Exposure-response analysis of Raltitrexed assessing liver toxicity.

AIM: Raltitrexed (RTX) is a thymidylate synthase inhibitor with large pharmacokinetics (PK) variability that can be administered in case of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) intolerance or dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency. While it is a more potent thymidylate synthase inhibitor than 5FU, RTX failed to replace this drug for colorectal cancer patients, mainly due to its toxicity at the recommended dose of 3 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. However, every 2 weeks administration at 2 mg/m2 demonstrated a favourable toxicity profile. METHOD: We performed a randomized crossover comparative population PK study between every 2 weeks TOMOX (RTX 2 mg/m2 ) and every 3 weeks TOMOX (RTX 3 mg/m2 ). RESULTS: A three-compartment model and a proportional error model best describe the data. Creatinine clearance and sex, but not body surface area (BSA), were covariates of RTX clearance leading to decrease of its interindividual variability of 28%. Weight and body surface area were covariates of central and peripheral volumes of distribution, respectively, leading to decreases of interindividual variability of 34.6% and 100%, respectively. In contrast to the dose, AUC was a good predictor of liver toxicity (P = 0.006, OR = 3.91, 95%CI = [1.48-10.34]). Using covariates to compute individual clearance and a threshold AUC (1.639, determined in this study), a covariates-based dose was calculated, leading to less variability in AUC than observed with the actual BSA-based or fixed doses. CONCLUSION: These results advocate for the use of creatinine clearance and sex to determine the RTX dose instead of BSA.

Metronomic cyclophosphamide induces regulatory T cells depletion and PSA-specific T cells reactivation in patients with biochemical recurrent prostate cancer.

Biochemical recurrence (BCR) occurs in up to 40% of prostate cancer patients after prostatectomy. In our study, we performed an immune monitoring study in 20 prostate cancer patients with BCR previously treated with metronomic cyclophosphamide (mCTX). We observed a decrease of regulatory T cells (Tregs) from 2 months and this was more pronounced after 6 months of mCTX treatment. This drop of Tregs was associated with increased level of activated HLADR+ CD45R0+ T cells in peripheral blood. Furthermore, a reactivation of Th1 polarized anti-PSA T-cell response was detected in BCR patients treated with mCTX. However, dendritic cell subsets counts and activation were not influenced by the treatment. In the clinical setting, we found that PSA level control was observed in 82% (9/11) of patients with a significant diminution of Tregs after mCTX compared to 33% (3/9) in patients without Tregs decrease. In addition, 30% (6/20) of patients previously treated with mCTX remained free for androgen deprivation therapy. In conclusion, Tregs diminution and immune activation associated with PSA level control occurred after mCTX in prostate cancer patients with BCR.

Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic or unresectable locally recurrent anal squamous cell carcinoma: a phase II study of French interdisciplinary GERCOR and FFCD groups (Epitopes-HPV02 study).

BACKGROUND: The squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) is a rare disease, but its incidence is markedly increasing. About 15% of patients are diagnosed at metastatic stage, and more than 20% with a localized disease treated by chemoradiotherapy (CRT) will recur. In advanced SCCA, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CF) combination is the standard option but complete response is a rare event and the prognosis remains poor with most disease progression occurring within the first 12 months. We have previously published the potential role of the addition of docetaxel (D). Among 8 consecutive patients with advanced recurrent SCCA after CRT, the DCF regimen induced a complete response in 4 patients, including 3 pathological complete responses. Then, the Epitopes-HPV02 study was designed to confirm the interest of DCF regimen in SCCA patients. METHODS: This multicentre phase II trial assesses the DCF regimen in advanced SCCA patients. Main eligibility criteria are: histologically proven SCCA, unresectable locally advanced recurrent or metastatic disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-performance status (ECOG-PS) <2, and being eligible for DCF. Patients receive either 6 cycles of standard DCF or 8 cycles of modified DCF depending on age (> vs. ≤ 75 years-old) and ECOG-PS (0 vs. 1). The trial was set up based on a Simon's optimal two-stage design for phase II trials, allowing an early futility interim analysis. The primary endpoint is the observed progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 12 months from the first DCF cycle. A PFS rate below 10% is considered uninteresting, while a PFS rate above 25% is expected. With a unilateral alpha error of 5% and a statistical power of 90%, 66 evaluable patients should be included. Main secondary endpoints are overall survival, PFS, response rate, safety, health-related quality of life, and the correlation of biomarkers with treatment efficacy. DISCUSSION: Since the recommended CF regimen is based in a small retrospective analysis and generates a low rate of complete responses, the Epitopes-HPV02 study will establish a new standard in case of a positive result. Associated biomarker studies will contribute to understand the underlying mechanism of resistance and the role of immunity in SCCA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02402842 , EudraCT: 2014-001789-81.

A prospective observational study on the evaluation of everolimus-related adverse events in metastatic renal cell carcinoma after first-line anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy: the AFINITE study in France.

PURPOSE: The objective of the study was to describe the occurrence of stomatitis and noninfectious lung disease in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with second-line everolimus in a real-world setting. METHODS: This multicenter, prospective, observational study was conducted in France by physicians with experience of treatment of patients with mRCC. Patients aged ≥18 years who received everolimus after first-line antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy were included in the study. The primary safety assessments were occurrence of stomatitis (in terms of severity, event dates, and therapeutic management) and noninfectious pneumonitis (in terms of detection methodology, severity, event dates, and therapeutic management). RESULTS: Between September 2010 and August 2012, 284 patients were enrolled at 77 centers, of whom, 274 received everolimus therapy. Most patients had mRCC of clear cell histology (88%), and most of them (84%) received first-line sunitinib. In total, 40% of patients experienced treatment-related stomatitis, and 15% of patients experienced noninfectious lung disease. Most of them had a single episode. The incidence of grade 3 stomatitis and noninfectious lung disease were 8 and 3%, respectively. Mean time to the first episode was 27 days for stomatitis and 72 days for noninfectious lung disease from treatment initiation. Stomatitis and noninfectious lung disease resulted in treatment discontinuations in 2 and 7% of patients, respectively. The primary first-episode treatment was mouthwash (86%) for stomatitis and corticosteroids (65%) for noninfectious lung disease. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that stomatitis and noninfectious lung disease are commonly associated with everolimus use. Both adverse events were rarely severe and were managed easily and efficiently.

How to manage intravenous vinflunine in cancer patients with renal impairment: results of a pharmacokinetic and tolerability phase I study.

AIMS: Vinflunine (VFL) ditartrate, a novel tubulin-targeted inhibitor, is registered for the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial transitional cell carcinoma. This phase I study assessed the effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of VFL. METHODS: VFL was infused in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumours once every 3 weeks with anticipated dose reduction on the first cycle stratified according to the creatinine clearance (CLcr ) values. Pharmacokinetic data were collected on the first two cycles in renally impaired patients (CLcr ≤ 60 ml min(-1) ) and were compared with a control cohort of patients (CLcr > 60 ml min(-1) ). RESULTS: Thirty-three patients (46-86 years) were treated, 13 in group 1 (40 ml min(-1) ≤ CLcr ≤ 60 ml min(-1) ) and 20 in group 2 (20 ml min(-1) ≤ CLcr < 40 ml min(-1) ). The renal dysfunction induced a mean decrease in VFL clearance of 12% in group 1 and 28% in group 2, compared with the control group. The anticipated dose reduction given in renally impaired patients (i.e. 280 mg m(-2) and 250 mg m(-2) in groups 1 and 2, respectively) yielded similar drug exposure to control patients. The tolerance profile of VFL in patients with renal dysfunction was similar to that observed in patients with CLcr > 60 ml min(-1) . CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the recommended doses of intravenous VFL administered once every 3 weeks in cancer patients with renal impairment are 280 mg m(-2) when CLcr is between 40 and 60 ml min(-1) and 250 mg m(-2) when CLcr is between 20 and <40 ml min(-1) .

Advanced biliary tract carcinomas: a retrospective multicenter analysis of first and second-line chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine/Cisplatin (Gem/CDDP) combination has demonstrated a clear survival advantage over gemcitabine alone and has become a new standard in advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma (aBTC). However, Gemcitabine/Oxaliplatin (GEMOX) combination and Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Gem/Carb) combination regimens have shown efficacy in phase II trials and there is no comparative study between different platinum salts.We assessed the efficacy and safety of different platinum-based chemotherapies at first line in aBTC patients. We also analysed the second-line chemotherapy. METHODS: Sixty-four consecutive patients with aBTC diagnosed between 1998 and 2010 were included for analysis. At first line chemotherapy, 44 patients received one day GEMOX regimen (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 Day 1, every 2 weeks), and 20 patients received Gem/Carb regimen (gemcitabine at 1000 mg/m2 Days 1 and 8 with carboplatin delivered according to an area-under-the-curve (AUC) 5 at day 1, every 3 weeks). At second line, a total of 16 patients received a fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. RESULTS: With GEMOX regimen, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.7 months (95%CI, 2.4 to 5) and median overall survival (OS) was 10.5 months (95%CI, 6.4 to14.7). The main toxicity was peripheral neuropathy (20% grade 2 and 7% grade 3). Grade 3/4 haematological toxicities were rare.With Gem/Carb regimen, PFS was 2.5 months (95%CI, 2.1 to 3.7) and OS was 4.8 months (95%CI, 3.7 to 5.8). The main grade 3/4 toxicities were haematological: anaemia (45%), thrombocytopenia (45%), and neutropenia (40%).At second-line, fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy was feasible in only a fourth of the patients. The median OS was 5.3 months (95%CI, 4.1 to 6.6), and median PFS was 4.0 months (95%CI, 2.6 to 5.5). CONCLUSIONS: One day GEMOX regimen has a favourable toxicity profile and could be an alternative to standard Gem/CDDP regimen, in particular in unfit patients for CDDP.At second-line, selective patients may benefit from fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy.

Metronomic cyclophosphamide: an alternative treatment for hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma.

Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma is a rare liver mesenchymatous tumor with an epithelial aspect developed from endothelial cells with a lack of validated therapeutic options at metastatic stage. Metronomic chemotherapy has been described as an anti-angiogenic therapy leading to the depletion of circulating endothelial progenitors. We report the results of two patients treated for metastatic hemangioendothelioma with metronomic cyclophosphamide chemotherapy. Following initiation of metronomic cyclophosphamide chemotherapy (50mg once a day continuously), the two patients exhibited significant clinical improvement and decrease in metastasis size without any clinically relevant side-effect. Metronomic cyclophosphamide could be proposed as a new therapeutic option to treat metastatic hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma.

Bifractionated CPT-11 with LV5FU2 infusion (FOLFIRI-3) in combination with bevacizumab: clinical outcomes in first-line metastatic colorectal cancers according to plasma angiopoietin-2 levels.

BACKGROUND: Optimization of chemotherapy effectiveness in metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRC) is a major endpoint to enhance the possibility of curative intent surgery. FOLFIRI3 has shown promising results as second-line chemotherapy for mCRC patients previously exposed to oxaliplatin. The clinical efficacy of FOLFIRI3 was never determined in association with bevacizumab in non-previously treated mCRC patients. METHODS: We conducted a phase II clinical trial to characterize the response rate and toxicity profile of FOLFIRI3-bevacizumab as initial treatment for mCRC. Sixty-one patients enrolled in 3 investigation centers were treated with FOLFIRI3-bevacizumab (median of 10 cycles) followed by a maintenance therapy combining bevacizumab and capecitabine. Levels of plasma angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay at baseline. RESULTS: Overall response rate (ORR) was 66.7% (8% of complete and 58% of partial responses). The disease control rate was 91.7%. After a median time of follow-up of 46.7 months, 56 patients (92%) had progressed or died. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 12.7 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 9.7-15.8 months). The median overall survival (OS) was 24.5 months (95% CI: 10.6-38.3 months). Twenty-one patients underwent curative intent-surgery including 4 patients with disease initially classified as unresectable. Most common grade III-IV toxicities were diarrhea (15%), neutropenia (13%), asthenia (10%), and infections (4%). Hypertension-related medications needed to be increased in 3 patients. In multivariate analysis, surgery of metastases and Ang-2 levels were the only independent prognostic factors for PFS and OS. Indeed, baseline level of Ang-2 above 5 ng/mL was confirmed as an independent prognostic factor for progression free survival (HR = 0.357; 95% CI: 0.168-0.76, p = 0.005) and overall survival (HR = 0.226; 95% CI: 0.098-0.53, p = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: As front-line therapy, FOLFIRI-3-bevacizumab is associated with an acceptable toxicity and induced promising objective response rates. However, unfavorable clinical outcomes were observed in patients with high levels of angiopoietin-2.

DCF versus doublet chemotherapy as first-line treatment of advanced squamous anal cell carcinoma: a multicenter propensity score-matching study.

Triplet DCF (docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-flurouracil) and doublet CP/CF (carboplatin and paclitaxel/cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil) regimens were prospectively evaluated in advanced squamous anal cell carcinoma (SCCA), and validated as standard treatments. Even though the high efficacy and good tolerance of DCF regimen were confirmed in 3 independent prospective trials, doublet CP regimen is still recommended in several guidelines based in its better safety profile with similar efficacy compared to CF regimen. We performed a propensity score-adjusted method with inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) and matched case control (MCC) comparison among patients with metastatic or non-resectable locally advanced recurrent SCCA, treated with chemotherapy as first line regimen. The primary endpoint was the overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoint was the progression-free survival (PFS). 247 patients were included for analysis. 154 patients received DCF and 93 patients received a doublet regimen. The median OS was 32.3 months with DCF and 18.3 months with doublet regimens (HR 0.53, 95%CI 0.38-0.74; p = 0.0001), and the median PFS was 11.2 months with DCF versus 7.6 months with doublet regimens (HR 0.53, 95%CI 0.39-0.73; p < 0.0001). The hazard ratios by IPTW and MCC analyses were 0.411 (95% CI, 0.324-0.521; p < 0.0001) and 0.406 (95% CI, 0.261-0.632; p < 0.0001) for OS, and 0.466 (95% CI, 0.376-0.576; p < 0.0001) and 0.438 (95% CI, 0.298-0.644; P < 0.0001) for PFS. The triplet DCF regimen provides a high and significant benefit in OS and PFS over doublet regimens, and should be considered as upfront treatment for eligible patients with advanced SCCA.

Modified DCF (Docetaxel, Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil) chemotherapy is effective for the treatment of advanced rectal squamous cell carcinoma.

Background: Advanced rectal squamous cell carcinoma (rSCC) is a very rare and aggressive entity, and the best initial management is crucial for long survival as well as organ preservation and quality of life. Whereas local diseases are treated with chemo-radiotherapy and salvage surgery, data are scarce on how to treat more advanced diseases, and the role of induction chemotherapy is unknown. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive patients with advanced rSCC and treated with modified DCF (docetaxel, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil; mDCF) regimen, from January 2014 and December 2021 in two French centers. Exploratory endpoints were efficacy (overall survival, recurrence-free survival, response rate, organ preservation rate) and safety. Results: Nine patients with locally advanced or metastatic diseases received a mDCF regimen and were included for analysis. The median age was 62.0 years, 7 patients (77.8%) were women, and all eight available tumors were positive for HPV, mostly (85.7%) to genotype 16. With a median follow-up of 33.1 months, 77.8% of patients were still alive and disease-free, and the median overall survival was not reached at six years. The objective response rate was 87.5% after mDCF, and the complete response rate was 25.0% after mDCF and was increased to 75.0% after chemoradiotherapy. Only one patient underwent surgery on the primary tumor, with a complete pathological response. The median mDCF cycle was eight over eight scheduled, and all patients received the complete dose of radiotherapy without interruptions. Conclusions: Induction mDCF chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy is safe and highly effective in patients with advanced rSCC, and should be considered as an option in metastatic stage or locally advanced disease with an organ-preservation strategy.

Second-line treatment after docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in metastatic squamous cell carcinomas of the anus. Pooled analysis of prospective Epitopes-HPV01 and Epitopes-HPV02 studies.

BACKGROUND: Squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) is a rare disease often diagnosed at a localised stage. For locally advanced recurrence or metastatic disease, DCF (docetaxel, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil) demonstrated high efficacy and became one of the standard regimens. However, there is no standard of care in the second line. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the Epitopes-HPV01 and Epitopes-HPV02 prospective trials, 115 patients with advanced SCCA were treated with a DCF regimen in the first line. In these studies, second-line data were registered per protocol. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of >40 months, at progression, 73 patients received a second-line (L2) treatment. In this L2 population, median overall survival (mOS) was 13.5 months (95%CI 9.4-19.8), and median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 5.7 months (3.4-7.3) in L2. Fourteen patients presented an oligometastatic progression and were treated with an ablative treatment (surgery or radiotherapy); mOS was 48.3 months (NE-NE), and mPFS was 31.3 months (23.2-NE). Fifty-nine patients received a systemic treatment (chemotherapy or immunotherapy); mOS was 11 months (8.4-15.4) and mPFS was 4.9 months (3.3-7). The most frequent chemotherapy regimens were the reintroduction of DCF, paclitaxel, FOLFIRI and mitomycin plus fluoropyrimidine. No significant difference was observed between regimens (p = 0.26). Six patients received anti-PD1/L1-based immunotherapy. CONCLUSION: Second-line treatments are effective in patients with SCCA. Ablative treatment is feasible and is probably the best option for patients with oligometastatic progression. If this is not possible, systemic therapy by an anti-PD1/L1 immunotherapy or chemotherapy can be recommended. Reintroduction of DCF, paclitaxel, FOLFIRI or mitomycin-C plus fluoropyrimidine are possible options.

Duration: escalation study of oral etoposide with carboplatin in patients with varied solid tumors.

Prolonged fractionated oral administration of etoposide may present a theoretical advantage over intravenous administration of the bolus. This phase I trial was carried out to determine the recommended duration of oral etoposide in combination with a fixed dose of carboplatin. Nineteen patients with varied solid tumors, who were not candidates for standard chemotherapy, were administered an escalating duration (6, 9 or 12 consecutive days) of oral etoposide (a 25 mg capsule three times daily) combined with carboplatin AUC5 administered on day 1, by a 30 min intravenous infusion, to define the maximum tolerated dose on the basis of the acute toxicities that were reported. Etoposide was started on day 2; the cycles repeated every 28 days until disease progression or toxicity. Pharmacokinetics was carried out during the two first cycles. The maximum tolerated dose was determined to be the 12-day treatment level, with two cases of grade 4 neutropenia, grade 3 anemia and thrombocytopenia. As no severe toxicity occurred with the 9-day treatment level and in an attempt to explore an optimal combination, a new 10-day treatment plan was studied in three patients. As one patient presented dose-limiting toxicity at that level, five additional patients were included to establish the recommended regimen. Nonhematological toxicities among all patients were moderate, consisting of grade 2 nausea and asthenia. No treatment-related death occurred. Objective responses were observed in four patients and stabilization in three patients. Pharmacokinetics highlighted no interaction between etoposide and carboplatin. Fractionated oral etoposide (3×25 mg/day) for 10 days in combination with carboplatin AUC 5 presents acceptable toxicity and efficacy. The main toxicity remains hematological.

Systemic lupus erythematosus associated with thymoma: A fifteen-year observational study in France.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical, biological and pathological characteristics of patients with the association of SLE and thymic epithelial tumors (TET) in a retrospective multicenter series. METHODS: Cases diagnosed in France between 2000 and 2015 were collected after a call for observations from the French network for thymic epithelial tumors (RYTHMIC database) and the French National Society of Internal Medicine (SNFMI). RESULTS: Fourteen patients were identified, the majority were women (93%). The median age at diagnosis of lupus was 43.5 [range: 30-66] years and 43.5 [range: 26-73] years at diagnosis of thymoma. TET required chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy complementary to surgery in >90% cases. Lupus was diagnosed before, simultaneously, or after diagnosis of thymoma in 6, 3 and 5 cases, respectively. Among the lupus manifestations, joint involvement was predominant (78.6%), followed by autoimmune cytopenia (35.7%), cutaneous affections (28.6%), serositis (28.6%) and renal involvement (21.4%). SLE was associated with one or more AID in 5/14 patients. These characteristics were compared with those from 17 patients identified in the literature. Among them, joint and skin involvement as well as pleural/pericardial effusions occurred in >50%. SLE was controlled by prednisone and hydroxychloroquine in the majority of cases, but 7 out of 31 patients had an immunosuppressant. CONCLUSION: The association of SLE and TET is rare, and its clinical profile seems to be distinguished by the frequency of cytopenias. The management of these patients is complicated by the need to treat cancer, lupus and/or associated autoimmune diseases.

FOLFOXIRI vs FOLFIRINOX as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: A population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: FOLFIRINOX regimen is the first-line reference chemotherapy (L1) in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (aPDAC). FOLFOXIRI, a schedule with a lower dose of irinotecan and no bolus 5-fluorouracil, has demonstrated efficacy and feasibility in colorectal cancer. AIM: To investigate the potential clinical value of FOLFOXIRI in patients with aPDAC in routine clinical practice. METHODS: Analyses were derived from all consecutive aPDAC patients treated in L1 between January 2011 and December 2017 in two French institutions, with either FOLFOXIRI (n = 165) or FOLFIRINOX (n = 124) regimens. FOLFOXIRI consisted of irinotecan (165 mg/m2), oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2), leucovorin (200 mg/m2) and 5-fluorouracil (3200 mg/m2 as a 48-h continuous infusion) every 2 wk. Ninety-six pairs of patients were selected through propensity score matching, and clinical outcomes of the two treatment regimens were compared. RESULTS: Median overall survival was 11.1 mo in the FOLFOXIRI and 11.6 mo in the FOLFIRINOX cohorts, respectively. After propensity score matching, survival rates remained similar between the two regimens in terms of overall survival (hazard ratio = 1.22; P = 0.219) and progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 1.27; P = 0.120). The objective response rate was 37.1% in the FOLFOXIRI group vs 47.8% in the FOLFIRINOX group (P = 0.187). Grade 3/4 toxicities occurred in 28.7% of patients in the FOLFOXIRI cohort vs 19.5% in the FOLFIRINOX cohort (P = 0.079). FOLFOXIRI was associated with a higher incidence of grade 3/4 digestive adverse events. Hematopoietic growth factors were used after each chemotherapy cycle and the low hematological toxicity rates were below 5% with both regimens. CONCLUSION: FOLFOXIRI is feasible in L1 in patients with aPDAC but does not confer any therapeutic benefit as compared with FOLFIRINOX. The low hematological toxicity rates strengthened the relevance of primary prophylaxis with hematopoietic growth factors.

Pooled analysis of 115 patients from updated data of Epitopes-HPV01 and Epitopes-HPV02 studies in first-line advanced anal squamous cell carcinoma.

AIMS: The addition of docetaxel to cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) has shown promising efficacy in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA). Preliminary results of Epitopes-HPV01 study showed a high rate of long-lasting complete response to DCF. The prospective, multicenter, Epitopes-HPV02 trial then confirmed the high efficacy of the modified DCF (mDCF) regimen in terms of complete response rate and long-term survival in metastatic or non-resectable locally advanced recurrent SCCA. Here, we present updated results of the Epitopes-HPV01 and Epitopes-HPV02 studies. PATIENTS & METHODS: Epitopes-HPV01 is a prospective study performed by the regional cancer network of Franche-Comté, France. Epitopes-HPV02 is a phase II study supported by two French collaborative oncological groups, performed in 25 centers. Both studies included patients with metastatic, or with unresectable local recurrent SCCA, treated with DCF regimen. RESULTS: In Epitopes-HPV01, 51 patients were enrolled between September 2012 and January 2019, and 49 patients were included for analysis; while 69 patients were included between September 2014 and December 2016 in Epitopes-HPV02, and 66 patients for analysis. Pooled analysis of 115 patients showed a median progression-free survival of 12.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 10.6-16.1] [11.0 months (9.3-16.0) in -HPV02, and 15.6 months (11.2-34.5) in -HPV01, (p = 0.06)]. The median overall survival was 39.2 months (26.0-109.1) [36.3 in -HPV02 (25.2-NR), and 61.1 months (21.4-120.0) in -HPV01 (p = 0.62)]. Objective response rate was 87.7% (90.9% in -HPV02 and 83.3% in -HPV01) with 40.3% of complete response (45.5% in -HPV02 and 33.3% in -HPV01). No differences were observed between standard DCF (n = 54) and mDCF (n = 58) in terms of OS (p = 0.57) and PFS (p = 0.99). 5-years PFS and OS rates were 24.5% and 44.4%, respectively, in the whole population. No treatment-related death was observed. CONCLUSION: Updated results of Epitopes-HPV01 and 02 studies, as well as the pooled analysis, confirm mDCF as a standard treatment in patients with advanced SCCA.

