Efficacy and safety of fixed-dose losartan/hydrochlorothiazide/amlodipine combination versus losartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination in Japanese patients with essential hypertension.

Japanese patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension received single-blind losartan 50 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg (L50/H12.5) for 8 weeks. Patients whose blood pressure (BP) remained uncontrolled were randomized double-blind to fixed-dose losartan 50 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg/amlodipine 5 mg (L50/H12.5/A5) or L50/H12.5 for 8 weeks followed by open-label L50/H12.5/A5 for 44 weeks. Adverse events were assessed. After 8 weeks, diastolic and systolic BP were reduced significantly more with L50/H12.5/A5 versus L50/H12.5 (both p < 0.001). Mean changes in diastolic and systolic BP were sustained for 44 weeks. L50/H12.5/A5 was well-tolerated and improved BP significantly versus L50/H12.5 in Japanese patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension.

Safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of Ad26.COV2.S: Results of a phase 1, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled COVID-19 vaccine trial in Japan.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of a 2-month homologous booster regimen of Ad26.COV2.S in Japanese adults. METHODS: In this multicenter, placebo-controlled, Phase 1 trial, adults (Cohort 1, aged 20-55 years, N = 125; Cohort 2, aged ≥ 65 years, N = 125) were randomized 2:2:1 to receive Ad26.COV2.S 5 × 1010 viral particles (vp), Ad26.COV2.S 1 × 1011 vp, or placebo, followed by a homologous booster 56 days later. Safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity were assessed. RESULTS: Two hundred participants received Ad26.COV2.S and 50 received placebo. The most frequent solicited local adverse event (AE) was vaccination-site pain, and the most frequent solicited systemic AEs were fatigue, myalgia, and headache. After primary vaccination, neutralizing and binding antibody levels increased through Day 57 (post-prime) in both cohorts. Fourteen days after boosting (Day 71), neutralizing antibody geometric mean titers (GMTs) had almost reached their peak value in Cohort 1 (5 × 1010 vp: GMT = 1049; 1 × 1011 vp: GMT = 1470) and peaked in Cohort 2 (504; 651); at Day 85, GMTs had declined minimally in Cohort 2. For both cohorts, binding antibody levels peaked at Day 71 with minimal decline at Day 85. CONCLUSION: A single dose and homologous Ad26.COV2.S booster increased antibody responses with an acceptable safety profile in Japanese adults (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04509947).

Evaluation of Montelukast for the Treatment of Children With Japanese Cedar Pollinosis Using an Artificial Exposure Chamber (OHIO Chamber).

Background: This study evaluated the efficacy of montelukast in reducing seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms in Japanese children with Japanese cedar (JC) pollinosis induced in an artificial exposure chamber (OHIO Chamber). Methods: Pediatric patients aged 10 to 15 years sensitive to JC pollen entered a randomized, double-blind, single-site, crossover study. After confirmation of an allergic response to a JC pollen exposure for 3 hours in the OHIO Chamber during the screening period, subjects received either montelukast 5 mg chewable tablets or placebo for a 7-day treatment period, followed by a 3-hour pollen exposure in the chamber. After a 7-day washout period, subjects crossed over to the other treatment. Subjects were instructed to self-assess their nasal symptoms using 5-point scale for every 30 minutes. The primary end point was the change from baseline (just before entering the exposure chamber for each exposure) in total nasal symptom score (TNSS; the sum of nasal congestion, nasal discharge, and sneezing scores) over 3 hours of pollen exposure. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study. Results: A total of 220 subjects (median age, 12 years) received treatment. For TNSS, the between-group difference in the change (95% confidence interval) was -0.01 (-0.11 to 0.10); the change between placebo and montelukast 5 mg was not significant. TNSS in the screening and treatment periods after receiving placebo for 7 days was 1.58 and 1.31, respectively, suggesting a placebo response. On account of high placebo response, a post hoc analysis was conducted. The analysis in a subgroup of subjects who did not show placebo response demonstrated a difference in the efficacy between montelukast and placebo (nominal P < .037). The most common AE was positive urine protein (4.6% with montelukast vs 7.8% with placebo). Conclusions: Although montelukast was well tolerated, this study did not demonstrate a treatment difference between active drug and placebo in Japanese children exposed to JC pollen in the OHIO Chamber.Trial Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01852812.

