Investigating the heterogeneity of alkylating agents' efficacy and toxicity between sexes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide (MAIAGE study).

BACKGROUND: A marginal interaction between sex and the type of alkylating agent was observed for event-free survival in the Euro-EWING99-R1 randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide in Ewing sarcoma. To further evaluate this interaction, we performed an individual patient data meta-analysis of RCTs assessing cyclophosphamide versus ifosfamide in any type of cancer. METHODS: A literature search produced two more eligible RCTs (EICESS92 and IRS-IV). The endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS, main endpoint) and overall survival (OS). The hazard ratios (HRs) of the treatment-by-sex interaction and their 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were assessed using stratified multivariable Cox models. Heterogeneity of the interaction across age categories and trials was explored. We also assessed this interaction for severe acute toxicity using logistic models. RESULTS: The meta-analysis comprised 1,528 pediatric and young adult sarcoma patients from three RCTs: Euro-EWING99-R1 (n = 856), EICESS92 (n = 155), and IRS-IV (n = 517). There were 224 PFS events in Euro-EWING99-R1 and 200 in the validation set (EICESS92 + IRS-IV), and 171 and 154 deaths in each dataset, respectively. The estimated treatment-by-sex interaction for PFS in Euro-EWING99-R1 (HR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.00-3.00) was not replicated in the validation set (HR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.55-1.72), without heterogeneity across trials (P = 0.62). In the pooled analysis, the treatment-by-sex interaction was not significant (HR = 1.31, 95% CI = 0.89-1.95, P = 0.17), without heterogeneity across age categories (P = 0.88) and trials (P = 0.36). Similar results were observed for OS. No significant treatment-by-sex interaction was observed for leucopenia/neutropenia (P = 0.45), infection (P = 0.64), or renal toxicity (P = 0.20). CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis did not confirm the hypothesis of a treatment-by-sex interaction on efficacy or toxicity outcomes.

Development of curative therapies for Ewing sarcomas by interdisciplinary cooperative groups in Europe.

Curative therapies for Ewing sarcoma have been developed within cooperative groups. Consecutive clinical trials have systematically assessed the impact and timing of local therapy and the activity of cytotoxic drugs and their combinations. They have led to an increase of long-term disease-free survival to around 70% in patients with localized disease. Translational research in ES remains an area in which interdisciplinary and international cooperation is essential for future progress. This article reviews current state-of-the art therapy, with a focus on trials performed in Europe, and summarizes novel strategies to further advance both the cure rates and quality of survival.

Ewing sarcoma of the hand or foot.

PURPOSE: Ewing Sarcoma (ES) of the hand or foot is a rare clinical condition. Due to the critical site, it is of major importance to choose an optimal procedure for local control in terms of outcome and function. Local therapeutic options for these patients range from: surgery (OP), surgery followed by radiotherapy (OP & RT), or radiotherapy (RT) alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 80 patients with ES of the hand or foot were analyzed. All patients received chemotherapy according to the protocols of the Cooperative Ewing Sarcoma Study Group (CESS) from 1991 to 2009 (EICESS-92 and EURO-E.W.I.N.G.99). Local therapy consisted of: OP in 39%, OP & RT in 44%, and RT in 12%. In 5% of the patients no local therapy (noL) was performed. Primary endpoint of our study was the event-free-survival (EFS). RESULTS: The 3-year overall EFS was 62% (95%CI 0.50-0.72). Patients with localized disease had a significantly better outcome with an EFS of 77% (95%CI 0.63-0.86), compared to patients with primary disseminated disease with an EFS of 30% (95%CI 0.14-0.49; p<0.001). In comparing local treatment modalities, no significant difference was observed. The 3-year EFS for OP was 61% (95% CI 0.40-0.76), for OP & RT 66% (95%CI 0.47-0.79) and for RT only 70% (95%CI 0.32-0.89) (p=0.253). Patients who did not receive local treatment had an unfavourable prognosis (3-year EFS=0.25; 95%CI 0.01-0.67; p=0.024). A multivariate analysis which included local treatment modality and known prognosticators, showed that primary dissemination was the only significant prognostic factor.Ewing sarcoma of the hand or foot is associated with a favourable outcome. CONCLUSION: Our data analysed a limited group of patients and thus did not provide a clear indication for a preferred local treatment modality.

Fertility-related quality of life in subfertile women undergoing tubal testing with transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy or hysterosalpingography.

OBJECTIVE: Both subfertility and its management can have significant impact on quality of life (QoL). Tubal patency testing as part of the fertility work-up, is considered to cause more physical complaints and stress than other tests. Pain scores for HSG are higher than for THL, but acceptability of the procedures was found to be comparable. Fertility-related QoL has not yet been studied in women undergoing tubal patency testing. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a standardized questionnaire study alongside a previously reported randomized controlled trial comparing THL and HSG in subfertile women, in which 24-month live birth rates occurred in 58.5% versus 55.4%, respectively. We randomly assigned 300 subfertile women to THL or HSG between May 2013 and October 2016. Women were eligible if they were undergoing a fertility work-up with an indication for evaluation of tubal patency. Fertility-related QoL was measured six weeks after the procedure with the validated FertiQoL questionnaire. The scores for the Core scale and subscales between THL and HSG were compared using Mann-Whitney-U test and multiple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: The questionnaire was completed by 84 women in the THL group (56%) and 96 women in the HSG group (64%). Core scores were 74.6 ± 12.8 for THL and 73.4 ± 12.4 for HSG (p = 0.39). Scores for the Emotional domain were 64.5 ± 19.0 for THL versus 66.0 ± 16.3 (p = 0.67) for HSG. Scores for the 'Mind-body' domain for THL were 76.9 ± 15.6 versus 74.1 ± 18.0 for HSG (p = 0.42), while scores for the Relational domain were 79.2 ± 12.9 for THL and 76.9 ± 15.6 for HSG (p = 0.21). Scores for the Social domain for THL were 77.9 ± 15.1 versus 76.7 ± 14.1, (p = 0.42). The multiple linear regression analysis showed only a statistical significant positive effect of older age on the score for the Emotional domain (p = 0.015). CONCLUSION: In a preselected group of women with low risk for tubal pathology we did not find differences in fertility-related QoL between tubal patency testing with THL versus HSG.

Prognostic factors in Ewing's tumor of bone: analysis of 975 patients from the European Intergroup Cooperative Ewing's Sarcoma Study Group.

PURPOSE: To further elaborate on prognostic factors for Ewing's sarcoma of bone and to document improvements in relapse-free survival (RFS) and trends in local therapy over the study period (1977 to 1993). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on a combined Gesellschaft Für Pädiatrische Onkologie und Hämatologie/Cooperative Ewing Sarcoma Study and United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group/Medical Research Council data set of 975 patients registered with the respective trial offices before the current collaborative European Intergroup Cooperative Ewing's Sarcoma Study trial. Both groups independently undertook studies with similar chemotherapy during the period. RESULTS: The key adverse prognostic factor is metastases at diagnosis (5-year RFS, 22% of patients with metastases at diagnosis v 55% of patients without metastases at diagnosis; P: <.0001). For the group with metastases, there was a trend for better survival for those with lung involvement compared with those with bone metastases or a combination of lung and bone metastases (P: <.0001). In the group of patients with no metastases at diagnosis, multivariate analysis demonstrated that site (axial v other), age-group (< 15 v > or = 15 years), and period of diagnosis had significant influence on RFS (all P: <.005). RFS was superior in the period after 1985 compared with the period before 1985 for nonmetastatic patients (45% v 60%, respectively; P: <.0001) and for metastatic patients (16% v 30%, respectively; P: =.016). Patients who relapsed within 2 years of diagnosis had a less favorable prognosis than patients who relapsed later (5-year survival after relapse, 4% v 23%, respectively; P: <. 0001). There were other changes over the period; in particular, radiotherapy or amputation were more common in the period before 1986, whereas endoprosthetic surgery was widely used in the later period. CONCLUSION: Survival and RFS improved over the period. Prognostic factors are metastases at diagnosis, primary site, and age.

