Edoxaban Antithrombotic Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation and Stable Coronary Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND: Despite consistent recommendations from clinical guidelines, data from randomized trials on a long-term antithrombotic treatment strategy for patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease are still lacking. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, open-label, adjudicator-masked, randomized trial comparing edoxaban monotherapy with dual antithrombotic therapy (edoxaban plus a single antiplatelet agent) in patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease (defined as coronary artery disease previously treated with revascularization or managed medically). The risk of stroke was assessed on the basis of the CHA2DS2-VASc score (scores range from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating a greater risk of stroke). The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism, unplanned urgent revascularization, and major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included a composite of major ischemic events and the safety outcome of major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. RESULTS: We assigned 524 patients to the edoxaban monotherapy group and 516 patients to the dual antithrombotic therapy group at 18 sites in South Korea. The mean age of the patients was 72.1 years, 22.9% were women, and the mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4.3. At 12 months, a primary-outcome event had occurred in 34 patients (Kaplan-Meier estimate, 6.8%) assigned to edoxaban monotherapy and in 79 patients (16.2%) assigned to dual antithrombotic therapy (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30 to 0.65; P<0.001). The cumulative incidence of major ischemic events at 12 months appeared to be similar in the trial groups. Major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding occurred in 23 patients (Kaplan-Meier estimate, 4.7%) in the edoxaban monotherapy group and in 70 patients (14.2%) in the dual antithrombotic therapy group (hazard ratio, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.53). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease, edoxaban monotherapy led to a lower risk of a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism, unplanned urgent revascularization, or major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding at 12 months than dual antithrombotic therapy. (Funded by the CardioVascular Research Foundation and others; EPIC-CAD ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03718559.).

Impact of Trimetazidine on the Incident Heart Failure After Coronary Artery Revascularization.

ABSTRACT: Abnormal myocardial metabolism is a common pathophysiological process underlying ischemic heart disease and heart failure (HF). Trimetazidine is an antianginal agent with a unique mechanism of action that regulates myocardial energy metabolism and might have a beneficial effect in preventing HF in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization. We aimed to evaluate the potential benefit of trimetazidine in preventing incident hospitalization for HF after myocardial revascularization. Using the common data model, we identified patients without prior HF undergoing myocardial revascularization from 8 hospital databases in Korea. To compare clinical outcomes using trimetazidine, database-level hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using large-scale propensity score matching for each database and pooled using a random-effects model. The primary outcome was incident hospitalization for HF. The secondary outcome of interest was major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). After propensity score matching, 6724 and 11,211 patients were allocated to trimetazidine new-users and nonusers, respectively. There was no significant difference in the incidence of hospitalization for HF between the 2 groups (HR: 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-1.31; P = 0.46). The risk of MACE also did not differ between the 2 groups (HR: 1.07, 95% CI, 0.98-1.16; P = 0.15). In conclusion, the use of trimetazidine did not reduce the risk of hospitalization for HF or MACE in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization. Therefore, the role of trimetazidine in contemporary clinical practice cannot be expanded beyond its current role as an add-on treatment for symptomatic angina.

Soft, skin-interfaced microfluidic systems with integrated immunoassays, fluorometric sensors, and impedance measurement capabilities.

Soft microfluidic systems that capture, store, and perform biomarker analysis of microliter volumes of sweat, in situ, as it emerges from the surface of the skin, represent an emerging class of wearable technology with powerful capabilities that complement those of traditional biophysical sensing devices. Recent work establishes applications in the real-time characterization of sweat dynamics and sweat chemistry in the context of sports performance and healthcare diagnostics. This paper presents a collection of advances in biochemical sensors and microfluidic designs that support multimodal operation in the monitoring of physiological signatures directly correlated to physical and mental stresses. These wireless, battery-free, skin-interfaced devices combine lateral flow immunoassays for cortisol, fluorometric assays for glucose and ascorbic acid (vitamin C), and digital tracking of skin galvanic responses. Systematic benchtop evaluations and field studies on human subjects highlight the key features of this platform for the continuous, noninvasive monitoring of biochemical and biophysical correlates of the stress state.

Edoxaban-based long-term antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary disease: Rationale and design of the randomized EPIC-CAD trial.

BACKGROUND: Anticoagulants are the standard therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and antiplatelet therapy for those with coronary artery disease (CAD). However, compelling clinical evidence is still lacking regarding the long-term maintenance strategy with the combination of anticoagulant and antiplatelet drugs in patients with AF and stable CAD. DESIGN: The EPIC-CAD trial is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, open-label randomized trial comparing the safety and efficacy of 2 antithrombotic strategies in patients with high-risk AF (CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 2 points) and stable CAD (≥6 months after revascularization for stable angina or ≥12 months for acute coronary syndrome; or medical therapy alone). Patients (approximately N = 1,038) will be randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to (1) monotherapy with edoxaban (a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant) or (2) combination therapy with edoxaban plus a single antiplatelet agent. The primary endpoint is the net composite outcome of death from any cause, stroke, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization, and major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding at 1 year after randomization. RESULTS: As of December 2021, approximately 901 patients had been randomly enrolled over 2 years at 18 major cardiac centers across South Korea. The completed enrollment is expected at the mid-term of 2022, and the primary results will be available by 2023. CONCLUSIONS: EPIC-CAD is a large-scale, multicenter, pragmatic design trial, which will provide valuable clinical insight into edoxaban-based long-term antithrombotic therapy in patients with high-risk AF and stable CAD.

Serum phosphorus and subclinical coronary atherosclerosis in asymptomatic subjects without kidney dysfunction.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is limited data on the association between serum phosphorus concentration (SPC) and subclinical coronary atherosclerosis in low-risk asymptomatic subjects without kidney dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 1,636 Korean individuals (mean age 52.6 ± 7.6 years; males: 712 (43.5%)) without traditional cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs) and kidney dysfunction who voluntarily underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) as part of a general health examination. Traditional CVRFs were defined as follows: systolic/diastolic blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mmHg, fasting blood glucose ≥ 126 mg/dL, hemoglobin A1c ≥ 6.5%, total cholesterol ≥ 240 mg/dL, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥ 160 mg/dL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol < 40 mg/dL, body mass index ≥ 25.0 kg/m2, currently smoking, and medical history of hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia. Study participants were stratified into tertiles according to their SPC levels (≤ 3.2, 3.3 - 3.6, and ≥ 3.7 mg/dL). RESULTS: 297 (18.2%) study participants had subclinical coronary atherosclerosis, characterized by any coronary plaque on CCTA. In multivariable regression analysis, the risk of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis increased in the second (odds ratio (OR): 1.629; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.149 - 2.308; p = 0.006) and third (OR: 1.645; 95% CI: 1.093 - 2.476; p = 0.017) SPC tertiles compared to the first SPC tertile. In addition, the risk of calcified plaque increased in the second (OR: 1.605; 95% CI: 1.124 - 2.292; p = 0.009) and third (OR 1.790; 95% CI 1.179 - 2.716; p = 0.006) SPC tertiles. CONCLUSION: In low-risk asymptomatic Korean individuals without kidney dysfunction, a higher SPC level was an independent predictor of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis.

Ten-Year Outcomes After Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Left Main Coronary Disease: Extended Follow-Up of the PRECOMBAT Trial.

BACKGROUND: Long-term comparative outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents and coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) for left main coronary artery disease are highly debated. METHODS: In the PRECOMBAT trial (Premier of Randomized Comparison of Bypass Surgery versus Angioplasty Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients with Left Main Coronary Artery Disease), patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease were randomly assigned to undergo PCI with sirolimus-eluting stents (n=300) or CABG (n=300) in 13 hospitals in Korea from April 2004 to August 2009. The follow-up was extended to at least 10 years for all patients (median, 11.3 years). The primary outcome was the incidence of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization). RESULTS: At 10 years, a primary outcome event occurred in 29.8% of the PCI group and in 24.7% of the CABG group (hazard ratio [HR] with PCI vs CABG, 1.25 [95% CI, 0.93-1.69]). The 10-year incidence of the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (18.2% vs 17.5%; HR 1.00 [95% CI, 0.70-1.44]) and all-cause mortality (14.5% vs 13.8%; HR 1.13 [95% CI, 0.75-1.70]) were not significantly different between the PCI and CABG groups. Ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization was more frequent after PCI than after CABG (16.1% vs 8.0%; HR 1.98 [95% CI, 1.21-3.21). CONCLUSIONS: Ten-year follow-up of the PRECOMBAT trial of patients with left main coronary artery disease randomized to PCI or CABG did not demonstrate significant difference in the incidence of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events. Because the study was underpowered, the results should be considered hypothesis-generating, highlighting the need for further research. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifiers: NCT03871127 and NCT00422968.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor-based Versus Angiotensin Receptor Blocker-based Optimal Medical Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

ABSTRACT: Optimal medical therapy (OMT) plays a crucial role in the secondary prevention of established coronary artery disease. The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is an important target of OMT. However, there is limited evidence on whether there is any difference in the combined effect of OMT according to the classes of RAS blockade [angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) vs. angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB)]. Based on the nationwide National Health Insurance database in South Korea, 39,096 patients who received OMT after percutaneous coronary intervention between July 2013 and June 2017 were enrolled. Patients were stratified into either acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or angina cohort and analyzed according to the class of RAS blockade included in OMT at discharge (ACEI vs. ARB). The primary end point was all-cause mortality. The study population had a median follow-up of 2.3 years (interquartile range, 1.3-3.3 years). In the propensity score-matched AMI cohort (8219 pairs), the risk for all-cause mortality was significantly lower in patients with ACEI-based OMT than in those with ARB-based OMT (hazard ratio 0.83 of ACEI, 95% confidence interval 0.73-0.94, P = 0.003). However, in the propensity score-matched angina cohort (6693 pairs), the mortality risk was comparable, regardless of the class of RAS blockade (hazard ratio 1.13, 95 confidence interval 0.99-1.29, P = 0.08). In conclusion, in this nationwide cohort study involving patients receiving OMT after percutaneous coronary intervention, ACEI-based OMT was associated with a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality in patients with AMI in comparison with ARB, but not in those with angina.

CardioNet: a manually curated database for artificial intelligence-based research on cardiovascular diseases.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are difficult to diagnose early and have risk factors that are easy to overlook. Early prediction and personalization of treatment through the use of artificial intelligence (AI) may help clinicians and patients manage CVDs more effectively. However, to apply AI approaches to CVDs data, it is necessary to establish and curate a specialized database based on electronic health records (EHRs) and include pre-processed unstructured data. METHODS: To build a suitable database (CardioNet) for CVDs that can utilize AI technology, contributing to the overall care of patients with CVDs. First, we collected the anonymized records of 748,474 patients who had visited the Asan Medical Center (AMC) or Ulsan University Hospital (UUH) because of CVDs. Second, we set clinically plausible criteria to remove errors and duplication. Third, we integrated unstructured data such as readings of medical examinations with structured data sourced from EHRs to create the CardioNet. We subsequently performed natural language processing to structuralize the significant variables associated with CVDs because most results of the principal CVD-related medical examinations are free-text readings. Additionally, to ensure interoperability for convergent multi-center research, we standardized the data using several codes that correspond to the common data model. Finally, we created the descriptive table (i.e., dictionary of the CardioNet) to simplify access and utilization of data for clinicians and engineers and continuously validated the data to ensure reliability. RESULTS: CardioNet is a comprehensive database that can serve as a training set for AI models and assist in all aspects of clinical management of CVDs. It comprises information extracted from EHRs and results of readings of CVD-related digital tests. It consists of 27 tables, a code-master table, and a descriptive table. CONCLUSIONS: CardioNet database specialized in CVDs was established, with continuing data collection. We are actively supporting multi-center research, which may require further data processing, depending on the subject of the study. CardioNet will serve as the fundamental database for future CVD-related research projects.

Association between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation in healthy adults.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Previous studies demonstrated conflicting results regarding the association between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and atrial fibrillation (AF). The statistical power was not sufficient because of modest sample sizes of these studies. We analysed a large population-based cohort to evaluate the association between NAFLD and AF. METHODS: We evaluated 334 280 healthy individuals without comorbidities who underwent National Health check-ups in South Korea from 2009 to 2014. NAFLD was defined by a surrogate marker, the fatty liver index (FLI). The association between FLI and AF incidence was analysed using multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 5.3 years, 1415 subjects (0.4%) were newly diagnosed with AF. Subjects were categorized into quartile groups according to FLI (range: Q1, 0-4.9; Q2, 5.0-12.5; Q3, 12.6-31.0; Q4, >31.0). The cumulative incidence of AF was significantly higher in subjects with higher FLIs than in those with lower FLIs (Q1, 167 [0.2%]; Q2, 281 [0.3%]; Q3, 470 [0.6%]; Q4, 497 [0.6%]; P < .001). Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) indicated that a higher FLI was independently associated with an increased risk for AF (HR between Q4 and Q1, 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-1.63; P = .002). After further adjustment for the interim events (diabetes, hypertension, heart failure and myocardial infarction), this association remained statistically significant (HR between Q4 and Q1, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.19-2.03; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: NAFLD, assessed by FLI, was independently associated with increased risk for AF in healthy Korean population. Moreover, NAFLD itself predisposes to AF independently of the interim events.

Higher fatty liver index is associated with increased risk of new onset heart failure in healthy adults: a nationwide population-based study in Korea.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is relatively common cardiovascular disease with high mortality and morbidity. Although it is associated with many cardiovascular risk factors, the association between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), the most common chronic liver disease, and HF has not been evaluated in a large-scale cohort study. Thus, we evaluated the ability of the fatty liver Index (FLI), a surrogate marker of NAFLD, to predict the development of HF in healthy individuals. METHODS: We analyzed the association between the FLI and new-onset HF with multivariate Cox proportional-hazards models in 308,578 healthy persons without comorbidities who underwent the National Health check-ups in the republic of Korea from 2009 to 2014. RESULTS: A total of 2532 subjects (0.8%) were newly diagnosed with HF during the study period (a median of 5.4 years). We categorized our subjects into quartile groups according to FLI (Q1, 0-4.9; Q2, 5.0-12.5; Q3, 12.6-31.0; and Q4, > 31.0). The cumulative incidence of HF was significantly higher in the highest FLI group than in the lowest FLI group (Q1, 307 [0.4%] and Q4, 890 [1.2%]; P < 0.001). Adjusted hazard ratio (HRs) indicated that the highest FLI group was independently associated with an increased risk for HF (HR between Q4 and Q1, 2.709; 95% confidence interval = 2.380-3.085; P < 0.001). FLI was significantly associated with an increased risk of new-onset HF regardless of their baseline characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Higher FLI was independently associated with increased risk of HF in a healthy Korean population.