Lipid-modifying efficacy and tolerability of anacetrapib added to ongoing statin therapy in Japanese patients with dyslipidemia.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We aimed to assess the effects of cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor anacetrapib added to statin ± other lipid-modifying therapies (LMT) in Japanese patients with dyslipidemia who were not at their LDL-C goal. METHODS: Patients on a stable dose of statin ± other LMT with LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL to <145 mg/dL, ≥120 mg/dL to <165 mg/dL, ≥140 mg/dL or ≥160 mg/dL for patients with a history of coronary heart disease (CHD), high-, moderate- and low-risk patients respectively, were randomized 2:1, stratified by background therapy, to double-blind anacetrapib 100 mg (n = 204) or placebo (n = 103) for 24 weeks, followed by a 28-week open-label extension phase (anacetrapib 100 mg) and a 12-week off-drug safety follow-up phase. The primary endpoint was percent change from baseline in LDL-C (beta-quantification method), as well as the safety profile of anacetrapib at Week 24; HDL-C was a key secondary endpoint. RESULTS: Anacetrapib 100 mg further reduced LDL-C (38.0%), non-HDL-C (35.1%), ApoB (28.7%), and Lp(a) (48.3%) and increased HDL-C (148.9%) and ApoAI (50.7%) versus placebo (p < 0.001 for all). There were no meaningful differences between the groups in the proportion of patients with liver enzymes elevations (2.0% vs. 0%), creatine kinase elevations overall (0.5% vs. 0%) or with muscle symptoms (0.5% vs. 0%), blood pressure, electrolytes or adjudicated cardiovascular events (0.5% vs. 0%). In the open-label period, sustained effects on lipid parameters were observed with anacetrapib and the treatment was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term treatment with anacetrapib 100 mg substantially reduced LDL-C, increased HDL-C and was well tolerated in Japanese patients with dyslipidemia (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01760460).

Montelukast in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis in paediatric Japanese patients; an open-label clinical trial.

Background: This study was conducted to evaluate the safety and tolerability, and population pharmacokinetics (PPK) of montelukast as well as efficacy in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR) in paediatric Japanese patients aged between 1 and 15 years. Methods: In this multi-centre, open-label trial, 87 paediatric Japanese patients with PAR received montelukast 4 mg oral granules (OG) for 4 weeks (1-5-year-olds, N = 15), 4 mg OG for 12 weeks (1-5-year-olds, N = 36), 5 mg chewable tablets (CT) for 12 weeks (6-9-year-olds, N = 18), or 5 mg CT for12 weeks (10-15-year-olds, N = 18). Clinical exams and laboratory assessments were conducted at study visits, and adverse events (AE) were monitored throughout the study up to 14 days after the last visit. Population pharmacokinetic approach was used to estimate AUC0-∞, Cmax, Tmax and apparent elimination half-life in each age group. Efficacy was assessed based on global evaluations by the subject's caregiver. Results: There were no serious AEs and one discontinuation due to an AE. The most common AEs in any of the treatment groups were nasopharyngitis, pharyngitis, and acute sinusitis. Montelukast exposure (AUC0-∞) was similar in the 1-5-year-old group and the 6-9-year-old group, but 19% lower in the 10-15-year-old group. Among all patients, the total proportion of patients whose global evaluation was "very much better" was 5.7% (week 2), 11.5% (week 4), and 16.9% (week 12) reflecting improvement in symptoms over time. Conclusion: Montelukast was generally well tolerated in Japanese children with PAR. AUC0-∞was similar in 1-5 and 6-9-year-olds, while a lower exposure was observed in the 10-15-year-old group likely due to differences in bodyweight. The exposure in Japanese paediatric patients was generally consistent with that in non-Japanese paediatric and adult patients. As assessed by the patients' caregivers, montelukast also demonstrated symptomatic improvement based on global evaluations of PAR.

