Clinical predictors of response to single­agent immune checkpoint inhibitors in chemotherapy­pretreated non­small cell lung cancer.

Single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are the standard option for chemotherapy-pretreated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), however only a subset of patients responds to this treatment. The present study aimed at the development of a tool for personalized prediction of the efficacy of ICIs. The study included 181 epidermal growth factor receptor/anaplastic lymphoma kinase-negative patients with metastatic NSCLC receiving single-agent ICI in the second or later line of therapy. For the comparison, a total of 63 metastatic patients with NSCLC treated by chemotherapy were also analyzed. Multivariate analysis revealed that Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≥2, never-smoking status and the baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥4.3 were associated with reduced progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) [ECOG PS: Hazard ratio (HR)=2.09; P=0.028 and HR=2.02; P=0.035, respectively; never-smoking: HR=3.53; P=0.007 and HR=1.80; P=0.004, respectively; NLR ≥4.3: HR=4.34; P<0.0001 and HR=4.89; P<0.0001 respectively]. Patients with an NLR <4.3, who had a favorable ECOG PS (0-1) and smoking history in the past, derived the utmost benefit from ICI [n=77; objective response rate (ORR)=35%; PFS and OS: 17.1 and 33.7 months, respectively]. The worst efficacy of ICI was observed in patients who had an NLR ≥4.3 coupled with poor ECOG PS and/or never-smoking status (n=38; ORR=8%; PFS=3.2 months and OS=7.2 months). The remaining patients belonged to the group with intermediate outcomes (n=66; ORR=17%; PFS and OS: 4.3 and 12.2 months, respectively). While combination of these factors was highly predictive for ICIs, it was not associated with outcomes of chemotherapy treatment. Easily available characteristics of the patients allow for highly accurate predictions of outcomes of single-agent ICI therapy in chemotherapy-pretreated NSCLC.

Inflammatory and autoimmune predictive markers of response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in NSCLC and melanoma.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are a standard in cancer therapy, but few patients respond to the treatment. The aim of the present study was the determination of immunological markers for monitoring response to ICI. The present study included 74 patients receiving ICI in subsequent [group 1; non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)] and first-line setting (group 2; melanoma) and 30 patients with NSCLC receiving first-line chemotherapy. In groups 1 and 2 ß-2 microglobulin (B2-MG), neopterin (NPT), IL-6, IL-18, HLA-DRB1 and autoantibodies were assessed after two months of ICI, and before the start of next administration in group 3. In group 1 low level of B2-MG (P<0.0001), NPT (P<0.0001), IL-6 (P<0.0001), IL-18 (P=0.0003), HLA-DRB1*03 (P=0.016) and anti-TPO antibodies (P=0.016) were associated with response >six months. In group 2 high level of B2-MG (P=0.0001), NPT (P=0.0016), IL-6 (P=0.013) and IL-18 (P=0.032) were associated with early disease progression (

Novel PD-1 inhibitor prolgolimab: expanding non-resectable/metastatic melanoma therapy choice.

BACKGROUND: Prolgolimab is an IgG1 anti-PD-1 (programmed cell death protein 1) monoclonal antibody containing the Fc-silencing 'LALA' mutation. We assessed the efficacy and safety of two dosing regimens of prolgolimab in patients with advanced melanoma in a multicenter open-label parallel-arm phase II trial (MIRACULUM). We present the final analysis after 1 year of follow-up and additional efficacy results from 2 years of follow-up. METHODS: Patients with advanced cutaneous or non-cutaneous melanoma, including stable brain metastasis, without autoimmune disease and who underwent no prior targeted therapy, anti-PD-(L)1 or anti-CTLA-4 (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4) therapy were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive prolgolimab in 2 dosing regimens, 1 mg/kg every 2 weeks (arm 1) or 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks (arm 2), until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Randomisation was stratified based on performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0 or 1), lactate dehydrogenase levels (elevated or normal) and prior systemic therapy (naive or previously treated). The primary outcome was the objective response rate, assessed as per immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours by independent central review. The hypothesis that each dosing regimen of prolgolimab has an overall response rate >28% was tested independently for each study arm comprising all patients who received at least one dose of prolgolimab. Exploratory assessment of efficacy, including subgroup analysis, at 2 years of follow-up was not specified in the protocol. This study is registered withClinicalTrials.gov(NCT03269565). RESULTS: Between August 2017 and March 2018, 126 patients with advanced melanoma were enrolled. At main 1-year data cut-off, the median follow-up was 13.8 and 14.5 months in arm 1 and 2, respectively. An objective response was observed in 38.1% of patients (arm 1) and in 28.6% (arm 2). Grade III-IV treatment-related adverse events occurred in 12.7% and 3.2% of patients in arm 1 and 2, respectively. For exploratory efficacy analysis, the median follow-up was 25.4 and 25.7 months in arm 1 and 2, respectively. The 2-year progression-free survival was 33.3% in arm 1 and 30.2% in arm 2, and the 2-year overall survival was 57.1% and 46.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The MIRACULUM study met its primary end-point in both the study arms. Prolgolimab showed significant antitumour activity and a manageable safety profile in patients with advanced melanoma.

Efficacy of lorlatinib in lung carcinomas carrying distinct ALK translocation variants: The results of a single-center study.

BACKGROUND: Lorlatinib is a novel potent ALK inhibitor, with only a few studies reporting the results of its clinical use. METHODS: This study describes the outcomes of lorlatinib treatment for 35 non-small cell lung cancer patients with ALK rearrangements, who had 2 (n = 5), 1 (n = 26) or none (n = 4) prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors and received lorlatinib mainly within the compassionate use program. RESULTS: Objective tumor response (OR) and disease control (DC) were registered in 15/35 (43%) and 33/35 (94%) patients, respectively; brain metastases were particularly responsive to the treatment (OR: 22/27 (81%); DC: 27/27 (100%)). Median progression free survival (PFS) was estimated to be 21.8 months, and median overall survival (OS) approached to 70.1 months. Only 4 out of 35 patients experienced no adverse effects; two of them were the only subjects who had no clinical benefit from lorlatinib. PFS and OS in the no-adverse-events lorlatinib users were strikingly lower as compared to the remaining patients (1.1 months vs. 23.7 months and 10.5 months vs. not reached, respectively; p < 0.0001 for both comparisons). ALK translocation variants were known for 28 patients; there was no statistical difference between patients with V.1 and V.3 rearrangements with regard to the OS or PFS. CONCLUSION: Use of lorlatinib results in excellent disease outcomes, however caution must be taken for patients experiencing no adverse effects from this drug.

Variability in lung cancer response to ALK inhibitors cannot be explained by the diversity of ALK fusion variants.

Multiple laboratory evidences indicate that distinct variants of ALK translocations differ in their biochemical properties and responsiveness to ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). These data are supported by some clinical studies, which showed improved responses to crizotinib in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients carrying particular variants of ALK translocation. We retrospectively considered 64 Russian patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC, who were treated by crizotinib (n = 23), ceritinib (n = 39) or alectinib (n = 2). ALK fusion variants were genotyped by PCR. Median progression-free survival (PFS) approached to 18 and 21 months in subjects with "short" (v.3a/b, v.5a/b) vs. "long" (TAPE-domain containing) fusion variants (p = 0.783), respectively; similar data were obtained while comparing EML4/ALK variant 1 vs. other ALK translocations (19 and 21 months, respectively; p = 0.604). Objective response rates were also strikingly similar in the above groups ("short": 88%, "long": 77%, p = 0.479; variant 1: 76%, other translocations: 81%, p = 0.753). Furthermore, ALK variants did not influence the disease outcomes when patients treated by crizotinib and ceritinib were analyzed separately. Overall, PFS on ALK TKI did not depend on whether the drug was administered upfront or after chemotherapy. Ceritinib produced significantly longer PFS than crizotinib (p = 0.022). In conclusion, this study revealed that distinct ALK translocation variants render similar clinical responsiveness to ALK inhibitors.