Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 13 de 13
Filtrar
1.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 18(10): 2366-2368.e3, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32437870

RESUMO

Since February 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has spread to Italy affecting more than 100,000 people. Several studies have reported a high prevalence of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, and investigated their potential association with clinical outcomes.1 The timing, clinical significance, and possible impact on viral spread of GI symptoms presentation have not been fully elucidated. Elevation of liver function tests and other laboratory values has also been reported; however, their prognostic significance has not been clearly established.2.


Assuntos
Betacoronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus/complicações , Gastroenteropatias/diagnóstico , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/complicações , Idoso , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Feminino , Gastroenteropatias/complicações , Gastroenteropatias/epidemiologia , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Prevalência , SARS-CoV-2
2.
J Autoimmun ; 114: 102511, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32713677

RESUMO

In cases of COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome, an excessive host inflammatory response has been reported, with elevated serum interleukin-6 levels. In this multicenter retrospective cohort study we included adult patients with COVID-19, need of respiratory support, and elevated C-reactive protein who received intravenous tocilizumab in addition to standard of care. Control patients not receiving tocilizumab were matched for sex, age and respiratory support. We selected survival as the primary endpoint, along with need for invasive ventilation, thrombosis, hemorrhage, and infections as secondary endpoints at 30 days. We included 64 patients with COVID-19 in the tocilizumab group and 64 matched controls. At baseline the tocilizumab group had longer symptom duration (13 ± 5 vs. 9 ± 5 days) and received hydroxychloroquine more often than controls (100% vs. 81%). The mortality rate was similar between groups (27% with tocilizumab vs. 38%) and at multivariable analysis risk of death was not significantly influenced by tocilizumab (hazard ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.33-1.15), while being associated with the use at baseline of non invasive mechanical or invasive ventilation, and the presence of comorbidities. Among secondary outcomes, tocilizumab was associated with a lower probability of requiring invasive ventilation (hazard ratio 0.36, 95% confidence interval 0.16-0.83; P = 0.017) but not with the risk of thrombosis, bleeding, or infections. The use of intravenous tocilizumab was not associated with changes in 30-day mortality in patients with COVID-19 severe respiratory impairment. Among the secondary outcomes there was less use of invasive ventilation in the tocilizumab group.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , Infecções por Coronavirus/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia Viral/tratamento farmacológico , Receptores de Interleucina-6/antagonistas & inibidores , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Betacoronavirus/imunologia , COVID-19 , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Infecções por Coronavirus/complicações , Infecções por Coronavirus/imunologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/mortalidade , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Interleucina-6/imunologia , Interleucina-6/metabolismo , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/complicações , Pneumonia Viral/imunologia , Pneumonia Viral/mortalidade , Receptores de Interleucina-6/metabolismo , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/diagnóstico , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/imunologia , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19
3.
Eur J Clin Invest ; 50(9): e13314, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32535885

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has infected 189 000 people in Italy, with more than 25 000 deaths. Several predictive factors of mortality have been identified; however, none has been validated in patients presenting with mild disease. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of interstitial pneumonia caused by SARS-CoV-2, presenting with mild symptoms, and requiring hospitalization in a non-intensive care unit with known discharge status were prospectively collected and retrospectively analysed. Demographical, clinical and biochemical parameters were recorded, as need for non-invasive mechanical ventilation and admission in intensive care unit. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent predictors of death. RESULTS: Between 28 February and 10 April 2020, 229 consecutive patients were included in the study cohort; the majority were males with a mean age of 60 years. 54% of patients had at least one comorbidity, with hypertension being the most commonly represented, followed by diabetes mellitus. 196 patients were discharged after a mean of 9 days, while 14.4% died during hospitalization because of respiratory failure. Age higher than 75 years, low platelet count (<150 × 103 /mm3 ) and higher ferritin levels (>750 ng/mL) were independent predictors of death. Comorbidities were not independently associated with in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital mortality of patients with COVID-19 presenting with mild symptoms is high and is associated with older age, platelet count and ferritin levels. Identifying early predictors of outcome can be useful in the clinical practice to better stratify and manage patients with COVID-19.


Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/mortalidade , Progressão da Doença , Ferritinas/sangue , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/diagnóstico , Pneumonia Viral/mortalidade , Fatores Etários , Idoso , COVID-19 , Causas de Morte , Estudos de Coortes , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Modelos Logísticos , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/epidemiologia , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Pandemias , Contagem de Plaquetas , Pneumonia Viral/diagnóstico , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores Sexuais
4.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 92(2): 405-411, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32145287

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In recent years, the feasibility and safety of endoscopic placement of different biodegradable biliary stents have been investigated. New, helicoidally shaped, biliary and pancreatic biodegradable stents have been developed for endoscopic use. Stents are provided in different sizes and with 3 expected speeds of degradation: slow (11 weeks), medium (20 days), and fast (12 days). The aim of this study was to evaluate degradation time, technical outcomes, and safety of these stents. METHODS: This was a single-center, prospective, pilot study (August 2018 to January 2019) of consecutive patients with indication for biliary or pancreatic plastic stent positioning during ERCP. The primary outcome was the evaluation of degradation time of the stents, which was controlled by abdominal radiograph. Secondary outcomes were the evaluation of specific stent-related technical features (loadability, pushability, and fluoroscopic visibility) as compared with commonly used plastic stents and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients (11 women [28.9%]; median age, 68.05 ± 10.74 years) who received 53 biodegradable stents (34 [64.2%] biliary and 19 [35.8%] pancreatic stents) were enrolled in the study. Thirty-five (66%) slow-degrading stents, 6 (11.3%) medium-degrading stents, and 12 (22.6%) fast-degrading stents were used. At time 1, partial degradation of the stents was present in 48 cases (90.6%). Five stents (9.4%) prematurely migrated. At the subsequent time 2 evaluation, complete degradation occurred in 100% of cases. Stent loadability was defined as excellent in all cases. Pushability of the stent was scored as excellent in 48 cases (90.5%), good in 4 cases (7.5%), and fair in 1 case (1.9%). Fluoroscopic visualization was excellent in 11 cases (20.8%), good in 39 cases (73.6%), and fair in 3 (5.6%). Only 1 AE of mild post-ERCP pancreatitis occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study suggest that the biodegradation of the new biliary and pancreatic stents is reliable and in line with expected times and technically successful in a variety of indications. Further randomized multicenter studies are required to validate our preliminary findings. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03767166.).


