Is hip arthroscopy useful in the treatment of borderline dysplasia?: a case-control study. / ¿Es útil la artroscopia de cadera para el tratamiento de la displasia limítrofe?: análisis de casos y controles.

INTRODUCTION: Since arthroscopy remains a controversial treatment of hip dysplasia, our objective was to analyse its clinical and radiological results in a cohort of patients with dysplasia and compare them to controls with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed a series of patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for the treatment of labral pathology; 29 of them with borderline hip dysplasia and 197 with FAI, comparing reoperations and joint survival. The diagnosis of borderline dysplasia was made with a lateral centre-edge angle greater than 18° but less than 25°. The average follow-up was 43 months. We performed a multivariate regression analysis to evaluate the association of reoperations with different demographic, radiological and intraoperative variables. RESULTS: Seven complications were registered in the FAI group (1 medically treated superficial wound infection, 3 pudendal nerve paraesthesias, 1 deep vein thrombosis and 2 heterotopic ossifications) and none in the dysplasia group. While 5 patients from the FAI group required a new surgery, none of the dysplasia group was re-operated (p=.38). After adjusting for confounders, reoperation showed a very strong association with the finding of osteochondral lesions during index surgery, with a coefficient of .12 (p<.001, 95%CI=.06-.17). CONCLUSION: Hip arthroscopy was useful in the treatment of borderline dysplasia, without non-inferior survival compared to the FAI group. We suggest indicating it carefully in dysplasia cases, whenever the symptoms of femoroacetabular friction prevail over those of instability.

No lower bacterial adhesion for ceramics compared to other biomaterials: An in vitro analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although there is some clinical evidence of ceramic bearings being associated with a lower infection rate after total hip arthroplasty (THA), available data remains controversial since this surface is usually reserved for young, healthy patients. Therefore, we investigated the influence of five commonly used biomaterials on the adhesion potential of four biofilm-producing bacteria usually detected in infected THAs. HYPOTHESIS: Ceramic biomaterials exhibit less bacterial adherence than other biomaterials. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this in vitro research, we evaluated the ability of Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 35984, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to adhere to the surface of a cobalt-chromium metal head, a fourth-generation ceramic head, a fourth-generation ceramic insert, a highly-crossed linked polyethylene insert and a titanium porous-coated acetabular component. After an initial washing step, bacterial separation from the surface of each specimen was done with a vortex agitator. The colony-forming units were counted to determine the number of viable adherent bacteria. RESULTS: We found no differences on global bacterial adhesion between the different surfaces (p=0.5). E. coli presented the least adherence potential among the analysed pathogens (p<0.001). The combination of E. coli and S. epidermidis generated an antagonist effect over the adherence potential of S. epidermidis individually (58±4% vs. 48±5%; p=0.007). The combination of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus presented a trend to an increased adherence of P. aeruginosa independently, suggesting an agonist effect (71% vs. 62%; p=0.07). DISCUSSION: Ceramic bearings appeared not to be related to a lower bacterial adhesion than other biomaterials. However, different adhesive potentials among bacteria may play a major role on infection's inception. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, in vitro study.

Metaphyseal debonding of the Corail collarless cementless stem: report of 18 cases and case-control study.

AIMS: The Corail stem has good long-term results. After four years of using this stem, we have detected a small group of patients who have presented with symptomatic metaphyseal debonding. The aim of this study was to quantify the incidence of this complication, to delineate the characteristics of patients presenting with this complication and to compare these patients with asymptomatic controls to determine any important predisposing factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of 855 Corail collarless cementless stems implanted for osteoarthritis, 18 presented with symptomatic metaphyseal debonding. A control group of 74 randomly selected patients was assembled. Clinical and radiological parameters were measured and a logistic regression model was created to evaluate factors associated with metaphyseal debonding. RESULTS: The prevalence of this complication was 2.1% in our series. In the multivariable model, the presence of a Dorr B-type proximal femur was associated with metaphyseal debonding (odds ratio (OR) 10.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.31 to 49.97, p = 0.002), as was a body mass index > 25 kg/m2 (OR 6.85, 95% CI 1.06 to 44.28, p = 0.04). Smaller stems and the use of a polyethylene acetabular liner appeared to be protective when compared with metal and ceramic setting hard-on-hard bearings. CONCLUSION: We have described an uncommon but important mode of failure of the Corail stem. Surgeons should be aware of this phenomenon; overweight patients with Dorr B-type femurs and in whom hard bearings are used appear to be particularly at risk. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1435-41.