The impact of age on the diagnosis and therapy of myelodysplastic syndromes: results from a retrospective multicenter analysis in Germany.

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is a disease of predominantly elderly patients with a median age of >70 yrs. However, data on the management of these patients outside of clinical trials are scarce. To assess patterns of MDS management in routine patient care with regard to the impact of age, we conducted a multicenter, representative survey of MDS health services in Germany. Data of 269 patients treated at 57 institutions were collected from preplanned chart reviews and were analyzed retrospectively. At diagnosis, median age was 70 yrs, 50% of patients had a Karnofsky index (KI) of 90%, and 12% had a comorbidity index ≥ 3 according to Sorror et al. (J Clin Oncol, 25, 2007, 4246). Cytogenetic analysis and International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) risk assessment were performed significantly less frequently in patients >75 yrs than in patients ≤ 75 yrs (P < 0.001 and P = 0.019). In bivariate analysis, potential predictors for performing IPSS risk assessment were age ≤ 75 yrs (y/n, P = 0.019), diagnosis at a university hospital (y/n, P = 0.001), WHO subtypes RCUD (y/n, P = 0.028), RARS (y/n, P = 0.002), or RAEB II (y/n, P = 0.037). Patients ≤ 75 yrs were more likely to receive active therapies (i.e., chemotherapy, immunomodulatory therapy, or epigenetic therapy) than patients >75 yrs (51% vs. 37%, P = 0.007). In bivariate analysis age ≤ 75 yrs (y/n, P = 0.007) was a significant predictor for active treatment with no correlation with the other predictors [IPSS risk score int-2 or high (y/n, P = 0.005), WHO subtypes RCUD (y/n, P < 0.001), RCMD (y/n, P = 0.003), RAEB II (y/n, P < 0.001), or CMML I (y/n, P = 0.020)]. This survey confirms the impact of age on the thoroughness of MDS diagnosis and the decision for active treatment. As cytogenetic analysis and risk assessment are essential for the choice of appropriate therapy, elderly patients in particular may not be receiving adequate treatment.

Blood component use and associated costs after standard dose chemotherapy--a prospective analysis of routine hospital care in lymphoproliferative disorders and NSCLC in Germany.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe blood component (BC) use and respective cost after standard dose chemotherapy (CT) in routine hospital care. METHODS: Analysis of data from a prospective, multicenter, longitudinal, observational study on lymphoproliferative disorder (LPD) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients undergoing first or second line standard dose (immuno-)CT. Data were collected from patient interviews and pre-planned chart reviews. Costs of BC are presented from provider perspective. RESULTS: One hundred eighty patients (n = 85 NSCLC, n = 95 LPD) receiving 189 CT lines/633 CT cycles) were evaluable (mean ± SD age, 59 ± 13.2 years, 68% stage III/IV, 14% Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ≥ 2). During 11% of cycles, BC were transfused to 27% of patients (n = 49; n = 22 NSCLC, n = 27 LPD). Of 310 transfused units (TU), 68% were red blood cells (RBC). Mean number of TU per cycle with transfusion was 3.3 ± 2.9 (median = 2, range = 2-17) for RBC, 4.8 ± 6.8 (median = 2, range = 1-23) for platelets (PLT) and 12.8 ± 14.6 (median = 8, range = 2-33) for fresh frozen plasma (FFP). Fifteen per cent of RBC units, 60% of PLT units and 92% of FFP in this study were transfused in cycles with sepsis. Mean BC cost per CT line were euro 602 ± 1,458 (median = 135, range = 135-9,385; NSCLC: euro 292 ± 376, median = 135, range = 135-2,124; LPD: euro 1,010 ± 2,137, median = 212, range = 135-9,385, p = 0.2137). For 55% of transfused RBC units, haemoglobin levels on the day of transfusion were 8.0-8.9 g/dl, for 38% <8 g/dl and for 7% ≥ 9 g/dl. Seventy-five per cent of PLT units were transfused at a PLT count <11,000/µl and 21% at 20,000-11,000/µl. CONCLUSIONS: The results reflect the diversity of BC use after standard dose CT. High transfusion need is associated with infectious complications, i.e. sepsis emphasising the need for adequate prophylaxis and further knowledge of baseline risk factors.

Diagnosis and therapy of myelodysplastic syndromes in Germany: a retrospective multicenter analysis.

BACKGROUND: Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogenous group of clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorders. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In order to assess current diagnosis and treatment patterns in Germany, the data of 269 patients with MDS from 57 representative centers were analyzed. RESULTS: The most common symptom leading to an initial diagnosis of MDS was anemia (79%). WHO classification, cytogenetic analysis, and IPSS scoring were performed in 92, 67, and 61% of patients, respectively. 5q deletions were identified in 34% of patients whose cytogenetic status was analyzed. Symptomatic anemia was the major trigger for initiating therapy. 49% of patients received supportive care only, and 49% received active therapy (i.e., chemo-, immunomodulatory, or epigenetic therapy), including 5% who received allogeneic transplantation. Of those patients treated with active therapy, approximately half of the higher-risk patients received azacitidine, and approximately half of the lower-risk patients received lenalidomide. Overall, 80% of patients received some form of supportive care, mainly red blood cell transfusions. CONCLUSION: While the WHO classification system is widely used in clinical practice, karyotyping and IPSS risk assessment do not seem to be common standard. Despite encouraging data on the use of effective and novel drugs, such as lenalidomide and azacitidine in MDS therapies, management of the disease could be further improved by more widespread use of risk stratification of patients using cytogenetics and IPSS assessment.

Comparison of actual hospital costs versus DRG revenues for in-patient treatment of febrile neutropenia during adjuvant anthracycline plus/minus taxane-based chemotherapy for primary breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: In flat-rate reimbursement systems, the hospital's own costs should not exceed its revenues. In a cohort of primary breast cancer (pBC) patients, costs and reimbursement for febrile neutropenia (FN) were compared to verify cost coverage. METHODS: A prospective, observational study in pBC patients receiving adjuvant anthracycline ± taxane-based chemotherapy calculated the costs per in-patient FN episode. The correlating revenues were retrospectively analyzed from diagnosis-related group (DRG) invoices. The actual costs of the therapies were compared to the individual DRG revenues, and the results are presented from the provider's perspective. RESULTS: In 50 patients, n = 11 patients were treated for FN as in-patients. The hospital's overall treatment costs were € 18,288, on average (Ø) € 1663 per case (range € 1139-2344); the overall DRG revenues were € 23,593, Ø € 2145 per case (range € 1266-2660). In n = 8 cases, the DRGs were cost covering, and in n = 3 cases, a loss was observed, but overall resulting in a gain of Ø € 482 per case and thus being cost covering for the provider. Inadequate DRG coding (n = 4/11; 36.4%) resulted in a preventable loss of Ø € 1069/case. CONCLUSIONS: The costs of FN treatment vary substantially and DRG reimbursements do not necessarily reflect the provider's costs. Surprisingly, the in-patient treatment of FN here is overall more than cost covering if adequately coded. The main reasons are asymmetrical costs for this FN low-risk pBC group. These results emphasize the importance of correct medical coding to avoid potential losses.

Management of febrile neutropenia--a German prospective hospital cost analysis in lymphoproliferative disorders, non-small cell lung cancer, and primary breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Febrile neutropenia/leukopenia (FN/FL) is the most frequent dose-limiting toxicity of myelosuppressive chemotherapy, but German data on economic consequences are limited. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective, multicentre, longitudinal, observational study was carried out to evaluate the occurrence of FN/FL and its impact on health resource utilization and costs in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), lymphoproliferative disorder (LPD), and primary breast cancer (PBC) patients. Costs are presented from a hospital perspective. RESULTS: A total of 325 consecutive patients (47% LPD, 37% NSCLC, 16% PBC; 46% women; 38% age = 65 years) with 68 FN/FL episodes were evaluated. FN/FL occurred in 22% of the LPD patients, 8% of the NSCLC patients, and 27% of the PBC patients. 55 FN/FL episodes were associated with at least 1 hospital stay (LPD n = 34, NSCLC n = 10, PBC n = 11). Mean (median) cost per FN/FL episode requiring hospital care amounted to € 3,950 (€ 2,355) and varied between € 4,808 (€ 3,056) for LPD, € 3,627 (€ 2,255) for NSCLC, and € 1,827 (€ 1,969) for PBC patients. 12 FN/FL episodes (LPD n = 9, NSCLC n = 3) accounted for 60% of the total expenses. Main cost drivers were hospitalization and drugs (60 and 19% of the total costs). CONCLUSIONS: FN/FL treatment has economic relevance for hospitals. Costs vary between tumour types, being significantly higher for LPD compared to PBC patients. The impact of clinical characteristics on asymmetrically distributed costs needs further evaluation.