Assuntos
Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Pancreatite , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Estudos Prospectivos , Stents , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
Viruses ; 15(8)2023 08 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37632080

RESUMO

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) was demonstrated to reduce susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro and improve infection course in chronic liver diseases. However, real-life evidence is lacking. We analyzed the impact of UDCA on COVID-19 outcomes in patients hospitalized in a tertiary center. Between January 2020 and January 2023, among 3847 patients consecutively hospitalized for COVID19, 57 (=UDCA group) were taking UDCA. The UDCA and the control groups (n = 3790) did not differ concerning comorbidities including diabetes mellitus type 2 (15.8% vs. 12.8%) and neoplasia (12.3% vs. 9.4%). Liver diseases and vaccination rate were more common in the UDCA group (14.0% vs. 2.5% and 54.4% vs. 30.2%, respectively). Overall mortality and CPAP treatment were 22.8 % and 15.7% in the UDCA, and 21.3% and 25.9% in the control group. Mortality was similar (p = 0.243), whereas UDCA was associated with a lower rate of CPAP treatment (OR = 0.76, p < 0.05). Treatment with UDCA was not an independent predictor of survival in patients hospitalized for COVID-19.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Ácido Ursodesoxicólico/uso terapêutico , Vacinação
7.
J Clin Med ; 9(5)2020 May 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32443899

RESUMO

We described features of hospitalized Covid-19 patients and identified predictors of clinical deterioration. We included patients consecutively admitted at Humanitas Research Hospital (Rozzano, Milan, Italy); retrospectively extracted demographic; clinical; laboratory and imaging findings at admission; used survival methods to identify factors associated with clinical deterioration (defined as intensive care unit (ICU) transfer or death), and developed a prognostic index. Overall; we analyzed 239 patients (29.3% females) with a mean age of 63.9 (standard deviation [SD]; 14.0) years. Clinical deterioration occurred in 70 patients (29.3%), including 41 (17.2%) ICU transfers and 36 (15.1%) deaths. The most common symptoms and signs at admission were cough (77.8%) and elevated respiratory rate (34.1%), while 66.5% of patients had at least one coexisting medical condition. Imaging frequently revealed ground-glass opacity (68.9%) and consolidation (23.8%). Age; increased respiratory rate; abnormal blood gas parameters and imaging findings; coexisting coronary heart disease; leukocytosis; lymphocytopenia; and several laboratory parameters (elevated procalcitonin; interleukin-6; serum ferritin; C-reactive protein; aspartate aminotransferase; lactate dehydrogenase; creatinine; fibrinogen; troponin-I; and D-dimer) were significant predictors of clinical deterioration. We suggested a prognostic index to assist risk-stratification (C-statistic; 0.845; 95% CI; 0.802‒0.887). These results could aid early identification and management of patients at risk, who should therefore receive additional monitoring and aggressive supportive care.

8.
Digestion ; 77(2): 96-107, 2008.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18382085

RESUMO

Ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease are inflammatory bowel diseases with a chronic relapsing course. Management of both conditions is far from being fully satisfactory. For this reason in the last decade a large number of biological therapies, targeting cytokines involved in intestinal inflammation, has been developed with various results in terms of efficacy, safety and costs. Activated granulocytes and monocytes represent the major sources of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the intestinal mucosa, playing a pivotal role in inducing and maintaining intestinal inflammation. Leukocytapheresis using an adsorptive carrier-based system (Adacolumn) or a removal filter column (Cellsorba) has been proposed as a feasible, safe and effective therapy for ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. The objective of this paper is to provide an overview on the current knowledge about mechanisms of action, available clinical data and the possible future perspectives for the use of Adacolumn and Cellsorba in the management of inflammatory bowel diseases.


Assuntos
Colite Ulcerativa/terapia , Doença de Crohn/terapia , Citaferese/instrumentação , Humanos
9.
Curr Med Chem ; 14(14): 1489-97, 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17584058

RESUMO

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory disorder which may involve any part of gastrointestinal tract. Chronic inflammation is primarily due to an immunological imbalance between pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, and with a defective apoptosis of lamina propria T cells. Amongst the pro-inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) seems to play a central role in pathogenesis of CD. Over the last years, increasing knowledge on the pathogenesis of CD together with progresses in bio-technology have led to the development of a number of biological agents targeting specific molecules involved in gut inflammation, most importantly TNF-alpha and its receptors. The aim of this paper is to critically review the rationale and state-of-the art for the use TNF- alpha inhibitors in the treatment of CD.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Doença de Crohn/terapia , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inibidores , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais/imunologia , Doença de Crohn/imunologia , Humanos , Imunoterapia/métodos , Relação Estrutura-Atividade , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/imunologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA