Assessment of adequate safety margin using single coupling interval-upper limit of vulnerability test.

PURPOSE: Upper limit of vulnerability (ULV) testing using T-wave scanning shocks at multiple coupling intervals correlates well with defibrillation threshold (DFT), but remains underutilized in clinical practice. We measured DFT and ULV at a single coupling interval (SCI), with the aim to identify adequate safety margin at a coupling interval that correlates best with DFT. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation underwent simultaneous SCI-ULV and DFT assessment. Following a drive train of 400 ms, a T-wave-coupled shock was delivered. To minimize shocks, patients were randomized to programmed shock at 20 ms before peak (Group I), at peak (Group II), or 20 ms after peak (Group III) of T wave. An initial T-wave test shock at 9 J was followed by ±2 J shocks, until SCI-ULV was ascertained. Device rescue shocks were programmed at test shock +2 J and +4 J shocks followed by external rescue shock. RESULTS: There were 200 patients: 66 patients in Group I, 67 patients each in Groups II and III; mean age was 68.9 ± 12.4 years; 75% of patients men, 66% with ischemic heart disease and mean ejection fraction of 27.1 ± 7.1%. Overall, the mean number of ventricular fibrillation induction was 1.39 ± 0.8, mean SCI-ULV energy was 7.97 ± 3.39 J, and mean DFT was 8.68 ± 3.19 J. The correlation between SCI-ULV and DFT improved from Group I to Group III and was best in Group III (r(2) = 0.689). There were no major adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: SCI-ULV measured 20 ms after the peak of the T wave correlates well with DFT for assessment of adequate safety margin.

Reel syndrome-not a twiddler variant.

We report three cases of an unusual form of "reel syndrome" characterized by isolated, reeling dislodgement of a single lead in patients with dual-chamber or biventricular devices. One of these patients presented with worsening heart failure due to loss of left ventricular pacing and the others were detected incidentally during scheduled device checks. We suspect that a ratchet mechanism was probably responsible for this and that this type of dislodgement is not a twiddler variant. We propose a simple solution for prevention.

Venous Myocardial Infarction in an Infant with Obstructed Totally Anomalous Pulmonary Venous Drainage and Coronary Sinus Ostial Atresia.

We report a rare causal association between obstructed supracardiac totally anomalous pulmonary venous drainage and coronary sinus ostial atresia. Our 12-week-old patient developed venous myocardial infarction secondary to coronary venous hypertension because her sole route of coronary venous drainage was obstructed. She recovered after the obstruction was relieved by balloon dilation. Surgical repair then included anastomosis of the pulmonary venous confluence to the left atrium, ligation of the vertical vein, and unroofing of the coronary sinus. Coronary sinus ostial atresia is rarely diagnosed before autopsy.

Guillain-Barré Syndrome with asystole requiring permanent pacemaker: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: Guillain-Barré syndrome is an acute demyelinating disorder of the peripheral nervous system that results from an aberrant immune response directed at peripheral nerves. Autonomic abnormalities in Guillain-Barré syndrome are usually transient and reversible. We present a case of Guillain-Barré syndrome requiring a permanent pacemaker in view of persistent symptomatic bradyarrhythmia. CASE PRESENTATION: An 18-year-old Caucasian female presented with bilateral lower limb paraesthesias followed by bilateral progressive leg weakness and difficulty in walking. She reported an episode of an upper respiratory tract infection 3 weeks prior to the onset of her neurological symptoms. Diagnosis of Guillain-Barré syndrome was considered and a lumbar puncture was performed. Cerebrospinal fluid revealed albuminocytologic dissociation (increased protein but normal white blood cell count) suggestive of Guillain-Barré syndrome and hence an intravenous immunoglobulin G infusion was started. Within 48 hours, she progressed to complete flaccid quadriparesis with involvement of respiratory muscles requiring mechanical ventilatory support. Whist in the intensive care unit, she developed multiple episodes of bradycardia and asystole requiring a temporary pacemaker. In view of the persistent requirement for the temporary pacemaker for more than 5 days, she received a permanent pacemaker. She returned for follow-up three months after discharge with an intermittent need for ventricular pacing. CONCLUSION: Guillain-Barré syndrome can result in permanent damage to the cardiac conduction system. Patients with multiple episodes of bradycardia and asystole in the setting of Guillain-Barré syndrome should be evaluated and considered as potential candidates for permanent pacemaker implantation.

Predictors of hemodynamic compromise with propofol during defibrillator implantation: a single center experience.

BACKGROUND: Intra-operative hypotension has been reported in cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) clinical trials but this phenomenon is not well characterized. The purpose of this study was to understand the frequency and determinants of intra-operative hypotension in patients undergoing defibrillator implantations. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical data of all CRT-D implantations over a 21-month period. We compared a randomly selected contemporaneous group undergoing implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) implantations as a reference group. Procedure protocol involved intra-arterial blood pressure monitoring throughout the case. Lidocaine (1%) was routinely used along with propofol for sedation in all patients. Procedure time was defined as the time from initial administration of lidocaine for arterial line access, to completion of defibrillator pocket closure. Cumulative dose of propofol was calculated in each patient. Hypotension was defined as a fall in the systolic blood pressure of >or=30% from baseline or a systolic blood pressure of 3 min. CRT-D and ICD patients were divided into hypotensive and non-hypotensive subsets. RESULTS: The incidence of hypotension in the CRT-D group (N = 100) was 56%, as compared to 40% in the ICD group (N = 97). The mean duration of procedure in the CRT-D group was 114 +/- 95 min in the hypotensive subset versus 69 +/- 31.9 min in the non-hypotensive subset (p = 0.0015). The mean NYHA class in the hypotensive subset of the CRT-D group was 2.85 +/- 1.2 vs 2.2 +/- 1.5 in the non-hypotensive subset (p = 0.0179). Cumulative dose of propofol in the hypotensive subset of the CRT-D group was 386 +/- 22 mg, while that in the non hypotensive subset was 238.3 +/- 17 mg (p < 0.0001). Creatinine clearance in the hypotensive subset of the CRT-D group was 63.8 +/- 12.8 ml/min, while that in the non-hypotensive subset was 78.7 +/- 23.5 ml/min (p = 0.003). Patients in the CRT-D group who developed hypotension had a lower left ventricular ejection fraction of 21.1 +/- 10.2% versus 29 +/- 14.8% in the non-hypotensive subset (p = 0.0035). CONCLUSIONS: Hypotension is a common occurrence during defibrillator implantation under conscious sedation. Risk factors for significant hypotension include: higher NYHA class, lower left ventricular ejection fraction, lower creatinine clearance, higher doses of propofol and longer procedure times.