Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 62(5): 414-8, 2014 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24995532

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) thrombosis is a life-threatening complication that remains a major clinical problem. Consensus diagnostic criteria do not exist. We investigated whether hematologic, echocardiographic, or pump parameters reliably change during LVAD thrombosis. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 20 consecutive cases of continuous-flow LVAD thrombosis (Thoratec HeartMate II n = 16, HeartWare HVAD n = 4) was performed. Hematologic markers (lactate dehydrogenase, plasma-free hemoglobin, hemoglobin, creatinine), echocardiographic parameters (left ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic diameter, mitral regurgitation, aortic insufficiency, inflow-cannula velocity), and pump characteristics (speed, power, estimated flow, pulsatility index) were analyzed with one-way repeated measures ANOVA with Tukey post-test or paired Student t-tests. RESULTS: Lactate dehydrogenase and plasma-free hemoglobin were significantly (p < 0.05) elevated at admission for LVAD thrombosis. Hemoglobin and creatinine were not significantly different at admission but changed significantly after admission. Left ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic diameter, mitral regurgitation, aortic insufficiency, inflow-cannula velocity, LVAD speed, power consumption, estimated flow, and pulsatility index were not significantly different at admission for LVAD thrombosis. CONCLUSION: Hematological markers of hemolysis, but not echocardiographic or pump parameters, reliably changed during LVAD thrombosis. Markers of hemolysis are the best early predictors of LVAD thrombosis.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca/cirurgia , Coração Auxiliar/efeitos adversos , Trombose/sangue , Trombose/diagnóstico , Biomarcadores/sangue , Ecocardiografia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Trombose/etiologia
2.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20041841

RESUMO

Amiodarone, an iodinated benzofuran derivative, introduced in 1960's as an anti-anginal agent, emerged as a potent anti-arrhythmic agent by 1970's and is currently one of the most commonly prescribed drugs in US for ventricular and atrial arrhythmias. Although amiodarone is considered a class III anti-arrhythmic agent, it also has class I, II, IV actions, making it a unique and effective anti-arrhythmic agent. Because of its minimal negative inotropic activity and very low rate of pro-arrhythmia, it is considered safe in treating arrhythmias in patients with Coronary Artery Disease and Left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Despite these advantages, long term oral therapy with amiodarone is limited by side effect profile involving various organs like thyroid, lung, heart, liver, skin etc. Though the side effects can be decreased significantly by keeping the maintenance dose at 200 to 300 mg/day, patients on amiodarone should be followed closely. Amiodarone interacts with medications such as Warfarin, Digoxin, Macrolides, Floroquinolones etc., which share Cytochrome P450 metabolic pathway. Hence reducing their doses prior to starting amiodarone is recommended. Amiodarone, a category D drug, is contraindicated in pregnant and breast feeding women. This review discusses the pharmacokinetics of amiodarone, its evolving clinical indications, management of toxicity and drug interactions.


Assuntos
Amiodarona/efeitos adversos , Amiodarona/farmacocinética , Antiarrítmicos/efeitos adversos , Antiarrítmicos/farmacocinética , Amiodarona/administração & dosagem , Antiarrítmicos/administração & dosagem , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA