Japanese structure survey of radiation oncology in 2009 with special reference to designated cancer care hospitals.

BACKGROUND: The structure of radiation oncology in designated cancer care hospitals in Japan was surveyed in terms of equipment, personnel, patient load, and geographic distribution, and compared with the structure in other radiotherapy facilities and the previous survey. METHODS: The Japanese Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology surveyed the national structure of radiation oncology in 2009. The structures of 365 designated cancer care hospitals and 335 other radiotherapy facilities were compared. RESULTS: Designated cancer care hospitals accounted for 50.0% of all the radiotherapy facilities in Japan. The patterns of equipment and personnel in designated cancer care hospitals and the other radiotherapy facilities were, respectively, as follows: linear accelerators per facility: 1.4 and 1.0; dual-energy function: 78.6 and 61.3%; three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy function: 88.5 and 70.0%; intensity-modulated radiotherapy function: 51.6 and 25.3%; annual number of patients per linear accelerator: 301.3 and 185.2; Ir-192 remote-controlled after-loading systems: 31.8 and 4.2%; and average number of full-time equivalent radiation oncologists per facility: 1.8 and 0.8. Compared with the previous survey, the ownership ratio of equipment and personnel improved in both designated cancer care hospitals and the other radiotherapy facilities. Annual patient loads per full-time equivalent radiation oncologist in the designated cancer care hospitals and the other radiotherapy facilities were 225.5 and 247.6, respectively. These values exceeded the standard guidelines level of 200. CONCLUSIONS: The structure of radiation oncology in designated Japanese cancer care hospitals was more mature than that in the other radiotherapy facilities. There is still a shortage of personnel. The serious understaffing problem in radiation oncology should be corrected in the future.

Japanese structure survey of radiation oncology in 2007 with special reference to designated cancer care hospitals.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The structure of radiation oncology in designated cancer care hospitals in Japan was investigated in terms of equipment, personnel, patient load, and geographic distribution. The effect of changes in the health care policy in Japan on radiotherapy structure was also examined. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The Japanese Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology surveyed the national structure of radiation oncology in 2007. The structures of 349 designated cancer care hospitals and 372 other radiotherapy facilities were compared. RESULTS: Respective findings for equipment and personnel at designated cancer care hospitals and other facilities included the following: linear accelerators/facility: 1.3 and 1.0; annual patients/linear accelerator: 296.5 and 175.0; and annual patient load/full-time equivalent radiation oncologist was 237.0 and 273.3, respectively. Geographically, the number of designated cancer care hospitals was associated with population size. CONCLUSION: The structure of radiation oncology in Japan in terms of equipment, especially for designated cancer care hospitals, was as mature as that in European countries and the United States, even though the medical costs in relation to GDP in Japan are lower. There is still a shortage of manpower. The survey data proved to be important to fully understand the radiation oncology medical care system in Japan.

Japanese Structure Survey of Radiation Oncology in 2011.

We evaluated the evolving structure of radiation oncology in Japan in terms of equipment, personnel, patient load and geographic distribution to identify and overcome any existing limitations. From March 2012 to August 2015, the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology conducted a questionnaire based on the Japanese national structure survey of radiation oncology in 2011. Data were analyzed based on the institutional stratification by the annual number of new patients treated with radiotherapy per institution. The estimated annual numbers of new and total (new plus repeat) patients treated with radiation were 211 000 and 250 000, respectively. Additionally, the estimated cancer incidence was 851 537 cases with approximately 24.8% of all newly diagnosed patients being treated with radiation. The types and numbers of treatment devices actually used included linear accelerator (LINAC; n = 836), telecobalt (n = 3), Gamma Knife (n = 46), 60Co remote afterloading system (RALS; n = 24), and 192Ir RALS (n = 125). The LINAC system used dual-energy functions in 619 units, 3D conformal radiotherapy functions in 719 and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) functions in 412. There were 756 JRS or JASTRO-certified radiation oncologists, 1018.5 full-time equivalent (FTE) radiation oncologists, 2026.7 FTE radiotherapy technologists, 149.1 FTE medical physicists, 141.5 FTE radiotherapy quality managers and 716.3 FTE nurses. The frequency of IMRT use significantly increased during this time. To conclude, although there was a shortage of personnel in 2011, the Japanese structure of radiation oncology has clearly improved in terms of equipment and utility.

Japanese structure survey of radiation oncology in 2010.

We evaluated the evolving structure of radiation oncology in Japan in terms of equipment, personnel, patient load, and geographic distribution to identify and overcome any existing limitations. From March 2011 to June 2013, the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology conducted a questionnaire based on the Japanese national structure survey of radiation oncology in 2010. Data were analyzed based on the institutional stratification by the annual number of new patients treated with radiotherapy per institution. The estimated annual numbers of new and total (new plus repeat) patients treated with radiation were 211 000 and 251 000, respectively. Additionally, the estimated cancer incidence was 805 236 cases, with ~26.2% of all newly diagnosed patients being treated with radiation. The types and numbers of treatment devices actually used included linear accelerator (LINAC; n = 829), telecobalt (n = 9), Gamma Knife (n = 46), 60Co remote afterloading system (RALS; n = 28), and 192Ir RALS (n = 131). The LINAC system used dual-energy functions in 586 units, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy functions in 663, and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) functions in 337. There were 564 JASTRO-certified radiation oncologists, 959.2 full-time equivalent (FTE) radiation oncologists, 1841.3 FTE radiotherapy technologists, 131.3 FTE medical physicists, 121.5 FTE radiotherapy quality managers, and 649.6 FTE nurses. The frequency of IMRT use significantly increased during this year. To conclude, although there was a shortage of personnel in 2010, the Japanese structure of radiation oncology has clearly improved in terms of equipment and utility.

Japanese structure survey of radiation oncology in 2005 based on institutional stratification of patterns of care study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the structure of radiation oncology in Japan in terms of equipment, personnel, patient load, and geographic distribution to identify and improve any deficiencies. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A questionnaire-based national structure survey was conducted between March 2006 and February 2007 by the Japanese Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology. These data were analyzed in terms of the institutional stratification of the Patterns of Care Study. RESULTS: The total numbers of new cancer patients and total cancer patients (new and repeat) treated with radiotherapy in 2005 were estimated at approximately 162,000 and 198,000, respectively. In actual use were 765 linear accelerators, 11 telecobalt machines, 48 GammaKnife machines, 64 60Co remote-controlled after-loading systems, and 119 192Ir remote-controlled after-loading systems. The linear accelerator systems used dual-energy function in 498 systems (65%), three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in 462 (60%), and intensity-modulated radiotherapy in 170 (22%). There were 426 Japanese Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology-certified radiation oncologists, 774 full-time equivalent radiation oncologists, 117 medical physicists, and 1,635 radiation therapists. Geographically, a significant variation was found in the use of radiotherapy, from 0.9 to 2.1 patients/1,000 population. The annual patient load/FTE radiation oncologist was 247, exceeding the Blue Book guidelines level. Patterns of Care Study stratification can clearly discriminate the maturity of structures according to their academic nature and caseload. CONCLUSIONS: The Japanese structure has clearly improved during the past 15 years in terms of equipment and its use, although the shortage of manpower and variations in maturity disclosed by this Patterns of Care Study stratification remain problematic. These constitute the targets for nationwide improvement in quality assurance and quality control.

[Board-certified radiation oncologists--what does a cancer treatment specialist mean ?].

The Japanese Board of Cancer Therapy (JBCT) has started the board certification of general oncologists, who have a general knowledge for the treatment of cancer. Board-certified general oncologists could co-operate with board-certified specialists for specific cancer or organs so as to provide all cancer patients in the nation with high-quality treatment. The number of board-certified radiation oncologists in Japan is so small that they cannot meet the increasing demand for radiation therapy. An issue in the departments of radiation oncology of many medical schools is how to develop an attractive training program for radiation oncologists. We discuss the present status of board certified radiation oncologists.

Analyses of dose-response in radiotherapy for patients with mature T/NK-cell lymphomas according to the WHO classification.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study was conducted to analyze the influence of radiotherapy doses and chemotherapy doses and clinical parameters on in-field disease control in order to assess the optimal radiation doses for treatment of mature T/NK-cell lymphomas according to the newly proposed WHO classification. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Subjects consisted of 62 patients with mature T/NK-cell lymphomas treated with radiotherapy at four Japanese institutions between 1983 and 2002. We reevaluated all histopathological specimens of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL), using the WHO classification. Radiation therapy was usually delivered to the involved field. The majority of patients also received adriamycin-based chemotherapy such as CHOP, modified CHOP, or more intensive chemotherapy. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in radiosensitivity among subtypes of mature T/NK-cell lymphomas, at least between extranodal NK/T-cell lymphomas, nasal type and peripheral T-cell lymphomas, unspecified. There was a radiation dose-response in non-bulky mature T/NK-cell lymphomas, indicating that radiation doses of more than 52 Gy may be required to obtain in-field control. However, it was difficult to obtain local control of bulky T-cell lymphomas, even with high doses of irradiation. CONCLUSIONS: Mature T/NK-cell lymphomas were more radioresistant than B-cell lymphomas such as diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL). The chemotherapy including adriamycin did not improve the in-field control of mature T/NK-cell lymphomas. These results were obtained by using non-randomized data and the significance of these results is limited by bias in data. However, our results suggest that the treatment strategy which is usually used for DLBCL, that is, a combined modality of CHOP and around 40 Gy of radiotherapy, may not be sufficiently effective for mature T/NK-cell lymphomas.

Results of radiation therapy for superficial esophageal cancer using the standard radiotherapy method recommended by the Japanese Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (JASTRO) Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Superficial esophageal cancer (SEC) is defined as esophageal cancer limited to the submucosal layers, including mucosal cancer and submucosal cancer, and is squamous cell carcinoma in most patients. In 2000, the Japanese Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (JASTRO) Study Group for SEC published a consensus guideline of standard radiotherapy methods. In this study, the interim treatment outcomes of SEC patients, who had received radiation therapy following the standard radiotherapy methods, were investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2000 to 2003, a total of 141 SEC patients were treated in 24 institutions in Japan. RESULTS: The 1-, 2- and 3-year survival rates were 95%, 90% and 90%, respectively, for patients with mucosal cancer and 90%, 81% and 70%, respectively, for patients with submucosal cancer. The overall survival was better in patients who had undergone chemotherapy than in patients who had received radiation therapy alone, though the difference was not statistically significant. The clinical target volume (CTV) did not influence overall survival and intracavitary irradiation did not influence the local control rate in either patients with mucosal or submucosal cancer. Radiation-induced esophageal ulcer was not observed in this series. CONCLUSION: The standard radiotherapy methods are safe and effective for treating SEC. However, the usefulness of chemotherapy and intracavitary irradiation and the optimal setting of the CTV should be clarified by future randomized trials.

[Altered fractionation].

For improving radiotherapy treatment results, altered fractionation (AF) is one of the most important biological factors to modify the conventional fractionation schedule. AF is classified into two categories. One is decreasing in dose-per-fraction and increasing in total dose, so-called hyperfractionation (HF), which expands the difference in radio-sensitivity between tumor and normal tissue. On the other hand, shortening of overall treatment time, so-called accelerated hyperfractionation (AHF), prevents accelerated repopulation of tumor cells during radiotherapy. AF is rarely recognized as a standard therapy despite many reports about its efficacy against various cancers, totally. This is often used for head and neck cancer. However, the problem is that they usually improve local-control, but do not always improve survival. Although AHF is recognized as one of a standard treatment for small cell lung cancer, it is still objectionable and disputable. Besides these, efficacy of AF against non-small cell lung cancer, bladder cancer and malignant glioma, has been reported. However, AF is not considered as a standard treatment. Accompanied with spread out of stereotactic irradiation, dose-fractionation-time relationship becomes to be more important subject, especially hypofractionation, to clarify the new aspect of AF.

Results of radiation monotherapy for primary central nervous system lymphoma in the 1990s.

PURPOSE: Results of radiation therapy for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) were poor in the 1970-1980s, with most reported 5-year survival rates being less than 10%. To investigate whether the prognosis of PCNSL patients treated by radiation alone remains still poor, we investigated the results of radiation monotherapy in the 1990s. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We collected data on 132 patients with histologically proven PCNSL treated by radiation alone in the 1990s from three nationwide or regional multiinstitutional studies conducted by the Japanese Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (JASTRO) Lymphoma Study Group or the Chubu Radiation Oncology Group. Follow-up data were updated as far as possible. Eleven patients who did not complete planned radiotherapy were included. The data were analyzed in relation to patient and tumor characteristics. The median patient age was 63 years, and the World Health Organization performance status (PS) was 3 or 4 in 40% of the patients. Multiple tumors were seen in 34%. Whole-brain irradiation with or without focal boost was used in 92%. The median radiation dose to the tumor site was 50 Gy (range, 8-74 Gy). RESULTS: For all 132 patients, the median survival time was 18 months and the 5-year survival rate was 18.0%. For 62 patients with PS 0-3 and aged 16-65 years (i.e., those eligible for the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 20962 study), the median survival was 26 months and 5-year survival was 24%. The 5-year survival was 25% for patients 63 years old or younger, and 9.8% for those older than 63 years (p = 0.0005). The 5-year survival was 22% for patients with PS 0-2 and 13% for those with PS 3 or 4 (p = 0.0040). Multivariate analysis confirmed the negative influence of higher age on patient prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: The results of radiation monotherapy for PCNSL appear to have improved as compared with those reported previously. The results of new treatment should be evaluated in light of this finding. Since most prospective studies on the combined treatment exclude poor PS and high-age patients, the 5-year survival rate of 30% may not be regarded as a marked improvement over radiation alone.

National medical care system may impede fostering of true specialization of radiation oncologists: study based on structure survey in Japan.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the actual work environment of radiation oncologists (ROs) in Japan in terms of working pattern, patient load, and quality of cancer care based on the relative time spent on patient care. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In 2008, the Japanese Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology produced a questionnaire for a national structure survey of radiation oncology in 2007. Data for full-time ROs were crosschecked with data for part-time ROs by using their identification data. Data of 954 ROs were analyzed. The relative practice index for patients was calculated as the relative value of care time per patient on the basis of Japanese Blue Book guidelines (200 patients per RO). RESULTS: The working patterns of RO varied widely among facility categories. ROs working mainly at university hospitals treated 189.2 patients per year on average, with those working in university hospitals and their affiliated facilities treating 249.1 and those working in university hospitals only treating 144.0 patients per year on average. The corresponding data were 256.6 for cancer centers and 176.6 for other facilities. Geographically, the mean annual number of patients per RO per quarter was significantly associated with population size, varying from 143.1 to 203.4 (p < 0.0001). There were also significant differences in the average practice index for patients by ROs working mainly in university hospitals between those in main and affiliated facilities (1.07 vs 0.71: p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: ROs working in university hospitals and their affiliated facilities treated more patients than the other ROs. In terms of patient care time only, the quality of cancer care in affiliated facilities might be worse than that in university hospitals. Under the current national medical system, working patterns of ROs of academic facilities in Japan appear to be problematic for fostering true specialization of radiation oncologists.

Japanese structure survey of radiation oncology in 2009 based on institutional stratification of the Patterns of Care Study.

The ongoing structure of radiation oncology in Japan in terms of equipment, personnel, patient load and geographic distribution was evaluated in order to radiation identify and improve any deficiencies. A questionnaire-based national structure survey was conducted from March 2010 to January 2011 by the Japanese Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (JASTRO). These data were analyzed in terms of the institutional stratification of the Patterns of Care Study (PCS). The total numbers of new cancer patients and total of cancer patients (new and repeat) treated with radiation in 2009 were estimated at 201,000 and 240,000, respectively. The type and numbers of systems in actual use consisted of Linac (816), telecobalt (9), Gamma Knife (46), (60)Co remote afterloading system (RALS) (29) and (192)Ir RALS systems (130). The Linac systems used dual energy function for 586 (71.8%), 3DCRT for 663 (81.3%) and IMRT for 337 units (41.3%). There were 529 JASTRO-certified radiation oncologists (ROs), 939.4 full-time equivalent (FTE) ROs, 113.1 FTE medical physicists and 1836 FTE radiation therapists. The frequency of interstitial radiation therapy use for prostate and of intensity-modulated radiotherapy increased significantly. PCS stratification can clearly identify the maturity of structures based on their academic nature and caseload. Geographically, the more JASTRO-certified physicians there were in a given area, the more radiation therapy tended to be used for cancer patients. In conclusion, the Japanese structure has clearly improved during the past 19 years in terms of equipment and its use, although a shortage of manpower and variations in maturity disclosed by PCS stratification remained problematic in 2009.

Strategy of radiation therapy for bone metastases and MSCC in breast cancer patients.

Bone metastasis is a common event in advanced cancers such as prostate, breast, lung, and renal cancers. Radiation therapy has been widely used for bone metastasis. However, it remains a challenging therapy because no radiation therapeutic guidelines, including radiation dose, radiation field, and fractionation, for patients with bone metastasis have been established. Many randomized controlled trials for bone metastasis have been carried out. They showed no significant difference in pain relief with a short course of radiation therapy such as 8 Gy/1 Fr and 20 Gy/5 Fr or with a long course of radiation therapy such as 30 Gy/10 Fr, 37.5 Gy/15 Fr, and 40 Gy/20 Fr. Toxicity rates with short and long courses were also the same. Recurrence rate at 2 years, however, was significantly higher in patients irradiated with a short course than in patients irradiated with a long course. Those trials also showed that response rate is affected by patient's age, performance state, tumor type, pathological state, number of metastatic tumors, and span from diagnosis of cancer to development of metastatic tumor. Breast cancer has a better prognosis than most other cancers. Recently, there have been significant advances in cancer therapy techniques and improvement in clinical results. Bone metastasis can cause extreme pain and motor deficits. Quality of life for patients with bone metastasis is drastically worsened. Patients with bad prognosis should be treated with radiation therapy when analgesia is the main aim of treatment. Survival of patients with oligometastasis or predominantly bone metastasis is expected to be better than that of patients with visceral metastasis. For patients with vertebral or weight-bearing long bone metastasis, long-course therapy is recommended. Many patients who are expected to have a good prognosis should be treated with a long course of radiation.

Cesium implant for tongue carcinoma with a thickness of 1.5 cm or more: cases successfully treated with a Modified Manchester System.

PURPOSE: Deciding on treatment carcinoma of the tongue when the tumor has a thickness of 1.5 cm or more is difficult. Surgery often requires wide resection and re-construction, leading to considerable functional impairment. A cesium implant is an attractive option, but according to the Manchester System, a two plane implant is needed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: According to the textbook, a tumor is sandwiched between the needles, which are implanted at the edge of the tumor. This may cause an unnecessarily high dose to the outer surface of the tongue, which sometimes leads to a persistent ulcer. To avoid this complication, we invented a modified implantation method, and applied the method to five consecutive patients. RESULTS: With a minimum follow-up of 2 years, all primary tumors in 5 consecutive patients have been controlled. No complications occurred in soft tissue of the tongue or in the mandible. CONCLUSION: Our modified Manchester System was feasible and effective for tumors that has a thickness of 1.5 cm or more.

Japanese structure survey of radiation oncology in 2007 based on institutional stratification of patterns of care study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the ongoing structure of radiation oncology in Japan in terms of equipment, personnel, patient load, and geographic distribution to identify and improve any deficiencies. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A questionnaire-based national structure survey was conducted from March to December 2008 by the Japanese Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (JASTRO). These data were analyzed in terms of the institutional stratification of the Patterns of Care Study. RESULTS: The total numbers of new cancer patients and total cancer patients (new and repeat) treated with radiation in 2007 were estimated at 181,000 and 218,000, respectively. There were 807 linear accelerator, 15 telecobalt, 46 Gamma Knife, 45 (60)Co remote-controlled after-loading, and 123 (192)Ir remote-controlled after-loading systems in actual use. The linear accelerator systems used dual-energy function in 539 units (66.8%), three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy in 555 (68.8%), and intensity-modulated radiation therapy in 235 (29.1%). There were 477 JASTRO-certified radiation oncologists, 826.3 full-time equivalent (FTE) radiation oncologists, 68.4 FTE medical physicists, and 1,634 FTE radiation therapists. The number of interstitial radiotherapy (RT) administrations for prostate, stereotactic body radiotherapy, and intensity-modulated radiation therapy increased significantly. Patterns of Care Study stratification can clearly identify the maturity of structures based on their academic nature and caseload. Geographically, the more JASTRO-certified physicians there were in a given area, the more RT tended to be used for cancer patients. CONCLUSIONS: The Japanese structure has clearly improved during the past 17 years in terms of equipment and its use, although a shortage of personnel and variations in maturity disclosed by Patterns of Care Study stratification were still problematic in 2007.

National structure of radiation oncology in Japan with special reference to designated cancer care hospitals.

BACKGROUND: The structure of radiation oncology in designated cancer care hospitals in Japan was investigated in terms of equipment, personnel, patient load, and geographic distribution, and compared with the structure in other radiotherapy facilities. METHODS: The Japanese Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (JASTRO) conducted a questionnaire survey about the national structure of radiation oncology in 2005. In the current study, the structures of 326 designated cancer care hospitals and the other 386 radiotherapy facilities in Japan were compared. RESULTS: Designated cancer care hospitals accounted for 45.3% of all radiotherapy facilities. The patterns of equipment and personnel in designated cancer care hospitals and the other radiotherapy facilities were as follows: linear accelerators/facility, 1.2 and 1.0; dual-energy function, 73.1% and 56.3%; three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy function, 67.5% and 52.7%; intensity-modulated radiotherapy function, 30.0% and 13.9%; annual number of patients/linear accelerator, 289.7 and 175.1; (192)Ir remote-controlled afterloading systems, 27.6% and 8.6%; and average number of full-time equivalent radiation oncologists/facility, 1.4 and 0.9 (P < 0.0001). There were significant differences in equipment and personnel between the two types of facilities. Annual patient loads/full-time equivalent radiation oncologist in the designated cancer care hospitals and the other radiotherapy facilities were 252 and 240. Geographically, the number of designated cancer care hospitals was associated with the population, and the number of JASTRO-certified physicians was associated with the number of patients undergoing radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: The Japanese structure of radiation oncology in designated cancer care hospitals was more mature than that in the other radiotherapy facilities in terms of equipment, although a shortage of personnel still exists. The serious understaffing problem in radiation oncology should be corrected in the future.

[General remarks on brachytherapy].

Brachytherapy has long been used because its therapeutic gain factor is high. The high-dose-rate remote after loading system (RALS) that enables therapists to treat patients without any radiation exposure recently has become the mainstream method and has been used in preference to low-dose-rate brachytherapy. 192Ir fine seeds were developed to expand the number of diseases treated and to increase the precision of treatment through computerization. However, because of new adaptations of brachytherapy and its use with external irradiation and other techniques, new issues have been generated as a result of the technological advances in external beam radiotherapy. The current status of brachytherapy is summarized, and information on the cautions and future views for developments and problems in brachytherapy are given in this report.