Pediatric Pain and Pain Management After Ambulatory Plastic Surgery: Trends in the Age of Opioid Awareness.

BACKGROUND: Overprescribing by physicians has been shown to be a major contributor to the opioid epidemic. Although pediatric ambulatory plastic surgery patients are commonly prescribed opioids for postoperative pain control, there is a lack of evidence for their necessity. This study aimed to investigate the role of prescribed narcotics in the ambulatory pediatric plastic surgery setting. METHODS: All assenting patients/guardians, ages 0 to 17 years, who underwent an ambulatory plastic surgery procedure by 1 attending surgeon from March 2018 to March 2019, were asked to participate in the study. A questionnaire was distributed at the first postoperative visit to interrogate postoperative pain, management, and narcotic use. RESULTS: A total of 95 patients/guardians completed the questionnaire. Seventy-eight percent (74) of patients picked up the narcotic medication, with 33% (31) taking at least 1 dose of narcotics, and only 9% (9) taking 4 or more doses. Patients overall found no difference in efficacy of the narcotics versus nonprescription analgesics (3.93/5 and 4.31/5, P = 0.11). Age was a significant predictor, with older patients requiring more narcotics (odds ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.24; P = 0.019). The type of surgery a patient underwent was not a significant predictor of the amount of narcotic used. Few patients knew how to properly dispose of the excess narcotics, with almost 50% still having it stored in their homes. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the majority of pediatric ambulatory plastic surgery patients do not require narcotic pain medications and experience adequate pain relief with over-the-counter analgesics. Importantly, education on proper disposal of narcotic medications may be a simple, yet effective target to decrease opioid availability for abuse.

Reduction of Unnecessary Gastrostomy Tube Placement in Hospitalized Patients.

BACKGROUND: Many patients undergoing gastrostomy tube placement at one academic medical center were able to resume an oral diet prior to discharge or did not survive hospitalization. The objective of this study was to reduce placement of nonbeneficial gastrostomy tubes and to maintain or improve adherence to gastrostomy tube guidelines. METHODS: In February 2017 the Acute Care Surgery service began an initiative in which gastrostomy tube placement was deferred until the patient was deemed medically stable for discharge. This study retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement at Columbia University Irving Medical Center, January 2014-January 2017, prior to the intervention, and February 2017-December 2019, after the intervention. Primary outcomes included the proportion of patients undergoing PEG tube placement who resumed an oral diet or who died during the index hospital stay. Secondary outcomes included the timing of the PEG tube placement. RESULTS: PEGs were placed in 240 patients in the preintervention period and in 171 patients in the postintervention period. In the postintervention period, there was a lower percentage of patients resuming oral diet after PEG placement (17.1% vs. 7.6%, p = 0.0049), a lower duration between stroke diagnosis and PEG placement (mean of 21.0 days vs. 17,1 days, p = 0.0305), and a lower duration between PEG placement and hospital discharge (mean of 19.7 days vs. 13.6 days, p = 0.0035). CONCLUSION: Intentional delay in PEG placement until patients were medically stabilized and approaching discharge was associated with a reduction in unnecessary procedures and an overall reduction in the number of procedures, while maintaining alignment with clinical guidelines and avoiding delays in discharge attributable to the procedure.