"A cuff is not enough": A community-based participatory research approach to soliciting perspectives of African Americans with hypertension and their family members on self-management intervention features.

We aimed to solicit the perspectives of African Americans with hypertension and their family members on the desired features of a behavioral hypertension self-management intervention. Using a community-based participatory approach to intervention design, we conducted four dyadic focus groups, including African American community members with hypertension (n = 23) and their family members (n = 23), recruited from African American-serving Christian churches in a large, southern metropolitan area. We used open-ended questions to elicit participants' perspectives regarding program features they would recommend, intervention delivery, and barriers necessary to address. Our grounded theory analysis identified themes reflecting participants' recommendations for hypertension self-management interventions to enhance health literacy and provide communication training via an accessible, population-tailored, family-based approach, which they believed has the potential to create family-level impact on health across generations. Participants also recommended intervention researchers engage in advocacy (i.e., via physician education and policy change) as part of a broader impact on structural inequities driving worse hypertension and health outcomes for African Americans. The perceptions and recommendations of African Americans with a lived experience of hypertension, as well as their family members, aid in shaping acceptable and efficacious behavioral interventions aiming to promote hypertension self-management behavior while leveraging the unique power of family relationships to create sustained behavior change.

Firibastat: a Novel Treatment for Hypertension.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to discuss the unique mechanism of firibastat, a new antihypertension medication. Hypertension continues to be a highly prevalent public health issue. RECENT FINDINGS: Firibastat is a novel agent developed to treat hypertension. As the first member in the class of centrally acting agents to target the brain renin angiotensin system, firibastat offers new pathways to consider and enhances the regimen of agents currently available to treat hypertension. Recent clinical trials have demonstrated effectiveness and safety in mild hypertension as well as resistant hypertension. This review introduces firibastat as a new therapeutic class of treatment for hypertension focused on the renin angiotensin system in the brain. Early studies have shown a significant reduction in blood pressure with minimal side effects particularly in patients who are difficult to treat.

Efficacy and Safety of Firibastat, A First-in-Class Brain Aminopeptidase A Inhibitor, in Hypertensive Overweight Patients of Multiple Ethnic Origins.

BACKGROUND: Despite existing therapy, successful control of hypertension in the United States is estimated at less than 50%. In blacks, hypertension occurs earlier, is more severe, controlled less often and has a higher morbidity and mortality than in whites. Blacks are also less responsive to monotherapy with angiotensin-I converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin-II receptor type 1 blockers. Obesity, higher salt-sensitivity and low plasma renin activity are possible reasons of this poor blood pressure (BP) control, especially in blacks. The aim of the study was to assess efficacy and safety of firibastat, a first-in-class aminopeptidase A inhibitor preventing conversion of brain angiotensin-II into angiotensin-III, in BP lowering in a high-risk diverse hypertensive population. METHODS: Two hundred fifty-six overweight or obese hypertensive patients, including 54% black and Hispanic individuals, were enrolled in a multicenter, open-label, phase II study. After a 2-week wash-out period, subjects received firibastat for 8 weeks (250 mg BID orally for 2 weeks, then 500 mg BID if automated office blood pressure (AOBP) >140/90 mm Hg; hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg QD was added after 1 month if AOBP ≥160/110 mm Hg). The primary end point was change from baseline in systolic AOBP after 8 weeks of treatment, and secondary end points include diastolic AOBP, 24-hour mean ambulatory BP and safety. RESULTS: Firibastat lowered systolic AOBP by 9.5 mm Hg ( P<0.0001) and diastolic AOBP by 4.2 mm Hg ( P<0.0001). 85% of the subjects did not receive hydrochlorothiazide and were treated with firibastat alone. Significant BP reduction was found across all subgroups regardless age, sex, body mass index, or race. Systolic AOBP decreased by 10.2 mm Hg ( P<0.0001) in obese patients, by 10.5 mm Hg ( P<0.0001) in blacks, and 8.9 mm Hg ( P<0.0001) in nonblacks. Most frequent adverse events were headaches (4%) and skin reactions (3%). No angioedema was reported. No change in potassium, sodium, and creatinine blood level were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate the efficacy of firibastat in lowering BP in a high-risk diverse population where monotherapy with angiotensin-I converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin-II receptor type 1 blockers may be less effective and support the strategy to further investigate firibastat in subjects with difficult-to-treat or potentially resistant hypertension. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique Identifier: NCT03198793.

Review: Increasing Awareness and Education on Health Disparities for Health Care Providers.

The focus of this review is to highlight health care disparities and trends in several common diseases in selected populations while offering evidence-based approaches to mitigating health care disparities. Health care disparities cross many barriers and affect multiple populations and diseases. Ethnic minorities, the elderly, and those of lower socioeconomic status (SES) are more at-risk than others. However, many low SES Whites and higher SES racial minorities have poorer health than their racial or SES peers. Also, recent immigrant groups and Hispanics, in particular, maintain high health ratings. The so-called Hispanic Paradox provides an example of how culture and social background can be used to improve health outcomes. These groups have unique determinants of disparity that are based on a wide range of cultural and societal factors. Providing improved access to care and reducing the social determinants of disparity is crucial to improving public health. At the same time, for providers, increasing an understanding of the social determinants promotes better models of individualized care to encourage more equitable care. These approaches include increasing provider education on disparities encountered by different populations, practicing active listening skills, and utilizing a patient's cultural background to promote healthy behaviors.

Social, Racial, and Cultural Considerations in Hypertension in Older Adults.

Black and Hispanic older adults in the United States have higher prevalence of hypertension, less adequate treatment, less consistent blood pressure control, and worse cardiovascular outcomes than their white counterparts. Genetic differences are insufficient to explain these disparities-various social, economic, and environmental factors notably contribute. Racial and ethnic differences in living circumstances, household income, access to appropriate care, food security, educational attainment, and tobacco use all negatively impact long-term hypertension outcomes in minoritized older adults. To remedy these inequities, the search for solutions must include a complete assessment of the social, racial, and cultural components of the problem.

Management of Stage 1 Hypertension in Adults With a Low 10-Year Risk for Cardiovascular Disease: Filling a Guidance Gap: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

High blood pressure (BP) is the leading cause of worldwide cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality. Patients and clinicians dealing with hypertension have benefited from the evidence of event-based randomized controlled clinical trials. One result from those trials has been the development of evidence-based guidelines. The commitment to using evidence from these event-based randomized trials has been a cornerstone in the development of guideline treatment recommendations. However, in some situations, evidence from event-based trials is not available to guideline writers or clinicians for assistance in treatment decision making. Such is the case for the management of many patients with stage 1 hypertension. The purpose of this scientific statement is to provide information complementary to the 2017 Hypertension Clinical Practice Guidelines for the patient with untreated stage 1 hypertension (systolic BP/diastolic BP, 130-139/80-89 mm Hg) with a 10-year risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease <10% who fails to meet the systolic BP/diastolic goal (<130/80 mm Hg) after 6 months of guideline-recommended lifestyle therapy. This statement provides evidence from sources other than event-based randomized controlled clinical trials and offers therapy options for consideration by clinicians.

Evidence of Reduced Efferent Renal Sympathetic Innervation After Chemical Renal Denervation in Humans.

BACKGROUND: Renal denervation (RDN) is effective at lowering blood pressure. However, it is unknown if ablative procedures elicit sympathetic denervation of the kidneys in humans. The aim of this investigation was to assess sympathetic innervation of the renal cortex following perivascular chemical RDN, which may be particularly effective at ablating perivascular efferent and afferent nerves. METHODS: Seven hypertensive patients (4F:3M; 50-65 years) completed PET-CT sympathetic neuroimaging of the renal cortex using 11C-methylreboxetine (11C-MRB, norepinephrine transporter ligand) and 6-[18F]-fluorodopamine (18F-FDA; substrate for the cell membrane norepinephrine transporter) before and 8 weeks after chemical RDN (Peregrine System Infusion Catheter, Ablative Solutions; n = 4; 2F:2M) or control renal angiography (n = 3; 2F:1M). Patients completed physiological phenotyping including 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure, hemodynamics, muscle sympathetic nerve activity, and 24-hour urine collection. RESULTS: RDN decreased 11C-MRB-derived radioactivity by ~30% (Δ  11C-MRB/chamber: -0.95 a.u. confidence interval (CI): -1.36 to -0.54, P = 0.0002), indicative of efferent RDN. In contrast, 18F-FDA-derived radioactivity increased (Δ  18F-FDA/chamber: 2.72 a.u. CI: 0.73-4.71, P = 0.009), consistent with reduced vesicular turnover. Controls showed no change in either marker. Ambulatory systolic pressure decreased in 3 of 4 patients (-9 mm Hg CI: -27 to 9, P = 0.058), and central systolic pressure decreased in all patients (-23 mm Hg CI: -51 to 5, P = 0.095). CONCLUSIONS: These results are the first to show efferent sympathetic denervation of the renal cortex following RDN in humans. Further studies of mechanisms underlying variable blood pressure lowering in the setting of documented RDN may provide insights into inconsistencies in clinical trial outcomes. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: Trial Number NCT03465917.

Feasibility of treating prehypertension with an angiotensin-receptor blocker.

BACKGROUND: Prehypertension is considered a precursor of stage 1 hypertension and a predictor of excessive cardiovascular risk. We investigated whether pharmacologic treatment of prehypertension prevents or postpones stage 1 hypertension. METHODS: Participants with repeated measurements of systolic pressure of 130 to 139 mm Hg and diastolic pressure of 89 mm Hg or lower, or systolic pressure of 139 mm Hg or lower and diastolic pressure of 85 to 89 mm Hg, were randomly assigned to receive two years of candesartan (Atacand, AstraZeneca) or placebo, followed by two years of placebo for all. When a participant reached the study end point of stage 1 hypertension, treatment with antihypertensive agents was initiated. Both the candesartan group and the placebo group were instructed to make changes in lifestyle to reduce blood pressure throughout the trial. RESULTS: A total of 409 participants were randomly assigned to candesartan, and 400 to placebo. Data on 772 participants (391 in the candesartan group and 381 in the placebo group; mean age, 48.5 years; 59.6 percent men) were available for analysis. During the first two years, hypertension developed in 154 participants in the placebo group and 53 of those in the candesartan group (relative risk reduction, 66.3 percent; P<0.001). After four years, hypertension had developed in 240 participants in the placebo group and 208 of those in the candesartan group (relative risk reduction, 15.6 percent; P<0.007). Serious adverse events occurred in 3.5 percent of the participants assigned to candesartan and 5.9 percent of those receiving placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Over a period of four years, stage 1 hypertension developed in nearly two thirds of patients with untreated prehypertension (the placebo group). Treatment of prehypertension with candesartan appeared to be well tolerated and reduced the risk of incident hypertension during the study period. Thus, treatment of prehypertension appears to be feasible. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00227318.).

An evaluation of the effects of an angiotensin receptor blocker on health-related quality of life in patients with high-normal blood pressure (prehypertension) in the Trial of Preventing Hypertension (TROPHY).

The Trial of Preventing Hypertension (TROPHY) demonstrated the feasibility of possibly reducing the incidence of hypertension with the angiotensin receptor blocker candesartan compared with placebo. The long-term benefits of pharmacologic therapy in high-normal blood pressure, or prehypertension are not known, and the long-term effect on health-related quality of life (HRQL) has not been determined. An analysis of covariance model was used to assess treatment differences from baseline in the HRQL scores using Short Form (SF)-36, and component measures at subsequent visits. Of the 809 randomized patients, 734 had both baseline and > or =1 HRQL follow-up assessment: 95% (379 of 397) of patients receiving candesartan and 91% (355 of 388) of patients receiving placebo. There were no statistically significant between-group differences in least-squares mean physical component survey and mental component survey scores or the individual scales at each scheduled visit relative to baseline values (P >.05). In TROPHY, patients with prehypertension had relatively high baseline HRQL, and HRQL was maintained with the angiotensin receptor blocker candesartan over both the 2-year treatment period and a total 4-year trial period.

Measurement of 18-hydroxycorticosterone during adrenal vein sampling for primary aldosteronism.

CONTEXT: In primary aldosteronism, elevated serum 18-hydroxycorticosterone (18OHB) suggests aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA) rather than bilateral, idiopathic hyperaldosteronism (IHA), but little is known about the relative production of 18OHB and aldosterone (A) in APAs compared with IHA. OBJECTIVES: We measured 18OHB, A, and cortisol (F) in blood from adrenal vein sampling (AVS) studies. We compared the discriminatory power of gradients in 18OHB/A and 18OHB/F ratios with A/F ratio gradients for distinguishing APA from IHA. DESIGN, SETTING, AND SUBJECTS: We measured 18OHB and A in excess serum from 23 AVS studies performed at our university hospitals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We calculated the ratios 18OHB/A, 18OHB/F, and A/F for all specimens, and determined the adrenal vein gradients for these ratios. RESULTS: The 18OHB/A ratios were much lower in blood draining APAs (2.17 +/- 0.62) than in blood draining the contralateral adrenals (12.96 +/- 12.76; P < 0.001) but similar to blood draining IHA adrenals (4.69 +/- 4.32; P = 0.02). In contrast, the 18OHB/F ratios were elevated in specimens from APAs (26.03 +/- 11.51) compared with IHA adrenals (9.22 +/- 5.18; P < 0.001) or the contralateral adrenals (6.23 +/- 2.97; P < 0.001). Using 18OHB/F gradient greater than two or 18OHB/A gradient less than 0.5 as criteria for lateralization, interpretations agreed with lateralizations based on A/F gradients in 21 of 23 cases. CONCLUSIONS: High serum 18OHB in APA reflects augmented production of both 18OHB and A, not disproportionate 18OHB secretion relative to A. The 18OHB/A and 18OHB/F gradients are useful adjuncts but not as reliable as A/F gradients for A lateralization during AVS.

Antihypertensive combination therapy: optimizing blood pressure control and cardiovascular risk reduction.

Treating hypertension reduces the rates of myocardial infarction, stroke, and renal disease; however, clinical trial experience suggests that monotherapy is not likely to be successful for achieving goal blood pressure (BP) levels in many hypertensive patients. In multiple recent clinical trials including various subsets of hypertensive patients, the achievement of BP goal has typically required the combination of 2 or more medications, particularly in patients with BP levels>160/100 mm Hg. When initiating combination therapy for hypertension, careful consideration must be given to the choice of medication. Clinical trial evidence has shown the efficacy of various combinations of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers, and diuretics in reducing BP and cardiovascular risk. Ongoing trials should provide additional guidance on the optimal choice of combination regimens in specific clinical settings.

Primary hyperaldosteronism: effect of adrenal vein sampling on surgical outcome.

HYPOTHESIS: Adrenal vein sampling is superior to computed tomography for subtype differentiation of primary hyperaldosteronism. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: University medical center. PATIENTS: Forty-eight patients (32 men and 16 women) with biochemically confirmed primary hyperaldosteronism. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We compared demographic factors, results of biochemical and imaging studies (computed tomography and adrenal vein sampling), therapy, and patient outcomes. RESULTS: Mean +/- SEM adrenal nodule size was 1.54 +/- 0.2 cm. Adrenal vein sampling was performed in 41 (85%) of 48 patients, and it was successful in 39 (95%) of those 41 patients. Concordance between computed tomography and adrenal vein sampling was observed in 22 (54%) of the 41 patients. Thirty-two patients underwent successful laparoscopic adrenalectomy. There was 1 complication and no deaths. All 32 patients were cured of hypokalemia. CONCLUSION: Adrenal vein sampling is superior to image-based techniques for subtype differentiation of primary hyperaldosteronism.

Cardiovascular risk reduction in hypertensive black patients with left ventricular hypertrophy: the LIFE study.

OBJECTIVES: We report on a subanalysis of the effects of losartan and atenolol on cardiovascular events in black patients in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study. BACKGROUND: The LIFE study compared losartan-based to atenolol-based therapy in 9,193 hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). Overall, the risk of the primary composite end point (cardiovascular death, stroke, myocardial infarction) was reduced by 13% (p = 0.021) with losartan, with similar blood pressure (BP) reduction in both treatment groups. There was a suggestion of interaction between ethnic background and treatment (p = 0.057). METHODS: Exploratory analyses were performed that placed LIFE study patients into black (n = 533) and non-black (n = 8,660) categories, overall, and in the U.S. (African American [n = 523]; non-black [n = 1,184]). RESULTS: A significant interaction existed between the dichotomized groups (black/non-black) and treatment (p = 0.005); a test for qualitative interaction was also significant (p = 0.016). The hazard ratio (losartan relative to atenolol) for the primary end point favored atenolol in black patients (1.666 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.043 to 2.661]; p = 0.033) and favored losartan in non-blacks (0.829 [95% CI 0.733 to 0.938]; p = 0.003). In black patients, BP reduction was similar in both groups, and regression of electrocardiographic-LVH was greater with losartan. CONCLUSIONS: Results of the subanalysis are sufficient to generate the hypothesis that black patients with hypertension and LVH might not respond as favorably to losartan-based treatment as non-black patients with respect to cardiovascular outcomes, and do not support a recommendation for losartan as a first-line treatment for this purpose. The subanalysis is limited by the relatively small number of events.

Long-term treatment with losartan versus atenolol improves insulin sensitivity in hypertension: ICARUS, a LIFE substudy.

OBJECTIVE: Hypertension and insulin resistance might be associated through peripheral vascular hypertrophy/rarefaction which compromises skeletal muscle blood flow and decreases glucose uptake, inducing insulin resistance. We hypothesized that treatment with losartan as compared to atenolol would improve insulin sensitivity through regression of peripheral vascular hypertrophy/rarefaction. METHODS: In 70 hypertensive patients with electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy, we measured minimal forearm vascular resistance (MFVR) by plethysmography and insulin sensitivity (M/IG) by a 2-h isoglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp at baseline and after 1, 2 and 3 years of blinded treatment with atenolol- or losartan-based regimens. RESULTS: Blood pressures were reduced similarly in the two treatment groups. After 3 years, MFVR was increased (3.7 versus 3.2 mmHg x min x 100, P < 0.05) and M/IG decreased (8.6 versus 12.1 l/kg x mmol x min, P < 0.05) in patients treated with atenolol, whereas MFVR and M/IG were unchanged (3.5 versus 3.5 mmHg x min x 100 and 12.6 versus 11.1 l/kg x mmol x min, both P = NS) in patients treated with losartan. As compared to atenolol, losartan treatment was associated with less increase in MFVR (4.3 versus 27%, P < 0.05) and less decrease in M/IG (24 versus -14%, P < 0.01). The relative change in M/IG was inversely associated with the relative change in MFVR (r = -0.16, P < 0.05) independently of the relative change in body mass index (r = -0.29, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: As compared to atenolol, losartan treatment was associated with less peripheral vascular hypertrophy/rarefaction and higher insulin sensitivity. The relative change in MFVR and M/IG were inversely related, supporting the hypothesis that peripheral vascular changes in hypertension may induce insulin resistance. The ability of losartan to preserve insulin sensitivity may explain the lower incidence of new onset diabetes in patients treated with losartan in the LIFE study.

Hypertension in special populations.

Hypertension is a multifaceted disease that may present somewhat differently in various populations. It is clear that hypertensive treatment reduces cardiovascular, renal, and cerebrovascular outcomes for all patients, yet recent clinical trial data suggest that some groups may benefit more than others from specific drug intervention. Furthermore, these data justify specific approaches for some special populations. This article reviews important features of the presentation, rationale for treatment, and treatment recommendations for the treatment of hypertension in special populations. The special populations addressed include diabetic patients, the elderly, and women.

Is low-risk hypertension fact or fiction? cardiovascular risk profile in the TROPHY study.

BACKGROUND: The Trial of Preventing Hypertension (TROPHY) Study is designed to establish whether treating high normal blood pressure with a low-dose angiotensin receptor blocker, candesartan cilexetil, for 2 years reduces the rate of progression to hypertension compared with placebo treatment over a 4-year observation period. We are presenting the baseline cardiovascular risk factor profile of the 809 subjects randomized in the TROPHY Study. The risk factors in this analysis were as follows: cholesterol >or=200 mg/dl; LDL-cholesterol >or=160 mg/dL; HDL-cholesterol or=150 mg/dL; body mass index >or=25 kg/m2 (overweight and obese), fasting insulin >or=20 mU/mL; heart rate >or=80 beats/min; hematocrit >or=43.5 % (men) and >or=41.2% (women). METHODS: The TROPHY Study is a 4-year randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trial of 809 subjects with high normal blood pressure (BP), which is currently in progress. RESULTS: The participants of the TROPHY study (mean age 49+/-8.1 years) with high normal BP (mean 134+/-4/85+/-4 mm Hg) had additional cardiovascular risk factors. Of the group, 96% had at least one, 81% had two or more, and 13% had five or more additional risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Our data from individuals with high normal BP suggests clearly that the risk of cardiovascular disease begins to rise before the diagnosis of hypertension is evident. The overall risk in such subjects reflects both the rising BP and other concurring factors. It appears that truly low-risk hypertension only rarely exists.

Metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance in the TROPHY sub-study: contrasting views in patients with high-normal blood pressure.

BACKGROUND: Although insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome are often used synonymously, concordance is not established. METHODS: Metabolic, hemodynamic, and hormonal data were analyzed on 141 patients in the Trial of Preventing Hypertension (TROPHY) Sub-Study with high-normal blood pressure (BP) (130 to 139/85 to 89 mm Hg [mean +/- SD, 133 +/- 8/85 +/- 6 mm Hg]; age, 48 +/- 9 years; body mass index 30 +/- 5 kg/m(2)). RESULTS: Fifty-three of 141 subjects (37.6%; approximately 3/8) had the metabolic syndrome based on three or more of the five risk factors (BP, waist circumference, fasting triglycerides, HDL-cholesterol, glucose). To maintain consistency in proportions, insulin resistance was defined as the upper 3/8 of the distribution on the homeostatic model assessment (HOMA), which uses fasting glucose and insulin and a modified Matsuda-DeFronzo index, based on fasting, 1- and 2-h glucose and insulin values. Among metabolic syndrome patients, 57% and 55% were in the upper 3/8 of the distribution for insulin resistance by HOMA and Matsuda-DeFronzo, respectively. Among subjects without the metabolic syndrome, 26% and 27% were insulin resistant by HOMA and Matsuda-DeFronzo criteria. The proportion of patients with metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance increased strongly and similarly with increasing body mass index. However, metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance were different compared with their respective controls in the lower 5/8 of the distribution, in waist/hip ratios, fasting and 1-h insulin, HDL-cholesterol, heart rate, and systolic BP responses to exercise and plasma renin, angiotensin, and aldosterone. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance are not synonymous anthropometrically, metabolically, hemodynamically, or hormonally in patients with high-normal BP.

A "gender blind" relationship of lean body mass and blood pressure in the Tecumseh study.

BACKGROUND: Body size correlates positively with blood pressure (BP) but there is controversy about the roles of obesity versus muscularity in this relationship. METHODS: We examined the BP relationship with overweight, lean body mass (LBM), and muscle performance in 231 adolescents (17.25 +/- 3.07 years, 123 males). The skinfold thickness (SKINT) was used to measure overweight, as this was a growing population. RESULTS: Maximal foot torque, a measure of muscle strength, correlated strongly (r = 0.51, P < .001) to LBM attesting to the validity of the calculated LBM. Anthropometric measurements were available also in 944 adults (29.9 +/- 5.5 years, 461 men). Correlations of LBM to systolic (adolescents r = 0.52, adults r = 0.19, both P < .001) and diastolic (adolescents r = 0.47, adults r = 0.20, both P < .001) BP were highly significant. SKINT also correlated significantly to systolic and diastolic BP in adolescents and in adults, respectively. In both genders and populations an increasing SKINT was associated with a similar increase in BP, but this effect was superimposed on an average 10 mm Hg between-gender BP difference. The LBM in both groups and genders related to the BP in an identical fashion; the men were on the high and the women on the low end of the same BP/LBM correlation line. Thus, the amount of LBM erased categoric BP differences between the genders. CONCLUSIONS: The gender-related BP differences appear to reflect the inherent gender differences in muscle bulk.