Low-Dose Prasugrel vs. Standard-Dose Clopidogrel for Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

BACKGROUND: Low-dose prasugrel (3.75 mg) is used as maintenance therapy for percutaneous coronary intervention; however, data on long-term outcomes are scarce.Methods and Results: We analyzed 5,392 participants in the KiCS-PCI registry who were administered low-dose prasugrel or clopidogrel at discharge between 2008 and 2018 and for whom 2-year follow-up data were available. We adjusted for confounders using matching weight analyses and multiple imputations. Similarly, we used inverse probability- and propensity score-weighted analyses. We also performed instrumental variable analyses. The primary outcomes were acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and bleeding requiring readmission. Secondary outcomes were all-cause death and a composite outcome of ACS, bleeding, heart failure, stroke, coronary bypass requiring admission, and all-cause death. In this cohort, 12.2% of patients were discharged with low-dose prasugrel. Compared with clopidogrel, low-dose prasugrel was associated with a reduced risk of ACS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39-0.85), bleeding (HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.40-0.97), and the composite outcome (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.59-0.86). Inverse probability-weighted analysis yielded similar results; however, matching weight analysis without multiple imputations and propensity score-matched analyses showed similar outcomes in both groups. Instrumental variable analyses showed reduced risks of ACS and composite outcome for those on low-dose prasugrel. All-cause mortality did not differ in all analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose prasugrel demonstrates comparable outcomes to clopidogrel in terms of ACS and bleeding.

One-year outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with the revived directional coronary atherectomy catheter: Insights from the J-PCI OUTCOME registry.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the 1-year outcomes, including all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), and major bleeding, of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with or without the revived directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) catheter in a Japanese nationwide registry. BACKGROUND: Clinical data regarding the midterm outcomes of patients undergoing PCI with DCA are scarce in contemporary real-world practice. METHODS: We analyzed the data of 74,764 patients who underwent PCI at 179 hospitals from January 2017 to December 2018. The baseline characteristics and 1-year outcomes of patients with stable coronary artery disease or unstable angina who underwent PCI with or without DCA were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 431 patients (0.6%) underwent PCI with DCA. Patients in the DCA group were younger and predominantly male, with fewer comorbidities than patients in the non-DCA group. Stentless PCI with DCA following additional drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty was the dominant strategy in the DCA group (43.6%). One-year outcomes, including all-cause mortality (1.2% in the DCA group vs. 2.5% in the non-DCA group, respectively, p = 0.075), cardiovascular death (0.9% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.69), MACEs (1.9% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.96), and nonfatal major bleeding requiring readmission (1.2% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.62), were comparable between the two groups. In the DCA group, 1-year outcomes were comparable, regardless of whether the stent or DCB was used. CONCLUSIONS: One-year clinical outcomes after PCI with DCA in patients with stable coronary artery disease or unstable angina are acceptable, regardless of stent use.

Overview of in-hospital outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with the revived directional coronary atherectomy.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to provide clinical insights on the usage rate, indications, and in-hospital outcomes of the revived directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) catheter (Atherocut™) in a Japanese nationwide percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) registry. BACKGROUND: Debulking devices such as the revived DCA catheter have become increasingly important in the era of complex PCI. However, little is known about PCI outcomes using a novel DCA catheter in contemporary real-world practice. METHODS: We analyzed 188,324 patients who underwent PCI in 1112 hospitals from January to December 2018. Baseline characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of patients with stable coronary artery disease or unstable angina who underwent PCI with or without the DCA were analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, 1696 patients (0.9%) underwent PCI with the DCA during the study period, predominantly for left main trunk or proximal left anterior descending artery lesions under a transfemoral approach. Patients in the DCA group were younger and had fewer comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease than patients in the non-DCA group. Stentless PCI using the DCA with drug-coated balloon angioplasty was a preferred treatment strategy in the DCA group (50.0%). Predefined in-hospital adverse outcomes, including mortality (0.2% vs. 0.3%, p = 0.446) and periprocedural complications (1.8% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.697), were comparable between the two groups, whereas the fluoroscopy time was longer and the total contrast volume was higher in the DCA group. CONCLUSIONS: In Japan, PCI using the revived DCA catheter is safely performed with low complication rates in patients with stable coronary artery disease or unstable angina.

Effect of proximal optimization technique on coronary bifurcation stent failure: Insights from the multicenter randomized PROPOT trial.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the effect of proximal optimization technique (POT) on coronary bifurcation stent failure (BSF) in cross-over stenting by comparing with the kissing balloon technique (KBT) in a multicenter randomized PROPOT trial. BACKGROUND: POT is recommended due to increased certainty for optimal stent expansion and side branch (SB) wiring. METHODS: We randomized 120 patients treated with crossover stenting into the POT group, which was followed by SB dilation (SBD), and the KBT group. Finally, 52 and 57 patients were analyzed by optical coherence tomography before SBD and at the final procedure, respectively. Composite BSF was defined as a maximal malapposition distance of >400 µm, or malapposed and SB-jailed strut rates of >5.95% and >21.4%, respectively. RESULTS: Composite BSF before SBD in the POT and KBT groups was observed in 29% and 26% of patients, respectively. In the POT group, differences in stent volumetric index between the proximal and distal bifurcation (odds ratio [OR] 60.35, 95% confidential interval [CI] 0.13-0.93, p = 0.036) and between the proximal bifurcation and bifurcation core (OR: 3.68, 95% CI: 1.01-13.40, p = 0.048) were identified as independent risk factors. Composite BSF at final in 27% and 32%, and unplanned additional procedures in 38% and 25% were observed, respectively. Composite BSF before SBD was a risk factor for the former (OR: 6.33, 95% CI: 1.10-36.50, p = 0.039) and the latter (OR: 6.43, 95% CI: 1.25-33.10, p = 0.026) in the POT group. CONCLUSION: POT did not result in a favorable trend in BSF. Insufficient expansion of the bifurcation core after POT was associated with BSF.

Bleeding avoidance strategies and percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes: A 10-year observation from a Japanese Multicenter Registry.

BACKGROUND: Bleeding avoidance strategies (BASs) are increasingly adopted for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) due to bleeding complications. However, their association with bleeding events outside of Western countries remains unclear. In collaboration with the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) CathPCI registry, we aimed to assess the time trend and impact of BAS utilization among Japanese patients. METHODS: Our study included 19,656 consecutive PCI patients registered over 10 years. These patients were divided into 4-time frame groups (T1: 2008-2011, T2: 2012-2013, T3: 2014-2015, and T4: 2016-2018). BAS was defined as the use of transradial approach or vascular closure device (VCD) use after transfemoral approach (TFA). Model performance of the NCDR CathPCI bleeding model was evaluated. The degree of bleeding reduction associated with BAS adoption was estimated via multilevel mixed-effects multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The NCDR CathPCI bleeding risk score demonstrated good discrimination in the Japanese population (C-statistics 0.79-0.81). The BAS adoption rate increased from 43% (T1) to 91% (T4), whereas the crude CathPCI-defined bleeding rate decreased from 10% (T1) to 7% (T4). Adjusted odds ratios for bleeding events were 0.25 (95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.45, P< .001) for those undergoing TFA with VCD in T4 and 0.26 (95% confidence interval 0.20-0.35, P< .001) for transradial approach in T4 compared to patients that received TFA without VCD in T1. CONCLUSIONS: BAS use over the studied time frames was associated with lower risk of bleeding complications among Japanese. Nonetheless, observed bleeding rates remained higher compared to the US population.

Safety and efficacy of mechanical circulatory support with Impella or intra-aortic balloon pump for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention and/or cardiogenic shock: Insights from a network meta-analysis of randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) with Impella or intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is used for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and/or for cardiogenic shock (CS) due to acute myocardial infarction. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of Impella or IABP when compared with no MCS using a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: EMBASE and MEDLINE were searched through February 2020 for RCT evaluating efficacy of Impella vs. IABP vs. no MCS in patients undergoing high-risk PCI or CS. The primary efficacy outcome was 30 day or in-hospital all-cause mortality whereas the primary safety outcomes were major bleeding and vascular complications. RESULTS: Our search identified nine RCTs enrolling a total of 1,996 patients with high-risk PCI and/or CS. There was no significant difference with Impella or IABP on all-cause mortality when compared with no MCS (Impella vs. no MCS; OR:0.82 [0.35-1.90], p = .65, IABP vs. no MCS; OR:0.77 [0.47-1.28], p = .31, I2 = 18.1%). Impella significantly increased major bleeding compared with no MCS (Impella vs. no MCS; OR:7.01 [1.11-44.4], p = .038, I2 = 19.2%). IABP did not increase the risk of major bleeding compared with no MCS (OR:1.27 [0.75-2.16], p = .38, I2 = 19.2%) but increased vascular complication compared with no MCS (OR:1.92 [1.01-3.64], p = .045, I2 = 1.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Neither Impella nor IABP decreased all-cause short-term mortality when compared with no MCS for high-risk PCI and/or CS. Moreover, Impella increased major bleeding compared with no MCS.

One-Year Outcome After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndrome　- An Analysis of 20,042 Patients From a Japanese Nationwide Registry.

BACKGROUND: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) hospital survivors experience a wide array of late adverse cardiac events, despite considerable advances in the quality of care. We investigated 30-day and 1-year outcomes of ACS hospital survivors using a Japanese nationwide cohort.Methods and Results:We studied 20,042 ACS patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in 2017: 10,242 (51%) with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), 3,027 (15%) with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and 6,773 (34%) with unstable angina (UA). The mean (±SD) age was 69.6±12.4 years, 77% of the patients were men, and 20% had a previous history of PCI. The overall 30-day all-cause, cardiac, and non-cardiac mortality rates were 3.0%, 2.4%, and 0.6%, respectively. The overall 1-year incidence of all-cause, cardiac, and non-cardiac death was 7.1%, 4.2%, and 2.8%, respectively. Compared with UA patients, STEMI patients had a higher risk of all fatal events, non-fatal ischemic stroke, and acute heart failure, and NSTEMI patients had a higher risk of heart failure. CONCLUSIONS: The results from our ACS hospital survivor PCI database suggest the need to improve care for the acute myocardial infarction population to lessen the burden of 30-day mortality due to ACS, heart failure, and sudden cardiac death, as well as 1-year ischemic stroke and heart failure events.

Association of decreasing hemoglobin levels with the incidence of acute kidney injury after percutaneous coronary intervention: a prospective multi-center study.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). One risk factor for AKI is periprocedural hemoglobin drop level (> 3 g/dL); however, whether the relationship between hemoglobin drop and AKI is linear or nonlinear remains unknown. We aimed to investigate the relationship between periprocedural hemoglobin drop and AKI after PCI. We evaluated 14,273 consecutive patients undergoing PCI between September 2008 and March 2019. AKI was defined as an absolute or a relative increase in serum creatinine level of 0.3 mg/dL or 50%, respectively. Restricted cubic spline was constructed to assess the association between hemoglobin drop and AKI by logistic regression and machine learning (ML) models, which were used to predict the risk of AKI. The patients' mean age was 68.4 ± 11.6 years; the AKI incidence was 10.5% (N = 1499). An absolute > 3 g/dL or 20% relative decrease in hemoglobin level was an independent predictor of AKI incidence (odds ratio, OR [95% confidence interval, CI]: 2.24 [1.92-2.61], P < 0.001; 2.35 [2.04-2.71], P < 0.001, respectively). An adjusted restricted cubic spline demonstrated that absolute/relative decrease in hemoglobin was linearly associated with AKI. Logistic and ML models with absolute/relative hemoglobin changes were comparable while estimating the risk of AKI (absolute area under the curve [AUC] (logistic):0.826, AUC (ML): 0.820; relative AUC (logistic): 0.818, AUC (ML): 0.816). An absolute/relative decrease in periprocedural hemoglobin after PCI was linearly associated with AKI. Detection of a relative/absolute decrease in hemoglobin may help clinicians identify individuals as high risk for AKI after PCI.

Prevalence of the Academic Research Consortium high bleeding risk criteria in patients undergoing endovascular therapy for peripheral artery disease in lower extremities.

The Academic Research Consortium (ARC) recently published a definition of patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. However, the prevalence of the ARC-HBR criteria in patients undergoing endovascular therapy (EVT) for peripheral artery disease in lower extremities has not been thoroughly investigated. This study sought to investigate the prevalence and impact of the ARC-HBR criteria in patients undergoing EVT. We analyzed 277 consecutive patients who underwent their first EVT from July 2011 to September 2019. We applied the full ARC-HBR criteria to the study population. The primary end point was a composite outcome of all-cause mortality, Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3 or 5 bleeding, and lower limb amputation within 12 months of EVT. Among the 277 patients, 193 (69.7%) met the ARC-HBR criteria. HBR patients had worse clinical outcomes compared with non-HBR patients at 12 months after EVT, including a higher incidence of the composite primary outcome (19.2% vs. 3.6%, p < 0.001) and all-cause death (7.8% vs. 0%, p = 0.007). In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, presence of the ARC-HBR criteria [hazard ratio (HR) 4.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25-13.80, p = 0.020], body mass index (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.01-1.27, p = 0.042), diabetes mellitus (HR 2.70, 95% CI 1.28-5.69, p = 0.009), hyperlipidemia (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.21-0.80, p = 0.009), and infrapopliteal lesions (HR 3.51, 95% CI 1.63-7.56, p = 0.001) were independent predictors of the primary composite outcome. Approximately 70% of Japanese patients undergoing EVT met the ARC-HBR criteria, and its presence was strongly associated with adverse outcomes within 12 months of EVT.

Mortality in patients undergoing revascularization with paclitaxel eluting devices for infrainguinal peripheral artery disease: Insights from a network meta-analysis of randomized trials.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate whether paclitaxel eluting devices increased the risk of death in patients undergoing revascularization for infrainguinal peripheral artery disease using network meta-analyses. METHODS: PUBMED and EMBASE were searched through April 2020 for randomized trials in patients with infrainguinal peripheral artery disease who underwent revascularization with or without a paclitaxel eluting device (balloon/stent). Short-term mortality defined as death at 6-12 months, and long-term mortality defined as death at >12 months after revascularization. RESULTS: Our search identified 57 eligible randomized controlled studies enrolling a total of 9,362 patients comparing seven revascularization strategies (balloon angioplasty vs. bare metal stent vs. covered stent vs. paclitaxel eluting stent vs. other drug eluting stent vs. paclitaxel-coated balloon vs. bypass surgery). Overall, paclitaxel eluting stent and paclitaxel-coated balloons did not increase short-term mortality (eg, vs. balloon angioplasty: paclitaxel-coated balloon OR [95% CI] 1.21 [0.88-1.66], p = .24; paclitaxel eluting stent OR [95%CI] 1.01 [0.63-1.63], p = .97, respectively). In addition, paclitaxel eluting stent did not show significant increase in long-term mortality (eg, vs. balloon angioplasty: OR [95%CI] 1.06 [0.70-1.59], p = .79). However, paclitaxel-coated balloon showed significant increase in long-term mortality compared to balloon angioplasty and bypass (vs. balloon angioplasty: OR [95% CI] 1.48 [1.06-2.07], p = .021; vs. bypass: OR [95%CI] 1.73 [1.05-2.84], p = .031, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this meta-analysis of randomized trials, there was no significant increase in mortality with paclitaxel eluting stent, but there was increased risk of long-term mortality in paclitaxel-coated balloon for the treatment of infrainguinal peripheral artery disease.

Antithrombotic strategies after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Insights from a network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of different antithrombotic strategies in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using network meta-analyses. BACKGROUND: Meta-analyses comparing single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) vs. dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), ± oral anticoagulant (OAC) was conducted to determine the appropriate post TAVI antithrombotic regimen. However, there was limited direct comparisons across the different therapeutic strategies. METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched through December 2018 to investigate the efficacy and safety of different antithrombotic strategies (SAPT, DAPT, OAC, OAC + SAPT, and OAC + DAPT) in patients undergoing TAVI. The main outcome were all-cause mortality, major or life-threatening bleeding events, and stroke. RESULTS: Our search identified 3 randomized controlled trials and 10 nonrandomized studies, a total of 20,548 patients who underwent TAVI. All OACs were vitamin K antagonists. There was no significant difference on mortality except that OAC + DAPT had significantly higher rates of mortality compared with others (p < .05, I2 = 0%). SAPT had significantly lower rates of bleeding compared with DAPT, OAC+SAPT, and OAC+DAPT (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.59 [0.46-0.77], p < .001, HR: 0.58 [0.34-0.99], p = .045, HR: 0.41 [0.18-0.93], p = .033, respectively, I2 = 0%). There was no significant difference on stroke among all antithrombotic strategies. CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent TAVI had similar all-cause mortality rates among different antithrombotic strategies except OAC+DAPT. Patients on SAPT had significantly lower bleeding risk than those on DAPT, OAC + SAPT, and OAC + DAPT. Our results suggest SAPT is the preferred regimen when there is no indication for DAPT or OAC. When DAPT or OAC is indicated, DAPT + OAC should be avoided.

Risk of undiagnosed coronary artery disease associated with infrapopliteal artery occlusion from a multicenter study.

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is associated with high cardiovascular mortality. Which part of PAD with lower extremities is related to coronary artery disease (CAD) remains unknown. We hypothesized that PAD including infrapopliteal artery (IPA) occlusion was associated with CAD. A total of 260 patients who have no history of CAD or the anginal symptom, complain of the claudication or critical limb ischemia and underwent peripheral angiography were retrospectively analyzed. IPA occlusion was diagnosed with peripheral angiography, and CAD was diagnosed with the coronary angiography. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the predictors of silent CAD. Among them, a total of 146 patients (56.2%) had IPA occlusion. Baseline characteristics were significantly different between two groups as to the proportions of age, male, dyslipidemia (with vs. without IPA occlusion; 72.4 ± 10.8 vs. 69.1 ± 10.2; 62.3% vs. 75.4%; 38.6% vs. 52.6%, respectively, all comparisons P < 0.05). Notably, the prevalence of CAD was significantly higher in patients with IPA occlusion (50.7% vs. 34.2%, P = 0.008). On a multivariate analysis, IPA occlusion was an independent predictor for the presence of silent CAD (OR, 1.94; CI, 1.09-3.44, P = 0.024), but aortoiliac artery occlusion (OR, 1.16; CI, 0.53-2.56, P = 0.71) and femoropopliteal artery occlusion (OR, 1.02; CI, 0.57-1.83, P = 0.96) were not. IPA occlusion was associated with silent CAD. Vascular surgeons, interventional radiologists, as well as interventional cardiologists should recognize IPA occlusion as a risk factor of silent CAD.

An overview of percutaneous coronary intervention in dialysis patients: Insights from a Japanese nationwide registry.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to provide an overview of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in dialysis patients from a Japanese nationwide registry. BACKGROUND: Little is known about dialysis patients undergoing PCI because few are enrolled in clinical trials. METHODS: We analyzed 624,900 PCI cases including 41,384 dialysis patients (6.6%) from 1,017 Japanese hospitals between 2014 and 2016. We investigated differences in characteristics and in-hospital outcomes between dialysis and nondialysis patients, and assessed factors associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes. RESULTS: Dialysis patients had more comorbidities than nondialysis patients and higher rates of complications including in-hospital mortality (3.3% vs. 1.5%, respectively, in the acute coronary syndrome [ACS] cohort, 0.2% vs. 0.1% in the non-ACS cohort) and bleeding complications requiring blood transfusion (1.1% vs. 0.4% in ACS, 0.5% vs. 0.2% in non-ACS). Dialysis was significantly associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 1.42, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.24-1.62 in ACS, OR: 2.25, 95% CI: 1.66-3.05 in non-ACS) and bleeding (OR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.30-1.96 in ACS, OR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.27-1.88 in non-ACS). For dialysis patients, age, acute heart failure, and cardiogenic shock were associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality in the ACS cohort, whereas age, female gender, and history of heart failure were associated with higher in-hospital mortality in the non-ACS cohort. CONCLUSIONS: PCI was widely performed for dialysis patients with either ACS or non-ACS in Japan. Dialysis patients had a greater risk of adverse outcomes than nondialysis patients after PCI.

Trans-radial percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with severe chronic renal insufficiency and/or on dialysis.

Periprocedural bleeding is associated with an increased risk of mortality during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in patients with severe chronic renal insufficiency. Therefore, trans-radial intervention (TRI) should be considered in these patients; however, PCI operators usually avoid this approach because of the risk of radial artery occlusion. We aimed to investigate the associations of TRI and in-hospital complications in these patients. This study included 306 consecutive patients with severe chronic renal insufficiency and/or on dialysis who underwent PCI. Patients were prospectively enrolled and divided according to the access site into TRI group and trans-femoral intervention group. Severe renal insufficiency was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2. Radial access was limited to the opposite side of the arteriovenous fistula in patients on hemodialysis. The primary study endpoint was the composite of in-hospital bleeding complications and death. TRI benefit was evaluated by inverse probability treatment weighted analysis. TRI was performed in 112 (37.3%) patients. TRI group included older patients with significantly lower rates of diabetes mellitus, dialysis, and three-vessel disease. Crossover to the other approach occurred only in TRI group (2.6%). The primary endpoint was significantly lower in TRI group (11.5% vs. 2.6%, P = 0.006). After an inverse probability treatment weighted analysis, TRI was an independent prognostic factor for a decrease in the primary endpoint (OR 0.19; 95% CI 0.051-0.73; P = 0.015). Radial artery occlusion occurred in three patients on dialysis (9.1%). TRI may determine better in-hospital outcomes in patients with severe chronic renal insufficiency and/or on dialysis.

Real-world use of intravascular ultrasound in Japan: a report from contemporary multicenter PCI registry.

Clinical trial data suggest that intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) may improve clinical outcomes after PCI. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety of IVUS in its broader use for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A total of 11,570 consecutive patients undergoing PCI between 2008 and 2014 in Japan were analyzed. Associations between IVUS use, PCI-related complications were assessed with logistic regression and propensity score matching analyses. Subgroup analysis was performed in elective PCI patients. IVUS was used in 84.8% of patients (N = 9814; IVUS group); its use was almost universal in elective PCIs (90.8 vs. 81.7% in urgent/emergent PCIs, P < 0.001). The non-IVUS group were older (68.7 ± 11.4 vs. 67.9 ± 10.8 years, P = 0.004), with more comorbid conditions. The non-IVUS group had smaller stent lumens (2.97 ± 0.42 mm vs. 3.09 ± 0.45 mm, P < 0.001) and a higher proportion of plain old balloon angioplasty. After matching, a lower rate of flow-impairing coronary dissections was observed in the IVUS group, although this was limited only to elective PCIs, not among urgent/emergent PCIs (non-IVUS vs. IVUS; 2.7% vs. 1.0%, P = 0.018, 0.7% vs. 1.2%, P = 0.32, respectively). With a multivariate logistic regression analysis, IVUS use remained an independent predictor to reduce risk of flow impairing severe coronary dissection among elective PCIs (odds ratio 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.22-0.66: P = 0.001). In this Japanese PCI registry, IVUS was used extensively during the study period, particularly in elective cases. Using IVUS was associated with a lower event rate of flow-impairing coronary dissections that was limited to elective PCIs, not among urgent/emergent PCIs, without increasing PCI-related complications.

Predictors of high cost after percutaneous coronary intervention: A review from Japanese multicenter registry overviewing the influence of procedural complications.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is widely used; however, factors of high-cost care after PCI have not been thoroughly investigated. We sought to evaluate the in-hospital costs related to PCI and identify predictors of high costs. METHODS: We extracted 2,354 consecutive PCI cases (1,243 acute cases, 52.8%) from 3 Japanese cardiovascular centers from 2011 to 2015. In-hospital complications were predefined under consensus definitions (eg, acute kidney injury [AKI]). We extracted the facility cost data for each patient's resource under the universal Japanese insurance system. We classified the patients into total cost quartiles and identified predictors for the highest quartile ("high-cost" group). In addition, incremental costs for procedure-related complications were calculated. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 401 cases (17.0%) experienced procedure-related complications. The in-hospital acute and elective PCI costs per case were US $14,840 (interquartile range [IQR] 11,370-20,070) and US $11,030 (IQR 8929-14,670), respectively. After adjusting for baseline differences, any of the procedure-related complications remained an independent predictor of high costs (acute: odds ratio 1.66, 95% CIs 1.13-2.43; elective: odds ratio 3.73, 95% CIs 1.96-7.11). Notably, incremental costs were mainly attributed to AKI, which accounted for 37.5% of all incremental costs; it increased by US $9,840 for each AKI event, and the total cost increase reached US $2,588,035. CONCLUSIONS: Procedure-related complications, particularly postprocedural AKI, were associated with higher costs in PCI. Further studies are required to evaluate prospectively whether the preventive strategy with a personalized risk stratification for AKI could save costs.

Barriers Associated With Door-to-Balloon Delay in Contemporary Japanese Practice.

BACKGROUND: Door-to-balloon (DTB) time ≤90 min is an important quality indicator in the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but a considerable number of patients still do not meet this goal, particularly in countries outside the USA and Europe.Methods and Results:We analyzed 2,428 STEMI patients who underwent primary PCI ≤12 h of symptom onset who were registered in an ongoing prospective multicenter database (JCD-KiCS registry), between 2008 and 2013. We analyzed both the time trend in DTB time within this cohort in the registry, and independent predictors of delayed DTB time >90 min. Median DTB time was 90 min (IQR, 68-115 min) during the study period and there were no significant changes with year. Predictors for delay in DTB time included peripheral artery disease, prior revascularization, off-hour arrival, age >75 years, heart failure at arrival, and use of IABP or VA-ECMO. Notably, high-volume PCI-capable institutions (PCI ≥200/year) were more adept at achieving shorter DTB time compared with low-volume institutions (PCI <200/year). CONCLUSIONS: Half of the present STEMI patients did not achieve DTB time ≤90 min. Targeting the elderly and patients with multiple comorbidities, and PCI performed in off-hours may aid in its improvement.

Effect of Smoking Status on Clinical Outcome and Efficacy of Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The "smoker's paradox" is an otherwise unexplained phenomenon in which the mortality of smokers after acute myocardial infarction is reduced, contrary to expectations. It has been suggested that an association with antiplatelet agents exists, but the true mechanism remains largely unidentified. METHODS AND RESULTS: The analysis included 6,195 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome, registered in the Japanese multicenter PCI registry. Smokers were significantly younger and had less comorbidity than non-smokers. Unadjusted in-hospital mortality rate, general complication rate, and bleeding complication rate were lower in smokers than in non-smokers. After adjustment, the trend persisted and smoking was not associated with overall mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61-1.34; P=0.62), and was associated with lower overall (P=0.032) and bleeding complication events (P=0.040). Clopidogrel effectively reduced the occurrence of in-hospital complications and major adverse cardiac events in smokers compared with non-smokers (OR, 0.55; 95% CI: 0.53-0.98 vs. OR, 1.20; 95% CI: 0.87-1.67; and OR, 0.37; 95% CI: 0.20-0.70 vs. OR, 1.48; 95% CI: 0.90-2.43, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The smoker's paradox was largely explained by confounding factors related to the lower risk profile of smokers, and they benefited from a positive modification of the efficacy of clopidogrel. (Circ J 2016; 80: 1590-1599).