RESUMO
Simulation-based training (SBT) is increasingly acknowledged worldwide and has become a popular tool for ultrasound education. Ultrasound simulation involves the use of technology and software to create a virtual training setting. Simulation-based training allows healthcare professionals to learn, practice, and improve their ultrasound imaging skills in a safe learning-based environment. SBT can provide a realistic and focused learning experience that creates a deep and immersive understanding of the complexity of ultrasound, including enhancing knowledge and confidence in specific areas of interest. Abdominal ultrasound simulation is a tool to increase patient safety and can be a cost-efficient training method. In this paper, we provide an overview of various types of abdominal ultrasound simulators, and the benefits, and challenges of SBT. We also provide examples of how to develop SBT programs and learning strategies including mastery learning. In conclusion, the growing demand for medical imaging increases the need for healthcare professionals to start using ultrasound simulators in order to keep up with the rising standards.
Assuntos
Abdome , Currículo , Treinamento por Simulação , Ultrassonografia , Humanos , Treinamento por Simulação/métodos , Abdome/diagnóstico por imagem , Competência Clínica , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção , Simulação por ComputadorRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the validity of the Interventional Ultrasound Skills Evaluation (IUSE) tool for assessment of procedural competence in ultrasound-guided procedures in a clinical environment, including a pass/fail score. METHODS: Novices and experienced radiologists were recruited from four hospitals and were observed and assessed while performing ultrasound-guided procedures. Performances were assessed using the IUSE tool by two independent raters. Validity evidence was gathered in accordance with Messick's framework: response process was ensured by standardisation of written rater instructions. Internal structure was explored using Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency reliability; inter-rater reliability was calculated as Pearson's r independently across all ratings, and test-retest reliability was reported using Cronbach's alpha. Relationship to other variables was investigated by comparing performances of the participants in each group. Consequences evidence was explored by calculating a pass/fail standard using the contrasting groups method. RESULTS: Six novices and twelve experienced radiologists were enrolled. The IUSE tool had high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.96, high inter-rater reliability (Pearson's r = 0.95), and high test-retest reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.98), and the mean score was 33.28 for novices and 59.25 for experienced with a highly significant difference (p value < 0.001). The pass/fail score was set at 55 resulting in no false positives or false negatives. CONCLUSIONS: Validity evidence from multiple sources supports the use of the IUSE tool for assessment of competence in ultrasound-guided procedures in a clinical environment and its use in high-stakes assessment such as certification. A credible pass/fail criterion was established to inform decision-making. KEY POINTS: ⢠A multi-site validity investigation established that the Interventional Ultrasound Skills Evaluation (IUSE) tool can be used to assess procedural competence in ultrasound-guided procedures. ⢠Validity evidence was gathered according to Messick's framework validity from the following sources: response process, internal structure, relationship to other variables, and consequences evidence. ⢠The IUSE tool can be used for both formative and summative assessment, and a credible pass/fail score was established to help inform decision-making such as certification.
Assuntos
Competência Clínica , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , UltrassonografiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To develop a generic and objective tool for assessing competence in percutaneous ultrasound-guided procedures. METHODS: Interventional ultrasound experts from the Nordic countries were invited to participate in a three-round Delphi process. A steering committee was formed to manage the process. In round 1, the experts were asked to suggest all aspects to consider when assessing competence in US-guided procedures. Suggestions were analyzed and condensed into assessment items. In round 2, the expert panel rated these items on a 1-5 scale and suggested new items. Items with a mean rating of ≤ 3.5 were excluded. In round 3, the expert panel rated the list items and suggested changes to the items. RESULTS: Twenty-five experts were invited, and response rates in the three rounds were 68% (17 out of 25), 100% (17 out of 17), and 100% (17 out of 17). The three-round Delphi process resulted in a 12-item assessment tool, using a five-point rating scale. The final assessment tool evaluates pre-procedural planning, US technique, procedural technique, patient safety, communication, and teamwork. CONCLUSIONS: Expert consensus was achieved on a generic tool for assessment of competence in percutaneous ultrasound-guided procedures-the Interventional Ultrasound Skills Evaluation (IUSE). This is the initial step in ensuring a valid and reliable method for assessment of interventional US skill. KEY POINTS: ⢠Through a Delphi process, expert consensus was achieved on the content of an assessment tool for percutaneous ultrasound-guided procedures-the Interventional Ultrasound Skills Evaluation (IUSE) tool. ⢠The IUSE tool is comprehensive and covers pre-procedural planning, US technique, procedural technique, patient safety, communication, and teamwork. ⢠This is an important step in ensuring valid and reliable assessment of interventional US skills.
Assuntos
Competência Clínica , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Humanos , UltrassonografiaRESUMO
This review looks at highlights of the development in ultrasound, ranging from interventional ultrasound and Doppler to the newest techniques like contrast-enhanced ultrasound and elastography, and gives reference to some of the valuable articles in Acta Radiologica. Ultrasound equipment is now available in any size and for any purpose, ranging from handheld devices to high-end devices, and the scientific societies include ultrasound professionals of all disciplines publishing guidelines and recommendations. Interventional ultrasound is expanding the field of use of ultrasound-guided interventions into nearly all specialties of medicine, from ultrasound guidance in minimally invasive robotic procedures to simple ultrasound-guided punctures performed by general practitioners. Each medical specialty is urged to define minimum requirements for equipment, education, training, and maintenance of skills, also for medical students. The clinical application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and elastography is a topic often seen in current research settings.
Assuntos
Publicações Periódicas como Assunto/história , Radiologia/história , Ultrassonografia/história , Catéteres , Meios de Contraste , Drenagem/história , Drenagem/instrumentação , Técnicas de Imagem por Elasticidade/história , Endossonografia/história , História do Século XX , História do Século XXI , Humanos , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem/história , Masculino , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Reto/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia Doppler/história , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/históriaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To perform a systematic review of the effect of simulation-based training (SBT) of percutaneous abdominal and thoracic ultrasound-guided procedures and to assess the transfer of procedural competence to a clinical context. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies assessing procedural competence after SBT. Two authors independently reviewed all studies and extracted data. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool for randomized studies (RoB) and non-randomized studies (ROBINS-I). Quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. RESULTS: 42 studies were included. 6 were randomized controlled, 3 non-randomized controlled, and 33 non-randomized non-controlled. 26 studies examined US-guided abdominal procedures, 13 examined thoracic procedures, and 3 examined both. The results favored SBT compared to other educational interventions and found that training was superior to no training. Only two studies examined the transfer of procedural skills to a clinical context. All studies had a high or critical risk of bias. Thus, the quality of evidence for the effect of SBT on procedural competence was low, and evidence for its transfer to a clinical context was very low. CONCLUSION: The evidence supporting SBT of percutaneous abdominal and thoracic US-guided procedures remains insufficient due to methodological problems and a high risk of bias. Future studies should be randomized and single-blinded, use assessment tools supported by validity evidence, compare different educational strategies, and examine the transfer of skills to a clinical setting.
Assuntos
Abdome , Simulação por Computador , Cavidade Torácica , Abdome/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Imagens de Fantasmas , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Cavidade Torácica/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia , Ultrassonografia de IntervençãoRESUMO
The miniaturization of ultrasound equipment in the form of tablet- or smartphone-sized ultrasound equipment is a result of the rapid evolution of technology and handheld ultrasound devices (HHUSD). This position paper of the European Federation of Societies in Ultrasound and Medicine (EFSUMB) assesses the current status of HHUSD in abdominal ultrasound, pediatric ultrasound, targeted echocardiography and heart ultrasound, and we will report position comments on the most common clinical applications. Also included is a SWOT (Strength - Weaknesses - Opportunities - Threats) analysis, the use for handheld devices for medical students, educational & training aspects, documentation, storage and safety considerations.
