Prognostic value of macrophage polarization markers in epithelial neoplasms and melanoma. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Macrophage polarization is relevant for tumor biology. M2 polarized macrophages favor tumor growth and survival, while M1 macrophages support tumor destruction and antigen presentation. Markers identifying M1/M2 polarization are a subject of debate. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the association of proposed macrophage markers with prognosis across epithelial tumors and melanoma. The Medline search engine was used and 195 articles were recovered for full review. Only articles which measured markers using immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence and had overall survival (OS) as the primary endpoint were included. One hundred and thirteen articles were finally accepted for analysis. CD68 was associated with worse survival across tumors (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.11-1.37). Tumor anatomical location influenced this association. Colorectal tumors showed an inverse association between CD68 and OS in contrast to the rest of cancer types (HR = 0.56 vs. 1.34). The approach taken to measure CD68 had an impact on prognosis; when macrophages were measured at the tumor invasion front prognosis was more favorable than when they were measured intratumorally (HR = 0.94 vs. 1.4). CD163, CD204, and CD206 showed a robust association with worse OS (HR = 1.63, 1.95, 1.65, respectively). Tumors arising in the lung and the liver showed a weaker association between CD163 and OS as compared with other locations (ß = -0.5401 for the lung and -0.5940 for the liver compared with other anatomical locations). The counting strategy also had an impact on CD163 association with OS, with hot-spot counting having higher HRs compared with averaging macrophage counts across spots or absolute cell counting (ß = -0.4678). In conclusion, proposed M2 markers are associated with worse survival across epithelial tumors and melanoma. The anatomical origin of tumors influences this association. The compartment where the macrophages were scored and counting strategy influenced the association with OS of CD68 and CD163, respectively.

Histopathological Subtypes and PD-L1 Expression in Primary Urethral Adenocarcinoma: A Series of 5 Cases.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Urethral adenocarcinoma is a rare disease with poor prognosis that can display multiple histologic patterns and has an unclear histogenesis. Radical surgery with extensive periurethral resection is the preferred therapeutic approach. Both chemotherapy and radiotherapy have been used as complementary treatment options. Due to the tendency of these tumors to recur, treatment-associated complications, and the limited choice of therapeutic options, patient management can be difficult. Given the lack of literature regarding immunotherapy in urethral adenocarcinoma, our objective was to explore the expression of programmed death receptor-ligand 1 (PD-L1) throughout the different histological subtypes of primary urethral adenocarcinoma. METHODS: We reviewed all primary urethral adenocarcinomas diagnosed at our hospital between 1965 and 2019, performed immunohistochemical assays on the tissue blocks, classified them according to their histology and origin, and performed PD-L1 (22C3) immunohistochemistry assays in all cases. RESULTS: We found a total of 5 cases of primary urethral adenocarcinoma. All of the patients were women. One of the cases was a cribriform adenocarcinoma, 2 were columnar-mucinous adenocarcinomas, and 2 were clear cell adenocarcinomas. One of the clear cell adenocarcinomas strongly expressed PD-L1. In addition, a profuse inflammatory infiltration constituted by CD3-positive and CD8-positive T lymphocytes within tumor cells was observed in this case. None of the other cases showed PD-L1 expression. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, some urethral adenocarcinomas may strongly express PD-L1 and thus could potentially allow the use of immunotherapy in selected cases of advanced or recurrent adenocarcinoma.