Promoter hypermethylation regulates vitamin D receptor (VDR) expression in colorectal cancer-A study from Kashmir valley.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal carcinogenesis (CRC) is a multistep process, involving both genetic and epigenetic modifications of genes involved in diverse pathways ranging from tumor suppression to DNA mismatch repair. PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to assess the role of promoter methylation of vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene, a transcription factor with myriad biological functions, in relation to its expression and clinicopathological parameters. METHODS: Tissue specimens were taken from a total of 75 colorectal cancer cases paired with their normal surrounding epithelium and analyzed by Real-time RT-PCR for assessing the expression profile and MS-PCR for analyzing the promoter methylation status of the VDR gene. Blood sample from the same patients was drawn for vitamin D estimation. RESULTS: The frequency of promoter methylation in cancerous tissue was 37.33% against 9.33% in normal tissues (p<0.001). The hypermethylated status of VDR promoter showed significantly inverse association with its expression (p=0.008). Furthermore, when compared with the clinical parameters, methylation status of VDR promoter was significantly associated with tumor staging (p=0.008), grading (p<0.001), depth of invasion (p=0.002) and lymph node metastases (p<0.001). Univariate and multivariate analysis indicated patients with increased VDR expression (p<0.001) and decreased methylation status (p=0.012) exhibited longer overall survival. Additionally, serum 25(OH)D3 levels were not significantly associated with any of the patient characteristics. CONCLUSION: Our study, first of its kind from Kashmir, indicated that VDR shows aberrant methylation pattern in CRC with consequent loss in its expression.

Comparison of Two Doses of Ropivacaine Hydrochloride for Lumbosacral Epidural Anaesthesia in Goats Undergoing Laparoscopy Assisted Embryo Transfer.

Goats (n = 12) undergoing laparoscopy assisted embryo transfer were randomly allotted to two groups (I and II) and injected same volume of ropivacaine hydrochloride at 1.0 mg/kg and 0.5 mg/kg body weight, respectively, at the lumbosacral epidural space. The hind quarters of all the animals were lifted up for the first 3.0 minutes following injection. Immediately after induction the animals were restrained in dorsal recumbency in Trendelenburg position in a cradle. Laparoscopy was performed after achieving pneumoperitoneum using filtered room air. Regional analgesia and changes in physiological parameters were recorded. The mean induction time in animals of group I (n = 6) was 12.666 ± 1.994 minutes. In these animals the analgesia extended up to the umbilical region and lasted for 60 minutes. Only two animals in group II were satisfactorily induced in 11.333 ± 2.333 minutes. In animals of group I, the time taken for regaining the full motor power was significantly long (405 ± 46.314 min) when compared to group II goats (95 ± 9.219 min). From this study it was concluded that ropivacaine did not produce adequate analgesia in most of the goats at 0.5 mg/kg. When used at 1.0 mg/kg, it produced satisfactory regional analgesia lasting for one hour but the prolonged motor loss precludes its use. Additional studies using ropivacaine hydrochloride at doses in between the two extremes used here may be undertaken before recommending it for lumbosacral anaesthesia in goats undergoing laparoscopy.