The experience and professional development of medical appraisers.

This article explores the experiences of General Practitioner (GP) appraisers working in a unfamiliar setting (Jersey) with appraisees new to the process. Findings were interpreted using the learning theory, 'situated cognition', to shed light on the experience of appraisers working with new appraisees more generally and contribute to new understandings of workplace learning. Rich qualitative data derived from transcripts of nine in-depth interviews with GP appraisers were analysed thematically in a rigorous and iterative manner process. GP appraisers working in an unfamiliar environment shared a common sense of culture shock and discomfort. Initially, they needed to work much harder than usual to establish rapport and credibility, but by the second round of appraisals, appraisers were reminded of the power of appraisal. The innovative application of 'situated cognition' helps to explain why appraisers felt like 'novices' in Jersey and how they were required to reconstruct their professional knowledge. This is the first time appraiser development has been considered in this way and appraisers can be helped to develop professionally if they are offered a mix of appraisal-related activities in new places and with new people. Such implications for educational support apply internationally where doctors are involved in a process of peer review as part of on-going professional development.

Elder Abuse Vulnerability and Risk Factors: Is Financial Abuse Different From Other Subtypes?

Elder abuse (EA) affects one in six older adults, and financial EA, a common subtype, severely impacts victims and society. Understanding victim vulnerability and perpetrator risk factors is essential to EA prevention and management. The limited existing evidence about these factors in relation to EA types suggests that financial EA is different. In a cross-sectional quantitative analysis of secondary data (N = 1,238), we investigated EA vulnerability and risk factors, and victim-perpetrator family relationship, with respect to different EA types (financial only, financial co-occurring with other types, and nonfinancial abuse). Financial abuse-only cases had the lowest prevalence of vulnerability and risk factors. Most of these factors, and a familial relationship, were significantly more common in cases involving other EA types. Findings indicate that financial abuse, occurring in isolation, is distinct from other EA types. Risk assessment and future research should consider financial abuse separately to other EA forms.