SALL4 oncogene is an immunogenic antigen presented in various HLA-DR contexts.

Purpose: To investigate the immunoprevalence of SALL4-derived peptides in healthy volunteers and cancer patients. Experimental Design: A multistep approach including prediction algorithms was used to design in silico SALL4-derived peptides theoretically able to bind on common HLA-DR and HLA-A/B molecules. The presence of T-cell responses after a long term T-cell assay (28 days) against SALL4 was monitored in 14 healthy donors and the presence of T-cell responses after a short term T-cell assay (10 days) was monitored in 67 cancer patients using IFN-γ ELISPOT assay. A T-cell clone specific for the immunoprevalent A18 K-derived peptide was isolated, characterized and used as a tool to characterize the natural processing of A18 K. Results: A SALL4 specific T-cell repertoire was present in healthy donors (8/14) and cancer patients (29/67) after short term T-cell assay. We further identified two immunoprevalant SALL4-derived peptides, R18 A and A18 K, which bind MHC-class II. In parallel, an A18 K specific Th1 clone recognized monocyte derived Dendritic Cell (moDC) loaded with SALL4 containing cell lysate. The level of IFN-γ secreted by specific T-cell clone was greater in presence of moDC loaded with SALL4 containing cell lysate (49.23 ± 14.02%) than with moDC alone (18.03 ± 3.072%) (p = 0.0477) Conclusion: These results show for the first time immunogenicity of SALL4 oncogenic protein-derived peptides, especially A18 K and R18 A peptides and make them potential targets for personalized medicine. Thus, SALL4 possess major characteristics of a tumor antigen.

Lenvatinib for the Treatment of Radioiodine-Refractory Thyroid Cancer in Real-Life Practice.

Background: In the Study of (E7080) Lenvatinib in Differentiated Cancer of the Thyroid (SELECT) phase 3 trial on advanced radioactive iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (rDTC), lenvatinib improved median progression-free survival over placebo by almost 15 months and induces an objective response rate of 64.8%, but adverse events occurred in almost all patients. The present study evaluates the efficacy and toxicity of lenvatinib treatment in real-life practice. Methods: Clinical charts of 88 consecutive patients treated with lenvatinib from July 2015 to June 2016 in 27 French centers were retrospectively reviewed. Patients treated for other thyroid cancer types (n = 11) or previously treated with lenvatinib within a trial (n = 2) were excluded and the remaining 75 rDTC patients formed the basis of this report. Results: 75 rDTC patients were analyzed (33 females, median age 65 years [range, 35-88 years]), 12 had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2; 24 cases received lenvatinib as first line systemic treatment; 47 (63%) patients had documented progressive disease prior to treatment initiation. Distant metastases were located in lungs, bones, and lymph nodes (89%, 60%, and 69%, respectively). The initial treatment dose was 24 mg in 54 patients and was lower in the other 21 patients. The median follow-up was 7 months, with a median duration of treatment of 6 months [0.3-15]. Median progression-free survival was 10 months. Among the 65 patients with evaluation of tumor response during treatment, best tumor response was a partial response in 23 patients (31%) and stable disease in 38 (51%). Eleven patients (14.7%) discontinued lenvatinib because of disease progression. Forty-four (59%) and 23 (31%) patients had dose reductions or an interruption of lenvatinib for adverse events (AEs). The most frequent AEs related to treatment were fatigue, hypertension, weight loss, diarrhea, and anorexia. Eleven deaths occurred during the study (one considered to be drug related). Pneumothorax occurred in 2 patients with lung metastases. Conclusions: Real-life patients with rDTC can benefit from lenvatinib treatment. AEs are frequent and should be closely monitored.

A simple and fast LC-MS/MS method with a very high sensitivity for the measurement of raltitrexed in human plasma.

Raltitrexed is a thymidylate synthase inhibitor that can be administered safely to patients with cardiovascular disease or dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency, as opposed to 5FU. The recommended dose of 3mg/m2 every 3 weeks often leads to toxicity. Interestingly, the 2mg/m2 every 2 weeks dose appears to be less toxic. A pharmacokinetic trial was then performed by our team to investigate such phenomenon. However, there are currently, two main methods for RTX measurement described in the literature: a radioimmunoassay (RIA) and chromatographic-based methods with either UV or mass spectrometry detections. The RIA methods: display a low limit of quantification (below 1µg/L), but also a low extent of linearity for the calibration curve. The chromatographic-based methods: include high level of calibrators, but have poor sensitivity (>2µg/mL). If a high sensitivity is essential to satisfactorily describe the elimination of RTX, high concentrations in the calibration curve are also needed to avoid bias linked to the dilutions of the samples. A new LC-MS/MS method was then developed that allows to simultaneously measure very low (0.1µg/L) and very high (3000µg/L) concentrations in the same run. Moreover, the extraction steps are very simple and fast with mainly a precipitation and a filtration steps. This method was validated following the EMA recommendations. In view of the extent of the calibration curve, the carry-over effect was more deeply investigated. With this method, it was possible to measure RTX in samples taken 3 weeks after the administration. Taken together, this method allows to simply and quickly measure RTX in plasma of patients.

Efficacy, Safety and Cost of Regorafenib in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in French Clinical Practice.

BACKGROUND: Regorafenib is an orally administered multikinase inhibitor that has been approved for patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Even though regorafenib significantly improved survival in two international phase 3 trials (CORRECT and CONCUR), a high rate of treatment-related toxic effects and dose modifications were observed with a modest benefit. The aim of this study was to provide information concerning the efficacy, safety, and cost of regorafenib in patients with mCRC in clinical practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients treated with regorafenib monotherapy for unresectable mCRC in five Franche-Comté cancer hospitals (France). The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points were safety and descriptive cost analyses of patients treated with regorafenib in clinical practice. Another aim of this study was to assess the impact of regorafenib prescription on the risk of hospitalization in real-life practice. RESULTS: From January 2014 to August 2014, 29 consecutive patients were enrolled. Patients were heavily pretreated and were refractory to standard chemotherapies. The primary tumor sites were the colon and the rectum for 55% and 45% of patients, respectively. Fifteen patients (51%) harbored an RAS mutation. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group - Performance Status (PS) was 0-1 for 86% of patients and 2 for 14% of patients. Nineteen patients (66%) initially received reduced doses of 120 or 80 mg/day. The median duration of treatment was 2.5 months (range, 0.13-11.4 months). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 86% of patients. The most frequent adverse events of any grade were fatigue (35%), diarrhea (20%), and hand-foot skin reaction (20%). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 10 patients (35%). Three patients (10%) were admitted to hospital due to drug-related severe adverse events. The mean cost of patient management with regorafenib for the duration of treatment was 9908 ± 8191€, and median cost was 7917€ (Interquartile range (IQR) 4469-13,042). The median overall survival was six months (95% confidence interval, five to eight months). CONCLUSIONS: The safety and efficacy of regorafenib in heavily pretreated mCRC patients was comparable, in our study, to prospective and retrospective trials. Toxic effects were mostly manageable in an outpatient setting. Regorafenib itself represented the most important (93%) part of supported costs. Even though most side effects were manageable in an outpatient setting, severe adverse events occurred from hospitalization in 10% of patients. These data should be confirmed in a larger real-life-based cohort. Identification of predictive biomarkers is needed for mCRC patient selection for regorafenib treatment.