Aggressive hydration for preventing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: trial sequential analysis.

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated that aggressive hydration with lactated Ringer's (LR) solution reduces the frequency and severity of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP). In this trial sequential analysis (TSA), we aimed to evaluate the prophylactic effect of aggressive hydration on PEP in specific patient subgroups and to determine the need for additional RCTs. METHODS: We conducted a systematic and comprehensive search to identify all randomized controlled studies published through August 2021 that examined the effectiveness of aggressive hydration for preventing PEP. The primary outcome was the frequency of PEP. We also performed TSA to calculate the required information size and assess whether our results were conclusive. RESULTS: The analysis included 12 studies involving 2,501 patients. According to the TSA, the overall frequency of PEP was significantly lower in the aggressive hydration group (5.6%; 74 of 1,327 patients) than in the control group (13.1%; 154 of 1,174 patients) (risk ratio [RR]: 0.458; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.350-0.599). In the subgroup analysis of patients with average risk, the cumulative Z curve crossed both the conventional test boundary and the trial sequential monitoring boundary. However, in the high-risk group and in patients with moderate-to-severe PEP, the Z curve did not cross the trial sequential monitoring boundary. CONCLUSIONS: This TSA indicates that aggressive hydration is effective in the overall prevention of PEP. However, additional RCTs are required to examine the prophylactic effect of aggressive hydration with LR on PEP in high-risk populations.

Prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis with a combination of pharmacological agents based on rectal non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Rectally administered non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are effective but suboptimal in the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis or PEP. New trials with the combination of rectal NSAIDs and other pharmacological agents have been conducted. This network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to determine the relative efficacy of combination regimens and identify an optimal regimen for preventing PEP. METHODS: We performed a systematic and comprehensive search to identify and analyze all the randomized controlled studies published until October 15, 2019, examining rectal NSAIDs and their combination with other pharmacological agents for the prevention of PEP. The primary outcome was the frequency of PEP. We conducted an NMA to combine the direct and indirect comparisons of rectal NSAIDs and their combination with other pharmacological agents. RESULTS: The NMA included 24 studies evaluating 14 regimens in 11 321 patients. According to predictive interval plot and surface under the cumulative ranking curve values, indomethacin + lactated Ringer's solution, followed by diclofenac + nitrate and indomethacin + normal saline, is the most efficacious combination of pharmacological agents for the overall prevention of PEP. Rectal indomethacin alone is the most efficacious agent for prevention of moderate to severe PEP, and rectal diclofenac is the most useful agent for prevention of PEP among the high-risk group. CONCLUSIONS: Rectal indomethacin with intravenous hydration and rectal diclofenac with sublingual nitrate are the most efficacious combination regimens for the overall prevention of PEP.

Endoscopic wire-guided papillectomy versus conventional papillectomy for ampullary tumors: A prospective comparative pilot study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: A major concern about endoscopic snare papillectomy (ESP) is the risk of procedure-related pancreatitis. To maintain pancreatic duct access for stent placement after ESP, wire-guided ESP (WP) was introduced. The aim of the study was to compare post-procedure pancreatitis rates, the success rate of pancreatic stent insertion, and complete resection rates between WP and conventional ESP (CP) procedures. METHODS: This was a multi-center, prospective, randomized pilot study. Forty-five patients with ampullary tumors were randomly assigned to a WP group (n = 22) or a CP group (n = 23). In the WP group, a guidewire was placed in the pancreatic duct prior to ESP. A 5-Fr pancreatic stent was passed over the guidewire and placed across the pancreatic duct orifice. RESULTS: Complete resection was achieved in 20 patients (91%) in the WP group and 18 patients (78%) in the CP group (P = 0.414). A pancreatic stent was placed successfully in all patients in the WP group but in only 15 patients (65%) in the CP group (P = 0.004). Post-papillectomy pancreatitis occurred in four (18%) patients in the WP and three (13%) patients in the CP groups (P = 0.960). In the CP group, three of eight (37.5%) patients without stents developed pancreatitis compared with zero of 15 patients with stents (P = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: The WP method is a useful technique used to insert a pancreatic stent after ESP, compared with CP. However, there was no significant difference in the post-procedure pancreatitis or complete resection rates between the two methods.

Assessment of safety of non-anesthesiologist-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography based on performance status in elderly patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been increasingly performed in the elderly patients, yet little is known concerning objective criteria of safety. This study aimed to determine the potential predictors for the procedure-related outcomes. METHODS: Two hundred eighty-one patients older than 70 years who were indicated for ERCP (group A [n = 195], 70-79 years of age; group B [n = 86], ≥ 80 years of age) were prospectively enrolled and analyzed for the development of serious adverse events related to ERCP. RESULTS: ERCP was not performed in six patients at high risk for the procedure. There were significant differences between group A and B in Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) (23.1 vs 14.9, P < 0.01) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (3 and 4, 49/195 vs 33/86, P < 0.05). Major ERCP-related complications (hypotension, severe bradycardia, hypoxia, myocardial infarction, cerebral infarction) occurred in five patients from group B and three from group A. Post-ERCP pancreatitis occurred in one patient from group A and bleeding in one from group B. In univariate analysis, old age (≥ 80 years), American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥ 3, and DASI < 10 were statistically significant predictors for overall serious events related to ERCP. In the multivariate analysis, DASI < 10 (only manage to ambulate) was independent predictor for overall serious events related to ERCP. CONCLUSION: DASI score is useful predictor for the feasibility assessment of safe ERCP in the elderly patients.

Cyst fluid amylase and CEA levels in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic cysts: a single-center experience with histologically proven cysts.

OBJECTIVE: Cyst fluid amylase is a potential marker for pseudocysts and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN). This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic role of cyst fluid amylase and to determine the optimal cutoff values of cyst fluid amylase and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic cysts. METHODS: Based on the pancreatic cyst database at Massachusetts General Hospital, a total of 78 patients with histologically proven cysts [pancreatic pseudocyst (PP), n = 16; mucinous cystic neoplasm, mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN), n = 22; IPMN, n = 40] were selected. Complete cyst fluid amylase and CEA values were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty two of 78 patients were male with median age of 60.4 years (range, 24-84). Cyst diameter ranged from 5 to 130 mm. For cyst fluid amylase, there was significant difference between PP and MCN (median, 30,034.50 vs. 4,723.50 U/L; p < 0.05) or IPMN (30,034.50 vs. 1,585.00; p = 0.001), but no difference between MCN and IPMN. For cyst fluid CEA, there was a significant difference between PP and MCN (median, 26.00 vs. 627.50 ng/mL; p < 0.001) or IPMN (26.00 vs. 356.50; p < 0.001). Median amylase and CEA values were significantly different between PP and mucinous neoplasms (MCN/IPMN) (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001). Optimal cutoff values of 6,800 U/mL for amylase and 50 ng/mL for CEA correlated with the crossover of the sensitivity and specificity curves for differentiating PP and mucinous neoplasms. The overall accuracies of cyst fluid amylase and CEA were 69 and 85%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Cyst fluid amylase analysis does not differentiate between MCN and IPMN. The combination of cyst fluid CEA and amylase value may increase the diagnostic accuracy for differentiating mucinous neoplasms from pseudocysts.

Systemic effect of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided pancreatic cyst ablation with ethanol and paclitaxel.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided pancreatic cyst ablation is a minimally invasive treatment modality. Local injection of ablative agents may rarely cause systemic effects in patients. AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the systemic effect of ablative agents by analyzing the plasma drug concentration. METHODS: Ten patients with pancreatic cysts were enrolled. Cyst ablation was performed by 99 % ethanol lavage (2.5-70 mL) and paclitaxel (Genexol-polymeric micelle, 6.0-24.0) injection. Blood samples were collected at 0, 2, 4, 7 and 24 h. Plasma paclitaxel concentration was analyzed by a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry with the lowest limit of quantitation of 0.1 ng/mL. Procedure-related complications were closely monitored. RESULTS: Pancreatic cysts were located at the head in two, body in seven and tail in one patient. Eight cysts were septated. Median diameter and original volume were 39.5 mm (range 2.7-21.8) and 14.79 mL (3.42-343.30). Median cyst fluid CEA and amylase values were 17.10 ng/mL (0.5-14127.5) and 73.50 U/L (3.1-91,590). Peak plasma paclitaxel concentration values were observed between 2 and 7 h, ranging from 0.45 to 14.73 ng/mL. The highest concentration (17.10 ng/mL at 0 h) was observed in a patient who had intracystic bleeding. Mild abdominal pain occurred in five patients and vomiting in one patient during the first 48-h monitoring. CONCLUSION: Plasma paclitaxel concentration after EUS-guided pancreatic cyst ablation was nearly as low as the undetectable value and rarely caused systemic side-effect.

Early oral antibiotic switch compared with conventional intravenous antibiotic therapy for acute cholangitis with bacteremia.

BACKGROUND: Biliary decompression with antibiotic therapy is the mainstay treatment for acute cholangitis with bacteremia. A few studies have been conducted to investigate the optimal duration and route of antibiotic therapy in biliary tract infection with bacteremia. METHODS: Patients with acute cholangitis with bacteremia who achieved successful biliary drainage were randomly assigned to an early oral antibiotic switch group (group A, n = 29) and a conventional intravenous antibiotics group (group B, n = 30). Patients were discharged when they were afebrile over 2 days after oral antibiotic switch and showed consecutive improvement in the laboratory index. They were followed up and assessed at 30 days after diagnosis to evaluate the eradication of bacteria, recurrence of acute cholangitis, and 30-day mortality rate. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in baseline characteristics, clinical and laboratory index, severity of acute cholangitis, bacteria isolated from blood cultures, and clinical outcomes. The rate of eradication of bacteria was 93.1 % in group A and 93.3 % in group B, respectively (p = 0.97). Using non-inferiority tests, the rate of eradication of bacteria in group A was not inferior to that in group B (95 % CI -0.13 to 0.14, p = 0.97). There was no statistically significant difference in the recurrence of acute cholangitis and a 30-day mortality rate between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Early switch to oral antibiotic therapy following adequate biliary drainage for treatment of acute cholangitis with bacteremia was not inferior to conventional 10-day intravenous antibiotic therapy.

Current concerns on journal article with preprint: Anesthesia and Pain Medicine perspectives.

Preprints are preliminary research reports that have not yet been peer-reviewed. They have been widely adopted to promote the timely dissemination of research across many scientific fields. In August 1991, Paul Ginsparg launched an electronic bulletin board intended to serve a few hundred colleagues working in a subfield of theoretical high-energy physics, thus launching arXiv, the first and largest preprint platform. Additional preprint servers have since been implemented in different academic fields, such as BioRxiv (2013, Biology; www.biorxiv.org) and medRxiv (2019, Health Science; www.medrxiv.org). While preprint availability has made valuable research resources accessible to the general public, thus bridging the gap between academic and non-academic audiences, it has also facilitated the spread of unsupported conclusions through various media channels. Issues surrounding the preprint policies of a journal must be addressed, ultimately, by editors and include the acceptance of preprint manuscripts, allowing the citation of preprints, maintaining a double-blind peer review process, changes to the preprint's content and authors' list, scoop priorities, commenting on preprints, and preventing the influence of social media. Editors must be able to deal with these issues adequately, to maintain the scientific integrity of their journal. In this review, the history, current status, and strengths and weaknesses of preprints as well as ongoing concerns regarding journal articles with preprints are discussed. An optimal approach to preprints is suggested for editorial board members, authors, and researchers.

Current concerns on journal article with preprint: Korean Journal of Internal Medicine perspectives.

Preprints are preliminary research reports that have not yet been peer-reviewed. They have been widely adopted to promote the timely dissemination of research across many scientific fields. In August 1991, Paul Ginsparg launched an electronic bulletin board intended to serve a few hundred colleagues working in a subfield of theoretical high-energy physics, thus launching arXiv, the first and largest preprint platform. Additional preprint servers have since been implemented in different academic fields, such as BioRxiv (2013, Biology; www.biorxiv.org) and medRxiv (2019, Health Science; www.medrxiv.org). While preprint availability has made valuable research resources accessible to the general public, thus bridging the gap between academic and non-academic audiences, it has also facilitated the spread of unsupported conclusions through various media channels. Issues surrounding the preprint policies of a journal must be addressed, ultimately, by editors and include the acceptance of preprint manuscripts, allowing the citation of preprints, maintaining a double-blind peer review process, changes to the preprint's content and authors' list, scoop priorities, commenting on preprints, and preventing the influence of social media. Editors must be able to deal with these issues adequately, to maintain the scientific integrity of their journal. In this review, the history, current status, and strengths and weaknesses of preprints as well as ongoing concerns regarding journal articles with preprints are discussed. An optimal approach to preprints is suggested for editorial board members, authors, and researchers.

Relationship between the Tokyo Guidelines and Pathological Severity in Acute Cholecystitis.

Background: It is not well understood whether the severity of acute cholecystitis (AC) correlates with the extent of gallbladder (GB) inflammation or laboratory findings. This study aimed to assess whether the severity of AC, in accordance with the Tokyo Guidelines (TGs), is consistent with the extent of GB inflammation on histopathological and laboratory findings, including microbiological isolation in blood and bile. Methods: The medical records of patients who underwent cholecystectomy for AC between January 2017 and May 2020 were reviewed. Demographic data, laboratory findings, the microbiologic culture of blood and bile, the extent of GB inflammation, and stone composition were compared in accordance with the TGs. Results: A total of 217 patients were divided into three groups of increasing severity-Grade I (n = 146), Grade II (n = 51), and Grade III (n = 20)-in accordance with the TGs. The Grade III group contained significantly older patients compared with the Grade I or Grade II groups (Grade I, 56.9 ± 13.9; Grade II, 64.3 ± 15.4; Grade III, 69.9 ± 9.9; p-value < 0.001). Patients in the Grade III group showed significantly higher levels of CRP, WBC, creatinine, and bilirubin and lower levels of platelets and albumin compared with the Grade I or Grade II group. As the grade of severity increased, the rate of microbiological isolation in blood (Grade I, 0% [0/146]; Grade II, 2.0% [1/51]; Grade III, 20% [4/20]; p-value < 0.001) and bile (Grade I, 19.9% [29/146]; Grade II, 33.3% [17/51]; Grade III, 70% [14/20]; p-value < 0.001) also increased significantly. However, there were no significant differences in the extent of GB inflammation between grades. Conclusions: AC severity, as stated by the TGs, does not correlate with the extent of GB inflammation on histopathological and laboratory findings. However, microbiological isolation in blood and bile was increased proportionally to the grade of the TGs.

Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided ethanol lavage with paclitaxel injection treats patients with pancreatic cysts.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided interventions have been used to treat patients with cystic lesions of the pancreas (CLPs). We used EUS to guide injection and lavage of ethanol, followed by injection of paclitaxel, into cysts, and investigated treatment response and predictors. METHODS: Fifty-two patients were enrolled in the study using the following inclusion criteria: unilocular or oligolocular cysts, indeterminate cystic lesions that required EUS fine-needle aspiration, and cystic lesions that grew during the observation period. Forty-seven patients were followed up for more than 12 months and their outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean diameter of the CLPs was 31.8 mm (range, 17-68 mm) and the estimated volume was 14.09 mL (range, 1.16-68.74 mL). Twenty CLPs were oligolocular. The mean level of carcinoembryonic antigen was 463 ng/mL (range, 1-8190 ng/mL). The median follow-up period was 21.7 months. A complete response was observed in 29 patients, a partial response in 6 patients, and persistent cysts in 12 patients. Four of 12 patients with persistent cysts underwent surgery. The histopathologic degree of epithelial ablation varied from 0% to 100%. Based on univariate analysis, EUS diameter and original volume predicted cyst resolution; in multivariate analysis, only original volume predicted resolution. Mild pancreatitis and splenic vein obliteration each occurred in 1 patient. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-guided injection and lavage of ethanol, followed by injection of paclitaxel, appears to be a safe method for treating pancreatic cysts; 62% of patients had complete resolution. Small cyst volume predicted complete resolution.

New 10F soft and pliable polyurethane stents decrease the migration rate compared with conventional 10F polyethylene stents in hilar biliary obstruction: results of a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Migration of biliary stents is a well-documented problem that can result in a variety of complications. The newly designed polyurethane (PU) stent, which is made of a soft and pliable material, may prevent distal and proximal stent migration. OBJECTIVE: To compare the migration rate of the PU stent with that of the conventional polyethylene stent (PE). DESIGN: Prospective, comparative, randomized trial. SETTING: Tertiary academic medical centers. PATIENTS: Fifty patients with a hilar stricture who had not undergone a previous drainage procedure. INTERVENTION: In patients with hilar stricture, random assignment of either a PU stent or PE stent. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: The rate of early proximal or distal migration before stent occlusion. RESULTS: Overall and distal migration rates were significantly lower in the PU group than in the PE group (4.5% vs 29%, P = .032 and 4.5% vs 26.1%, P = .049, respectively). There was no significant difference between the migration rate in benign and malignant biliary strictures (5.9% vs 21.4%, P = .167). Sex, stent length, preprocedure bilirubin level, and Bismuth type were not associated with migration rate in either the PU or PE group. Median stent patency was 148 days (range 36-224 days) in the PU group and 151 days (range 40-241 days) in the PE group (P = .891). LIMITATIONS: Small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the new PU stent, which is soft and pliable, decreased distal migration. The PU stent patency rates appear similar, but this study is not powered to demonstrate equivalency of patency.

Rectal NSAIDs-based combination modalities are superior to single modalities for prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Different modalities have been employed to reduce the risk and severity of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP). However, there has been a paucity of studies comparing the efficacy of various prophylactic modalities for preventing PEP. This network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to determine the relative efficacy of pancreatic duct stents and pharmacological modalities for preventing PEP. METHODS: We performed a systematic and comprehensive search to identify and analyze all randomized controlled studies published until June 2020 that examined the effectiveness of pancreatic duct stents, rectal non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) based regimens, hydration, and their combinations for the prevention of PEP. The primary outcome was the frequency of PEP. An NMA was performed to combine direct and indirect comparisons of different prophylactic modalities. RESULTS: The NMA included 46 studies evaluating 18 regimens in 16,241 patients. Based on integral analysis of predictive interval plots, and expected mean ranking and surface under the cumulative ranking curve values, combination prophylaxis with indomethacin + lactated Ringer's solution (LR), followed by diclofenac + nitrate and indomethacin + normal saline, was found to be the most efficacious modality for the overall prevention of PEP. Indomethacin + LR, followed by diclofenac and pancreatic duct stents, was the most efficacious modality for high-risk groups. CONCLUSION: Rectal NSAIDs-based combination regimens with aggressive hydration or nitrate are superior to single modalities for the prevention of PEP.

Outcomes of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis.

Background/Aims: The adverse events associated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) have not been sufficiently evaluated. This study aimed to review the morbidity and mortality associated with ERCP in ESRD patients on HD using a systematic review and pooled analysis. Methods: A systematic review and pooled analysis were conducted on studies that evaluated the clinical outcomes of ERCP in patients on HD. Random-effect model meta-analyses with subgroup analyses were conducted. The methodological quality of the included publications was evaluated using the risk of bias assessment tool for nonrandomized studies. The publication bias was assessed. Results: A total of 239 studies were identified, and 12 studies comprising 7921 HD patients were included in the analysis. The pooled estimated frequency of bleeding associated with ERCP in HD patients was 5.8% (460/7921). In the subgroup analysis of seven comparative studies, the ERCP-related bleeding rate was significantly higher in HD patients than in non-HD patients (5.5% (414/7544) vs. 1.5% (6734/456,833), OR 3.84; 95% CI 4.26−25.5; p < 0.001). The pooled frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis was 8.3%. The pooled frequency of bowel perforation was 0.3%. The pooled estimated mortality associated with ERCP was 7.1% The publication bias was minimal. Conclusion: This pooled analysis showed that ERCP-related morbidity and mortality are higher in HD patients than in non-dialysis patients.

Rib and pericardium invaded huge abdominal mass in young woman: A case report with literature review.

RATIONALE: Desmoid fibromatosis is a rare benign tumor, but due to its rarity and diverse clinical course, treatment guidelines have not been established. However, since a good prognosis can be expected, an accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment are required. We describe a rare case of desmoid fibromatosis on young female that presented as huge abdominal mass. PATIENTS CONCERNS: A 28-year-old female with left upper abdominal pain 1 month ago was referred. DIAGNOSES: Abdominal computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging revealed a heterogeneous soft tissue mass approximately 29 × 17 cm in size in the left abdomen with abdominal wall invasion and pathological fracture in costochondral junction of the left 8th to 10th ribs. INTERVENTIONS: Surgical resection was performed. OUTCOMES: 33 × 23 × 6 cm sized tumorous mass showed proliferation of bland fibromatosis and myofibroblast with nuclear ß-catenin expression on pathological examination. Desmoid fibromatosis arising from intra-abdominal soft tissue with ribs and pericardium invasion was diagnosed. LESSONS: The mainstay of treatment of symptomatic desmoid fibromatosis is surgical resection, and in the case of abdominal tumor, it can be more dangerous when it invades adjacent organ. We report a case that required additionally multidisciplinary approach for surgery and postoperative treatment of huge abdominal desmoid tumor which infiltrate bone and pericardium beyond abdominal cavity.

Use of udenafil is not associated with a reduction in post-ERCP pancreatitis: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial.

BACKGROUND: Udenafil, a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor, may decrease sphincter of Oddi tone and allow efficient cannulation. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether prophylactic udenafil reduces the rates of occurrence of post-ERCP pancreatitis. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. SETTING: Three academic medical centers. PATIENTS: From November 2008 to November 2010, a total of 278 patients who underwent ERCP were analyzed. INTERVENTION: ERCP. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis. RESULTS: Demographic features, indications for ERCP, and therapeutic procedures were similar in each group. The overall rate of pancreatitis was 7.9% (22/278). There was no significant difference in the rate (8.0% [11/137] vs 7.8% [11/141], P = .944) and severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis between the udenafil and placebo groups. Severe pancreatitis developed in 1 patient in the placebo group. On both univariate and multivariate analyses, age 40 years or younger, suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, complete pancreatic duct opacification, and failed cannulation were associated with post-ERCP pancreatitis. Only mild udenafil-related complications occurred, including flushing (n = 3) and headache (n = 3). LIMITATIONS: Unselected patient group, overestimation of the rate of pancreatitis in the placebo group. CONCLUSION: Udenafil was not effective for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis in this study. ( CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: KCT0000021.).

Prevalence and risk factor of erosive esophagitis observed in Korean National Cancer Screening Program.

Prevalence of erosive esophagitis (EE) has been increasing in Korea. The purpose of this study was to estimate prevalence of EE among low socioeconomic population in Korea and to investigate risk factors for EE. We reviewed the medical records of 7,278 subjects who were examined by upper endoscopy in the Korean National Cancer Screening Program at Chung-Ang University Yong-san Hospital from March 2003 to March 2008. The study population included subjects ≥ 40 yr of age who were Medicaid recipients and beneficiaries in the National Health Insurance Corporation. Multivariate analysis was used to determine risk factors for EE. Prevalence of EE was 6.7% (486/7,278). According to the LA classification system, LA-A in 344 subjects, LA-B in 135 subjects, and LA-C and D in 7 subjects. In multivariate analysis, age ≥ 60 yr, male sex, BMI ≥ 25, current smoking, alcohol consumption, fasting glucose level ≥ 126 mg/dL, and endoscopic hiatal hernia were significant risk factors for EE. The prevalence of EE in low socioeconomic Korean population is similar to that in personal annual medical check-ups. Risk factors for EE among them include old age, male sex, BMI ≥ 25, current smoking, alcohol consumption, fasting glucose level ≥ 126 mg/dL, and hiatal hernia.

Perioperative Magnesium for Postoperative Analgesia: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

The purpose of this study was to summarize and evaluate evidence on the effectiveness of perioperative magnesium as an adjuvant for postoperative analgesia. We conducted an umbrella review of the evidence across systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effect of perioperative magnesium on pain after surgical procedures. Two independent investigators retrieved pain-related outcomes and assessed the methodological quality of the evidence of included studies using the A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) tool, and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. In addition, an updated meta-analysis of postoperative pain-related outcomes with a trial sequential analysis (TSA) was conducted. Of the 773 articles initially identified, 17 systematic reviews and meta-analyses of 258 RCTs were included in the current umbrella review. Based on the AMSTAR tool, the overall confidence of the included systematic reviews was deemed critically low to low. Pain score, analgesic consumption, time to first analgesic request, and incidence of analgesic request were examined as pain-related outcomes. According to the GRADE system, the overall quality of evidence ranged from very low to moderate. While the updated meta-analysis showed the beneficial effect of perioperative magnesium on postoperative analgesia, and TSA appeared to suggest sufficient existing evidence, the heterogeneity was substantial for every outcome. Although the majority of included systematic reviews and updated meta-analysis showed a significant improvement in outcomes related to pain after surgery when magnesium was administered during the perioperative period, the evidence reveals a limited confidence in the beneficial effect of perioperative magnesium on postoperative pain.

Colonic diverticular perforation by a migrated biliary stent: A case report with literature review.

RATIONALE: Plastic endobiliary stents, after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, can get spontaneously dislocated from the common bile duct and migrate intothe distal bowel. Most migrated biliary stents are removed with the passing of stool. However, migrated biliary stents can cause bowel perforation, albeit rarely, and surgical intervention may be required. Recently, we observed a colonic diverticular perforation caused by a migrated biliary stent, and we have reported this case with a review of the literature. PATIENTS CONCERNS: A 74-year-old man presented with severe right lower quadrant pain after biliary stent insertion 1month ago. DIAGNOSES: Abdominal computed tomography revealed perforation of the proximal ascending colon by the migrated biliary stent, combined with localized peritonitis. INTERVENTIONS: Emergency diagnostic laparoscopic examination revealed penetration of the proximal ascending colon by the plastic biliary stent, and right hemicolectomy was performed. OUTCOMES: On pathological examination, colonic diverticular perforation by the biliary stent was confirmed. The patient was discharged without any additional complications. LESSONS: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography endoscopists must always be cautious of the possibility of stent migration in patients with biliary stents in situ. In cases of biliary stent dislocation from the common bile duct in asymptomatic patients, follow-up with serial, plain abdominal radiographs, and physical examination is needed until confirmation of spontaneous passage through stool. In symptomatic cases suggesting peritonitis, abdominal computed tomography scan confirmation is needed, and early intervention should be considered.