Assuntos
Ecocardiografia , Ultrassonografia , Criança , Humanos , Ultrassonografia/instrumentaçãoRESUMO
Background Preoperative embolization is based on the preoperative digital subtraction angiography (DSA) tumor blush, and as such is considered the "gold standard" for determining tumor vascularity. However, to our knowledge reliability studies evaluating vascularity ratings of DSA tumor blush in spinal metastases have not been published previously. Purpose To evaluate inter- and intra-rater agreement in the assessment of the vascularity of spinal metastases using DSA tumor blush. Material and Methods This reliability study included 46 patients with symptomatic metastatic spinal cord compression requiring surgery. DSA data stored in the hospital picture archiving and communication system (PACS) from the participants of a randomized controlled trial were used. Inter- and intra-rater agreement on vascularity assessment using DSA tumor blush according to a three-step ordinal scale was evaluated: no hypervascularity; moderate hypervascularity; and pronounced hypervascularity. The statistical analysis was based on the linear weighted kappa's for multiple raters that extend Cohen's κ. Three raters and κ = 0.2 in the null hypothesis implied that the power of the study was 0.96. Results Inter- and intra-rater agreements were moderate in rating the vascularity of spinal metastases and the agreements were significantly higher than the κ = 0.20 in the null hypothesis ( P = 0.0002 and P = 0.0001). The κ value for inter-rater agreement was 0.57 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41-0.72) and for intra-rater agreement 0.55 (95% CI, 0.38-0.71). Conclusion There is moderate inter-rater and intra-rater agreement in classifying the vascularity of spinal metastases on a three-step ordinal scale for DSA tumor blush.
Assuntos
Angiografia Digital , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/irrigação sanguínea , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/secundárioRESUMO
Transverse oscillation (TO) is a real-time ultrasound vector flow method implemented on a commercial scanner. The TO setup was examined on a flowrig with constant and pulsatile flow. Subsequently, 25 patients undergoing cardiac bypass surgery were scanned intraoperatively with TO on the ascending aorta and compared to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution (PACTD). On the flowrig, TO had a precision of 5.5%, 9.4% and 14.7%, a percentage error of 18.2%, 14.6% and 40.7%, and a mean bias of 0.4 cm/s, 36.8 ml/min and 32.4 ml/min for velocity and flow rate (constant and pulsatile) estimation. The correlation coefficients for all flowrig evaluations were 0.99 indicating systematic bias. After bias correction, the percentage error was reduced to 11.5%, 12.6% and 15.9% for velocity and flow rate (constant and pulsatile) estimation. In the in vivo setup, TO, TEE, and PACTD had a precision of 21.9%, 13.7%, and 12.0%. TO compared with TEE and PACTD had a mean bias of 12.6 cm/s and -0.08 l/min, and a percentage error of 23.4%, and 36.7%, respectively. The percentage error was reduced to 22.9% for the TEE comparison, but increased to 43.8% for the PACTD comparison, after correction for the systematic bias found in the flowrig. TO is a reliable and precise method for velocity and flow rate estimation on a flowrig. However, TO with the present setup, is not interchangeable with PACTD for cardiac volume flow estimation, but is a reliable and precise angle-independent ultrasound alternative for velocity estimation of cardiac flow.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Mammographic density is a well-established risk factor for breast cancer. We investigated the association between three different methods of measuring density or parenchymal pattern/texture on digitized film-based mammograms, and examined to what extent textural features independently and jointly with density can improve the ability to identify screening women at increased risk of breast cancer. METHODS: The study included 121 cases and 259 age- and time matched controls based on a cohort of 14,736 women with negative screening mammograms from a population-based screening programme in Denmark in 2007 (followed until 31 December 2010). Mammograms were assessed using the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) density classification, Tabár's classification on parenchymal patterns and a fully automated texture quantification technique. The individual and combined association with breast cancer was estimated using binary logistic regression to calculate Odds Ratios (ORs) and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUCs). RESULTS: Cases showed significantly higher BI-RADS and texture scores on average than controls (p < 0.001). All three methods were individually able to segregate women into different risk groups showing significant ORs for BI-RADS D3 and D4 (OR: 2.37; 1.32-4.25 and 3.93; 1.88-8.20), Tabár's PIII and PIV (OR: 3.23; 1.20-8.75 and 4.40; 2.31-8.38), and the highest quartile of the texture score (3.04; 1.63-5.67). AUCs for BI-RADS, Tabár and the texture scores (continuous) were 0.63 (0.57-0-69), 0.65 (0.59-0-71) and 0.63 (0.57-0-69), respectively. Combining two or more methods increased model fit in all combinations, demonstrating the highest AUC of 0.69 (0.63-0.74) when all three methods were combined (a significant increase from standard BI-RADS alone). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the (relative) amount of fibroglandular tissue (density) and mammographic structural features (texture/parenchymal pattern) jointly can improve risk segregation of screening women, using information already available from normal screening routine, in respect to future personalized screening strategies.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Mamografia/métodos , Densidade da Mama , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Dinamarca , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Medicina de Precisão , Curva ROC , Medição de RiscoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Adult studies have proven ultrasound elastography as a validated measure of liver fibrosis. The present study aimed to review the available literature on ultrasound elastography in children to evaluate the ability of the method to distinguish healthy from fibrotic liver tissue and investigate whether cutoff values for liver fibrosis in children have been established. METHODS: A literature search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to identify studies on ultrasound elastography of the liver in children. Only original research articles in English concerning ultrasound elastography in children with and without liver disease, younger than 18 years, were included. All reference lists of the included articles were hand-searched for further references. RESULTS: Twenty-seven articles were included. Elastography in children without liver disease was investigated in 14 studies and were comparable to those existing for adults. Twelve studies compared elastography with liver biopsy in children with liver disease and found that cirrhosis was correctly diagnosed, whereas it was more difficult to assess severe fibrosis correctly. For the distinction between no, mild, and moderate fibrosis in children with liver disease the method was less accurate. Ultrasound elastography was able to differentiate between children with and without liver fibrosis. In children without liver disease ultrasound, elastography showed consistent liver stiffness values comparable to those found in adults. No fibrosis-specific cutoffs were proposed. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound elastography was able to diagnose cirrhosis, distinguish healthy from fibrotic liver tissue, and showed consistent liver stiffness values in children without liver disease.
Assuntos
Técnicas de Imagem por Elasticidade , Cirrose Hepática/diagnóstico por imagem , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-NascidoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Mammographic breast density and parenchymal patterns are well-established risk factors for breast cancer. We aimed to report inter-observer agreement on three different subjective ways of assessing mammographic density and parenchymal pattern, and secondarily to examine what potential impact reproducibility has on relative risk estimates of breast cancer. METHODS: This retrospective case-control study included 122 cases and 262 age- and time matched controls (765 breasts) based on a 2007 screening cohort of 14,736 women with negative screening mammograms from Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen. Digitised randomized film-based mammograms were classified independently by two readers according to two radiological visual classifications (BI-RADS and Tabár) and a computerized interactive threshold technique measuring area-based percent mammographic density (denoted PMD). Kappa statistics, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) (equivalent to weighted kappa), Pearson's linear correlation coefficient and limits-of-agreement analysis were used to evaluate inter-observer agreement. High/low-risk agreement was also determined by defining the following categories as high-risk: BI-RADS's D3 and D4, Tabár's PIV and PV and the upper two quartiles (within density range) of PMD. The relative risk of breast cancer was estimated using logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (ORs) adjusted for age, which were compared between the two readers. RESULTS: Substantial inter-observer agreement was seen for BI-RADS and Tabár (κ=0.68 and 0.64) and agreement was almost perfect when ICC was calculated for the ordinal BI-RADS scale (ICC=0.88) and the continuous PMD measure (ICC=0.93). The two readers judged 5% (PMD), 10% (Tabár) and 13% (BI-RADS) of the women to different high/low-risk categories, respectively. Inter-reader variability showed different impact on the relative risk of breast cancer estimated by the two readers on a multiple-category scale, however, not on a high/low-risk scale. Tabár's pattern IV demonstrated the highest ORs of all density patterns investigated. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows the Tabár classification has comparable inter-observer reproducibility with well tested density methods, and confirms the association between Tabár's PIV and breast cancer. In spite of comparable high inter-observer agreement for all three methods, impact on ORs for breast cancer seems to differ according to the density scale used. Automated computerized techniques are needed to fully overcome the impact of subjectivity.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Glândulas Mamárias Humanas/anormalidades , Mamografia , Idoso , Densidade da Mama , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Glândulas Mamárias Humanas/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To assess whether preoperative transcatheter arterial embolization of spinal metastases reduces blood loss, the need for transfusion with allogeneic red blood cells (RBCs), and surgery time in the surgical treatment of patients with symptomatic metastatic spinal cord compression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-blind, randomized (1:1), controlled, parallel-group, single-center trial was approved by the Danish National Committee on Biomedical Research Ethics and was conducted from May 2011-March 2013. Participants (N = 45) were scheduled for decompression and posterior thoracic/lumbar spinal instrumentation and randomly assigned to either preoperative embolization (n = 23) or a control group (n = 22). The primary outcome was intraoperative blood loss. Secondary outcomes were perioperative blood loss, allogeneic RBC transfusion, and surgery time. Analyses were performed by intention-to-treat. RESULTS: The intention-to-treat analysis included 45 patients. Mean intraoperative blood loss did not differ significantly (P = .270) between the embolization group (618 mL [SD, 282 mL]) and the control group (735 mL [SD, 415 mL]). There was also no significant difference in allogeneic RBC transfusion (P = .243). Surgery time was significantly shorter in the embolization group (P = .031): median 90 minutes (range, 54-252 min) versus 124 minutes (range, 80-183 min). The subanalysis of hypervascular metastases revealed a significant (P = .041) reduction in blood loss in the embolization group: 645 mL (SD, 289 mL) versus 902 mL (SD, 416 mL). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative embolization in patients with symptomatic spinal metastasis independent of primary tumor diagnosis did not reduce intraoperative blood loss and allogeneic RBC transfusion significantly but did reduce the surgery time. A small reduction of intraoperative blood loss was shown in hypervascular metastases.
Assuntos
Embolização Terapêutica/métodos , Laminectomia/métodos , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/secundário , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Laminectomia/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Método Simples-Cego , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/complicações , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Soccer players are commonly affected by long-standing adductor-related groin pain (ARGP), but the clinical significance of MRI findings in these athletes is largely unknown. Our aims were (1) to evaluate whether MRI findings are associated with long-standing ARGP in soccer players, (2) to assess MRI findings in asymptomatic soccer players and non-soccer playing controls. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 28 male soccer players with long-standing ARGP, 17 male asymptomatic soccer players and 20 male asymptomatic non-soccer playing athletes of matching age and athletic exposure. Participants underwent identical standardised and reliable clinical examination, and MRI scans (3 T) of the pelvis performed by a blinded observer. Images were consensus rated by three blinded radiologists according to a standardised MRI evaluation protocol. The associations between clinical adductor-related findings and pathological MRI findings were investigated with χ(2) statistics and OR. RESULTS: Central disc protrusion (p=0.027) and higher grades of pubic bone marrow oedema (BMO; p=0.027) were significantly more present in symptomatic players than asymptomatic players. However, up to 71% of asymptomatic soccer players displayed different positive MRI findings, and asymptomatic soccer players had significantly higher odds (OR ranging from 6.3 to 13.3) for BMO, adductor tendinopathy and degenerative changes than non-soccer players. CONCLUSIONS: ARGP in soccer players was associated with central disc protrusion and higher grades of pubic BMO. Moreover, positive MRI findings were significantly more frequent in soccer players compared with non-soccer players irrespective of symptoms, suggesting that these MRI changes may be associated with soccer play itself rather than clinical symptoms.
Assuntos
Dor Abdominal/patologia , Futebol/fisiologia , Dor Abdominal/etiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Doenças da Medula Óssea/complicações , Doenças da Medula Óssea/patologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Dor Crônica/patologia , Estudos Transversais , Edema/complicações , Edema/patologia , Virilha , Humanos , Deslocamento do Disco Intervertebral/complicações , Deslocamento do Disco Intervertebral/patologia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Tendinopatia/complicações , Tendinopatia/patologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is currently no standardised MRI evaluation protocol for athletes who present with symptoms that may relate to the pubic symphysis, the pubic bones, and the adductor muscle insertions. We outline the protocol and reliability data. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three musculoskeletal radiologists developed an 11-element MRI evaluation protocol defined according to precise criteria and illustrated in a pictorial atlas. Eighty-six male athletes (soccer players and non-soccer players) underwent standardised 3 Tesla MRI of the pelvis. Two external musculoskeletal radiologists were trained to use the protocol and pictorial atlas during two sessions of 2-4 h each. Each radiologist rated all 86 MRI independently. One radiologist evaluated the scans once, the other twice 2 months apart. Cohen κ statistics were used to determine intraobserver and interobserver agreement. RESULTS: The main findings were (1) substantial intraobserver (κ range 0.65-0.67) and moderate interobserver (κ range 0.45-0.52) agreement in rating pubic bone marrow oedema, (2) substantial to moderate intraobserver (κ range 0.49-0.72) and moderate-to-fair interobserver (κ range 0.21-0.52) agreement in rating most other MRI findings, (3) slight intraobserver and interobserver (κ range -0.06-0.05) agreement in rating adductor longus tendinopathy. CONCLUSIONS: The Copenhagen Standardised MRI protocol demonstrated moderate-to-substantial reliability in rating bone marrow oedema, and varied from fair-to-substantial agreement for the majority of MRI features, but showed only slight agreement in rating adductor longus tendinopathy. This rigorous investigation also confirms that while MRI evaluation seems to provide reasonable reliability in rating pubic bone marrow oedema, the evaluation of adductor tendinopathy in a clinical and research setting needs further resolution by continued development and testing of MRI acquisition protocols.
Assuntos
Artropatias/patologia , Sínfise Pubiana/patologia , Medicina Esportiva/métodos , Tendinopatia/patologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Doenças da Medula Óssea/patologia , Protocolos Clínicos , Edema/patologia , Virilha , Quadril , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Dor Musculoesquelética/etiologia , Dor Musculoesquelética/patologia , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Futebol/fisiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE: To assess whether perioperative allogenic blood transfusions in patients undergoing surgical treatment for spinal metastases independently influence patient survival. METHODS: A retrospective study including 170 consecutive patients undergoing surgical treatment for spinal metastases in 2009 and 2010 at a tertiary referral center. Variables related to postoperative survival were all included in the same multivariable logistic regression analysis with either 3- or 12-month survival as the dependent variable. The independent variables were: transfusion of allogenic red blood cells, age at surgery, gender, preoperative hemoglobin, revised Tokuhashi score and no. of instrumented levels. RESULTS: Perioperative allogenic blood transfusion of 1-2 units was associated with increased 12-month survival [p = 0.049, odds ratio 2.619 (confidence interval 1.004-6.831)], but not with 3-month survival. Larger transfusion volumes did not significantly influence survival. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study support that perioperative blood transfusion of <5 units does not decrease survival in patients operated for spinal metastases. Transfusion of 1-2 units seems to be associated with increased 12-month survival. Future studies should assess if a liberal transfusion regime can be applied to this group of patients; thereby, prioritizing early postoperative mobilization.