Efficacy and safety of the cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor anacetrapib in Japanese patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessed the lipid-modifying efficacy/safety profile of anacetrapib 100 mg added to ongoing statin ± other lipid-modifying therapies (LMT) in Japanese patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH). METHODS: Patients 18-80 years with a genotype-confirmed/clinical diagnosis of HeFH who were on a stable dose of statin ± other LMT for ≥6 weeks and with an LDL-C concentration ≥100 mg/dL were randomized to anacetrapib 100 mg (n = 34) or placebo (n = 34) for 12 weeks, followed by a 12-week off-drug reversal phase. The primary endpoints were percent change from baseline in LDL-C (beta-quantification method [BQ]) and safety/tolerability. RESULTS: At Week 12, treatment with anacetrapib reduced LDL-C (BQ) compared to placebo and resulting in a between-group difference of 29.8% (95% CI: -38.6 to -21.0; p < 0.001) favoring anacetrapib. Anacetrapib also reduced non-HDL-C (23. 6%; p < 0.001), ApoB (14.1%; p < 0.001) and Lp(a) (48.7%; p < 0.001), and increased HDL-C (110.0%; p < 0.001) and ApoA1 (48.2%; p < 0.001) versus placebo. Anacetrapib 100 mg added to ongoing therapy with statin ± other LMT for 12 weeks was generally well-tolerated. There were no differences between the groups in the proportion of patients who discontinued drug due to an adverse event or abnormalities in liver enzymes, creatinine kinase, blood pressure, electrolytes or adjudicated cardiovascular events. CONCLUSIONS: In Japanese patients with HeFH, treatment with anacetrapib 100 mg for 12 weeks resulted in substantial reductions in LDL-C and increases in HDL-C and was well tolerated. (ClinicalTrials.govNCT01824238).

Add-on effect of hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg in Japanese subjects with essential hypertension uncontrolled with losartan 50 mg and amlodipine 5 mg.

This study assessed the antihypertensive efficacy of a triple combination, fixed-dose therapy of losartan 50 mg (L50)/hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg (H12.5)/amlodipine 5 mg (A5) versus co-administration of L50 plus A5 (L50+A5) in Japanese subjects with uncontrolled essential hypertension. Initially, all subjects received single-blind treatment with L50+A5 for 8 weeks. Subjects whose blood pressure (BP) remained stable within pre-specified limits during the last 4 weeks of L50+A5 administration were randomized (n =3 27) to double-blind treatment with L50/H12.5/A5 or L50+A5 for 8 weeks. Primary and secondary efficacy endpoints were mean change from baseline to Week 8 in trough diastolic BP (DBP) and trough systolic BP (SBP), respectively. Safety was assessed throughout the study. The treatment difference for L50/H12.5/A5 versus L50+A5 in mean change from baseline in DBP at Week 8 was -1.1 mm Hg (95% confidence interval (CI) -2.7, 0.6; P = 0.205). However, the treatment difference in mean change from baseline in SBP at Week 8 was -3.2 mm Hg (95% CI: -5.7, -0.8; P=0.011). A chance imbalance in the change in DBP before randomization between groups was identified in a post-hoc analysis as a major reason for the smaller-than-expected difference in DBP between groups. The overall safety profile was generally similar between groups. In conclusion, treatment with L50/H12.5/A5 for 8 weeks did not demonstrate a significant difference in DBP reduction, but demonstrated a nominally significant difference in SBP reduction, compared with L50+A5. L50/H12.5/A5 was well tolerated. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01302691.).

Efficacy and safety of losartan 100 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg in Japanese subjects with essential hypertension: two randomized, controlled trials.

Two randomized studies were designed to assess the safety, tolerability and efficacy of losartan 100 mg (L100) plus hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg (H12.5) in a single fixed-dose combination. In one study, subjects received losartan 50 mg (L50) plus H12.5 during an 8-week filter period. They were then randomized to either L100/H12.5 or L50/H12.5 for another 8 weeks, followed by L100/H12.5 for 44 weeks. The primary end point was safety of L100/H12.5 for 52 weeks. In the second study, subjects received L100 during an 8-week filter period. Subjects were then randomized to receive either L100/H12.5 or L100 for a further 8 weeks. The primary end point was change from baseline in sitting diastolic blood pressure (SiDBP) at week 8. Safety was assessed throughout both studies. L100/H12.5 reduced SiDBP and sitting systolic blood pressure (SiSBP) at 8 weeks, and when compared with L100, the differences were statistically significant for both measures (P<0.001). L100/H12.5 reductions SiDBP for 8 weeks were comparable to L50/H12.5. The efficacy of L100/H12.5 was maintained to week 52. Drug-related adverse events with an incidence ⩾ 2% in the L100/H12.5 group during the 52-week extension period were an increase in aspartate aminotransferase and in blood uric acid. Additionally, mean uric acid levels were reduced by 0.57 mg dl(-1) from baseline with long-term treatment with L100/H12.5 in subjects whose baseline uric acid level was >7.0 mg dl(-1). In conclusion, L100/H12.5 was shown to be more effective than L100 at reducing SiDBP and SiSBP and showed good tolerability in Japanese patients with essential hypertension.

Efficacy and safety of the cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor anacetrapib in Japanese patients with dyslipidemia.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the effects of anacetrapib (ANA) on lipids and safety when administered as monotherapy or in combination with atorvastatin (ATV) in Japanese patients with dyslipidemia. METHODS: Patients (n = 407) were randomized equally to 1 of 10 groups: placebo, ATV 10 mg, ANA 10, 40, 100, or 300 mg once daily, and the same ANA doses in combination with ATV 10 mg. Patients were treated with study medication for 8 weeks and followed for an additional 8 weeks, during which ANA was switched to placebo. RESULTS: For the placebo and ANA monotherapy groups (10, 40, 100, and 300 mg), least squares mean percent changes from baseline at Week 8 for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) calculated by the Friedewald equation were 3%, -12%, -27%, -32%, and -32%, respectively, and for high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) were 1%, 56%, 116%, 134%, and 159%, respectively (p < 0.001 vs. placebo for all doses). All ANA doses co-administered with ATV 10 mg produced significantly greater LDL-C reductions and HDL-C increases compared with ATV 10 mg monotherapy. ANA was well tolerated, and dose-dependent relationships for adverse events were not observed across treatment groups. Changes from baseline in blood pressure and electrolytes were not significantly different between the active and control treatment groups. CONCLUSION: ANA, as monotherapy or co-administered with ATV, produced significant reductions in LDL-C and increases in HDL-C. ANA was generally well tolerated in Japanese patients with dyslipidemia.

Characteristics and 1-year prognosis of medically treated patients with chronic heart failure in Japan.

The study was designed to characterize patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) in Japan in terms of the etiologies and prognosis. CHF was defined by ejection fraction (EF >or=50%), left ventricular diastolic dimension (LVDD >or=55 mm) or a past history of congestive heart failure. Among the 721 recruited patients, the most frequent etiology for CHF was dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) in patients aged less than 59 years, and valvular heart disease (VHD) in those aged 70 years or more. The 1-year crude mortality was 8% overall and 12% in patients with myocardial infarction (MI). Sudden death accounted for 40% of the total deaths among all patients, and 60% in patients with MI. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) was a consistent prognostic marker in CHF patients with a variety of etiologies. Total death and hospitalization because of heart failure were significantly less frequent in patients with BNP less than 100 pg/ml. In conclusion, the etiologies of Japanese CHF appear to be more diverse than those of other Western countries, but BNP is an excellent prognostic marker despite the etiological diversity. Sudden, unexpected death in CHF patients is also a serious problem in Japan. A nation-wide epidemiologic study should be done to characterize Japanese CHF.