Efficacy of ruxolitinib in the treatment of relapsed/refractory large granular lymphocytic leukaemia.

Large granular lymphocytic (LGL) leukaemia is a rare chronic lymphoproliferative disorder characterized by an expansion of cytotoxic T or NK cells. Despite a usually indolent evolution, most patients will require a treatment over the course of the disease because of cytopenia or symptomatic associated autoimmune disorders. First-line treatment is based on immunosuppressive agents, namely cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and ciclosporin. However, relapses are frequent, and there is no consensus on the management of relapsed/refractory patients. The implication of the JAK/STAT pathway in the pathogenesis of this disease has prompted our group to propose treatment with ruxolitinib. A series of 21 patients who received this regimen is reported here. Ten patients (47.6%) were refractory to the three main immunosuppressive drugs at the time of ruxolitinib initiation. Ruxolitinib yielded an overall response rate of 86% (n = 18/21), including 3 complete responses and 15 partial responses. With a median follow-up of 9 months, the median response duration was 4 months. One-year event-free survival and 1-year overall survival were 57% and 83% respectively. Mild side effects were observed. Biological parameters, notably neutropenia and anaemia, improved significantly, and complete molecular responses were evidenced. This study supports ruxolitinib as a valid option for the treatment of relapsed/refractory LGL leukaemia.

Hypomethylating agent monotherapy in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia: a French multicentric retrospective study.

Very few data are available about hypomethylating agent (HMA) efficiency in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemias (CBF-AML). Our main objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HMA in the specific subset of CBF-AML. Here, we report the results of a multicenter retrospective French study about efficacy of HMA monotherapy, used frontline or for R/R CBF-AML. Forty-nine patients were included, and received a median of 5 courses of azacitidine (n = 46) or decitabine (n = 3). ORR was 49% for the whole cohort with a median time to response of 112 days. After a median follow-up of 72.3 months, median OS for the total cohort was 10.6 months. In multivariate analysis, hematological relapse of CBF-AML at HMA initiation was significantly associated with a poorer OS (HR: 2.13; 95%CI: 1.04-4.36; p = 0.038). Responders had a significantly improved OS (1-year OS: 75%) compared to non-responders (1-year OS: 15.3%; p < 0.0001). Hematological improvement occurred for respectively 28%, 33% and 48% for patients who were red blood cell or platelet transfusion-dependent, or who experienced grade 3/4 neutropenia at HMA initiation. Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of HMA. Our study highlights that HMA is a well-tolerated therapeutic option with moderate clinical activity for R/R CBF-AML and for patients who cannot handle intensive chemotherapy.