of a tertiary referral center.

Background: Management of bile duct injury (BDI) after cholecystectomy is challenging. The authors analyzed their center's 49-year experience.Methods: From 1968 to 2016, 120 consecutive patients were managed in a tertiary HBP center, 105 referred from other centers (Group A), 15 from our center (Group B). Surgical strategies and long-term outcomes were retrospectively reviewed.Results: Primary cholecystectomy approach was open in 35% and laparoscopic in 65%. In Group A, intraoperative BDI diagnosis was made in 25/105 patients, including 13 via intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) which was used in 21% of cases. Median time from BDI to referral was 148 days (range 0-10,758), and 3 patients had BDI-related secondary cirrhosis. Ninety-four patients underwent secondary surgical repair, mostly a complex biliary procedure (97%). Postoperative overall and severe morbidity rates were 26% and 6%, respectively. One patient with biliary cirrhosis at referral died postoperatively from hepatic failure. Nine patients (9.6%) developed a secondary biliary stricture after a median of 54 months from repair (6-228 months). In Group B, IOC was performed in 14/15 in whom BDI were intraoperatively detected and immediately repaired. There were 13 minor and 2 major BDIs, all repaired by uncomplex procedures with uneventful postoperative course. One patient had a secondary biliary stricture after 5 months, successfully treated by temporary endoprosthesis.Conclusion: Late follow-up after primary or secondary repair of BDI is recommended to detect recurrent biliary stricture. Bile duct injuries may occur in a tertiary center, but are intraoperatively detected with routine IOC and immediately repaired resulting in satisfactory outcome.

Distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic neoplasia: is splenectomy really necessary? A bicentric retrospective analysis of surgical specimens.

BACKGROUND: While distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (DPS) is the reference treatment for pancreatic body and tail neoplasia, oncological benefits of splenectomy have never been demonstrated. Involvement of spleen, splenic hilum and lymph nodes (LN) was therefore assessed on DPS specimens. METHODS: All DPS pancreatic neoplasia specimens obtained in 2 Brussels University Hospitals over 15 years (2004-2018) were reviewed retrospectively, using both preoperative radiological imaging and postoperative pathological analyses of splenic parenchyma, hilar tissue and LN. RESULTS: The total of 130 DPS specimens included 85 adenocarcinomas, 37 neuroendocrine neoplasms and 8 other carcinomas. Tumours involved the pancreatic body without tail invasion for 59 specimens (B, Body group), and the pancreatic tail with/without body for 71 (T, Tail group). At pathology, direct splenic and/or hilar involvement was observed in 13 T specimens (13/71, 18.3%), but in none belonging to the Body group. The observed numbers of splenic hilar LN (only reported in 49/130 patients) were low, only one T adenocarcinoma had positive splenic LN in addition to direct splenic involvement. CONCLUSION: Splenectomy remains justified during pancreatectomy for neoplasia involving the pancreatic tail, but in case of pancreatic body tumours, its benefits should be questioned in the light of absent splenic LN/parenchymal involvement.

Complex liver resection under hepatic vascular exclusion and hypothermic perfusion with versus without veno-venous bypass: a comparative study.

BACKGROUND: While hypothermic liver perfusion has been shown to improve parenchymal tolerance to complex resections in patients requiring prolonged hepatic vascular exclusion (HVE), the benefit of associated veno-venous bypass (VVB) in this setting remains poorly evaluated. METHODS: All patients undergoing liver resection requiring HVE and hypothermic liver perfusion for at least 55 min between 2006 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Perioperative outcomes were compared between patients with (VVB+) or without VVB (VVB-). RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were analyzed, including 13 VVB+ and 14 VVB-. Median HVE duration was similar in VVB+ and VVB- patients (96 vs. 75 min, respectively). VVB+patients had longer operative time (460 vs. 375 min, p = 0.023) but less blood loss (p = 0.010). Five (19%) patients died postoperatively from liver failure or sepsis, without difference between groups. Postoperative major morbidity rate was similar between VVB+ and VVB- patients (30% vs. 50%, respectively) such as rates of liver failure, haemorrhage, renal insufficiency and sepsis, but VVB- patients experienced more respiratory complications (64% vs. 15%, p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: During liver resection under HVE and hypothermic liver perfusion, use of VVB allows for reducing blood loss and postoperative respiratory complications. VVB should be recommended in case of liver resection with prolonged HVE.

Surgical Treatment of Colorectal Cancer with Peritoneal and Liver Metastases Using Combined Liver and Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Report from a Single-Centre Experience.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapeutic advances have enabled successful cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) expansion in treating metastatic colorectal cancer. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to evaluate the safety of combining liver surgery (LS) with HIPEC and CRS (which remains controversial) and its impact on overall survival (OS) rates. METHODS: From 2007 to 2015, a total of 77 patients underwent CRS/HIPEC for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) of colorectal cancer. Twenty-five of these patients underwent concomitant LS for suspicion of liver metastases (LM; group 2), and were compared with patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC only (group 1). Demographic and clinical data were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: Among the group 2 patients, two underwent major hepatectomies, six underwent multiple wedge resections, 16 underwent single wedge resections (one with radiofrequency ablation), and one underwent radiofrequency ablation alone. For groups 1 and 2, median peritoneal cancer index was 6 and 10 (range 0-26; p = 0.08), complication rates were 15.4 and 32.0 % (Dindo-Clavien ≥3; p = 0.15), and median follow-up was 34.2 and 25.5 months (range 0-75 and 3-97), respectively. One group 2 patient died of septic shock after 66 days. Pathology confirmed LM in 21 patients in group 2 (four with benign hepatic lesions were excluded from long-term outcome analysis). Two-year OS rates were 89.5 and 70.2 % (p = 0.04), and 2-year recurrence-free survival rates were 38.3 and 13.4 % (p = 0.01) in groups 1 and 2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous surgery for colorectal LM and PC is both feasible and safe, with low postoperative morbidity. Further longer-term studies would help determine its impact on patient survival.

Traumatic biliary neuroma after orthotopic liver transplantation: a possible cause of "unexplained" anastomotic biliary stricture.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic biliary neuromas (TBNs) represent a rare cause of biliary stricture (BS) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Diagnosis is challenging preoperatively and is most often made at pathology after resection. Herein, we report a 20-year experience of TBN-related BS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Medical records of 1030 adult patients undergoing OLT from 1991 to 2014 were reviewed. Patients with histologically proven TBN were identified among those presenting a BS. RESULTS: Over the study period, 52 patients developed an anastomotic BS. Of these, 17 had repeat surgery and specimen examination identified TBN in five instances. All five patients with TBN had a duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction during OLT. Median delay from OLT to onset of symptoms was 69 months (range 4-239). Preoperative imaging showed a compressive mass in one patient. Four patients underwent TBN resection combined with hepaticojejunostomy and had an uneventful postoperative course. One patient underwent TBN resection and duct-to-duct reconstruction; he died from acute pancreatitis on postoperative day 21. After a median follow-up of 40.5 months (range 10-54), no recurrent BS occurred. CONCLUSION: Traumatic biliary neuromas represent a possible diagnosis for unexplained anastomotic BS after OLT. Surgical excision combined with hepaticojejunostomy is effective, allows histological diagnosis, and prevents from recurrence.

Does the site of platelet sequestration predict the response to splenectomy in adult patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura?

Splenectomy is the only potentially curative treatment for chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) in adults. However, one-third of the patients relapse without predictive factors identified. We evaluate the predictive value of the site of platelet sequestration on the response to splenectomy in patients with ITP. Eighty-two consecutive patients with ITP treated by splenectomy between 1992 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Platelet sequestration site was studied by (111)Indium-oxinate-labeled platelets in 93% of patients. Response to splenectomy was defined at last follow-up as: complete response (CR) for platelet count (PC) ≥100 × 10(9)/L, response (R) for PC≥30 × 10(9)/L and <100 × 10(9)/L with absence of bleeding, no response (NR) for PC<30 × 10(3)/L or significant bleeding. Laparoscopic splenectomy was performed in 81 patients (conversion rate of 16%), and open approach in one patient. Median follow-up was 57 months (range, 1-235). Platelet sequestration study was performed in 93% of patients: 50 patients (61%) exhibited splenic sequestration, 9 (11%) hepatic sequestration and 14 patients (17%) mixed sequestration. CR was obtained in 72% of patients, R in 25% and NR in 4% (two with splenic sequestration, one with hepatic sequestration). Preoperative PC, age at diagnosis, hepatic sequestration and male gender were significant for predicting CR in univariate analysis, but only age (HR = 1.025 by one-year increase, 95% CI [1.004-1.047], p = 0.020) and pre-operative PC (HR = 0.112 for > 100 versus <=100, 95% CI [0.025-0.493], p = 0.004) were significant predictors of recurrence-free survival in multivariate analysis. Response to splenectomy was independent of the site of platelet sequestration in patients with ITP. Pre-operative platelet sequestration study in these patients cannot be recommended.

Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma or a Metaphor for Heterogeneity: From Single-Cell Analysis to Whole-Body Imaging.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) represents a formidable challenge due to its aggressive nature and poor prognosis. The tumor microenvironment (TME) in PDAC, characterized by intense stromal desmoplastic reactions and a dominant presence of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), significantly contributes to therapeutic resistance. However, within the heterogeneous CAF population, fibroblast activation protein (FAP) emerges as a promising target for Gallium-68 FAP inhibitor positron emission tomography (Ga68FAPI-PET) imaging. Notably, 68Ga-FAPI-PET demonstrates promising diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, especially in conjunction with low tracer uptake in non-tumoral tissues. Moreover, it provides valuable insights into tumor-stroma interactions, a critical aspect of PDAC tumorigenesis not adequately visualized through conventional methods. The clinical implications of this innovative imaging modality extend to its potential to reshape treatment strategies by offering a deeper understanding of the dynamic TME. However, while the potential of 68Ga-FAPI-PET is evident, ongoing correlative studies are essential to elucidate the full spectrum of CAF heterogeneity and to validate its impact on PDAC management. This article provides a comprehensive review of CAF heterogeneity in PDAC and explores the potential impact of 68Ga-FAPI-PET on disease management.