RESUMO
Clinical performance metrics are the foundation of the design and ultimate performance of North Carolina's Medicaid reform plan. This commentary describes the general approach of the state's Department of Health and Human Services in setting metrics, including goals, assumptions, and starting principles.
Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde , Medicaid , Humanos , North Carolina , Estados UnidosAssuntos
COVID-19 , Medicina de Família e Comunidade , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Atenção Primária à Saúde , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Teste para COVID-19 , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Medicina de Família e Comunidade/métodos , Medicina de Família e Comunidade/organização & administração , Medicina de Família e Comunidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Alocação de Recursos para a Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Alocação de Recursos para a Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Alocação de Recursos para a Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde/métodos , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , Equipamento de Proteção Individual , Papel do Médico , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
The National Academy of Medicine has called for fundamental reform in the governance and accountability of graduate medical education, but how to implement this change is unclear. We describe the North Carolina graduate medical education system, and we propose tracking outcomes and aligning residency stipends with outcomes such as specialty choice, practice in North Carolina, and acceptance of new Medicaid and Medicare patients.
Assuntos
Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Apoio ao Desenvolvimento de Recursos Humanos , Educação/economia , Educação/normas , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/economia , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/organização & administração , Humanos , Medicaid , Medicare , Avaliação das Necessidades/economia , North Carolina , Melhoria de Qualidade , Saúde da População Rural/economia , Saúde da População Rural/educação , Apoio ao Desenvolvimento de Recursos Humanos/métodos , Apoio ao Desenvolvimento de Recursos Humanos/organização & administração , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The effect of practice facilitation that provides onsite quality improvement (QI) and electronic health record (EHR) coaching on chronic care outcomes is unclear. This study evaluates the effectiveness of such a program-similar to an agricultural extension center model-that provides these services. METHODS: Through the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) portion of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, the North Carolina Area Health Education Centers program became the Regional Extension Center for Health Information Technology (REC) for North Carolina. The REC program provides onsite technical assistance to help small primary care practices achieve meaningful use of certified EHRs. While pursuing meaningful use functionality, practices were also offered complementary onsite advice regarding QI issues. We followed the first 50 primary care practices that utilized both EHR and QI advice targeting diabetes care. RESULTS: The achievement of meaningful use of certified EHRs and performance of QI with onsite practice facilitation showed an absolute improvement of 19% in the proportion of patients who achieved excellent diabetes control (hemoglobin A1c < 7%) compared to baseline. In addition, the percentages of patients with poorly controlled diabetes (hemoglobin A1c > 9%) fell steeply in these practices. LIMITATIONS: No control group was available for comparison. CONCLUSION: Practice facilitation that provided EHR and QI coaching support showed important improvements in diabetes outcomes in practices that achieved meaningful use of their EHR systems. This approach holds promise as a way to help small primary care practices achieve excellent patient outcomes.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência de Longa Duração , Uso Significativo/organização & administração , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Difusão de Inovações , Humanos , Assistência de Longa Duração/métodos , Assistência de Longa Duração/normas , Modelos Organizacionais , North Carolina , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Melhoria de QualidadeRESUMO
There is consensus that patients need to be engaged with their care, but how to do this in a primary care setting remains unclear. This case study demonstrates Patient Advisory Council engagement with the operations of a patient-centered medical home.
Assuntos
Comitês Consultivos/organização & administração , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/organização & administração , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , HumanosRESUMO
Dramatic and unprecedented changes in health care have altered the health care landscape and have significant implications for health professions education. This issue of the NCMJ explores these changes and highlights innovative models across the health professions that are designed to prepare graduates to practice in the emerging health care system and to deliver high-quality care in a cost-effective manner. These new educational programs--which include training for future doctors, nurses, dentists, pharmacists, and various allied health professionals--aim to prepare providers to meet the needs of North Carolina communities, and they use new educational models to give graduates the competencies they need to practice in health care teams and to contribute in other ways to improved health outcomes for the people of the state.
Assuntos
Difusão de Inovações , Pessoal de Saúde/educação , Modelos Educacionais , Humanos , North CarolinaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic began interrupting family medicine residency training in spring 2020. While a decline in scores on the American Board of Family Medicine In-Training Examination (ITE) has been observed, whether this decline has translated into the high-stakes Family Medicine Certification Examination (FMCE) is unclear. The goal of this study was to systematically assess the magnitude of COVID-19 impact on medical knowledge acquisition during residency, as measured by the ITE and FMCE. METHODS: A total of 19,101 initial certification candidates from 2017 to 2022 were included in this study. Annual ITE scores and FMCE scores were reported on the same scale (200-800) and served as the outcome measure. We conducted multilevel regression analysis to determine ITE score growth and FMCE scores compared to cohorts prior to COVID-19. RESULTS: During COVID-19, the increase in ITE scores from postgraduate year 2 (PGY-2) to PGY-3 was 25.5 points less, representing a 57.6% relative decrease; and from PGY-3 ITE to FMCE, it was 8.6 points less, a 12.7% relative decrease, compared with cohorts prior to COVID-19. FMCE scores were 6.6 points less during COVID-19, representing a 1.2% relative decline from the average FMCE score prior to COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: This study found nonsubstantive COVID-19 impact on FMCE scores, but a considerable knowledge acquisition decline during residency, especially during the PGY-2 to PGY-3 period. While COVID-19 impacted learning, our findings indicated that residencies were largely able to remediate knowledge deficits before residents took the FMCE.