Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 37
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
JAMA ; 2024 Jun 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38888913

RESUMO

Importance: Body mass index (BMI) of the 95th or greater percentile for age and sex is common among young people, and its prevalence has increased in recent decades. Objective: To examine the benefits and harms of weight management interventions initiated in health care settings among children and adolescents with high BMI. Data Sources: MEDLINE via Ovid, PsycINFO via Ovid, and the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials through January 12, 2023; ongoing surveillance through January 26, 2024. Study Selection: English-language studies of weight management interventions (behavioral and pharmacologic, including liraglutide, semaglutide, orlistat, and phentermine/topiramate) among children aged 2 to 18 years with high BMI (eg, ≥85th or ≥95th percentile for age and sex) conducted in or recruited from health care settings. Data Extraction and Synthesis: One investigator abstracted data; a second checked for accuracy. Outcomes with sufficient evidence for meta-analysis were pooled using random-effects models. Main Outcomes and Measures: BMI and other weight-related outcomes, cardiometabolic measures, quality of life, physical activity, dietary pattern scores, and harms. Results: Fifty-eight randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included (N = 10 143). Behavioral interventions were associated with small reductions in BMI and other weight outcomes after 6 to 12 months (28 RCTs [n = 4494]; mean difference in change between groups, -0.7 [95% CI, -1.0 to -0.3]). Larger effects were seen in interventions with higher contact hours and that offered physical activity sessions. Reporting was sparse for outcomes other than BMI, with few significant findings. Semaglutide and phentermine/topiramate had the largest effects on BMI (eg, 1 RCT [n = 201] for semaglutide; mean difference, -6.0 [95% CI, -7.3 to -4.6]). The very few studies that evaluated outcomes after medication discontinuation showed immediate weight regain. Gastrointestinal adverse effects were common with liraglutide, semaglutide, and orlistat. Serious adverse effects were rare, but no studies had follow-up longer than 17 months. Conclusions and Relevance: In the short term, weight management interventions led to lower BMI in children and adolescents, with no evidence of serious harm. Evidence is lacking about how weight management interventions affect BMI beyond 1 year and after medication discontinuation and about longer-term effects on other outcomes.

2.
JAMA ; 329(24): 2171-2184, 2023 06 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37338868

RESUMO

Importance: Anxiety is commonly seen in primary care and associated with substantial burden. Objective: To review the benefits and harms of screening and treatment for anxiety and the accuracy of instruments to detect anxiety among primary care patients. Data Sources: MEDLINE, PsychINFO, Cochrane library through September 7, 2022; references of existing reviews; ongoing surveillance for relevant literature through November 25, 2022. Study Selection: English-language original studies and systematic reviews of screening or treatment compared with control conditions and test accuracy studies of a priori-selected screening instruments were included. Two investigators independently reviewed abstracts and full-text articles for inclusion. Two investigators independently rated study quality. Data Extraction and Synthesis: One investigator abstracted data; a second checked accuracy. Meta-analysis results were included from existing systematic reviews where available; meta-analyses were conducted on original research when evidence was sufficient. Main Outcomes and Measures: Anxiety and depression outcomes; global quality of life and functioning; sensitivity and specificity of screening tools. Results: Of the 59 publications included, 40 were original studies (N = 275 489) and 19 were systematic reviews (including ≈483 studies [N≈81 507]). Two screening studies found no benefit for screening for anxiety. Among test accuracy studies, only the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) GAD-2 and GAD-7 screening instruments were evaluated by more than 1 study. Both screening instruments had adequate accuracy for detecting generalized anxiety disorder (eg, across 3 studies the GAD-7 at a cutoff of 10 had a pooled sensitivity of 0.79 [95% CI, 0.69 to 0.94] and specificity of 0.89 [95% CI, 0.83 to 0.94]). Evidence was limited for other instruments and other anxiety disorders. A large body of evidence supported the benefit of treatment for anxiety. For example, psychological interventions were associated with a small pooled standardized mean difference of -0.41 in anxiety symptom severity in primary care patients with anxiety (95% CI, -0.58 to -0.23]; 10 RCTs [n = 2075]; I2 = 40.2%); larger effects were found in general adult populations. Conclusions and Relevance: Evidence was insufficient to draw conclusions about the benefits or harms of anxiety screening programs. However, clear evidence exists that treatment for anxiety is beneficial, and more limited evidence indicates that some anxiety screening instruments have acceptable accuracy to detect generalized anxiety disorder.


Assuntos
Programas de Rastreamento , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento/efeitos adversos , Transtornos de Ansiedade/diagnóstico , Transtornos de Ansiedade/terapia , Ansiedade/diagnóstico , Medo
3.
JAMA ; 329(23): 2068-2085, 2023 06 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37338873