Myeloablative radiochemotherapy and hematopoietic stem-cell rescue in poor-prognosis Ewing's sarcoma.

PURPOSE: The prognosis of patients with multifocal primary and early or multiple relapsed Ewing's sarcoma is poor with conventional chemoradiotherapy and surgery. We evaluated the efficacy and feasibility of a myeloablative regimen administered as consolidation treatment for these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The ablative regimens consisted of simultaneous radiochemotherapy: 12 Gy hyperfractionated total-body irradiation (TBI; two doses of 1.5 Gy for 4 days) plus fractionated high-dose melphalan (30 to 45 mg/m2 for 4 days) followed by high-dose etoposide (40 to 60 mg/kg) with or without carboplatin (900 to 1,500 mg/m2) (hyper-ME +/- C). These regimens were applied in a dose-escalation study that included 17 patients. All patients underwent remission induction chemotherapy and local treatment before myeloablative therapy. Seven patients had multifocal primary Ewing's sarcoma, and 10 had early or multiple relapse. We performed a matched-cohort analysis of the 17 grafted patients with 41 historic controls matched for sex, age, diagnosis, extent of disease, interval from diagnosis to transplant in the transplant group, and interval from diagnosis to relapse in the control group. RESULTS: The probability of relapse in the study patients is 52% at 6 years after the last event before transplantation. In the control group, the probability of relapse at 6 years was 98%. Eight of 17 treated patients are alive in complete remission at a median observation time of 49 months (range, 19 to 76) from the last event before transplantation. Probability of relapse-free survival in the study patients is 45% +/- 12% at 6 years after the last event before transplant, compared with 2% +/- 2% for the historic control group. CONCLUSION: Myeloblative therapy with hyper-ME +/- C radiochemotherapy can improve the prognosis of multifocal primary and early or multiple relapsing Ewing's sarcoma.

Ewing's tumors with primary lung metastases: survival analysis of 114 (European Intergroup) Cooperative Ewing's Sarcoma Studies patients.

PURPOSE: To analyze event-free survival (EFS) and prognostic factors in patients who present with Ewing's tumors (ET) of bone and synchronous pulmonary and/or pleural metastases (ppm). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of 1,270 patients (pts) registered at the continental office of the German/European Intergroup Cooperative Ewing's Sarcoma Studies (CESS81, CESS86, EICESS92), 114 were diagnosed ET with ppm. Patients underwent neoadjuvant therapy and local treatment of the primary tumor. Whole-lung irradiation 15 to 18 Gy was applied to 75 ppm-pts. EFS and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated according to the Kaplan-Meier method, and prognostic factors were analyzed by log-rank tests and Cox and logistic regression procedures. RESULTS: On November 1, 1997, at a median time under study of 5.9 years, the 5-year EFS was 0.36 (95% CI, 0.26 to 0.46) and the 10-year EFS was 0.30 (95% CI, 0.19 to 0.41). Thirty-seven of 59 (63%) first relapses involved lung and/or pleura, and the lungs were the only site of relapse in 26 of 59 (44%) ppm-pts. Risk factors identified in univariate and multivariate tests were poor response of the primary tumor toward chemotherapy, metastatic lesions in both lungs, and treatment without additional lung irradiation. CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy response of the primary tumor is a prognostic factor in patients with ET with ppm. Strategies of treatment intensification warrant further evaluation.

EWS-FLI1 and EWS-ERG gene fusions are associated with similar clinical phenotypes in Ewing's sarcoma.

PURPOSE: There are a variety of solid tumors in which alternative chromosomal translocations generate related fusion products. In alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma and synovial sarcoma, these variant fusions have been found to have major clinical significance. We investigated whether the two alternative gene fusion products, EWS-FLI1 and EWS-ERG, define different clinical subsets within the Ewing's sarcoma family of tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We selected 30 cases of Ewing's sarcoma with the EWS-ERG gene fusion and 106 cases with the EWS-FLI1 fusion. Clinical data were obtained for each case and compared with the molecular diagnostic findings. RESULTS: There were no significant clinical differences observed between the two groups in age of diagnosis, sex, metastasis at diagnosis, primary site, event-free survival, or overall survival. CONCLUSION: Differences in the C-terminal partner in the Ewing's sarcoma family gene fusions are not associated with significant phenotypic differences.

