Ultrasound assessment of hands and feet for synovitis at time of first clinical visit markedly reduces time to diagnosis in routine care.

OBJECTIVES: The role of musculoskeletal US (MSUS) in routine care for diagnosing arthritis is not fully elucidated, but US is more sensitive than clinical joint examination for detecting synovitis. Therefore, the use of US may facilitate diagnosis of arthritis. The aim of the study was to assess whether MSUS examination of hands and feet in relation to the first clinical visit had an impact on the time to reach a final diagnosis and the number of clinical follow-up visits needed after first consultation. METHODS: Two cohorts referred to the outpatient arthritis clinic with suspected arthritis were compared with each other, (i) MSUS (October 2017 to June 2018) of hands and feet performed prior to the first clinical visit and (ii) MSUS (November 2016 to June 2017) was performed ad hoc, for the following aspects: time to clinical diagnosis, number of clinical visits needed, and number of US examinations. RESULTS: In total, 163 and 109 patients were included in the MSUS and comparative cohorts, respectively. Adding MSUS to the first clinical visit reduced the time to diagnosis from mean 31 (32.2) days to 12 (17.3) days (P < 0.01). The number of clinical visits needed was reduced from mean 2.8 (1.1) to 2.1 (1.3) (P < 0.01), corresponding to a reduction of 114 visits in the MSUS cohort. A final diagnosis with inflammatory arthritis was found in 76 (47%) of patients in the MSUS cohort vs 29 (27%) in the comparative cohort (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: In patients referred for suspected arthritis, routine MSUS in relation to the first clinical visit significantly reduces time to diagnosis and number of clinical visits needed to reach a final diagnosis.

Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Joint Inflammation in Rheumatoid Arthritis-Agreement With Ultrasonography and Clinical Evaluation.

Objective: To compare joint inflammation seen by whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WBMRI), with "whole-body" ultrasound and clinical assessments, in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) before and during tumor necrosis factor-inhibitor (TNF-I, adalimumab) treatment. Methods: In 18 patients with RA, clinical assessment for joint tenderness and swelling, WBMRI, and ultrasound were obtained at baseline and week 16. Wrist, metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP), elbow (except for WBMRI), shoulder, knee, ankle, and metatarsophalangeal joints were examined. Joint inflammation was defined by WBMRI as the presence of synovitis and/or osteitis and by ultrasound as gray-scale synovial hypertrophy grade >2 and/or color Doppler grade >1. On patient level, agreement was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficients (rho) for sum scores for 28 joints (i.e., wrists, MCPs, PIPs, elbows, shoulders, and knees) between clinical examination (DAS28CRP), ultrasound (US28), and WBMRI (WBMRI26; elbows not included). On joint level, agreement on inflammation between WBMRI, ultrasound, and clinical findings was calculated with Cohen's kappa (κ). Results: At patient level, WBMRI26 and US28 sum scores showed good correlation (rho = 0.72; p < 0.01) at baseline, but not at follow-up (rho = 0.25; p = 0.41). At joint level, moderate agreement was seen for hand joints (κ = 0.41-0.44); for other joints κ <0.40. No correlation with DAS28CRP was seen. No statistically significant correlations were observed between changes in WBMRI26, US28, and DAS28CRP during treatment. Conclusions: WBMRI and ultrasound joint inflammation sum scores at patient level showed good agreement in clinically active RA patients before TNF-I initiation, whereas agreement was poorer at joint level, and after treatment.