Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 190(1): 100-107, 2020 Aug 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32556186

RESUMO

In order to establish national diagnostic reference levels for mammography examinations, entrance skin air kerma, entrance skin dose and average glandular doses (AGDs) were calculated for a total of 25 624 cranio-caudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) projections of 6309 patients for 40-49 and 50-64 age groups. The average entrance skin air kerma and entrance skin dose values for both age groups were found to be higher in MLO projections compared with CC projections. The minimum and maximum values of AGDs were determined as 0.4 and 7.9 mGy for both projections. The maximum numbers of AGDs for CC and MLO projections were calculated in the range of 1.1-1.5 and 1.6-2.0 mGy, respectively. The third quartile values of AGDs were calculated for each compressed breast thickness between 20 and 99 mm. The first national diagnostic reference levels of the country were established for each 10-mm compressed breast thickness in mammography examinations.


Assuntos
Níveis de Referência de Diagnóstico , Mamografia , Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Exame Físico , Doses de Radiação
2.
Diagn Interv Radiol ; 21(5): 428-34, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26133189

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We aimed to establish the first diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for computed tomography (CT) examinations in adult and pediatric patients in Turkey and compare these with international DRLs. METHODS: CT performance information and examination parameters (for head, chest, high-resolution CT of the chest [HRCT-chest], abdominal, and pelvic protocols) from 1607 hospitals were collected via a survey. Dose length products and effective doses for standard patient sizes were calculated from the reported volume CT dose index (CTDIvol). RESULTS: The median number of protocols reported from the 167 responding hospitals (10% response rate) was 102 across five different age groups. Third quartile CTDIvol values for adult pelvic and all pediatric body protocols were higher than the European Commission standards but were comparable to studies conducted in other countries. CONCLUSION: The radiation dose indicators for adult patients were similar to those reported in the literature, except for those associated with head protocols. CT protocol optimization is necessary for adult head and pediatric chest, HRCT-chest, abdominal, and pelvic protocols. The findings from this study are recommended for use as national DRLs in Turkey.


Assuntos
Tomografia Computadorizada de Emissão/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada de Emissão/normas , Abdome/diagnóstico por imagem , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Cabeça/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Lactente , Pediatria/métodos , Pediatria/normas , Doses de Radiação , Tórax/diagnóstico por imagem , Turquia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA