Patient-reported symptom-mapping in carpal tunnel syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: To date, no method has been described or utilized to study the distribution of symptoms in carpal tunnel syndrome. We describe a technique of symptom-mapping that yields a population-based "anatomic profile" of carpal tunnel syndrome. METHODS: Symptoms were mapped on visual questionnaires depicting the volar hand, wrist, and forearm. Thirty-four hands in 26 patients with isolated carpal tunnel syndrome were included in the study. RESULTS: Painful symptoms were clearly centered over the carpal tunnel and were reported much less frequently in the digits. Nonpainful sensory disturbances (e.g., numbness, paresthesias) were found to have a much more peripheral and lateral distribution. DISCUSSION: Our technique serves to establish a population-based "anatomic profile" of carpal tunnel syndrome, assisting with clinical diagnosis and serving as a reference point for the comparison of pretreatment and posttreatment clinical data. Muscle Nerve 59:321-325, 2019.

Office-Based Carpal Tunnel Release With Ultrasound Guidance: 6-month Outcomes From the Multicenter ROBUST Trial.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and effectiveness of office-based carpal tunnel release with ultrasound guidance (CTR-US). Methods: In this prospective multicenter observational study, patients were treated with CTR-US in an office setting. Outcomes were time to resume normal daily activities, time to return to work, Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire Symptom Severity Scale and Functional Status Scale scores, Michigan Hand Questionnaire, Numeric Pain Scale, EuroQoL-5 Dimension 5-Level score, procedure satisfaction, and adverse events over 6 months. Results: A total of 149 participants (226 hands) from seven centers underwent office-based CTR-US. The mean age was 58 years, 52% were women, and 68% were employed. The mean incision length was 5 mm, 52% had simultaneous bilateral procedures, and wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet was used in all cases. All procedures were completed as planned, with no conversions to open repair and mean intraoperative pain severity of 1.6 ± 1.5. The median time to resume normal activities was 2 days (interquartile range: 1-4 days) and return to work was 4 days (interquartile range: 1-5 days). Over 6 months, Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire Symptom Severity Scale decreased by a mean of 1.7 points, Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire Functional Status Scale decreased by 1.1 points, Michigan Hand Questionnaire Global score increased by 35 points, Numeric Pain Scale decreased by 3.7 points, and EuroQoL-5 Dimension 5-Level score increased by 0.11 points. At 6 months, 94% reported procedure satisfaction. Unilateral and simultaneous bilateral procedures were similarly effective. There was one (0.4%) adverse event, a nerve contusion treated with neurolysis and nerve wrap where the patient fully regained normal function within 7 weeks. There were no revisions for persistent or recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome symptoms. Conclusions: Office-based CTR-US, performed either unilaterally or as simultaneous bilateral procedures, is well tolerated with a low complication rate and associated with rapid recovery, sustained improvement in symptoms and function, and high procedure satisfaction. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic III.

Warning Signs: Occult Diabetes and Dysglycemia in the Hand Surgery Patient Population.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus often exists for many years prior to diagnosis, and very little is known about the role of the prediagnosis stage of metabolic impairment in contributing to hand and upper-extremity pathology. The goal of this study is to determine the prevalence of undiagnosed glucose dysregulation in patients presenting with the 2 most commonly treated conditions of the hand and wrist. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed of hand surgery patients with no established diagnosis of prediabetes or diabetes referred for a 2-hour glucose tolerance test according to American Diabetes Association criteria. Patients were divided into 3 groups: peripheral neuropathies, trigger finger, and controls with various upper-extremity diagnoses. Rates of undiagnosed prediabetes and diabetes were compared between groups, including subgroup analysis of patients based on unilateral or bilateral presentation. Binary logistic regression analysis was also used to calculate odds ratios for multiple variables. RESULTS: Patients with neuropathy had a significantly higher incidence of undiagnosed dysglycemia compared with the control group. Of those patients, 51.3% were prediabetic and 12.8% were diabetic. The control group had significantly lower rates. Within the bilateral neuropathy patients, 59.6% had prediabetes and 15.4% had diabetes, versus 34.6% with prediabetes and 7.7% with diabetes in the unilateral group. CONCLUSIONS: Hand surgeons encounter a patient population with high rates of undiagnosed prediabetes and diabetes, with some presentations as much as 6 times higher than the general population. Certain patient presentations should prompt appropriate diagnostic testing and referral, especially those presenting with bilateral compression neuropathy and elevated body mass index.