Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Am J Emerg Med ; 38(2): 288-291, 2020 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31079976

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown the value of CT brain imaging in adults with first-time seizures, but there are no recommendations regarding emergent brain CTs in persons with an established seizure disorders. Our study aimed to derive a clinical decision instrument (CDI) to determine which patients with status epilepticus (SE) require emergent brain imaging. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of patients who presented to our emergency department with SE between 2010 and 2018. Patients with first-time seizures were excluded. A priori, we defined high risk criteria for emergent imaging as well as positive findings on brain CT. High risk criteria included known malignancy, trauma, and immunosuppression. Positive CT scans included findings such as intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and mass. RESULTS: We identified 214 patients who met inclusion criteria Of the 181 patients without high risk criteria, 3% had positive CT scans. Of the 33 patients with high risk criteria, 10% had positive CT scans. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for our initial CDI were 38%, 85%, 9%, and 97%. Adding the criterion of prior ICH would have lowered our miss rate to 0.6%. Modifying our CDI to 1) History of ICH, 2) Malignancy, 3) Immunosuppression, and 4) Trauma would result in a CDI with sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 87.5%, 87.4%, 21.2%, and 99.5%. CONCLUSIONS: By using four criteria to identify high risk patients, we can defer CT scanning in the vast majority of patients with SE and known seizure disorders. This CDI should be prospectively validated before adoption.


Assuntos
Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagem , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Epilepsia/diagnóstico por imagem , Estado Epiléptico/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Epilepsia/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Philadelphia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Estado Epiléptico/etiologia , Adulto Jovem
2.
West J Emerg Med ; 21(3): 684-687, 2020 Apr 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32421520

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Mechanical ventilation is a commonly performed procedure in the emergency department (ED). Approximately 240,000 patients per year receive mechanical ventilation in the ED representing 0.23% of ED visits. An ED-based trial published in 2017 showed that a bundle of interventions in mechanically ventilated patients, including low tidal volume ventilation, reduced the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome by nearly 50%. Prior literature has shown that as many as 40% of ED patients do not receive lung protective ventilation. Our goal was to determine whether differences exist between the percent of males vs females who are ventilated at ≥ 8 milliliters per kilogram (mL/kg) of predicted body weight. METHODS: We conducted this study at Temple University Hospital, a tertiary care center located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. This was a planned subgroup analysis of study looking at interventions to improve adherence to recommended tidal volume settings. We used a convenience sample of mechanically ventilated patients in our ED between September 1, 2017, and September 30, 2018. All adult patient > 18 years old were eligible for inclusion in the study. Our primary outcome measure was the number of patients who had initial tidal volumes set at > 8 mL/kg of predicted body weight. Our secondary outcome was the number of patients who had tidal volumes set at ≥ 8 mL/kg at 60 minutes after initiation of mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: A total of 130 patients were included in the final analysis. We found that significantly more females were initially ventilated with tidal volumes ≥ 8 mL/kg compared to men: 56% of females vs 9% of males (p=<0.001). Data was available for 107 patients (82%) who were in the ED at 60 minutes after initiation of mechanical ventilation. Again, a significantly larger percentage of females were ventilated with tidal volumes ≥ 8 mL/kg at 60 minutes: 56% of females vs 10% of males (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The vast majority of tidal volumes ≥ 8 mL/kg during mechanical ventilation occurs in females. We suggest that objective measurements, such as a tape measure and tidal volume card, be used when setting tidal volumes for all patients, especially females.


Assuntos
Respiração Artificial , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório , Volume de Ventilação Pulmonar/fisiologia , Lesão Pulmonar Induzida por Ventilação Mecânica , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Philadelphia/epidemiologia , Respiração Artificial/efeitos adversos , Respiração Artificial/métodos , Respiração Artificial/normas , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/epidemiologia , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/terapia , Fatores Sexuais , Centros de Atenção Terciária/estatística & dados numéricos , Lesão Pulmonar Induzida por Ventilação Mecânica/epidemiologia , Lesão Pulmonar Induzida por Ventilação Mecânica/etiologia , Lesão Pulmonar Induzida por Ventilação Mecânica/fisiopatologia , Lesão Pulmonar Induzida por Ventilação Mecânica/prevenção & controle
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA