Increased rates of subjective shoulder instability after Bankart repair with remplissage compared to Latarjet surgery.

HYPOTHESIS AND BACKGROUND: Controversy exists as to the ideal management of young active patients with subcritical glenoid bone loss and an off-track Hill-Sachs lesion, and the Latarjet and arthroscopic Bankart with remplissage are effective surgical options. The purpose of this study was to compare rates of recurrent instability and reoperation, as well as patient-reported outcome measures, between Latarjet and arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage surgery patients. The authors hypothesized that there would be no difference in rates of recurrent instability, reoperation, and postoperative outcomes between patients who underwent Latarjet surgery and patients who underwent Bankart repair with concomitant remplissage postoperatively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent primary shoulder stabilization for shoulder instability from 2014 to 2019 were screened. Latarjet and Bankart repair with remplissage patients were included if arthroscopic surgery was performed in response to anterior shoulder instability. Recurrent instability, revision, shoulder range of motion, return to sport (RTS), and patient-reported outcome measures (Oxford Shoulder Instability, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form scores) were compared between groups. RESULTS: Overall, 43 Latarjet patients (age: 29.8 ± 12.1 years, 36 males 7 females) and 28 Bankart repair with remplissage patients (age: 28.2 ± 8.8 years, 25 males 3 females) were included with a mean follow-up of 3.3 ± 1.9 years. Patients who underwent Latarjet surgery had larger amounts of bone loss (19% vs. 11%, P < .001), a lower rate of off-track Hill-Sachs lesions (47% vs. 82%, P < .001), and more frequently had a history of chronic shoulder dislocations (88% vs. 43%, P < .001) compared to Bankart repair with remplissage patients. Latarjet patients less frequently reported feeling subjective shoulder instability after surgery (21% vs. 50%, P = .022), which was defined as feeling apprehension or experiencing a shoulder subluxation or dislocation event. There were no differences in rates of postoperative dislocation, revision, reoperation, or RTS, as well as patient-reported outcome scores, between groups (all P > .05). CONCLUSION: Despite differences in osseous defects, Latarjet and Bankart repair with remplissage patients had similar rates of clinical, patient-reported, and RTS outcomes at a mean of 3.3 years postoperatively. Latarjet surgery patients may be less likely to experience subjective shoulder instability postoperatively than patients who undergo Bankart repair with concomitant remplissage.

Patients' under 25 subjective readiness to return to sport after ACL reconstruction with bone-patellar-bone grafts: Autograft vs. allograft.

Purpose: To assess the difference in perceived readiness to return to sport (RTS) within the first year postoperative period between individuals undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) autografts or allografts. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction done either with BTB autograft or allograft from 2010 to 2018. Skeletally mature patients aged 14 to 25 were eligible for inclusion. Patients completed the Marx Activity Rating Scale (MARS) questionnaire postoperatively evaluating perceived ability to perform various activities to compare subjective ability to RTS. Those patients who were outside outlined cohort age, failed to complete a single post-operative survey, underwent revision procedures, or underwent simultaneous or staged additional ligament surgery were excluded. Results: Fifty-nine patients (20.1 ± 3.19 years, 57.6 % Male) were included in the study. Sixteen patients underwent ACL reconstruction with allograft (19.8 ± 3.43 years) while 43 patients received autograft (20.2 ± 3.13). At 3 months autograft recipients reported higher perceived ability to cut (P = .003). At 6-months, allograft recipients reported higher perceived ability to run (P = .033), cut (P = .048), and decelerate (P = .008) as well as a higher overall perceived ability to RTS (P = .032). At all other times, there was no significant difference between cohorts' subjective readiness to perform activities. Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that at times within the first year of recovery following ACL reconstruction, patients who receive allografts and autografts may have significantly different perceived ability to perform activities or RTS. However, while present at various times throughout the first year of recovery, any difference in perceived ability to perform activities or in overall RTS is no longer present at 12 months. Level of evidence: Level II, Prospective cohort study.

Epidemiology of Ankle Dislocations in the United States: 2009 to 2018.

BACKGROUND: Injuries to the ankle joint are common and often sustained during participation in athletic activities. There is little information regarding the overall epidemiology of ankle dislocation, both with and without associated fracture. DESIGN AND METHODS: The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) database was queried to characterize ankle dislocation presentations to U.S. Emergency Departments (ED) from 2009-2018. Ankle dislocations were analyzed by age, sex, mechanism, and race. RESULTS: From 2009-2018, 30,477 patients with ankle dislocations presented to U.S. EDs with a majority (59.8%) occurring in male patients. The overall incidence of ankle dislocations increased by 54% from 2009-2018 (p = 0.017). Over half (53%) of ankle dislocations occurred in association with sports. Ankle dislocations peaked in the third decade of life at 16.94 per million person-years. For male, the age at which ankle dislocation peaked was 33.33, whereas for females, ankle dislocations peaked at 39.27. CONCLUSION: Preventive strategies are necessary to decrease the risk of sustaining ankle dislocations in the adult population participating in jumping sports.

Bankart Repair With or Without Concomitant Remplissage Results in Similar Shoulder Motion and Postoperative Outcomes in the Treatment of Shoulder Instability.

Purpose: To compare the results of patients who underwent Bankart repair with or without concomitant remplissage for treatment of shoulder instability. Methods: All patients who underwent shoulder stabilization for shoulder instability from 2014 to 2019 were evaluated. Patients who underwent remplissage were matched to those patients who received no remplissage based on sex, age, body mass index, and date of surgery. Glenoid bone loss and presence of an engaging Hill-Sachs lesion were quantified by 2 independent investigators. Postoperative complications, recurrent instability, revision, shoulder range of motion (ROM), return to sport (RTS), and patient-reported outcome measures (Oxford Shoulder Instability, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores) were compared between groups. Results: Overall, 31 patients who underwent remplissage were identified and matched to 31 patients who received no remplissage at a mean follow-up of 2.8 ± 1.8 years. Glenoid bone loss was similar between groups (11% vs 11%, P = .956); however, engaging Hill-Sachs lesions were more prevalent in the patients who underwent remplissage than the patients who received no remplissage (84% vs 3%, P < .001). There were no significant differences in rates of redislocation (remplissage: 12.9% vs no remplissage: 9.7%), subjective instability (45.2% vs 25.8%), reoperation (12.9% vs 0%), or revision (12.9% vs 0%) between groups (all P > .05). Also, there were no differences in RTS rates, shoulder range of motion, or patient-reported outcome measures (all P > .05). Conclusions: If a patient is indicated for Bankart repair with concomitant remplissage, surgeons may expect shoulder motion and postoperative outcomes similar to those of patients without engaging Hill-Sachs lesions who undergo Bankart repair without concomitant remplissage. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic case series, level IV.

Racial and Ethnic Diversity Within U.S. Residencies: Trends from 2011 to 2019.

OBJECTIVE: Examine trends in the proportion of underrepresented minority (URM) residents from 2011 to 2019 across all specialties and investigate differences between surgical and non-surgical specialties. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: N/A. PARTICIPANTS: The authors extracted data on the proportion of URM residents in all specialties from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education yearly reports. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant decline in the proportion of URM residents in surgical specialties (p < 0.01) from 2011 (9.9%) to 2019 (9.1%) and a significant increase in the proportion of URM residents in non-surgical specialties (p < 0.01) from 2011 (9.6%) to 2019 (10.2%). CONCLUSIONS: This study emphasizes the need to increase recruitment of URMs in medicine, especially in surgical specialties. Findings from this study can inform much-needed initiatives to address barriers to entry for diverse applicants within specialties that lack diversity and have shown minimal improvement over time.

Epidemiology of Peripheral Nerve Injuries in Sports, Exercise, and Recreation in the United States, 2009 - 2018.

OBJECTIVE: To assess rates of peripheral nerve injuries (PNI) in sport, exercise, and recreational activities. METHODS: The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) was used to query nerve injuries presenting to emergency departments across the United States. Identified injuries were stratified to those with product codes associated with exercise, sports, or recreation. Injuries only to the upper and lower extremities were included as cranial and spinal cord injuries were excluded. PNI was analyzed by age, sex, sport/recreational activity, race, and evaluated for incidence rates by year and activity. Statistical significance was considered to be P < 0.05. RESULTS: Between 2009-2018, 551,612 patients presented with PNI from which 120,675 (21.9%) were associated with exercise, sports, or recreation. PNI significantly increased between 2009-2018 (p = 0.002) with an overall incidence rate of 36.9 (95% confidence interval: 28.6, 45.2) per 1,000,000 person-years. A majority of PNI occurred through exercise (n = 56,328, 46.7%). PNI peaked in the fourth and fifth decades in males and females, respectively, with males accounting for significantly more than females (incidence rate ratio: 1.52, 95% confidence interval: 1.18, 1.86; p < 0.0001). White patients had a majority of PNI at 49.3% though African-Americans carried the highest incidence rate at 30.4 (95% confidence interval: 23.8, 36.9) per 1,000,000 person-years. Football had the highest proportion of PNI until age 19 (17.3%) as exercise carried the highest proportion for those 20 and older ranging from 27.9% to 53.8% of PNI. CONCLUSION: PNIs are rising with participation in exercise, sports, and recreation over this 10-year study period. Injuries predominantly occurred in football for those under 20 and exercise for those 20 and older. Precautions and appropriate training are necessary for individuals participating in high-intensity exercise, sports, or recreation to limit the risk of a devastating neurological injury.

The Evaluation of Trochlear Osseous Morphology: An Epidemiologic Study.

BACKGROUND: The femoral trochlea is considered the most significant osseous factor affecting stability in the patellofemoral joint. The true prevalence of trochlear dysplasia in the general population is largely unknown. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: To investigate the prevalence of trochlear dysplasia in the general population. Our hypothesis was that, while trochlear dysplasia is not uncommon, there is a low prevalence of severe dysplasia in the general population. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiology study. METHODS: Five observers were asked to evaluate 692 skeletally mature femoral specimens from 359 skeletons for trochlear dysplasia at 2 time points. We further subclassified the dysplastic trochlea in 62 femora with the highest rated degree of dysplasia. RESULTS: Sex (P = .11) and race (P = .2) had no effect on the severity of dysplasia. Interobserver reliability was excellent (0.906 and 0.904), and intraobserver reliability was good to excellent (0.686 to 0.808). The percentages of trochlea graded as normal, mildly dysplastic, moderately dysplastic, and severely dysplastic were 61.5%, 21.4%, 12.7%, and 4.4%, respectively, in the first evaluation, and 58.5%, 23.7%, 12.7%, and 5.1% in the second evaluation. Of the 62 trochlea with the highest scores for dysplasia, 36 had trochlear dysplasia without a supratrochlear spur, 8 had trochlear dysplasia with medial femoral condyle hypoplasia, and 18 had trochlear dysplasia with a supratrochlear spur. CONCLUSION: Observers with differing degrees of clinical experience had similar opinions on the degree of trochlear dysplasia. Also, our cohort showed that moderate to severe dysplasia is not uncommon, as it is present in approximately 17% of knees in our cohort. Our findings also suggest that clinicians are speaking the same language when identifying and describing trochlear dysplasia on gross inspection.

Evaluation of serum calcium differences in hypertensive crises and control patients: A randomly matched case-control study.

The role of calcium in blood pressure has been widely studied among hypertensive patients; however, no study has explored the role of calcium in hypertensive crises. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the differences in serum calcium levels between hypertensive crises patients and a 1:1 random matched controls (age-, sex-, race-, diabetes, and body mass index matched). This study is a single-center, retrospective, chart review, case-control study of patients with hypertensive crises (case group) and patients without hypertensive crises (control group). Patients were included in the case group if they were 18 years of age or older with hypertensive crises and have a documented calcium level. The control group patients were required to be 18 years of age or older, have a documented calcium level, and have no diagnosis of hypertensive crises. The primary outcome of the study was to compare the mean serum calcium in patients with hypertensive crises vs patients without hypertensive crises. Five hundred and sixty-six patients were included in the study: 283 patients in both the case group and control group. The primary outcome results showed that serum calcium concentration was not significantly different between the case group (8.99 ± 0.78 mg/dL) and control group (8.96 ± 0.75 mg/dL) (P = .606). This study found no significant difference in serum calcium levels in patients with hypertensive crises compared to a random matched control group. Larger observational or experimental studies may be useful to evaluate the effect of calcium on blood pressure in hypertensive crises.