Contribution of lymphoscintigraphy to intraoperative sentinel lymph node detection in early cervical cancer: Analysis of the prospective multicenter SENTICOL cohort.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the contribution of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy to intraoperative lymphatic mapping (ILM) in early cervical cancer METHODS: We conducted an ancillary analysis of the multicenter prospective SENTICOL study in early cervical cancer. Radiocolloid was injected intracervically on the day before (long protocol) or morning of (short protocol) surgery, lymphoscintigraphy was performed, and the results of a centralized image review were communicated to the surgeons. ILM was performed on combined radioactivity/patent blue detection. Sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) were electively sampled before routine bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy by laparoscopy. RESULTS: Of 139 patients in the modified intention-to-diagnose analysis, 114 had centrally reviewed lymphoscintigrams, which showed 352 SLNs in 100 patients. Lymphoscintigraphy and ILM detection rates were 87.8% and 97.8%, respectively. Agreement between lymphoscintigraphy and ILM was low for the number of SLNs (κ=0.23; -0.04; 0.49) and bilateral SLNs (κ=0.36; 0.2; 0.52). No patient without SLNs by ILM had SLNs by lymphoscintigraphy. Lymphoscintigraphy identified substantial proportions of unusual drainage pathways. No patients with metastatic nodes had SLNs by lymphoscintigraphy but not by ILM in the relevant territory. In 1 of the 2 patients with false-negative SLN results, SLNs were bilateral by lymphoscintigraphy and unilateral by ILM. CONCLUSION: Although the detection rate was lower by lymphoscintigraphy than by ILM, the substantial proportions of SLNs in unusual territories provided valuable guidance for the surgical exploration. Awareness of the limited agreement between lymphoscintigraphic and surgical detection might help surgeons decrease the false-negative rate.

The sentinel node technique detects unexpected drainage pathways and allows nodal ultrastaging in early cervical cancer: insights from the multicenter prospective SENTICOL study.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy may improve nodal staging in cervical cancer. The aims of this study are to determine the rate of unusual patterns of cervical lymphatic drainage, to determine the rates of micrometastases and isolated tumor cells (ITCs) in SLNs, and to assess the clinical impact of SLN biopsy. METHODS: Multicenter prospective study conducted between January 2005 and June 2007 in women undergoing laparoscopic surgery for early cervical cancer. Combined technetium/Patent Blue labeling was used. Lymphoscintigraphy was performed before surgery. SLN location was recorded, and factors associated with location were explored. SLNs underwent step sectioning ± immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: 145 patients were enrolled and 139 included in a modified intention-to-diagnose analysis. Although 80.6 % of SLNs were in external iliac and interiliac areas, 38.2 % of patients had at least one SLN in an unexpected area and 5.1 % had SLNs only in unexpected areas. In unexpected areas, the number of SLNs per patient was not significantly different between lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative detection (0.79 [0.62-1.02] versus 0.50 [0.37-0.68]; P = 0.096). In expected locations, there were significantly more blue and hot SLNs per patient than blue or hot SLNs (1.70 [1.45-1.99], 0.42 [0.30-0.57], 0.52 [0.39-0.69]). Of 28 metastatic SLNs, 17 contained micrometastases or ITCs. SLN involvement was found only by immunohistochemistry in 39.1 % of patients with positive nodes, and involved SLNs were located in unexpected areas in 17 % of those patients. CONCLUSIONS: Sentinel lymph node biopsy detects unusual drainage pathways and micrometastases in a substantial proportion of patients, thus improving nodal staging.

Feasibility and performance of lymphoscintigraphy in sentinel lymph node biopsy for early cervical cancer: results of the prospective multicenter SENTICOL study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate feasibility, SLN detection rate, and SLN location of lymphoscintigraphy in sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for early cervical cancer. METHODS: Ancillary analysis of data from the multicenter prospective SENTICOL study (January 2005-June 2007) of patients with early cervical cancer (FIGO stage IA with emboli to IB1) was conducted. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy was performed after intracervical administration of 60 or 120 MBq of (99m)Tc-labeled radiocolloid on the day before (long protocol) or morning of (short protocol) surgery. SLNs were identified intraoperatively using combined radioactivity/patent blue detection. SLNs were sampled electively and routine bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed by laparoscopy. A centralized review of lymphoscintigraphies was performed to assess feasibility, detection rates, and anatomic SLN location. RESULTS: Of 139 patients included in the SENTICOL study, 133 received radiocolloid injection, and 131 (98.5 %) underwent preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, with the long protocol in three-fourths of cases. The lymphoscintigraphic detection rate was 87.8 %, with a median of 2 (1-4) SLNs per patient. By multivariate analysis, factors independently associated with lymphoscintigraphic SLN detection were age [odds ratio (OR) 0.91, 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) 0.87-0.96; P < 0.001], and protocol (long vs. short; OR 8.23, 95 % CI 1.87-36.25; P = 0.005). Bilateral SLN identification by lymphoscintigraphy occurred in 67 % of cases and was independently influenced by age (OR 0.95, 95 % CI 0.92-0.98, P < 0.001) and protocol (OR 5.42, 95 % CI 2.21-13.27; P < 0.001). Although 60.5 % of preoperative SLNs were in the external iliac territory, unusual drainage patterns included the common iliac (19.6 %), para-aortic (10.8 %), and parametrial (6 %) basins. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates the feasibility and good detection rate of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, with better detection in younger patients and with the long protocol. The high proportion of SLN basins in unexpected territories is of interest to guide intraoperative detection. Further studies are needed to better evaluate preoperative detection and to assess the contribution of lymphoscintigraphy to intraoperative detection.