Localized Ewing tumor of bone: final results of the cooperative Ewing's Sarcoma Study CESS 86.

PURPOSE: Cooperative Ewing's Sarcoma Study (CESS) 86 aimed at improving event-free survival (EFS) in patients with high-risk localized Ewing tumor of bone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed 301 patients recruited from January 1986 to July 1991 (60% male; median age 15 years). Tumors of volume >100 mL and/or at central-axis sites qualified patients for "high risk" (HR, n = 241), and small extremity lesions for "standard risk" (SR, n = 52). Standard-risk patients received 12 courses of vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin alternating with actinomycin D (VACA); HR patients received ifosfamide instead of cyclophosphamide (VAIA). Tumor sites were pelvis (27%), other central axis (28%), femur (19%), or other extremity (26%). The initial tumor volume was <100 mL in 33% of cases and > or =100 mL in 67%. Local therapy was surgery (23%), surgery plus radiotherapy (49%), or radiotherapy alone (28%). Event-free survival rates were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analyses, comparisons were done by log-rank test, and risk factors were analyzed by Cox models. RESULTS: On May 1, 1999 (median time under study, 133 months), the 10-year EFS was 0.52. Event-free survival did not differ between SR-VACA (0.52) and HR-VAIA (0.51, P =.92). Tumor volume of >200 mL (EFS, 0.36 v 0.63 for smaller tumors; P =.0001) and poor histologic response (EFS, 0.38 v 0.64 for good responders; P =.0007) had negative impacts on EFS. In multivariate analyses, small tumor volumes of <200 mL, good histologic response, and VAIA chemotherapy augured for fair outcome. Six of 301 patients (2%) died under treatment, and four patients (1.3%) developed second malignancies. CONCLUSION: Fifty-two percent of CESS 86 patients survived after risk-adapted therapy. High-risk patients seem to have benefited from intensified treatment that incorporated ifosfamide.

Radiation therapy in Ewing's sarcoma: an update of the CESS 86 trial.

PURPOSE: We present an update analysis of the multiinstitutional Ewing's sarcoma study CESS 86. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From January 1986 through June 1991, 177 patients with localized Ewing's sarcoma of bone, aged 25 years or less, were recruited. Chemotherapy consisted of four 9-week courses of vincristine, actinomycin D, cyclophosphamide, and adriamycin (VACA) in low-risk (extremity tumors < 100 cm3), or vincristine, actinomycin D, ifosfamide, and adriamycin (VAIA) in high-risk tumors (central tumors and extremity tumors > or = 100 cm3). Local therapy was an individual decision in each patient and was either radical surgery (amputation, wide resection) or resection plus postoperative irradiation with 45 Gy or definitive radiotherapy with 60 Gy (45 Gy plus boost). Irradiated patients were randomized concerning the type of fractionation in either conventional fractionation (once daily 1.8-2.0 Gy, break of chemotherapy) or hyperfractionated split-course irradiation simultaneously with the VACA/VAIA chemotherapy (twice daily 1.6 Gy, break of 12 days after 22.4 Gy and 44.8 Gy, total dose and treatment time as for conventional fractionation). For quality assurance in radiotherapy, a central treatment planning program was part of the protocol. RESULTS: Forty-four patients (25%) received definitive radiotherapy; 39 (22%) had surgery, and 93 (53%) had resection plus postoperative irradiation. The overall 5-year survival was 69%. Thirty-one percent of the patients relapsed, 30% after radiotherapy, 26% after radical surgery, and 34% after combined local treatment. The better local control after radical surgery (100%) and resection plus radiotherapy (95%) as compared to definitive radiotherapy (86%) was not associated with an improvement in relapse-free or overall survival because of a higher frequency of distant metastases after surgery (26% vs. 29% vs. 16%). In irradiated patients, hyperfractionated split-course irradiation and conventional fractionation yielded the same results (5-year overall survival of definitively irradiated patients 63% after conventional fractionation and 65% after hyperfractionation; relapse-free survival 53% vs. 58%; local control 76% vs. 86%, not significant). The six local failures after radiotherapy did not correlate with tumor size or response to chemotherapy. Radiation treatment quality (target volume, technique, dosage) was evaluated retrospectively and was scored as unacceptable in only 1 out of 44 patients (2%) with definitive radiotherapy. Grade 3-4 complications developed in 4 out of 44 (9%) patients after definitive radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Under the given selection criteria for local therapy, radiation therapy yielded relapse-free and overall survival figures comparable to radical surgery. Hyperfractionated split-course irradiation simultaneously with multidrug chemotherapy did not significantly improve local control or survival.

Second malignancies after treatment for Ewing's sarcoma: a report of the CESS-studies.

PURPOSE: During recent years, more intensified systemic and local treatment regimens have increased the 5-year survival figures in localized Ewing's sarcoma to more than 60%. There is, however, concern about the risk of second malignancies (SM) in long-term survivors. We have analyzed the second malignancies in patients treated in the German Ewing's Sarcoma Studies CESS 81 and CESS 86. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 1981 through June 1991, 674 patients were registered in the two sequential multicentric Ewing's sarcoma trials CESS 81 (recruitment period 1981-1985) and CESS 86 (1986-1991). The systemic treatment in both studies consisted of a four-drug-regimen (VACA = vincristine, actinomycin D, cyclophosphamide, and adriamycin; or VAIA = vincristine, actinomycin D, ifosfamide, and adriamycin) and a total number of four courses, each lasting nine weeks, was recommended by the protocol. Local therapy in curative patients was either complete surgery (n = 162), surgery plus postoperative radiotherapy with 36-46Gy (n = 274), or definitive radiotherapy with 46-60Gy (n = 212). The median follow-up at the time of this analysis was 5.1 years, the maximum follow-up 16.5 years. RESULTS: The overall survival of all patients including metastatic patients was 55% after 5 years, 48% after 10 years, and 37% after 15 years. Eight out of 674 patients (1.2%) developed a SM. Five of these were acute myelogenic leukemias (n = 4) or MDS (n = 1), and three were sarcomas. The interval between diagnosis of Ewing's sarcoma and the diagnosis of the SM was 17-78 months for the four AMLs, 96 months for the MDS and 82-136 months for the three sarcomas. The cumulative risk of an SM was 0.7% after 5 years, 2.9% after 10 years, and 4.7% after 15 years. Out of five patients with AML/MDS, three died of rapid AML-progression, and two are living with disease. Local therapy (surgery vs. surgery plus postoperative irradiation vs. definitive radiotherapy) had no impact on the frequency of AML/MDS, but local therapy did influence the risk of secondary sarcomas. All three patients with secondary sarcomas had received radiotherapy; however, all three sarcomas were salvaged by subsequent treatment and are in clinical remission with a follow-up of 1 month, 4.3 years, and 7.5 years after the diagnosis of the secondary sarcoma. Thus far, SM contributed to less than 1 % (3/328) of all deaths in the CESS-studies. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of leukemia after treatment for Ewing's sarcoma is probably in the range of 2%. The risk of solid tumors also seems to be low within the first 10 years after treatment and remains in the range of 5 % after 15 years. In the CESS-studies, less than 1% of all deaths within the first 10 years after diagnosis were caused by SM. Effective salvage therapy for secondary sarcomas is feasible.

Radiotherapy in Ewing's sarcoma and PNET of the chest wall: results of the trials CESS 81, CESS 86 and EICESS 92.

PURPOSE: Treatment results and the pattern of relapse were evaluated in the multimodal treatment of Ewing's sarcomas of the chest wall. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In a retrospective analysis, 114 patients with non-metastatic Ewing's sarcoma of the chest wall were evaluated. They were treated in the CESS 81, CESS 86, or EICESS 92 studies between January 1981 and December 1993. The treatment consisted of polychemotherapy (VACA, VAIA, or EVAIA) and local therapy, either surgery alone (14 patients), radiotherapy alone (28 patients) or a combination of both (71 patients). The median follow-up was 46.6 months (range 5-170). A relapse analysis for all patients with local or combined relapses was performed. RESULTS: Overall survival was 60% after 5 years, event-free survival was 50%. Thirty-seven patients had a systemic relapse (32.4%), 11 patients had a local relapse alone (9.6%), and 3 patients had a combined local and systemic relapse (2.6%). The risk to relapse locally after 5 years was 0% after surgery alone, 19% after radiation alone, and 19% after postoperative irradiation. None of the 8 patients with preoperative irradiation have failed locally so far. With the introduction of central radiotherapy planning in CESS 86, local control of irradiated patients improved. Ten of 14 patients with local failure could be evaluated in the relapse analysis: 3 patients had an in-field relapse, 4 patients had a marginal relapse, 2 patients had a relapse outside the radiation fields, and 1 patient failed with pleural dissemination. Six treatment deviations were observed. CONCLUSION: Local control was best after surgery alone in a positively selected group of patients. Local control after radiation or combined radiation and surgery was good. With diligent performance of radiotherapy, it will be possible to further improve the results in the radiotherapy group.

High-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) as salvage therapy for relapsed osteosarcoma.

In this report, we describe our experience with high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in 15 children with relapsed osteosarcoma who were treated by members of the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group. Eight patients received HDC after the first relapse, six patients after the second relapse and one after the sixth relapse. Thirteen patients underwent HDC and ASCT in complete remission and two patients had macroscopic tumor residues. Seven patients received HDC based on melphalan and etoposide. Four of these patients were treated with additional carboplatinum. Two patients received carboplatinum, etoposide, and thiotepa or cyclophosphamide. In six patients double HDC was performed. In all six of these, the first HDC consisted of thiotepa/ cyclophosphamide. The second regimens included melphalan/etposide (two patients), melphalan/etposide/ carboplatinum (one patient), and melphalan/busulfan (one patient). Three of the 15 patients died of toxic complications. Eight patients developed further relapses, two patients showed persistent disease, and two patients are presently in continuous complete remission. The probability of relapse-free survival was 0.20 +/- 0.12 within a median follow-up (MFU) of 8 months and the probability of overall survival was 0.29 +/- 0.12 after a MFU of 16 months. In conclusion, utilization of HDC and ASCT in this patient group did not significantly improve the treatment outcome compared to conventional relapse therapy.

Prognostic implication of immunodetection of P glycoprotein in Ewing's sarcoma.

Increased expression of P glycoprotein is associated with multidrug resistance in many cell lines. P glycoprotein has been detected in different human tumors. To assess the implication of multidrug resistance in the prognosis of Ewing's sarcoma the expression of P glycoprotein was studied immunohistochemically in pre- and post-therapeutic tumor tissues of 21 cases treated according to the CESS 81 or 86 protocol. The response to chemotherapy was evaluated histologically. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded and fresh frozen sections were immunostained with a monoclonal antibody to P glycoprotein, clone JSB 1, using the double APAAP method. P glycoprotein was detected in 12 cases of 21 (57%) in either pre- or postchemotherapy tumor tissues. From the 21 cases 8 revealed a good morphological response to chemotherapy (33%); 10 of the 13 non-responders were positive for P glycoprotein (77%), but only 2 of the 8 responders (25%). The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Comparing P glycoprotein expression with the clinical outcome, we found that 7 of 12 positive cases had died (58%). From the negative cases only 3 of 9 had died (33%). However, judged by the Kaplan Meyer life tables, these data were not significant. In conclusion our results suggest that the immunodetection of P glycoprotein indicates a poor response to chemotherapy and probably a bad clinical outcome for Ewing's sarcoma patients.

Ewing tumour: incidence, prognosis and treatment options.

Ewing tumours, i.e. Ewing's sarcoma and malignant peripheral neuroectodermal tumours, are the second most common primary malignant tumours of bone in childhood and adolescence, with an annual incidence rate in Caucasians of 3 per 1 million children <15 years of age. Histopathologically small blue round cell tumours, Ewing tumours show a typical chromosomal rearrangement in >95% of cases linking the EWS gene on chromosome 22q12 to a member of the ETS transcription gene family, most commonly to Fli-1 on 11q24. This fusion contributes to the malignant potential of Ewing tumour cells, indeed antisense oligonucleotides may prevent tumour growth in vitro. After open biopsy, and histological and possibly molecular biological confirmation of the diagnosis, treatment consists of several months of multidrug cytostatic therapy and local therapy. Both surgery and radiotherapy may control local disease, but without consequent cytostatic chemotherapy all patients will eventually succumb to distant metastases. With the use of alkylating agents including doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and/or ifosfamide, and other cytostatic drugs such as actinomycin D (dactinomycin), vincristine and etoposide, long-term survival can be achieved in >50% of patients with localised disease. Patients with clinically detectable metastases at diagnosis, patients not responding to therapy and patients with disease relapse have a significantly poorer prognosis. Maximum supportive care and local therapy managed by an experienced physician are required in all patients, and inclusion of high-risk patients in phase I and II studies is warranted. Hence, treatment of patients with Ewing tumours should be performed in experienced centres only and preferably within controlled clinical trials.

[The magnetic resonance tomography of Ewing's sarcomas: the morphology and tumor extension]. / Magnetresonanztomographie von Ewing-Sarkomen: Morphologie und Tumorausdehnung.

PURPOSE: The morphology and delineation of Ewing sarcoma in magnetic resonance imaging was investigated. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Magnetic resonance images (spin-echo techniques; T1-w pre/post gadolinium, T2-w) of 59 patients as part of a multicenter study were evaluated retrospectively. Qualitative image analysis was performed: signal intensity (point of reference extraosseous: muscle, intraosseous: bone marrow), enhancement patterns, lesion delineation and differentiation between tumor and oedema. RESULTS: Signal intensity: T1-w: extraosseous: 75% isointense, intraosseous: 92% hypointense; T2-w extraosseous: 100% hyperintense, intraosseous: 93% hyperintense. Enhancement pattern: 97% both extra- and intraosseous. Best delineation intraosseous in T1-w (53% good, 36% very good), extraosseous in gadolinium enhanced T1-w (46% good, 37% very good) and T2-w (55% good, 33% very good). Differentiation between tumour and oedema was intraosseous not possible, extraosseous in T2-w in 61%. CONCLUSION: Morphology of Ewing sarcoma in magnetic resonance imaging is rather uniform. The lesion is intra- and extraosseous sharply delineated, though tumour and oedema can be rarely differentiated.

Pre-emptive immunotherapy with purified natural killer cells after haploidentical SCT: a prospective phase II study in two centers.

Adoptive immunotherapy with allogeneic purified natural killer (NK) cell products might exert graft-versus-tumor alloreactivity with little risk of GVHD. In a prospective phase II study in two centers, we administered purified NK cell products to high-risk patients treated with haploidentical T-cell-depleted SCT. Sixteen patients received a total of 29 NK cell infusions on days +3, +40 and +100 after transplantation. Median doses (and ranges) of infused NK- and T-cells per product were 1.21 (0.3-3.8) × 10(7)/kg and 0.03 (0.004-0.72) × 10(5)/kg, respectively. With a median follow-up of 5.8 years 4/16 patients are alive. Cause of death was relapse in five, GVHD in three, graft failure in three, and transplant related neurotoxicity in one patient. Four patients developed acute GVHDgrade II, all receiving a total of 0.5 × 10(5) T cells/kg. Compared with historical controls, NK cell infusions had no apparent effect on the rates of graft failure or relapse. Adoptive transfer of allogeneic NK cells is safe and feasible, but further studies are needed to determine the optimal dose and timing of NK cell therapy. Moreover, NK cell activation/expansion may be required to attain clinical benefit, while careful consideration must be given to the number of T cells infused.