Enhanced recovery after fetal spina bifida surgery: what is our global practice?

OBJECTIVE: Prenatal spina bifida closure results in improved outcomes for the child compared to postnatal surgery but is associated with significant maternal morbidity. Optimization of the perioperative care for women who underwent fetal spina bifida surgery could improve maternal and pregnancy outcomes. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols are multimodal, evidence-based care plans that have been adopted for multiple surgical procedures to promote faster and better patient recovery and shorter hospitalization. This study aims to explore if fetal centers have implemented ERAS principles in this setting. Furthermore, we provide recommendations for the perioperative management of patients undergoing fetal spina bifida surgery. METHODS: Fifty-three fetal therapy centers offering prenatal surgery for open spina bifida were identified and invited to complete a digital questionnaire covering their pre-, intra- and postoperative management. An overall score was calculated per center based on the center's compliance with 20 key ERAS principles, extrapolated from ERAS guidelines for cesarean section, gynecologic oncology and colorectal surgery. Each item was scored 1 or 0 when the center did or did not comply with each principle, with a maximum score of 20. RESULTS: The questionnaire was completed by 46 centers in 17 countries (response rate 87%). Twenty-two centers (48%) exclusively perform open fetal surgery (laparotomy and hysterotomy), whereas 14 (30%) offer both open and fetoscopic procedures and 10 (22%) use fetoscopy only. The perioperative management of patients undergoing fetoscopic and open surgery was highly similar. The median ERAS score was 12 (mean 12.5, SD 2.4, range 8-17). Center compliance was the highest for the use of regional anesthesia (98%), avoidance of bowel preparation (96%), and thromboprophylaxis (96%), while the lowest compliance was achieved for preoperative carbohydrate loading (15%), postoperative nausea and vomiting prevention (33%), avoidance of overnight fasting (33%) and a 2-hour fasting period for clear fluids (20%). ERAS scores were similar in centers with a short (2-5 days), medium (6-10 days) and long (≥11 days) hospital stay (12.8 ± 2.4, 12.1 ± 2.0, and 10.3 ± 3.2, respectively, p=0.15). Furthermore, there was no significant association between ERAS score and surgical technique or center volume. CONCLUSION: The perioperative management of fetal spina bifida surgery is highly variable across fetal therapy centers worldwide. Standardizing protocols according to ERAS principles may improve patient recovery, reduce maternal morbidity, and shorten hospital stay after fetal spina bifida surgery. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Image quality measurements and metrics in full field digital mammography: an overview.

This paper gives an overview of test procedures developed to assess the performance of full field digital mammography systems. We make a distinction between tests of the individual components of the imaging chain and global system tests. Most tests are not yet fully standardised. Where possible, we illustrate the test methodologies on a selenium flat-panel system.

Optimal beam quality selection in digital mammography.

An experimental method of determining the optimal beam quality for digital mammography systems was applied to two systems (Fuji Profect and GE Senographe 2000D). The mean glandular dose (MGD) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured using Perspex breast phantoms simulating breasts from 20 mm to 90 mm thick. For each thickness, four combinations of tube voltage and target/filter were tested. Optimal beam quality was defined as giving a target CNR for the lowest MGD and was similar for the two systems. For breasts with a thickness of 21 mm or 32 mm, a tube voltage of either 25 kV or 28 kV and a Mo/Mo target/filter combination was optimal. For breast thicknesses of 45 mm and greater, the combination that had the highest X-ray energy (34 kV Rh/Rh) was optimal. Optimization using the higher energy beam quality required greater detector dose to compensate for the lower contrast. Thus for a 75 mm thick breast the 34 kV Rh/Rh combination required about a 90% greater detector dose than 28 kV Mo/Mo to achieve the same CNR because of the 25% reduction in contrast. Nonetheless, the MGD was reduced by 32% by choosing the higher energy spectra and achieving the same CNR. Current automatic exposure control (AEC) designs that aim for a fixed detector dose are not optimal and greater use of higher energy spectra should be accompanied by higher detector doses at all breast thicknesses which are average or above. This may result in slightly higher doses, but better image quality for these breasts.

Evaluation of the diagnostic value of a computed radiography system by comparison of digital hard copy images with screen-film mammography: results of a prospective clinical trial.

The purpose of the study was to determine prospectively the diagnostic value of a computed radiography (CR) system by comparing mammographic hard copy images with screen-film mammography (SFM). A series of 100 patients, who came for diagnostic investigation, underwent two-view SFM (Lorad M-IV Platinum) and digital mammography with a CR system (AGFA CR system). The images were obtained by double exposure, i.e. same view without removing compression of the corresponding breast. The CR images were processed with dedicated processing for mammography. Six radiologists read sets of SFM and CR images. The primary efficacy parameter was the overall diagnostic value. The secondary efficacy parameters were lesion conspicuity and lesion details (for masses and micro-calcifications), tissue visibility at chest wall and at skin line, axillary details, overall density and sharpness impression and the overall noise impression. These parameters were scored by a 7-point scoring system. "CR non-inferior to SFM" was concluded if the lower confidence interval bound exceeded 80%. The confidence interval for the overall diagnostic value was between 96.4% and 100%. Pooled analysis of the ten features for image quality comparison demonstrated for all but one feature (lesion details of the calcifications) CR non-inferiority to SFM.