RESUMO

Importance: Depression is common and associated with substantial burden. Suicide rates have increased over the past decade, and both suicide attempts and deaths have devastating effects on individuals and families. Objective: To review the benefits and harms of screening and treatment for depression and suicide risk and the accuracy of instruments to detect these conditions among primary care patients. Data Sources: MEDLINE, PsychINFO, Cochrane library through September 7, 2022; references of existing reviews; ongoing surveillance for relevant literature through November 25, 2022. Study Selection: English-language studies of screening or treatment compared with control conditions, or test accuracy of screening instruments (for depression, instruments were selected a priori; for suicide risk, all were included). Existing systematic reviews were used for treatment and test accuracy for depression. Data Extraction and Synthesis: One investigator abstracted data; a second checked accuracy. Two investigators independently rated study quality. Findings were synthesized qualitatively, including reporting of meta-analysis results from existing systematic reviews; meta-analyses were conducted on original research when evidence was sufficient. Main Outcomes and Measures: Depression outcomes; suicidal ideation, attempts, and deaths; sensitivity and specificity of screening tools. Results: For depression, 105 studies were included: 32 original studies (N=385 607) and 73 systematic reviews (including ≈2138 studies [N ≈ 9.8 million]). Depression screening interventions, many of which included additional components beyond screening, were associated with a lower prevalence of depression or clinically important depressive symptomatology after 6 to 12 months (pooled odds ratio, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.50-0.73]; reported in 8 randomized clinical trials [n=10 244]; I2 = 0%). Several instruments demonstrated adequate test accuracy (eg, for the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire at a cutoff of 10 or greater, the pooled sensitivity was 0.85 [95% CI, 0.79-0.89] and specificity was 0.85 [95% CI, 0.82-0.88]; reported in 47 studies [n = 11 234]). A large body of evidence supported benefits of psychological and pharmacologic treatment of depression. A pooled estimate from trials used for US Food and Drug Administration approval suggested a very small increase in the absolute risk of a suicide attempt with second-generation antidepressants (odds ratio, 1.53 [95% CI, 1.09-2.15]; n = 40 857; 0.7% of antidepressant users had a suicide attempt vs 0.3% of placebo users; median follow-up, 8 weeks). Twenty-seven studies (n = 24 826) addressed suicide risk. One randomized clinical trial (n=443) of a suicide risk screening intervention found no difference in suicidal ideation after 2 weeks between primary care patients who were and were not screened for suicide risk. Three studies of suicide risk test accuracy were included; none included replication of any instrument. The included suicide prevention studies generally did not demonstrate an improvement over usual care, which typically included specialty mental health treatment. Conclusions and Relevance: Evidence supported depression screening in primary care settings, including during pregnancy and postpartum. There are numerous important gaps in the evidence for suicide risk screening in primary care settings.


Assuntos
Depressão , Programas de Rastreamento , Suicídio , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Gravidez , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Depressão/diagnóstico , Depressão/terapia , Programas de Rastreamento/efeitos adversos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Metanálise como Assunto , Psicoterapia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Medição de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Tentativa de Suicídio/prevenção & controle , Estados Unidos
4.
JAMA ; 330(17): 1653-1665, 2023 11 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37934220

RESUMO

Importance: Alcohol use disorder affects more than 28.3 million people in the United States and is associated with increased rates of morbidity and mortality. Objective: To compare efficacy and comparative efficacy of therapies for alcohol use disorder. Data Sources: PubMed, the Cochrane Library, the Cochrane Central Trials Registry, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and EMBASE were searched from November 2012 to September 9, 2022 Literature was subsequently systematically monitored to identify relevant articles up to August 14, 2023, and the PubMed search was updated on August 14, 2023. Study Selection: For efficacy outcomes, randomized clinical trials of at least 12 weeks' duration were included. For adverse effects, randomized clinical trials and prospective cohort studies that compared drug therapies and reported health outcomes or harms were included. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two reviewers evaluated each study, assessed risk of bias, and graded strength of evidence. Meta-analyses used random-effects models. Numbers needed to treat were calculated for medications with at least moderate strength of evidence for benefit. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was alcohol consumption. Secondary outcomes were motor vehicle crashes, injuries, quality of life, function, mortality, and harms. Results: Data from 118 clinical trials and 20 976 participants were included. The numbers needed to treat to prevent 1 person from returning to any drinking were 11 (95% CI, 1-32) for acamprosate and 18 (95% CI, 4-32) for oral naltrexone at a dose of 50 mg/d. Compared with placebo, oral naltrexone (50 mg/d) was associated with lower rates of return to heavy drinking, with a number needed to treat of 11 (95% CI, 5-41). Injectable naltrexone was associated with fewer drinking days over the 30-day treatment period (weighted mean difference, -4.99 days; 95% CI, -9.49 to -0.49 days) Adverse effects included higher gastrointestinal distress for acamprosate (diarrhea: risk ratio, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.27-1.97) and naltrexone (nausea: risk ratio, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.51-1.98; vomiting: risk ratio, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.23-1.91) compared with placebo. Conclusions and Relevance: In conjunction with psychosocial interventions, these findings support the use of oral naltrexone at 50 mg/d and acamprosate as first-line pharmacotherapies for alcohol use disorder.


Assuntos
Acamprosato , Dissuasores de Álcool , Alcoolismo , Naltrexona , Humanos , Acamprosato/efeitos adversos , Acamprosato/uso terapêutico , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas , Alcoolismo/tratamento farmacológico , Alcoolismo/epidemiologia , Alcoolismo/psicologia , Alcoolismo/terapia , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/etiologia , Naltrexona/efeitos adversos , Naltrexona/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Dissuasores de Álcool/efeitos adversos , Dissuasores de Álcool/uso terapêutico , Intervenção Psicossocial
5.
JAMA ; 327(23): 2334-2347, 2022 06 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35727272

RESUMO

Importance: Cardiovascular disease and cancer are the 2 leading causes of death in the US, and vitamin and mineral supplementation has been proposed to help prevent these conditions. Objective: To review the benefits and harms of vitamin and mineral supplementation in healthy adults to prevent cardiovascular disease and cancer to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force. Data Sources: MEDLINE, PubMed (publisher-supplied records only), Cochrane Library, and Embase (January 2013 to February 1, 2022); prior reviews. Study Selection: English-language randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of vitamin or mineral use among adults without cardiovascular disease or cancer and with no known vitamin or mineral deficiencies; observational cohort studies examining serious harms. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Single extraction, verified by a second reviewer. Quantitative pooling methods appropriate for rare events were used for most analyses. Main Outcomes and Measures: Mortality, cardiovascular disease events, cancer incidence, serious harms. Results: Eighty-four studies (N=739 803) were included. In pooled analyses, multivitamin use was significantly associated with a lower incidence of any cancer (odds ratio [OR], 0.93 [95% CI, 0.87-0.99]; 4 RCTs [n=48 859]; absolute risk difference [ARD] range among adequately powered trials, -0.2% to -1.2%) and lung cancer (OR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.58-0.95]; 2 RCTs [n=36 052]; ARD, 0.2%). However, the evidence for multivitamins had important limitations. Beta carotene (with or without vitamin A) was significantly associated with an increased risk of lung cancer (OR, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.01-1.42]; 4 RCTs [n=94 830]; ARD range, -0.1% to 0.6%) and cardiovascular mortality (OR, 1.10 [95% CI, 1.02-1.19]; 5 RCTs [n=94 506] ARD range, -0.8% to 0.8%). Vitamin D use was not significantly associated with all-cause mortality (OR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.91-1.02]; 27 RCTs [n=117 082]), cardiovascular disease (eg, composite cardiovascular disease event outcome: OR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.95-1.05]; 7 RCTs [n=74 925]), or cancer outcomes (eg, any cancer incidence: OR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.92-1.03]; 19 RCTs [n=86 899]). Vitamin E was not significantly associated with all-cause mortality (OR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.97-1.07]; 9 RCTs [n=107 772]), cardiovascular disease events (OR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.90-1.04]; 4 RCTs [n=62 136]), or cancer incidence (OR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.98-1.08]; 5 RCTs [n=76 777]). Evidence for benefit of other supplements was equivocal, minimal, or absent. Limited evidence suggested some supplements may be associated with higher risk of serious harms (hip fracture [vitamin A], hemorrhagic stroke [vitamin E], and kidney stones [vitamin C, calcium]). Conclusions and Relevance: Vitamin and mineral supplementation was associated with little or no benefit in preventing cancer, cardiovascular disease, and death, with the exception of a small benefit for cancer incidence with multivitamin use. Beta carotene was associated with an increased risk of lung cancer and other harmful outcomes in persons at high risk of lung cancer.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Minerais , Neoplasias , Vitaminas , Adulto , Comitês Consultivos , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Suplementos Nutricionais/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/prevenção & controle , Minerais/efeitos adversos , Minerais/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/prevenção & controle , Prevenção Primária , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Vitamina A/efeitos adversos , Vitaminas/efeitos adversos , Vitaminas/uso terapêutico , beta Caroteno/efeitos adversos
6.
JAMA ; 326(23): 2412-2420, 2021 12 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34747987

RESUMO

Importance: In January 2021, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) issued a values statement that acknowledged systemic racism and included a commitment to address racism and health equity in recommendations for clinical preventive services. Objectives: To articulate the definitional and conceptual issues around racism and health inequity and to describe how racism and health inequities are currently addressed in preventive health. Methods: An audit was conducted assessing (1) published literature on frameworks or policy and position statements addressing racism, (2) a subset of cancer and cardiovascular topics in USPSTF reports, (3) recent systematic reviews on interventions to reduce health inequities in preventive health or to prevent racism in health care, and (4) health care-relevant professional societies, guideline-making organizations, agencies, and funding bodies to gather information about how they are addressing racism and health equity. Findings: Race as a social category does not have biological underpinnings but has biological consequences through racism. Racism is complex and pervasive, operates at multiple interrelated levels, and exerts negative effects on other social determinants and health and well-being through multiple pathways. In its reports, the USPSTF has addressed racial and ethnic disparities, but not racism explicitly. The systematic reviews to support the USPSTF include interventions that may mitigate health disparities through cultural tailoring of behavioral interventions, but reviews have not explicitly addressed other commonly studied interventions to increase the uptake of preventive services or foster the implementation of preventive services. Many organizations have issued recent statements and commitments around racism in health care, but few have provided substantive guidance on operational steps to address the effects of racism. Where guidance is unavailable regarding the proposed actions, it is principally because work to achieve them is in very early stages. The most directly relevant and immediately useful guidance identified is that from the GRADE working group. Conclusions and Relevance: This methods report provides a summary of issues around racism and health inequity, including the status of how these are being addressed in preventive health.


Assuntos
Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/métodos , Racismo , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Comitês Consultivos , Equidade em Saúde , Humanos , Grupos Raciais , Estados Unidos
7.
JAMA ; 324(20): 2076-2094, 2020 11 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33231669

RESUMO

Importance: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in the US, and poor diet and lack of physical activity are major factors contributing to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Objective: To review the benefits and harms of behavioral counseling interventions to improve diet and physical activity in adults with cardiovascular risk factors. Data Sources: MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through September 2019; literature surveillance through July 24, 2020. Study Selection: English-language randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of behavioral counseling interventions to help people with elevated blood pressure or lipid levels improve their diet and increase physical activity. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data were extracted from studies by one reviewer and checked by a second. Random-effects meta-analysis and qualitative synthesis were used. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cardiovascular events, mortality, subjective well-being, cardiovascular risk factors, diet and physical activity measures (eg, minutes of physical activity, meeting physical activity recommendations), and harms. Interventions were categorized according to estimated contact time as low (≤30 minutes), medium (31-360 minutes), and high (>360 minutes). Results: Ninety-four RCTs were included (N = 52 174). Behavioral counseling interventions involved a median of 6 contact hours and 12 sessions over the course of 12 months and varied in format and dietary recommendations; only 5% addressed physical activity alone. Interventions were associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular events (pooled relative risk, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.73-0.87]; 9 RCTs [n = 12 551]; I2 = 0%). Event rates were variable; in the largest trial (Prevención con Dieta Mediterránea [PREDIMED]), 3.6% in the intervention groups experienced a cardiovascular event, compared with 4.4% in the control group. Behavioral counseling interventions were associated with small, statistically significant reductions in continuous measures of blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, fasting glucose levels, and adiposity at 12 to 24 months' follow-up. Measurement of diet and physical activity was heterogeneous, and evidence suggested small improvements in diet consistent with the intervention recommendation targets but mixed findings and a more limited evidence base for physical activity. Adverse events were rare, with generally no group differences in serious adverse events, any adverse events, hospitalizations, musculoskeletal injuries, or withdrawals due to adverse events. Conclusions and Relevance: Medium- and high-contact multisession behavioral counseling interventions to improve diet and increase physical activity for people with elevated blood pressure and lipid levels were effective in reducing cardiovascular events, blood pressure, low-density lipoproteins, and adiposity-related outcomes, with little to no risk of serious harm.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Aconselhamento , Dieta Saudável , Exercício Físico , Adulto , Aconselhamento/métodos , Dislipidemias , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Fatores de Risco de Doenças Cardíacas , Humanos , Hipertensão
8.
JAMA ; 324(7): 682-699, 2020 08 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32809007

RESUMO

Importance: Increasing rates of preventable sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in the US pose substantial burdens to health and well-being. Objective: To update evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) on effectiveness of behavioral counseling interventions for preventing STIs. Data Sources: Studies from the previous USPSTF review (2014); literature published January 2013 through May 31, 2019, in MEDLINE, PubMed (for publisher-supplied records only), PsycINFO, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Ongoing surveillance through May 22, 2020. Study Selection: Good- and fair-quality randomized and nonrandomized controlled intervention studies of behavioral counseling interventions for adolescents and adults conducted in primary care settings were included. Studies with active comparators only or limited to individuals requiring specialist care for STI risk-related comorbidities were excluded. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Dual risk of bias assessment, with inconsistent ratings adjudicated by a third team member. Study data were abstracted into prespecified forms. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) were estimated using the DerSimonian and Laird method or the restricted maximum likelihood method with Knapp-Hartung adjustment. Main Outcomes and Measures: Differences in STI diagnoses, self-reported condom use, and self-reported unprotected sex at 3 months or more after baseline. Results: The review included 37 randomized trials and 2 nonrandomized controlled intervention studies (N = 65 888; 13 good-quality, 26 fair-quality) recruited from primary care settings in the US. Study populations were composed predominantly of heterosexual adolescents and young adults (12 to 25 years), females, and racial and ethnic minorities at increased risk for STIs. Nineteen trials (n = 52 072) reported STI diagnoses as outcomes (3 to 17 months' follow-up); intervention was associated with reduced STI incidence (OR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.54-0.81; I2 = 74%]). Absolute differences in STI acquisition between groups varied widely depending on baseline population STI risk and intervention effectiveness, ranging from 19% fewer to 4% more people acquiring STI. Thirty-four trials (n = 21 417) reported behavioral change outcomes. Interventions were associated with self-reported behavioral change (eg, increased condom use) that reduce STI risk (OR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.10-1.56; I2 = 40%, n = 5253). There was limited evidence on persistence of intervention effects beyond 1 year. No harms were identified in 7 studies (n = 3458) reporting adverse outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: Behavioral counseling interventions for individuals seeking primary health care were associated with reduced incidence of STIs. Group or individual counseling sessions lasting more than 2 hours were associated with larger reductions in STI incidence, and interventions of shorter duration also were associated with STI prevention, although evidence was limited on whether the STI reductions associated with these interventions persisted beyond 1 year.


Assuntos
Terapia Comportamental , Aconselhamento , Comportamento Sexual , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Terapia Comportamental/métodos , Aconselhamento/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Razão de Chances , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Gravidez , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Comportamento de Redução do Risco , Adulto Jovem
9.
JAMA ; 323(22): 2310-2328, 2020 06 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32515820

RESUMO

Importance: Illicit drug use is among the most common causes of preventable morbidity and mortality in the US. Objective: To systematically review the literature on screening and interventions for drug use to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force. Data Sources: MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through September 18, 2018; literature surveillance through September 21, 2019. Study Selection: Test accuracy studies to detect drug misuse and randomized clinical trials of screening and interventions to reduce drug use. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Critical appraisal and data abstraction by 2 reviewers and random-effects meta-analyses. Main Outcomes and Measures: Sensitivity, specificity, drug use and other health, social, and legal outcomes. Results: Ninety-nine studies (N = 84 206) were included. Twenty-eight studies (n = 65 720) addressed drug screening accuracy. Among adults, sensitivity and specificity of screening tools for detecting unhealthy drug use ranged from 0.71 to 0.94 and 0.87 to 0.97, respectively. Interventions to reduce drug use were evaluated in 52 trials (n = 15 659) of psychosocial interventions, 7 trials (n = 1109) of opioid agonist therapy, and 13 trials (n = 1718) of naltrexone. Psychosocial interventions were associated with increased likelihood of drug use abstinence (15 trials, n = 3636; relative risk [RR], 1.60 [95% CI, 1.24 to 2.13]; absolute risk difference [ARD], 9% [95% CI, 5% to 15%]) and reduced number of drug use days (19 trials, n = 5085; mean difference, -0.49 day in the last 7 days [95% CI, -0.85 to -0.13]) vs no psychosocial intervention at 3- to 4-month follow-up. In treatment-seeking populations, opioid agonist therapy and naltrexone were associated with decreased risk of drug use relapse (4 trials, n = 567; RR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.59 to 0.82]; ARD, -35% [95% CI, -67% to -3%] and 12 trials, n = 1599; RR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.62 to 0.85]; ARD, -18% [95% CI, -26% to -10%], respectively) vs placebo or no medication. While evidence on harms was limited, it indicated no increased risk of serious adverse events. Conclusions and Relevance: Several screening instruments with acceptable sensitivity and specificity are available to screen for drug use, although there is no direct evidence on the benefits or harms of screening. Pharmacotherapy and psychosocial interventions are effective at improving drug use outcomes, but evidence of effectiveness remains primarily derived from trials conducted in treatment-seeking populations.


Assuntos
Programas de Rastreamento/normas , Antagonistas de Entorpecentes/uso terapêutico , Psicoterapia , Detecção do Abuso de Substâncias/normas , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento/efeitos adversos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Naloxona/efeitos adversos , Naloxona/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas de Entorpecentes/efeitos adversos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Gravidez , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Detecção do Abuso de Substâncias/métodos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/prevenção & controle , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/terapia , Inquéritos e Questionários
11.
JAMA ; 320(11): 1172-1191, 2018 09 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30326501

RESUMO

Importance: Overweight and obesity have been associated with adverse health effects. Objective: To systematically review evidence on benefits and harms of behavioral and pharmacotherapy weight loss and weight loss maintenance interventions in adults to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force. Data Sources: MEDLINE, PubMed Publisher-Supplied Records, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies published through June 6, 2017; ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for ongoing trials through August 2017; and ongoing surveillance in targeted publications through March 23, 2018. Studies from previous reviews were reevaluated for inclusion. Study Selection: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) focusing on weight loss or weight loss maintenance in adults. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data were abstracted by one reviewer and confirmed by another. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted for weight loss outcomes in behavior-based interventions. Main Outcomes and Measures: Health outcomes, weight loss or weight loss maintenance, reduction in obesity-related conditions, and adverse events. Results: A total of 122 RCTs (N = 62 533) and 2 observational studies (N = 209 993) were identified. Compared with controls, participants in behavior-based interventions had greater mean weight loss at 12 to 18 months (-2.39 kg [95% CI, -2.86 to -1.93]; 67 studies [n = 22065]) and less weight regain (-1.59 kg [95% CI, -2.38 to -0.79]; 8 studies [n = 1408]). Studies of medication-based weight loss and maintenance interventions also reported greater weight loss or less weight regain in intervention compared with placebo groups at 12 to 18 months (range, -0.6 to -5.8 kg; no meta-analysis). Participants with prediabetes in weight loss interventions had a lower risk of developing diabetes compared with controls (relative risk, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.51 to 0.89]). There was no evidence of other benefits, but most health outcomes such as mortality, cardiovascular disease, and cancer were infrequently reported. Small improvements in quality of life in some medication trials were noted but were of unclear clinical significance. There was no evidence of harm such as cardiovascular disease from behavior-based interventions; higher rates of adverse events were associated with higher dropout rates in medication groups than in placebo groups. Conclusions and Relevance: Behavior-based weight loss interventions with or without weight loss medications were associated with more weight loss and a lower risk of developing diabetes than control conditions. Weight loss medications, but not behavior-based interventions, were associated with higher rates of harms. Long-term weight and health outcomes data, as well as data on important subgroups, were limited.


Assuntos
Fármacos Antiobesidade/uso terapêutico , Terapia Comportamental , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Manejo da Obesidade/métodos , Obesidade/terapia , Redução de Peso , Adulto , Terapia Combinada , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Obesidade/complicações , Obesidade/tratamento farmacológico , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Estados Unidos
12.
JAMA ; 320(18): 1910-1928, 2018 11 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30422198

RESUMO

Importance: Unhealthy alcohol use is common, increasing, and a leading cause of premature mortality. Objective: To review literature on the effectiveness and harms of screening and counseling for unhealthy alcohol use to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force. Data Sources: MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through October 12, 2017; literature surveillance through August 1, 2018. Study Selection: Test accuracy studies and randomized clinical trials of screening and counseling to reduce unhealthy alcohol use. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Independent critical appraisal and data abstraction by 2 reviewers. Counseling trials were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses. Main Outcomes and Measures: Sensitivity, specificity, drinks per week, exceeding recommended limits, heavy use episodes, abstinence (for pregnant women), and other health, family, social, and legal outcomes. Results: One hundred thirteen studies (N = 314 466) were included. No studies examined benefits or harms of screening programs to reduce unhealthy alcohol use. For adolescents (10 studies [n = 171 363]), 1 study (n = 225) reported a sensitivity of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.60 to 0.83) and specificity of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.74 to 0.86) using the AUDIT-C (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption) to detect the full spectrum of unhealthy alcohol use. For adults (35 studies [n = 114 182]), brief screening instruments commonly reported sensitivity and specificity between 0.70 and 0.85. Two trials of the effects of interventions to reduce unhealthy alcohol use in adolescents (n = 588) found mixed results: one reported a benefit in high-risk but not moderate-risk drinkers, and the other reported a statistically significant reduction in drinking frequency for boys but not girls; neither reported health or related outcomes. Across all populations (68 studies [n = 36 528]), counseling interventions were associated with a decrease in drinks per week (weighted mean difference, -1.6 [95% CI, -2.2 to -1.0]; 32 studies [37 effects; n = 15 974]), the proportion exceeding recommended drinking limits (odds ratio [OR], 0.60 [95% CI, 0.53 to 0.67]; 15 studies [16 effects; n = 9760]), and the proportion reporting a heavy use episode (OR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.58 to 0.77]; 12 studies [14 effects; n = 8108]), and an increase in the proportion of pregnant women reporting abstinence (OR, 2.26 [95% CI, 1.43 to 3.56]; 5 studies [n = 796]) after 6 to 12 months. Health outcomes were sparsely reported and generally did not demonstrate group differences in effect. There was no evidence that these interventions could be harmful. Conclusions and Relevance: Among adults, screening instruments feasible for use in primary care are available that can effectively identify people with unhealthy alcohol use, and counseling interventions in those who screen positive are associated with reductions in unhealthy alcohol use. There was no evidence that these interventions have unintended harmful effects.


Assuntos
Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/terapia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Álcool/diagnóstico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Álcool/terapia , Comportamentos de Risco à Saúde , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Adolescente , Adulto , Terapia Comportamental/métodos , Aconselhamento , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento
13.
Ann Intern Med ; 164(12): 804-13, 2016 Jun 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27064410

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in the United States. PURPOSE: To update a systematic review about the benefits of aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events in adults aged 40 years or older and to evaluate effect modification in subpopulations. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (January 2008 to January 2015), and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. STUDY SELECTION: Two investigators independently reviewed 3396 abstracts and 65 articles according to prespecified criteria. All included trials evaluated aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events. DATA EXTRACTION: Two investigators assessed study quality; data were abstracted by 1 reviewer and checked by a second. DATA SYNTHESIS: Two good-quality and 9 fair-quality randomized, controlled trials were identified. In analyses of all doses, aspirin reduced the risk for nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) (relative risk [RR], 0.78 [95% CI, 0.71 to 0.87]) but not nonfatal stroke; aspirin showed little or no benefit for all-cause or cardiovascular mortality. Benefits began within the first 5 years. Older adults achieved greater relative MI reduction, but no other effect modifications were found in analyzed subpopulations. In trials with aspirin doses of 100 mg or less per day, the reduction in nonfatal MI benefit persisted (absolute risk reduction, 0.15 to 1.43 events per 1000 person-years) and a 14% reduction in nonfatal stroke benefit was noted, but no benefit was found for all-cause mortality (RR, 0.95 [CI, 0.89 to 1.01]) or cardiovascular mortality (RR, 0.97 [CI, 0.85 to 1.10]). LIMITATION: Evidence for aspirin in primary prevention is heterogeneous and limited by rare events and few credible subgroup analyses. CONCLUSION: The beneficial effect of aspirin for the primary prevention of CVD is modest and occurs at doses of 100 mg or less per day. Older adults seem to achieve a greater relative MI benefit. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.


Assuntos
Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapêutico , Prevenção Primária , Adulto , Aspirina/administração & dosagem , Doenças Cardiovasculares/mortalidade , Causas de Morte , Fibrinolíticos/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Fatores de Risco
14.
JAMA ; 317(23): 2427-2444, 2017 Jun 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28632873

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: Obesity is common in children and adolescents in the United States, is associated with negative health effects, and increases the likelihood of obesity in adulthood. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the benefits and harms of screening and treatment for obesity and overweight in children and adolescents to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane Collaboration Registry of Controlled Trials, and the Education Resources Information Center through January 22, 2016; references of relevant publications; government websites. Surveillance continued through December 5, 2016. STUDY SELECTION: English-language trials of benefits or harms of screening or treatment (behavior-based, orlistat, metformin) for overweight or obesity in children aged 2 through 18 years, conducted in or recruited from health care settings. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two investigators independently reviewed abstracts and full-text articles, then extracted data from fair- and good-quality trials. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate the benefits of lifestyle-based programs and metformin. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Weight or excess weight (eg, body mass index [BMI]; BMI z score, measuring the number of standard deviations from the median BMI for age and sex), cardiometabolic outcomes, quality of life, other health outcomes, harms. RESULTS: There was no direct evidence on the benefits or harms of screening children and adolescents for excess weight. Among 42 trials of lifestyle-based interventions to reduce excess weight (N = 6956), those with an estimated 26 hours or more of contact consistently demonstrated mean reductions in excess weight compared with usual care or other control groups after 6 to 12 months, with no evidence of causing harm. Generally, intervention groups showed absolute reductions in BMI z score of 0.20 or more and maintained their baseline weight within a mean of approximately 5 lb, while control groups showed small increases or no change in BMI z score, typically gaining a mean of 5 to 17 lb. Only 3 of 26 interventions with fewer contact hours showed a benefit in weight reduction. Use of metformin (8 studies, n = 616) and orlistat (3 studies, n = 779) were associated with greater BMI reductions compared with placebo: -0.86 (95% CI, -1.44 to -0.29; 6 studies; I2 = 0%) for metformin and -0.50 to -0.94 for orlistat. Groups receiving lifestyle-based interventions offering 52 or more hours of contact showed greater improvements in blood pressure than control groups: -6.4 mm Hg (95% CI, -8.6 to -4.2; 6 studies; I2 = 51%) for systolic blood pressure and -4.0 mm Hg (95% CI, -5.6 to -2.5; 6 studies; I2 = 17%) for diastolic blood pressure. There were mixed findings for insulin or glucose measures and no benefit for lipids. Medications showed small or no benefit for cardiometabolic outcomes, including fasting glucose level. Nonserious harms were common with medication use, although discontinuation due to adverse effects was usually less than 5%. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Lifestyle-based weight loss interventions with 26 or more hours of intervention contact are likely to help reduce excess weight in children and adolescents. The clinical significance of the small benefit of medication use is unclear.


Assuntos
Comitês Consultivos , Programas de Rastreamento , Obesidade Infantil/diagnóstico , Obesidade Infantil/terapia , Adolescente , Fármacos Antiobesidade/efeitos adversos , Fármacos Antiobesidade/uso terapêutico , Índice de Massa Corporal , Peso Corporal/efeitos dos fármacos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/efeitos adversos , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Lactonas/efeitos adversos , Lactonas/uso terapêutico , Programas de Rastreamento/efeitos adversos , Metformina/efeitos adversos , Metformina/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados não Aleatórios como Assunto , Orlistate , Sobrepeso/complicações , Sobrepeso/diagnóstico , Sobrepeso/terapia , Obesidade Infantil/complicações , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Estados Unidos , Redução de Peso
15.
Ann Intern Med ; 161(12): 874-83, 2014 Dec 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25243895

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are common and preventable. PURPOSE: To update a previous systematic review about the benefits and harms of sexual risk-reduction counseling to prevent STIs for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. DATA SOURCES: Selected databases from January 2007 through October 2013, manual searches of references lists and gray literature, and studies from the previous review. STUDY SELECTION: English-language fair- or good-quality trials conducted in adolescents or adults. DATA EXTRACTION: One investigator abstracted data and a second checked the abstraction. Study quality was dual-reviewed. DATA SYNTHESIS: 31 trials were included: 16 (n=56,110) were newly published and 15 (n=14,214) were from the previous review. Most trials targeted persons at increased risk for STIs based on sociodemographic characteristics, risky sexual behavior, or history of an STI. High-intensity (>2 hours) interventions reduced STI incidence in adolescents (odds ratio, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.24 to 0.60]) and adults (odds ratio, 0.70 [CI, 0.56 to 0.87]). Lower-intensity interventions were generally not effective in adults, but some approaches were promising. Although moderate-intensity interventions may be effective in adolescents, data were very sparse. Reported behavioral outcomes were heterogeneous and most likely to show a benefit with high-intensity interventions at 6 months or less. No consistent evidence was found that sexual risk-reduction counseling was harmful. LIMITATIONS: Low-risk populations and male adolescents were underrepresented. Reliability of self-reported behavioral outcomes was unknown. CONCLUSION: High-intensity counseling on sexual risk reduction can reduce STIs in primary care and related settings, especially in sexually active adolescents and in adults at increased risk for STIs. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.


Assuntos
Terapia Comportamental , Aconselhamento , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Comportamento de Redução do Risco , Comportamento Sexual , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Incidência , Medição de Risco , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
16.
Ann Plast Surg ; 68(6): 616-20, 2012 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21629074

RESUMO

Extramammary Paget's disease is a rare intraepithelial adenocarcinoma typified histologically by the presence of Paget cells. Treatment has historically been surgical, with wide excision being the standard of care. However, due to clinically indeterminate margins and diffuse spread, local recurrence rates remain high. Mohs micrographic surgery has been proposed to improve the rate of local recurrence. Application of Mohs technique to treat extramammary Paget's disease can be difficult because of the large size of these lesions. Reported excisions either involved lengthy procedures or peripheral Mohs modification. The peripheral technique does not evaluate the depth of the central lesion, yet prognosis and lymph node involvement are directly related to the degree of vertical invasion. In this study, we discuss our experience with extramammary Paget's disease, along with a novel approach to treatment by using a modification of peripheral Mohs micrographic surgery that incorporates histologic analysis of the central specimen's depth.


Assuntos
Neoplasias dos Genitais Masculinos/cirurgia , Cirurgia de Mohs , Doença de Paget Extramamária/cirurgia , Idoso , Feminino , Neoplasias dos Genitais Masculinos/diagnóstico , Neoplasias dos Genitais Masculinos/patologia , Virilha , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doença de Paget Extramamária/diagnóstico , Doença de Paget Extramamária/patologia , Escroto
17.
Ann Intern Med ; 153(12): 815-25, 2010 Dec 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21173416

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Falls among older adults are both prevalent and preventable. PURPOSE: To describe the benefits and harms of interventions that could be used by primary care practitioners to prevent falling among community-dwelling older adults. DATA SOURCES: The reviewers evaluated trials from a good-quality systematic review published in 2003 and searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and CINAHL from the end of that review's search date to February 2010 to identify additional English-language trials. STUDY SELECTION: Two reviewers independently screened 3423 abstracts and 638 articles to identify randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) of primary care-relevant interventions among community-dwelling older adults that reported falls or fallers as an outcome. Trials were independently critically appraised to include only good- or fair-quality trials; discrepancies were resolved by a third reviewer. DATA EXTRACTION: One reviewer abstracted data from 61 articles into standardized evidence tables that were verified by a second reviewer. DATA SYNTHESIS: Overall, the included evidence was of fair quality. In 16 RCTs evaluating exercise or physical therapy, interventions reduced falling (risk ratio, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.81 to 0.94]). In 9 RCTs of vitamin D supplementation, interventions reduced falling (risk ratio, 0.83 [CI, 0.77 to 0.89]). In 19 trials involving multifactorial assessment and management, interventions with comprehensive management seemed to reduce falling, although overall pooled estimates were not statistically significant (risk ratio, 0.94 [CI, 0.87 to 1.02]). Limited evidence suggested that serious clinical harms were no more common for older adults in intervention groups than for those in control groups. LIMITATIONS: Interventions and methods of fall ascertainment were heterogeneous. Data on potential harms of interventions were scant and often not reported. CONCLUSION: Primary care-relevant interventions exist that can reduce falling among community-dwelling older adults. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.


Assuntos
Acidentes por Quedas/prevenção & controle , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Idoso , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Compostos de Cálcio/uso terapêutico , Aconselhamento , Suplementos Nutricionais , Terapia por Exercício , Comportamento Alimentar , Avaliação Geriátrica , Humanos , Medição de Risco , Comportamento de Redução do Risco , Transtornos da Visão/terapia , Vitamina D/uso terapêutico
18.
Ann Plast Surg ; 67(4): 439-41, 2011 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21540729

RESUMO

Palmoplantar keratoderma is a heterogeneous group of disorders affecting keratinization on the palms and soles of the feet. The benign lesions cause pain and limit function. Treatment of palmoplantar keratoderma remains problematic and restricted to symptomatic therapy; no cure exists. Medical treatments and surgical excision are currently the mainstay of therapy; however, these treatments have limited success, significant morbidity, and recurrence is common. We present a case report of successful treatment with CO2 laser therapy and a review of the literature.


Assuntos
Ceratodermia Palmar e Plantar/cirurgia , Lasers de Gás/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos
19.
J Hand Surg Am ; 36(11): 1852-4, 2011 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21958718

RESUMO

Longitudinal melonychia is a brown streaking of the nailbed. It is often benign but can be a subungual melanoma. Subungual melanoma is a rare malignancy. Diagnosis is often delayed, resulting in a higher staging and poorer prognosis than other cutaneous melanomas. We provide an update on the evaluation of longitudinal melonychia and biopsy technique.


Assuntos
Biópsia por Agulha/métodos , Doenças da Unha/patologia , Unhas/cirurgia , Nevo Pigmentado/patologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças da Unha/diagnóstico , Doenças da Unha/cirurgia , Nevo Pigmentado/diagnóstico , Nevo Pigmentado/cirurgia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/cirurgia , Transplante de Pele/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
20.
Ann Intern Med ; 151(11): 793-803, 2009 Dec 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19949145

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In primary care settings, prevalence estimates of major depressive disorder range from 5% to 13% in all adults, with lower estimates in those older than 55 years (6% to 9%). In 2002, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended screening adults for depression in clinical practices that have systems to ensure accurate diagnosis, effective treatment, and follow-up. PURPOSE: To conduct a targeted, updated systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force about the benefits and harms of screening adult patients for depression in a primary care setting, the benefits of depression treatment in older adults, and the harms of depression treatment with antidepressant medications. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, PsycINFO (1998 to 2007), expert suggestions, and bibliographies of recent systematic reviews. STUDY SELECTION: Fair- to good-quality randomized clinical trials or controlled clinical trials; systematic reviews; meta-analyses; and large observational studies of serious adverse events and early discontinuation due to adverse effects. All studies were published in English. DATA EXTRACTION: Two investigators abstracted, critically appraised, and synthesized 33 articles that met inclusion criteria. DATA SYNTHESIS: Nine fair- or good-quality trials indicate that primary care depression screening and care management programs with staff assistance, such as case management or mental health specialist involvement, can increase depression response and remission. Benefit was not evident in screening programs without staff assistance in depression care. Seven regulatory reviews or meta-analyses and 3 large cohort studies indicate no increased risk for completed suicide deaths with antidepressant treatment. Risk for suicidal behaviors was increased in young adults (aged 18 to 29 years) who received antidepressants, particularly those who received paroxetine, but was reduced in older adults. LIMITATION: Examination of harms was limited to serious adverse events, and existing systematic reviews were primarily used. Additional studies published from 2007 to 2008 extend this review. CONCLUSION: Depression screening programs without substantial staff-assisted depression care supports are unlikely to improve depression outcomes. Close monitoring of all adult patients who initiate antidepressant treatment, particularly those younger than 30 years, is important both for safety and to ensure optimal treatment.


Assuntos
Depressão/diagnóstico , Programas de Rastreamento , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Antidepressivos/efeitos adversos , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Depressão/terapia , Retroalimentação , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Psicoterapia , Medição de Risco , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/efeitos adversos , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/uso terapêutico , Suicídio/psicologia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA