The risks and characteristics of the delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric carcinoma in cases with anticoagulants.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive treatment for early gastric carcinoma. Vitamin K antagonists and direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) were reported to increase the risk of delayed bleeding after ESD. However, the evaluation of ESD cases taking anticoagulants is scarce. We analyzed the risk and characteristics of delayed bleeding after gastric ESD in patients on anticoagulants. METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational study at a single center. Consecutive patients who underwent ESD for early gastric carcinoma and took anticoagulants, including warfarin, rivaroxaban, dabigatran, apixaban, and edoxaban, between January 2012 and December 2018, were analyzed. We also calculated delayed bleeding rates for those without anticoagulants. RESULTS: Of 1855 eligible patients who underwent gastric ESDs, 143 took anticoagulants. Delayed bleeding occurred in 30 (21.0%) cases taking anticoagulants, with 15 (19.5%) cases in the DOAC group [rivaroxaban, seven cases (21.2%); dabigatran, four cases (20.0%); apixaban, four cases (23.5%); and edoxaban, zero cases (0%)] and 15 cases (22.7%) in the warfarin group. Furthermore, 43/344 (12.5%) patients taking antiplatelets and 76/1368 (5.6%) patients without antithrombic drugs experienced delayed bleeding. Multivariable logistic analysis revealed post-heart valve replacement (OR, 6.56; 95% CI, 1.75-24.7; p < .05) as a risk for delayed bleeding in warfarin-taking patients, while no statistically significant factor was found in DOAC-taking patients. CONCLUSIONS: Anticoagulants were associated with a high incidence of severe delayed bleeding. Careful attention should be paid to patients on anticoagulants after gastric ESD, especially those on warfarin after heart valve replacement.

The sub-classification of type B2 vessels according to the magnifying endoscopic classification of the Japan Esophageal Society.

OBJECTIVES: Guidelines for magnified endoscopic diagnosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) have been proposed by the Japan Esophageal Society. Type B1, B2, and B3 reflect increasing tumor invasion depths (within mucosal epithelium or into lamina propria mucosa [T1a-EP/LPM], into muscularis mucosa or superficial invasion into submucosa [T1a-MM/T1b-SM1], and into submucosa [T1b-SM2], respectively). The diagnostic accuracy of type B1 and B3 is high, but accuracy of type B2 is low. We aimed to improve the diagnostic accuracy of type B2. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 248 SCC lesions treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection between January 2012 and July 2018 and identified the B2 lesions. The maximum diameter of the area presenting B2 was measured and evaluated in relation to tumor invasion, for which receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated. The optimal area size for distinguishing T1a-EP/LPM from T1a-MM or deeper invasion was determined. RESULTS: There were 78 lesions with B2, of which 26 (33%) were T1a-MM or T1b-SM1 SCCs. ROC curve analysis indicated that the optimal cut-off for the target area showing B2 was 4 mm. The invasion depth (EP/LPM: MM/SM1: SM2) of B2 observed in an area with a diameter <4 mm (B2-Narrow) and those with diameter ≥4 mm (B2-Broad) was 46:11:1 and 1:15:4, respectively. To predict T1a-MM or deeper invasion, B2-Broad had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 61%, 98%, 95%, and 79%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic accuracy of type B2 was improved by evaluating the area of type B2.

Retrospective study of technical aspects and complications of endoscopic submucosal dissection for large superficial colorectal tumors.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is widely carried out, but is still considered difficult. In 2010, a tumor size of ≥ 50 mm and less experience in colorectal ESD were reported as independent risk factors for complications such as perforation, delayed perforation and postoperative bleeding. In order to overcome such difficulties, we developed a scissors-type grasping device and reported the treatment results of a multicenter study. The aim of the present study was to investigate therapeutic outcomes of colorectal ESD of different tumor sizes. METHODS: Group A (134 tumors): tumor size < 50 mm, and Group B (16 tumors): tumors ≥ 50 mm. All tumors were removed by ESD. We retrospectively evaluated the clinicopathological features of the tumors and the treatment results. RESULTS: Age, sex, tumor location and histopathological diagnosis were not different between the two groups. Laterally spreading tumor non-granular type was more often observed in Group A (64/134, 47.8%) than in Group B (0/16, 0%). Procedure time was significantly longer in Group B (Group A: 38 min; Group B: 86 min, P < 0.01). However, procedure speed was significantly faster in Group B (Group A: 0.21 cm(2) /min; Group B: 0.37 cm(2) /min, P < 0.01). No complications were observed in either group. The en bloc resection rate, en bloc R0 resection rate, and en bloc curative resection rate were similar between the groups with no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: Procedure speed for Group B was faster than that for Group A. Group B was treated as safely as Group A.

Impact of COVID-19 on the endoscopy department since the early phase of the pandemic in 2020: A questionnaire study among patients with canceled examinations at a single Japanese institution.

INTRODUCTION: In early 2020, the Japanese government declared a nationwide state of emergency for the COVID-19 pandemic. We investigated the impact of the emergency declaration on endoscopy adherence and conducted a follow-up study of patients with canceled examinations at a tertiary endoscopy facility in Japan in 2020. METHODS: We compared the number of endoscopies performed, and cancelations at the endoscopy unit between 2019 and 2020 and used the Bayesian structural time series (BSTS) model to estimate the decrease in the number of endoscopies in 2020. We administered a questionnaire to those who had not undergone a scheduled endoscopy. RESULTS: Of 14 146 and 13 338 scheduled examinations, 1233 (8.7%) and 1403 (10.5%) were canceled in 2019 and 2020, respectively. During both years, age < 50 years, age > 80 years, upper endoscopy, and experience of endoscopy in the past 5 years were significantly associated with cancelations. In 2020, cancelations in the 14th-26th week of the year, including the period of state of emergency, increased significantly, and more women canceled. Of the 409 questionnaire-respondents, 174 (42.5%) indicated that COVID-19 had influenced their cancelation, and 315 (77.0%) had not undergone similar endoscopic examinations since then. The BSTS model predicted a decrease of 957 (95% CI -1213 to -708, P = .003) examinations. CONCLUSION: In 2020, despite low numbers of COVID-19 cases in the study site, the number of endoscopies decreased, and cancelation increased. Further research is needed on the future impact of a decrease in the number of endoscopies during a COVID-19 pandemic.

[Successful use of danaparoid in the treatment of portal vein thrombosis that developed in a warfarin-administered hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis patient].

An 84-year-old woman with hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and atrial fibrillation, who presented with hematemesis, was initially treated with endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) for an esophageal varix hemorrhage. However, computed tomography (CT) upon admission had revealed portal vein thrombosis, despite having received warfarin for existing atrial fibrillation. We subsequently initiated a 2-week treatment with danaparoid;warfarin being discontinued in order to reduce the risk of re-hemorrhage. A follow-up CT after treatment revealed complete reduction of the portal vein thrombosis. This is the first successful report of danaparoid use in the treatment of portal vein thrombosis that developed in a patient who had received warfarin.

A case of gastric adenocarcinoma considered to originate from a sporadic fundic gland polyp in a Helicobacter pylori-uninfected stomach.

We encountered a rare case of gastric adenocarcinoma considered to arise from a sporadic fundic gland polyp (FGP). A woman in her 70 s, who had been prescribed a proton pump inhibitor for 5 years, was referred to our institution for further investigation and treatment of a gastric lesion. White light endoscopy showed numerous isochromatic FGPs in the greater curvature of the gastric body and a 15-mm reddish polypoid lesion with uneven surface characteristics. Magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging revealed an irregular granular microsurface structure with irregular microvessels, which is suggestive of cancer. The absence of atrophic changes in the entire gastric mucosa was confirmed endoscopically and histologically, and multiple Helicobacter pylori (HP) tests were negative. An en bloc resection was performed by polypectomy. The specimen showed adenocarcinoma that was thought to arise from an FGP. The lesion consisted of cystically dilated fundic glands in the basal part and neoplastic cells with nuclear atypia and high nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio in the foveolar part; on the basis of these findings, noninvasive adenocarcinoma was diagnosed. Although both adenocarcinoma in an HP-uninfected stomach and epithelial high-grade dysplasia in a sporadic FGP are extremely rare, this possibility should be considered when performing esophagogastroduodenoscopy.